LES of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction affected by microramp vortex generators
2
0
0
Texte intégral
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8) . an author's
(9)
(10)
(11) https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/19247
(12)
(13) .
(14) . Joly, Laurent and Grébert, Arnaud and Jamme, Stéphane and Bodart, Julien LES of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction affected by microramp vortex generators. (2016) In: 69th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics, 20 November 2016 - 22 November 2016 (Portland, United States).. .
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23) .
(24) Abstract Submitted for the DFD16 Meeting of The American Physical Society. LES of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction affected by microramp vortex generators LAURENT JOLY, ARNAUD GREBERT, STPHANE JAMME, JULIEN BODART, Institut Suprieur de l’Aronautique et de l’Espace, Universit de Toulouse, AERODYNAMICS, ENERGETICS AND PROPULSION DEP. TEAM — At large Mach numbers, the interaction of an oblique shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer (SWTBLI) developing over a flat plate gives rise to a separation bubble known to exhibit low-frequency streamwise oscillations around StL = 0.03 (a Strouhal number based on the separated region length). Because these oscillations yield wall pressure or load fluctuations, efforts are made to reduce their amplitude. We perform large eddy simulations to reproduce the experiments by Wang etal (2012) where a rake of microramp vortex generators (MVGs) were inserted upstream the SWTBLI with consequences yet to be fully understood. There is no consensus on the flow structure downstream MVGs and this is first clarified in the case of MVGs protruding by 0.47δ in a TBL at Mach number M = 2.7 and Reynolds number Reθ = 3600. Large-scale vortices intermittently shed downstream the MVGs are characterized by a streamwise period close to twice the TBL thickness and a frequency f ≈ 0.5Ue /δ, two orders of magnitude higher than the one of the uncontrolled SWTBLI. We then characterize the interaction between the unsteady wake of the MVGs with the SWTBLI resulting in the reduction of the interaction length and the high-frequency modulation of the shock feet motions.. Laurent Joly Institut Suprieur de l’Aronautique et de l’Espace, Universit de Toulouse Date submitted: 29 Jul 2016. Electronic form version 1.4.
(25)
Documents relatifs
Supported by a second set of simulations using the Edge code, two flow conditions were selected for a study on the transition location effects on steady and unsteady shock
They can be either secondary vortices generated in the interaction of the actuators jets with the mean flow or negative streamwise structures from the boundary layer segregated
We compared the interaction of isotropic, axisymmetric and sheared turbulent flows with a Mach 1.5 shock wave, with a specific interest for the sheared situation. The behaviour
Today prediction of 2-D unsteady, strongly interacting flowfields is becoming possi- ble with the tools of CFD. Because of the strength of the shock/boundary layer
For strong SWBLIs, it is well established that the separation bubble and the system of shock waves (included the reflected shock wave whose foot is located upstream from the
Vibroacoustic responses of a heavy fluid loaded cylindrical shell excited by a turbulent boundary layer3. Laurent Maxit, Mahmoud Karimi, Valentin Meyer,
2014 Experimental measurements have established that when a turbulent boundary-layer approaches separation, separates or interacts with a shock-wave, the turbulence
Fluid-structure interaction between a composite aileron and a turbulent flow at transonic conditions
While the dominant frequency results from the interaction between the strong shock wave and the boundary layer separation, the secondary oblique shock wave also
