frequently greater than the vertical permeability on account of the w a y
in
which deposits are fist laid d o w n and then consolidated. Samside showedin 1930
that a suitable geometrical transformation could transform the natural soil mass into an imaginary, isotropic for-Fig. 6.
mation. T h e foregoing resdts concerning diffusion horns can then be applied to Samside’s imaginary soil mass and,by the
inverse transformation, the diffusion horns for the real soil mass can be found.I
Fig. 7.
The
statics and dynamics of underground waterREFRACTION
W h e n flow talres place from a homogeneous, isotropic medium of a certain permcability into another similar medium of a different permeability, the streamlines (mean trajectories within the horns) are refracted at the interface between the two media. T h e horns themselves are refracted
in
a similar way.INLET CONDITIONS
U p
to this point w e have presumed that the upper endof a diffusion horn always terminated
in
a point; in practice, however, some departure from this conditionmay
occur.If
rapid diffusion is sought for, injections can be made through a spreading device, but, in doing this, the flow under study is inevitably modified to s o m e extent.Having seen h o w a jet of coloured
liquid
(or of elec- trolyte) diffuses out in the form of a diffusion horn, w e shall n o w see h o w injections can he used for velocity and discharge measurements.M E A S U R E M E N T O F T H E V E L O C I T Y O F I N F I L T R A T I O N O F G R O U N D W A T E R
Our
first task is to define the different velocities which can be considered in ground-water flow.T h e velocity of inatration at a given point will be defined
by
the equation:ui = c!
S
where
Q
is the clischarge passing through the total cross-sectional areaS;
andU i
is therefore the m e a n discharge per unit area y.Darcy’s law can be written U,
=
q=
KIwhere
K =
coefficient of permeability,I =
slope of the ground-water table at the pointin
question.the medium is porous, the water is excluded from pace occupied
by
the grainsand
the velocity of inatrationU,
defined above is not the real velocity of the water.If
it is supposed that all the water within the interstices isin
motion, then the m e a n velocityU,
can be defined as follows:
1 I
I
Fig. 8.
io2
where
p
is the porosity, i.e. the ratio of the volume of voids to the total volume of the granular medium.However, only part of the intersticial water is really in motion;
if
this is taken account of, the effectiye m e a n velocity or effective velocity of the water m a y be defined as:KI
p, p,
u
e ---=4
where p c is the effective porosity.
Direct measurement
by
means of salt or colourinfiltra- tion tests enables the latter velocity alone to be found. T h e determination of the m e a n velocityU,
.necessitates permeability and porosity measurements
in
addition.Very m a n y procedures are used for measuring effect- ive velocities;
in
the present paper w e shall confine ourselves to making certain remarks on the dissolved salt or dyestuff methods.In
this case, the velocity of propagation of a batch of electrolyte or colouring matter is measuredby
timing between two well-pointsin
the ground-water nappe. Itis
most important for the t w o well-points to be located on the same streamline, or at least within the same diffusion horn. The concen- tration of electrolyte or of colouring matter reaching the downstream well-point vanes with time; it increases from zero to a m a x i m u m and thereafter falls very slowly back to zero (seeFig. 8).
T h e curve of concentration as a function of time resembles a Pearson probability curve. T h e passage of the batch of electrolyte or colouring matter lasts a considerable time and it is no easy matter to determine the m e a n duration of infiltration corresponding to the
T h e m e a s u r e m e n t of g r o u n d - w a t e r $ow
:I
m e a n velocity. T h e only sure deduction that can he m a d e is that the first appearance of the colouration gives the m a x i m u m velocity. Certain workers have taken the time corresponding
to
the peak concentration as a n estimate ofU,.
This
point can be illustratedin
the following simple way. Let us replace the porous mediumby
a series of capillary tubcs, and letus
examine the propagation of a certain quantity of colouredliquid
along one of these tubes (seeFig. 9).
It is well known that the velocity at any pointwithin
the tube depends on the distance of this point from the centre of the tube, as compared to r,, the radius of the tube.T h e velocity at any point is given
by
the formula:U
=
K (rz0-
rz)where
K = - - - dP 1 ax 4p (p. is the coefficient of viscosity of water).
and is given
by Kr2,.
velocity within the tube is just half the maximum.
