• Aucun résultat trouvé

Research and knowledge transfer priorities in developmental coordination disorder: Results from consultations with multiple stakeholders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Research and knowledge transfer priorities in developmental coordination disorder: Results from consultations with multiple stakeholders"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Research and knowledge transfer priorities in developmental

coordination disorder: Results from consultations with multiple

stakeholders

Chantal Camden PT, Ph.D

1

| Sabah Meziane SLP

2

| Désirée Maltais PT, Ph.D

3

|

Noémi Cantin OT, Ph.D

4

| Marie Brossard-Racine Ph.D

5

| Jade Berbari

1

|

Mélanie Couture OT, Ph.D

1

1 2 3 4 5 Correspondence Funding information

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Design:

Setting and participants:

Main variables:

Outcome measures:

(2)

|

and 2 9 12 13

|

|

11 15

|

(3)

2

11 A

16 were

(4)

N (%) /

138 (35%)

(5)

All

stakeholders Parents

Adults with

DCD stakeholders stakeholders Others

success at school for children with DCD?

5.74 (8.84)1 7.07 (9.24)1 5.84 (8.58)3 8.27 (10.18)1 3.50 (7.55)5

screening and diagnosis of people with DCD?

4.28 (8.36)2 4.20 (8.21)5 10.75 (11.55)1 6.80 (9.92)1 4.26 (8.40)2 2.14 (4.72)

-quences of DCD (self-esteem problems,

3.75 (7.68)3 5.38 (8.93)2 9.67 (10.87)2 3.23 (6.79) 3.34 (7.28)4 3.93 (7.66)4 3.61 (7.26)4 4.54 (7.84)4 2.42 (7.20) 4.46 (7.96)4 3.94 (7.21)3 7.43 (10.58)1 interventions? 3.11 (6.45)5 0.92 (2.57) 6.60 (8.86)2 4.21 (6.24)3 4.98 (8.41)3 0.42 (1.16) 2.23 (6.25) 6.07 (10.53)2 2.49 (6.40) 3.55 (7.72) 2.75 (5.03)5 3.29 (7.03) 1.66 (5.05) 2.29 (5.29) 2.07 (5.04) 2.42 (5.07) 4.29 (6.89)5 0.79 (2.39) 1.93 (4.76) 0.64 (2.67) 2.67 (6.08)5 0.29 (1.07) 1.50 (4.61) 2.67 (6.23) 2.22 (5.96) 1.72 (5.36) 3.29 (5.94) 1.16 (3.96) 1.43 (4.32) 1.50 (3.50) 1.22 (3.97) 1.20 (4.26) 2.57 (5.79) 1.03 (3.53) 1.55 (4.33) 2.92 (7.42)4 0.60 (2.64) 0.21 (0.43) 0.91 (3.52) 0.36 (2.33) 1.33 (4.62) 0.51 (2.20) 0.90 (3.43) 1.55 (4.39) 2.00 (3.64) 0.29 (1.07) 0.45 (2.72) 0.69 (3.46) 3.42 (8.21)3 0.59 (3.04) 0.23 (1.64) 0.00 (0.00) 0.25 (2.01) 0.03 (0.31) 0.00 (0.00) 0.047 (0.40) 0.00 (0.00)

(6)

Scores using an incremental interval scale (SD) All

stakeholders Parents

Adults with

DCD stakeholders stakeholders Others

4.92 (8.19)1 2.99 (3.96)1 1.67 (3.45) 6.80 (8.89)2 4.76 (8.29)1 3.86 (7.69)2

-nosing DCD

3.68 (8.40)2 1.52 (3.32) 11.25 (12.39)1 6.93 (10.67)1 3.04 (7.66)4

Resources and strategies supporting school professionals

3.27 (6.36)3 2.07 (3.20)2 4.36 (6.72)4 4.45 (7.67)2 3.14 (5.27)5

-quences of DCD

2.83 (6.87)4 1.72 (3.27)4 7.17 (8.91)2 2.94 (6.60) 2.24 (6.08)5 5.93 (9.89)1

Strategies to support teachers 2.79 (6.21)5 1.90 (3.04)3 0.50 (1.17) 4.23 (7.87)3 1.57 (4.29)

