• Aucun résultat trouvé

GRADE table: What ARV regimen to start in children younger than 3 years old?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "GRADE table: What ARV regimen to start in children younger than 3 years old? "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

WHO/HIV/2013.32 © World Health Organization 2013

GRADE table: What ARV regimen to start in children younger than 3 years old?

Author(s): Penazzato M.

Date: 2012-09-25

Question: Should treatment interruption be used in infants and young children living with HIV starting early ART?

Settings: Resource-limited settings Bibliography: Wamalwa 2012

Quality assessment No. of patients Effect

Quality Importance No. of

studies Design Risk of

bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations

Treatment

interruption Control Relative

(95% CI) Absolute

Serious adverse events (follow-up median 9.9 months1)

1 randomized

trials

serious2 no serious inconsistency3

serious4 serious5,6 none 1/21

(4.8%)

1/21 (4.8%)

RR 1 (1 to 1)

- ⊕ΟΟΟ

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

0.1%7 -

23%7 -

Weight-for-age z-score change (follow-up median 9.9 months;8 better indicated by lower values)

1 randomized

trials

serious2 no serious inconsistency

serious4 serious5 none 16 15 - median 0.13 lower

(0.31 lower to 0.05 higher)9

⊕ΟΟΟ VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Height-for-age z-score change (follow-up median 9.9 months;8 better indicated by lower values)

1 randomized

trials

serious2 no serious inconsistency3

serious4 serious5 none 16 15 - median 0.10 lower

(0.33 lower to 0.13 higher)10

⊕ΟΟΟ VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Weight for height z-score change (follow-up median 9.9 months;8 measured by: mean change; better indicated by lower values)

1 randomized

trials

serious2 no serious inconsistency

serious4 serious5 none 16 15 - median 0.11 lower (32

lower to 0.1 higher)11

⊕ΟΟΟ VERY LOW

CRITICAL

1 This is post-randomization follow up.

2 Unblinded by design, assessment of serious adverse effects may have biased the results. In addition, the trial was terminated early for rapid restart of treatment.

(2)

WHO/HIV/2013.32 © World Health Organization 2013

3 Only one trial assessed this specific question, providing a comparator with continuous ART.

4 Children were severely immunosuppressed at treatment initiation and therefore do not necessarily represent the entire population of infants and children starting early ART.

5 The sample size calculation did not account for early restart or unplanned interruption.

6 Very low level of events in both arms.

7 Based on 95% CI calculation from the control arm.

8 Total post-randomization follow-up, but outcome assessed at six months from randomization.

9t-test, P = 0.16.

10t-test, P = 0.4.

11t-test, P = 0.3.

Références

Documents relatifs