T h e results of these tests are shown
in
Table 13.This study proved that the increase
in
seepageof
the canal was not great w h e n the third well was installed at various positions. T h e interference for wellNo. 1
was Thusthe third
well can easily be located at350
ft.from the canal without seriously reducing the discharge of well
No. 1.
Repetition of similar tests
by
installing two wells, Nos. 3 and4, in
linewith
wells Nos. 1 and 2 close to the canal, gave results which are'plotted inFig.
13.T h e fall in discharge of wells of both the groups proved to be as shownis Table
15.
Thus
with
the wells of the second group, Nos.3.
and4,
as shown
in
Table 14. 015 OF WELL IIIJEII96
TABLE 14.
Distance of third well from the canal bank inft.
Percentage interference of well No. 1.
150 9.25
250 5.65
350 2.6
450 0.76
at
200
ft. from the fist group7 the interferenceis
of the orderof 5 and 7
per cent respectively.T h e increase in the canal seepage at the position of wells of the second group w a s found to b e
15
per cent.1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
TABLE
15.Percentage Percentage Distance of 2nd row interference interference in well in well of wells fiom the canal
No. 3 and 4 bank converted to
ft.
No. 1 and 2200 7.25 9.6
250 6.2 8.5
300 4.8 6.4
350 3.2 5.3
500 1.2 2.1
600 0.2 0.8
Thus
it seems that for sites with pervious canal bedand having
a r o w of wells close to the bank, the installa- tion of a second r o w of wells at300
ft. from the canalhank would
be of advantage.,
B I B L I O G R A P H Y
ANONYMOUS.
Annual reports of the Irrigation Research 10. THEIN, Guntcr. Hydrologische Methoden, Leipzig, Institute, Lahore, for the years 1938, 1939 and 1940. J. M. Gebhardt, 1906.Statistical
&
Physics Section. 11. THEIS,C.
V. “The relation between the lowering of theBOULTON,
N.S.
“The steady flow of ground water to a piezometric surface and the rate of and duration of pumped well in vicinity of a river”, Philosophical M a g a - discharge of a well using ground-water storage”, Tran- zine, series 7, vol. 33, Jan. 1952. suctions of the American Geophysical Union, vol. 16,GHANAN
SINGE, LUTERI, H. R. and VAIDHIANATHAN, 1935.V. I. “On
the transmission constant of water in subsoil 12.-
, “The significance and nature of the cone of depres- sands”, Punjab Irrigation Research Institution, vol. 5, sion in ground water bodies”, Economic Geology, vol. 33.no. 9, 1939. 13.
VAIDHIANATHAN,
V.I.
and LUTHRA, H. R. “The trans- ISRAELSEN,O. W.
and REEVE, R.C.
Canal lining expe- mission co-efficient of water in natural silts”, Punjab riment in the delta area, Utah. ‘(Bulletin 313 (Technical) Irrigation Research Institution, vol. 5, no. 2, Jan. 1934.Utah Agricultural Experiment Section.” 14. WENZEL, L. K. Methods for determining permeability
?&ANGAR,
S. D.
Waterlogging in Western Punjab, Punjab of water-bearing materials, “U.S. Dept. of Interior Water Engineering Congress Paper no. 284. Supply Paper’’ no. 887.ROZENY. Fasserkrafi und Wasserwirtschuft7 vol. 28 15.
-
, The Theim method for determining permeabilityno. 10,1933. of water-bearing materials, “U.S. Geol. Survey, Water
MUSKET,
M.
The pow of homogeneous &ids through Supply Paper” no. 679.porous media, New York and London, McGraw
H i l l
WILSDON, B. H. and BOSE, N. R.(‘A
gravitational survcyBook
Co. Inc., 1937. of the sub-alluvium of the Jhalum, Chenab, Ravi Doabs ROUSE, H. Irrigation engineering, chapter on ground and its application to problems of waterlogging”, Memoirs water by C.E.
Jacob. of the Punjab Irrigation Research Laboratory, vol. 6, TAYLOR,E.
M. and MEHTA, M. D. %orne irrigation no. 1, 1928.problems in the Punjab”, The Indian JournaZ of Agri- cultural Science, vol. 9, part
II,
April 1941.16.
D I S C U S S I O N
DR, DANEL.
The lining of canals is probably the best remedy for waterlogging. It must be borne in mind that much smaller cross-sections can then be used because of better friction coeffieient and less water to convey. There is less free board if automatic control of levels and water distribution is resorted to.DR.
NUIRAHMAD.
Yes,I
agree that canal lining is the best remedy but so far w e have not been able to overcome the difficulties of finding a suitable material. Our canals are very big; their width m a y vary from 150 ft. to 300 ft. and their depth from 8 ft. to 15 ft. with a discharge capacity of 5,000-15,000 CU. ft. per second,All
these canals have toThe statics and dynamics of underground water
run throughout the year, and cannot be closed for more than a month. We are thercforc looking for a cheap and yuickly- applied material.
I
a m unable to give any opinion on automatic level control asI
have no information.MR.
SAYEDEL AYOUB. Dr.
