• Aucun résultat trouvé

Adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer with IMRT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer with IMRT"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ADJUVANT TREATMENT OF VULVAR CANCER WITH IMRT

Mota, A.1, Leite, R.1, Pimenta, A1, Ribeiro, F.1, Sousa, M1, Fortunato, M.1, Santos, F.1, Roldão, M.1

1Radiotherapy Department of Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil , E.P.E. - Portugal

There are very few studies regarding IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) and the treatment of vulvar cancer. Therefore, we will present our experience on IMRT treatment in adjuvant vulvar cancer, at our Department.

RESULTS

This work is based on a retrospective analysis of vulvar cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant IMRT between January 2009 and February 2012.

All patients were treated with IMRT (sliding window), in a Clinac 2100CD (linear accelarator), with photon energy 6MV. For dosimetry, the inversed planning system was used. It was evaluated the Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage, the dose's homogeneity distribution and the dose tolerance of the organs at risk – rectum (V40), bladder (V40), small bowel (V35) and bone marrow (V20).

The acute toxicity (intestinal, genitourinary and skin) was evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Organization Group criteria.

CONCLUSIONS: IMRT seems to be a promising treatment in vulvar cancer. IMRT planning has a proper PTV coverage with considerable sparing of organs at risk and is well tolerated by patients.

We also achieve with IMRT a low loco-regional relapse, as mentioned in literature.

Treatment Response 50% patients alive at the present analysis

30% patients had loco-regional relapse 1 patient had distant metastasis 30 patients

AGE: 32 to 88 years (median: 75) HISTOLOGY: Squamous cells carcinoma

ALL COMPLETED TREATMENT MEAN DOSE: 62.32Gy (50-66Gy)

FOLLOW-UP: 13 to 50 months

Graphics 1 and 2: Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival (Kaplan Meier)

OAR AVERAGE DOSE

Rectum 33.04 Gy

Bladder 31.51 Gy

Small bowel 23.85 Gy

Bone marrow 22.27 Gy

OAR AVERAGE DOSE

V40 Rectum 28.40 Gy

V40 Bladder 26.09 Gy

V35 Small bowel 26.40 Gy

V20 Bone marrow 48.59 Gy

Table 1 and 2: OAR average doses

Fig. 3 and 4: IMRT Dosimetry Fig. 1 and 2: PTV coverage - 95% isodoses curve

Bibliography:1. D'Souza DP, Rumble RB, Fyles A, Yaremko B, Warde P, IMRT Indications Expert Panel. The role of IMRT in gynecologic cancers. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2010 Oct 29. Various p. (Evidence-based series; no. 21-3-7 2. Beriwal et al, IMRT for the treatment of vulvar carcinoma: a comparative dosimetric study with early clinical outcome, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 2006 April 1;64(5):1395-400. Epub 2006 Jan 25 3. King et al, Current Practice of IMRT to Treat Carcinoma of the Vulva - Results of an International Survey, ASTRO Presentation 2011

MATERIAL AND METHODS

BACKGROUND

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 1 2 3 N Grade Genitourinay Intestinal Skin Graphic 3: Toxicities

2.12% cases: PTV <95% of the prescribed dose 1 case: PTV >107% of the prescribed dose

Figure

Table 1 and 2: OAR average doses

Références

Documents relatifs

Here we present a comprehensive attempt to cor- relate aragonitic Na/Ca ratios from Desmophyllum pertusum (formerly known as Lophelia pertusa), Madrepora oculata and a

Woll (2014, p.63) maintains that, in the face of financial sector resistance, governments can impose a crisis resolution with harsh conditions for failing banks.. Her example for

The gloss difference scales obtained by three observers, using binocular vision for these two viewing conditions, are plot- ted in Figure 5 as a function of the specular

PKE: Phacoemulsification; NPDS: Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy; MMC: Mitomycin C; POAG: Primary open-angle glaucoma; IOP: Intraocular pressure; VA: Visual acuity;

— Nos rapports ne sont pas directs mais nous vendons le beurre et la crème à plus de quatre cents clients répartis dans toute la Suistie romande.. Nous avons également

Levels of Analysis MACRO MICRO EX ANTE Time Frame POST HOC Institutional

composition of the fine samples collected with the HVDS in the same period, all the other size fractions show a higher content of alkylic groups and a lower content of oxygenated

The viscous air drag dissipation might (for highly polished surfaces) be dominant during the last milliseconds, whereas rolling friction can be dominant if we consider the final