• Aucun résultat trouvé

GRADE table: What ARV regimen to switch to in children younger than 3 years old?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "GRADE table: What ARV regimen to switch to in children younger than 3 years old? "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

WHO/HIV/2013.34 © World Health Organization 2013

GRADE table: What ARV regimen to switch to in children younger than 3 years old?

Author(s): Penazzato M.

Date: 2012-11-29

Question: Should infants and young children starting a PI-based regimen be switched to NNRTI once virological suppression is achieved versus continuing PI?

Settings: resource-limited settings

Bibliography: Coovadia et al. 2008, Kuhn et al. 2012

Quality assessment No. of patients Effect

Quality Importance No. of

studies Design Risk of

bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations

Switching to NNRTI once virological

suppression is achieved

Continuing PI

Relative

(95% CI) Absolute

Virological failure at 52 weeks (follow-up 156 weeks; assessed with: any VL>50 copies/ml)

1 randomized trials

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

Very serious1

no serious imprecision

none 40/96

(41.7%)

55/99 (55.6%)

HR 0.62 (0.41 to 0.92)2

160 fewer per 1000 (from 30 fewer to 273

fewer)

⊕⊕ΟΟ LOW

CRITICAL

Virological failure at 52 weeks (safety endpoint) (follow-up 156 weeks; assessed with: confirmed VL>1000 copies/ml)

1 randomized trials

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

Very serious1

no serious imprecision

none 18/96

(18.8%)

2/99 (2%)

HR 10.19 (2.36 to 43.94)3

168 more per 1000 (from 27 more to 572

more)

⊕⊕ΟΟ LOW

CRITICAL

Decline by 10% in CD4% by 52 weeks (follow-up 156 weeks; assessed with: CD4%)

1 randomized trials

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

Very serious1

no serious imprecision

none 3/96

(3.1%)

14/99 (14.1%)

RR 0.22 (0.07 to 0.74)4

110 fewer per 1000 (from 37 fewer to 132

fewer)

⊕⊕ΟΟ LOW

CRITICAL

Decline by 1 z-score in weight-for-age by 52 weeks (follow-up 156 weeks; assessed with: confirmed VL>1000 copies/ml)

1 randomized no no serious Very no serious none 4/96 13/99 RR 0.32 89 fewer per ⊕⊕ΟΟ IMPORTANT

(2)

WHO/HIV/2013.34 © World Health Organization 2013

trials serious risk of bias

inconsistency serious1 imprecision (4.2%) (13.1%) (0.11 to

0.94)5

1000 (from 8 fewer to 117

fewer)

LOW

Highest ALT (grade 3/4) (follow-up 156 weeks)

1 randomized trials

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

Very serious1

serious6 none 7/96

(7.3%)

4/99 (4%)

RR 13.66 (5.15 to 36.29)6

512 more per 1000 (from 168

more to 1000 more)

⊕ΟΟΟ VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Lowest neutropaenia (grade 3/4) (follow-up 156 weeks)

1 randomized trials

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

Very serious1

serious7 none 5/96

(5.2%)

3/99 (3%)

RR 1.72 (0.42 to 6.99)7

22 more per 1000 (from 18

fewer to 182 more)

⊕ΟΟΟ VERY LOW

CRITICAL

1 The findings may not be easily generalizable since enrolled children had all achieved and sustained viral load <400 copies/ml for at least 3 months within the first 12 months of treatment. This selected population is likely to have better adherence, fewer problems with ART tolerability and an improved prognosis, compared to an unselected population. In addition, evidence was further downgraded as the only trial available to inform this question used NVP and it is unclear whether the same results would be achieved with EFV.

2 P = 0.02.

3 Strong evidence indicates that virological failure is 10 times higher in the intervention arm (P = 0.002).

4 P = 0.01.

5 P = 0.04.

6 Small number of events, likely to be unpowered to assess this difference (P = 0.33).

7 Small number of events, likely to be unpowered to assess this difference (P = 0.45).

Références

Documents relatifs

In the Zurich Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychopathology study (ZAPPS) we have observed that a group of ado- lescents with high self-rated depressive symptoms in con- trast to

2 GRADE table (observational studies), PI-based regimen versus three NRTIs among HIV-2 or dually reactive patients. Quality assessment

4 Children were severely immunosuppressed at treatment initiation and therefore do not necessarily represent the entire population of infants and children starting early ART. 5

Question: Should Induction with a four-drug (containing three NRTIs) NNRTI-based regimen versus standard NNRTI-based regimen be used among infants and young children living with

This work was commissioned by the World Health Organization and carried out by The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Cochrane Review Group on HIV/AIDS.. 1 GRADE

▪ This study was designed to assess the knowl- edge and the ability to analyse situations acquired by very young children (&lt;6 years) trained by their own teachers at nursery

The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding and the timing of solid food introduction have been subject to debate (Fewtrell et al., 2010; Reilly &amp; Wells, 2005),

To compare virological outcomes in patients who switched to a cART including efavirenz (EFV), nevira- pine (NVP) or abacavir (ABC) with patients who contin- ued on a first