Nazir Ahmad mentioned some suggested means for lowering the water-table.I
would like to b o w if any modification of the irrigation system was ever considered; of that irrigation system which,I
under- stand from the speaker, was the sole reason for raising the water-table.It
is believed that modification of the irrigation system is often of invaluable help in lowering the water-table.DR.
NAZIR
AFIMAD.The
plains of the Indus are flat, witq a slope equivalent to approximately 1 : 50,000. The surface level of irrigation canals is deliberately set high so that they may command as large an arca of land as possible. Changing the alignment would not solve this problem. Modification of the canals to make them impervious is a solution, but it has not been undertaken because o£ practical and financial difficulties.MR. ROBAUX wondered whether anybody had thought of using special products (bentonites, etc.), in order to try to consolidate river beds.
DE.
NAZIR AHMAD replied that such attempts had proved fruitless because the products were swept away by the rivers.98
T H E M E A S U R E M E N T OF G R O U N D - W A T E R F L O W
bY
DR. P I E R R E D A N E L
Laboratoire Dauphinois d’Hydraulique Neyrpic, Grenoble (France)
B A S I C N O T I O N S
C O N C E R N I N G F L O W I N P O R O U S M E D I A
As
iswell
known, porous media flow is usually of the Hagen-Poiseuille type; this is the laminar régime,in
which there is no turbulence. However, though lami- nar flow in a cyh&icd tube does not cause any mixing, laminar flow in a granular medium is quite different and it seems advisable to stress this important, but often neglected, aspect of theproblem.
C O N E
In Fig. 1
is shown a thin thread of liquidfi
passing betweenthe
grains of a porous massin
laminar flow;suppose for clearness that is coloured. This thread of liquid divides and sub-divides
in
passing through the maze of interstices formedby
the grains; at the end of a certain distance, the numerous offshoots offi
are extremely fine. Considering n o w a second thread oflicpidf2
(seeFig. 2
where, for the sake of clearness, the individual grains are no longer shown), the fine offshoots offi
and fi become rapidly interlaced and mixed on account of the inevitable bifurcations occurring at random throughoutthe
mass of grains. Lastly, mole- cular diffusion, though very slow, will ensure a mixing as complete as that due to a thorough, turbulent shakingup
ofthe
whole liquid.In
view of what has just been said, it can n o wbe
understood
why
uniform, steady flowin
a granular medium cannot be divided up into streamlinesby
injections of colouring matter.In
fact, a dyestuff injected at some given point tends to diffuse out along the flowin
the shape of a cone, the angle of which varieswith
the nature ofthe
grains, but which is generally about 60. T h e concentration over a plane at any given distance from the inlet point is abell-
shaped curve, similar to the normal (or Gaussian) probability curve (Fig.
3).
This can easily be understood from a diagrammatic explanation which, for
the
sake of simplicity, will be applied first to the two-dimensional case.In
our diagram, the irregular1 y-shaped grains willbe replacedby
circular discs arrangedin
a staggered pattern (Fig.4).
It will
be
supposed that the initial stream of liquid divides into two equal streams, on accóunt of symmetry, and that this process goes on repeating itself.If,
for each successive row, the discharge inthe
outermost threads of liquid is counted as unity,then
the discharges passingO F D IF F U S I O N
Fig.
2.Fig.
3.The statics and dynamics of underground water
between discs are distributed according to the binomial law; our illustration is none other than the celebrated triangle of Pascal and recalls the not less famous machine of Dalton. It is known that the curve having ordinates equal to the binomial co-efficients tends toward a normal probability curve as the power of the binomial
ap-
proachesinfinity.
If
the three-dimensional cafie is studied, an analogous result is found; the shape of the initial curves is a little different but, inthe
end, the normal probability curve is once more obtained(Fig. 5).
In Fig. 3,
the axis of the cone passes through the tops of the hell-shaped curves and corresponds to the m e a n trajectory, as considered in the usual theories of the subject. The edges of the cone, inclined at30 to the axis, correspond to zero concentration.
Along
a straight h e drawn through the peak of the cone, the concentration falls off inversely as the square of the distance away from the summit;
in
the two-dimensional case, the falling- offin
Concentration is inversely pro- portional to this distance.“O‘
’ 0 ’ 0
4 0 3 0 3 0 ’
0 4 0 “ 0 4 0 4
1
i050400i005
0 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 5 ~0’
G ( ) II
*0702103~03502~0701
“80“~~”o”o’”o”o‘
m e a n flow trajectories are curved; it is possible to determine surfaces, which w e shall call horns of diffusion, which are similar to the cones described above but which follow the curved trajectories. It
will
then be seen that the limits of the diffusing liquid make a n angle of about 30 with the n flow paths. Similarly, w e can define curvesin
emaking
certain angles with the m e a n paths in the sameway
as w e formerly considered straight lines issuing from the summit of a diffusion cone.In
particular,if
a given flow is convergent, with an angle of convergence greater than 60, the diffusion horn, after diverging to start with, m a y thereafter converge also, but less rapidly than the general flow;in
fact, the section of the horn would remain constant for a n angle of convergence of 60..