T h e m a x i m u m velocity of flow corresponds to r
= O
It is easy to show that the m e a n
G 2 0
and U,,,,
= -
2If
a granular medium can be likened to a series of capillary tubes of equal diameter, pointingin
the direction of Bow, it would be easy to measure the m e a n velocityby
colouration tests. The first appearancc of the dyestuff is ‘easily detected, and gives a velocity just twice the effective velocityU,.
However, the complexity of a granular medium makes it improbable that such a schematization holds true
in
the general case. Thus, let us examine a series of capillary tubes of different. diameters Zr,, 2r2, 2r3, etc.. . .;
22, is the biggest of these.The m a x i m u m velocity for such a bundle of tubes is given
by U,,,,, = Kr12,
that isby
the maximum velocity within the biggest tube.T h e m e a n velocity
will
be givenby
the ratio:1
Total discharge
= -
2 M K (rI4+
rZ4+
2 3+ . . .)
Total cross-section M
(riz +
r 2 2+
raz+ . . .)
1 r14
+
rZ4+ r 3 + . . .
2 r ? + r 2 + r 3 2 +
...
u , =
-IC-O
I
r
x
I I
Io b C
PO
t O ..-.-.-
-C
-
Fig.
9.
b e assumed that the coloured water fills the space between two sections au and
bb,
at a distance e from each other, at time t= O
(seeFig. 9).
A t a later instant of time t, each surface of the coloured waterwill
be formedby
a paraboloid, the front paraboloid being similar to, and at a distance e from, the rear paraboloid.Seen
in
plan, these paraboloids have the equationsa n d
x
=
K(rzo-
r2) t x=
I<(rz0-
rz) t+
eTaking
the origin of the x axis as being the section ua of the initial layer, w e shall now calculate the volume contained in each paraboloid d o w n to a section ce for which x= L.
With such a n arrangement the m a x i m u m velocity Krlz
will
be more than twiceU , .
W e can thus conclude that for flowin
a porous medium the effective velocity is generally less than, or at most equal to, half the m a x i m u m speed corresponding to the appearance of the dyestuff.W e shall n o w study the motion of a layer
of
coloured water within a capillary tube of diameter Zr,; itw i l l
por
the front paraboloid, the volume is &enby:
The
statics and dynamics of underground waterFor the
hind
paraboloid: T h e point of intersection of the two curves corresponds to the point forwhich
-
rol (L-
e)+ -
1 (L-
]')e2 Kf
! L o
dt that is,
The instantaneous rates of flow are
t =
-
Lf l l
-
Kra4 LaPI
----..-
df 2 2 Kfz K r o 2
and
Kr04 (L
-
e)S [2] T o s u mup,
before the paraboloid au reaches the sec-at -
2 _I 2 Kt2 tion cc, the rate of discharge of colouring matter isgiven by
the expressiónEquations [i] and
[Z]
are plottedin
Fig.10.
As
long asthe
paraboloidbb
does not reach' section cc, equation[2]
alone gives the discharge; that is, the discharge of colouredliquid
equalsr04
- ___
sequently,
when
the paraboloid au passes cc,-
2F... -
K2$2 the rate of flow decreases accord@ to the lawTe (2 L
-
e)1
. K
(L-
e)zIn
the next stage, for which both ql and q2 are positivequantities, i.e. for K2t2
t >
the discharge is given
by
pective concentrations are
given by:
(L
-
e)22 2 1-- Kz tZ rO4
x
KrO4 -
'dv, d v l
-
7~ e (2L -
e)---_-
dt dt 2
K
t2 ' and(2 L
-
e).
7~ Kra*-
e (2 L-
e)2 Kt' 2 K2 t2 rO4 z e
.-_--
T h e m a x i m u m degree of concentration is reached at time
t = - L
fio2
T h e lapse of time between the first appearance of colouring matter and the attainment of this m a x i m u m depends only on
the
thickness of the initial layer of colouring matter.If
it is supposed that flowin
a porous medium is similar, it canbe
concluded that the effective velocity cannot be calculated fromthe
point of m a x i m u m concentration; this depends only on the quantity of dyestuff injected originally, or onthe
length of time taken for this injection.In
the decreasing part of the curve,the
concentration of colouring matter is roughly proportional to the thickness of the original layer, e(if
e is supposed m u c h smaller thanL)
and inversely proportional to the square of the time.Experimental tests have furnished essentially similar results. Thus,
if
the -granular soil massis
compared to a bundle of capillary tubes ofdiffering
diameters, placed parallel to each other, the discharge of colouring matter isgiven by
the s u m of the rates of flowin
each tube. According to what has already been said, the decreasing part ofthe
curve is independent of thedia-
i
L- e L T
kr,
eKr,Fig.
