• Aucun résultat trouvé

Virological outcomes in ARV-naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI-regimen to efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Virological outcomes in ARV-naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI-regimen to efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: inserm-00668435

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00668435

Submitted on 9 Feb 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Virological outcomes in ARV-naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI-regimen to

efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens

Tchadie Bommenel, Jean-Luc Meynard, Odile Launay, Anne Simon, Aba Mahamat, Valérie Martinez, Jacques Gilquin, Christine Katlama,

Anne-Sophie Lascaux, Christian Pradier, et al.

To cite this version:

Tchadie Bommenel, Jean-Luc Meynard, Odile Launay, Anne Simon, Aba Mahamat, et al.. Viro- logical outcomes in ARV-naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI-regimen to efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens. Journal of the International AIDS Society, BioMed Central (2008-2012) ; International Aids Society (2008-) ; Wiley (2017-), 2010, 13 (Suppl 4), pp.O21.

�10.1186/1758-2652-13-S4-O21�. �inserm-00668435�

(2)

O R A L P R E S E N T A T I O N Open Access

O215. Virological outcomes in ARV-naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI-regimen to efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens

T Bommenel

1

, JL Meynard

2

, O Launay

3

, A Simon

4

, A Mahamat

5

, V Martinez

6

, J Gilquin

7

, C Katlama

4

, AS Lascaux

8

, C Pradier

9

, E Rouveix

10

, D Costagliola

11*

, S Abgrall

11

From Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection Glasgow, UK. 7-11 November 2010

Objectives

To compare virological outcomes in patients who switched to a cART including efavirenz (EFV), nevira- pine (NVP) or abacavir (ABC) with patients who contin- ued on a first virologically successful boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-containing cART, and to assess virological differences between the switch regimens.

Methods

Using the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH- ANRS Co4), 439 antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients with undetectable viral load (VL) who switched from a first boosted PI-containing cART to a combination including EFV (n=196), NVP (n=123) or ABC (n=120) were selected. Each patient was matched with 3 patients who did not change their cART on the basis of sex, age, CD4 cell count, VL and date of the first cART initiation and duration of undetectability. Time to virological fail- ure (VF) was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. Potential confounding variables considered for the analyses were HIV transmission group, at the date of first PI-cART initiation: NRTI backbone, PI drug; at the index date: AIDS status, CD4 cell count, NRTIs background, calendar period, time since inclu- sion in the database, time since first PI-cART initiation, time between undetectability and switch. Each variable associated with VF in the univariate model (p<0.20) was included in a multivariable model designed to evaluate the impact of the sole switch first, then the impact of

the switch regimen, on the risk of VF. Each model was stratified by the matched groups (exposed/matched non- exposed patients).

Results

12-month probabilities of VF were 3.7% in patients not switching and 5.7% in patients switching, 3.9%, 7.2% and 9.0% in patients switching to EFV-, NVP- and ABC- cART, respectively. After adjustment on PI at first cART, CD4 cell counts and AIDS status at the date of switch, switch was not associated with VF (crude HR, 1.20; 95%CI,0.81-1.77; adjusted HR (aHR), 1.19; 95%CI, 0.80-1.76, compared to no switch). Patients switching to ABC-cART had a higher risk of VF (aHR, 1.99; 95%CI, 1.05-3.79) than patients not switching, patients switch- ing to EFV (aHR, 0.82; 95%CI, 0.41-1.65) or NVP (aHR, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.44-2.07) having similar risk of VF com- pared to patients not switching.

Conclusions

In previously ARV-naive patients, virologically success- fully treated with a boosted PI-cART, switch to a NNRTI-cART, either EFV or NVP, is virologically safe, while switch to an ABC-cART should not be recommended.

Author details

1INSERM U 943, BP 335, 56 boulevard Vincent Auriol, Paris, France.2AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.3AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.

4AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.5Centre Hospitalier Andrée Rosemon, Cayenne, France.6AP-HP, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.7AP-HP, Hôpital Hotel-Dieu, Paris, France.8AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-

11INSERM U 943, Paris, France

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Bommenelet al.Journal of the International AIDS Society2010,13(Suppl 4):O21 http://www.jiasociety.org/content/13/S4/O21

© 2010 Costagliola et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

(3)

Mondor, Creteil, France.9Hôpital de l’Archet 1, Nice, France.10Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France.11INSERM U 943, Paris, France.

Published: 8 November 2010

doi:10.1186/1758-2652-13-S4-O21

Cite this article as:Bommenelet al.:O215. Virological outcomes in ARV- naïve patients switching or not from a first successful boosted PI- regimen to efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir regimens.Journal of the International AIDS Society201013(Suppl 4):O21.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit Bommenelet al.Journal of the International AIDS Society2010,13(Suppl 4):O21

http://www.jiasociety.org/content/13/S4/O21

Page 2 of 2

Références

Documents relatifs

A few studies 1–6 reported on a technique that allows one to operate on patients sitting in a nearly upright position with the microscope inclined; however, to our knowledge, no

As a first step toward an Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) for Micro-Air Vehicle (MAV) obstacle avoidance, we introduce a vision based autopilot (LORA: Lateral Optic

To test whether antinuclear antibodies (ANA) can be used as a diagnostic tool in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), we evaluated the prevalence of ANA in biologic-na ï ve PsA patients and

This paper uses the well-established patterns of comorbidity of mood and alcohol use disorder to test the hypothesis that application of an expanded concept of bipolar-II

In section 3 we define a new operator for action negation therefore give arise to a new dynamic logic.. In Section 4 we apply the new logic to the

Findings: Compared to the control group, a significant interaction showed patients in the intervention showed increased exercise behaviour at higher intensities during

In groups three and four, deligation and stem-cell injection (12 animals with ADSCs and 12 ani- mals with MPCs, respectively) into the bladder wall was performed 6 weeks after

patients with a fully suppressed viral load and harboring M184V/I as unique NRTI resistance 64.. without resistance to