2.71 (6.26) 1.26 (2.41) 0.67 (1.56) 5.89 (8.87)3 2.71 (6.36) 1.68 (3.14)5 4.50 (8.17)4 3.16 (6.52)5 2.02 (5.07) 3.64 (9.05)3 1.06 (2.57) 2.59 (6.16) 1.47 (4.39) 0.79 (2.00) 1.75 (4.63) 3.50 (7.55)4 1.41 (4.64) 0.99 (2.43) 5.67 (8.19)3 0.40 (2.00) 1.37 (4.26) 1.60 (5.12) 0.72 (3.09) 0.52 (1.62) 3.42 (8.21)5 1.15 (3.93) 0.30 (1.54) 0.00 (0.00)

(7)

22

21

All

stakeholders Parents Adults stakeholders stakeholders Others

6.03 (1.19) 6.19 (1.09) clear 5.99 (1.14) 5.76 (1.16) 6.12 (1.14) 6.00 (1.10) 5.92 (1.23) 6.56 (1.01) 5.92 (1.14) 5.60 (1.32) 5.30 (1.42) 6.11 (1.35) 5.76 (1.21) 5.56 (1.13) 5.46 (1.41) 5.92 (1.10) 5.33 (0.52) 5.52 (1.40) 5.43 (1.30) 5.67 (1.41) 5.52 (1.49) 5.67 (0.52) 5.43 (1.31) 5.41 (1.22) 5.33 (1.32) 5.63 (1.33) 5.00 (1.00) 5.07 (1.47) 5.06 (1.41) 5.13 (1.44) 5.22 (1.46) 4.17 (1.17) 4.90 (1.73) 5.44 (1.24) 5.05 (1.57) 5.14 (1.74) 4.67 (1.97) 4.75 (1.77) 3.67 (1.32) 4.71 (1.70) 4.46 (1.66) 4.00 (2.00) 4.73 (1.44) 4.91 (1.36) 4.76 (1.42) 4.57 (1.62) renowned 4.53 (1.53) 4.71 (1.49) 5.00 (1.41) 4.52 (1.52) 4.40 (1.51) 3.29 (1.70) 4.41 (1.57) 4.17 (1.55) 4.12 (1.60) 4.17 (1.60)

(8)

5 27

|

Chantal Camden Health Expect Disabil Rehabil.

Dev Med Child Neurol

(9)

Scholarly and Research Communication

J Health Care Poor Underserved

Am J Public Health. Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5.

CMAJ

Child Care Health Dev. Guide to Knowledge Translation Planning at CIHR: Integrated and End-of-grant Approaches.

Serv Social.

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2(1):3.

Bull World Health Organ

Dev Med Child Neurol Phys Occup Ther Pediatr

Dev Med Child Neurol

Res Dev Disabil

Child Care Health Dev

Res Learn Technol. 2013;21:13. Interdiscip J Inform Knowl Manage

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Health Expect. 2019;22:1156–1164.

Références

Documents relatifs

Title Page Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Tables Figures ◭ ◮ ◭ ◮ Back Close. Full Screen

Whether for experimental purposes or for use by producers, the plants are employed in different forms (extracts, essential oils, etc.) against fungi (11 species identified),

Index Terms —Shannon theory, state-dependent channel, state leakage, empirical coordination, state masking, state amplifica- tion, causal encoding, two-sided state information,

Index Terms —Shannon theory, state-dependent channel, state leakage, empirical coordination, state masking, state amplifica- tion, causal encoding, two-sided state information,

Les femmes, qui, malgré cette plus forte hausse des mobilités, connaissent en moyenne moins de changements professionnels (4,7 % contre 6,2 %), doivent attendre, plus que les

Tafuri G, Trotta F, Leufkens HG, Martini N, Sagliocca L, Traversa G (2009) Off-label use of medicines in children: can available evidence avoid useless paediatric trials. The case

En complément de ce projet est l’implication de l’équipe Planéto, et plus particulièrement du groupe Orbitrap, dans l’analyse des données issues de la mission Hayabusa 2, où

An engaged research approach has been applied to ensure production of research knowledge that is concrete and relevant for practical problem solving (Van de Ven,