10,104
the starting point on this curve
is
all that distinguishes one tube from another. For the rising concentrations, however, each tube follows a separate curve (seeFig. 11).
If
n o w these curves are summed, a curve resembling the experimental curves is obtained. Thus, just after the colouring matter first appears, the curvemay
be concave upwards, as isfound
to be the case experi- mentally. T h e summit, instead of being a sharp point quite nearin
time to the first appearance of the dyestuff, is rounded and further a w a y from the starting point.The tail of the curve is however similar to that found
with
a single capillary tube. T o s u mup,
the simple theoretical flow pattern just studied gives results similar to typical experimental results with granular materials.It
isplain
that ground-water flow, evenin
homoge- neous soils, is much more complicated and variedand
that the theoretical analysis given above hasonly
a qualitative value. T h e merit of this theory is to correlate certain aspects of ground-water flow with k n o w n facts concerning laminar flowin
capillary tubes.The theory seems particularly useful
in
carrying out basic research into the flow of ground water, especially when difficulties ansein
comparing the results of different methods of ground-water prospection. Basic research of this nature could be carried out with very simple equipment, andwould
be concerned with the dispersionin
time and spaceof
injected liquid, with the effect of variationsin
the concentration and quantity of dyestuff injected and with the effect of rapid changesin
head on ground-water flow. T h e latter effect is similar to that producedby
injection of colouring matter at a well-point; a sudden rise in the ground- water table occursin
the well and the resulting dis- turbance is, according to some writers, propagated as a wave with a speed m u c h greater than the velocity of infiltration;in
this way, a n error m a y be introduced into the results offield
prospections.T o resume, it seems that measurements m a d e with colouring matter or salt solutions give a m a x i m u m velocity, as determined
by
the &st appearance of the injected solution, at least double the effective velocityU,.
Experimental evidence shows that,in
fact, the m a x i m u m velocity is about two or three times the effective velocity.If
the effective velocity is known, the flow of ground watermay
be calculatedby
the formulag
=
U,P,where p e
is
the effective porosity and can'be measuredby
saturation or drainage methodsby
field, as well asby
laboratory, tests. T h e length of time taken for drain- age tests is a most important factor; thus, the Ameri- can writer
King
points out that22.26
per cent ofIt has been seen that
if
continuous injections of dyestuff or salt are m a d e at a constant discharge, the concen- tration measured at a pointon
the diffusion horn varies as the inverse square of the distance from the point of injection (for a diffusion hornin
radial flow). More generally, the concentration varies inversely as the cross-section of the horn and, iii particular, will remain ,constant in a flow converging at the same rate as the diffusion angle (about 60).
Crosswise, the curve of concentration is bell-shaped (i.e. like a normal probability curve) for a freely-diffus-
ing
dyestuff, tha? is, w h e n neither fixed boundaries \ nor free surfaces are\encountered.On
the other hand,if
the diffusion horniis confined between fixed boundaries as
in
a real pipe, the concentration varies inversely as the cross-section of the conduit so formed and soon ceases to vary across the conduit.injection of pquid at a given point is considered, then the curve of concentration as a function of time
will
be like that which has just been studied.In
this case the dissymmetrical, bell-shaped curvegiving
the con- centration at: a given point as a function of timewill
flatten out as w e
go
furtherway
from the starting point.Let us examine the relation existing between t w o concentration curves, one for a point
A
situated at distanceL
from the oiigin, and a second for pointB
at a distance,KL.
T h e foregoing theoretical analysis shows than the scale of time willbemultiplied by K
and the concentrations dividedby K; in
other words, the concentrations measuredduring
the passage of aI
i
If, instead' of a constant input of dyestuff, a brief f