• Aucun résultat trouvé

What are landraces ? The case of sorghum in Duupa village (northern Cameroon)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "What are landraces ? The case of sorghum in Duupa village (northern Cameroon)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

What are landraces?

The case of sorghum in a Duupa village (northern Cameroon)

1. Objective

:

What are landraces ? Landraces result from an evolutionary processlinked both to farmers practicesand evolutionary forces. Previous studies have analysed the genetic diversity at a large scale but this does not allow for the study of interactions between farmers practices and evolutionary forces. Here we present the study of the organization of genetic diversity of sorghum landraces within a traditional agrosystemin a single village.

Sorghum bicolor

ssp

bicolor

Farmers practices

What results for the genetic

diversity and the genetic

structure of landraces ?

Adeline Barnaud*, Eric de Garine**, Monique Deu***, Doyle McKey*, Hélène I. Joly*

* UPR 67 CIRAD Gestion des ressources génétiques et dynamiques sociales, et UMR CNRS 5175 CEFE (Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive), 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier **UMR 7535, Laboratoire d'ethnologie et de sociologie comparative, 21 allée de l’université, 92023 Nanterre

***UMR 1096- PIA, CIRAD, TA 40/03, Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Evolutionary forces

• Selection • Drift • Mutation

• Seed exchange : at many social occasions • Sowing practices : landraces mixed in a

common bowl before sowing

Selection of panicle : at harvesting and threshing time

3.

Materiel and methods :

Plant material and microsatellite markers :

21 landraces(numbered L1 to L21) defined by farmers and belonging to different races genotyped for 14 microsatellite loci.

Analyses of diversity and population structure :

• Number of alleles, observed heterozygosity, gene diversity • Fis, AMOVA, AFTD(factorial analysis based on matrix distance)

• Wind-pollinated annual crop

• Selfing crop: up to 30% of outcrossing for

guinea race

• Taxonomy : 5 races: caudatum,durra,kafir

bicolor, and guinea and 10 intermediates

5. Conclusion :

Despite the great morphological diversity of the 21 landraces analyzed, our results show four

major clusters based on genetic data. This suggests that despite large gene flow, farmers

maintained morphological identity of landraces by selection.

2. Introduction :

Our study was conducted in the village of Wantéamong the Duupa farmersin subsahelian northern Cameroon. Sorghum cultivation is central to Duupa agriculture and society. Farmers cultivated 46 landracesover the village with an average of 12 landraces per field. Landraces present large morphological and taxonomic diversity and variable uses. Farmers have dynamic practices : they frequently change the location of their fields and they choose which landraces they will cultivate.

• On average Expected heterozygosity is 0.32, and ranges from 0.30 (L16) to 0.47 (L21)

• 21% of the alleles are private alleles, number of private alleles ranges from 0 to 5 (L1) • Fis values vary broadly from 0.53 to 0.85 [0.53 < Fis < 0.66 (L15, L16, L20, L21) ;

Fis > 0.70 (L8, L9, L10, L12, L13, L14)]

• 4 clusters:

• 35% of the variation is among clusters and 44% within landraces AFTD based on 14 SSRs among sorghum plants. Individuals are

identified by the number of their landraces and by their race (G: guinea, C: caudatum, D: durra, K: kafir, B: bicolor)

4.

Results & Discussion

1. 2 landraces: yatta (L18) and see goorya (L15) 2. Intermediates of durra and kafir landraces

3. Guinea landracesmainly with white seed 4. Guinea landracesmainly with red seed

Great genetic diversity

The level of selfing exhibits great variation among landraces

.1 .2 .25 .1 .05 -.05 -.1 7 _ 7 _ 7 _ 7 _ 7 _ 7 _ 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 8 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 9 G 1 KD 1 KD 1 KD 1 KD 1 KD 1 KD 1 KD 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 10 G 11 KD 11 KD 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 2 GC 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 12 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 13 G 14 GC 14 GC14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC 14 GC14 GC 15 BD15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD 15 BD15 BD15 BD 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 16 GC16 GC 16 GC 16 GC 17 G 17 G17 G17 G 17 G17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 17 G 4 C 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC18 DC18 DC18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC 18 DC18 DC 19 DC 19 DC 19 DC 19 DC 19 DC 19 DC 19 DC19 DC 19 DC 19 DC 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 20 D? 5 GC 5 GC5 GC 6 KDC 6 KDC 6 KDC 6 KDC 6 KDC 6 KDC

Diversitas Open Science Conference, 2005/11/09-12, Oaxaca, Mexique.

Références

Documents relatifs

environmental heterogeneity. The extent of intra-varietal variability differs considerably between varieties for the same trait. Axis 1 was correlated with the cycle length

The first sensory criteria of variability of cooked fonio grain were the visual characteristics (mainly colour and impurities).. They appeared as impor- tant criteria

Our results indicate that, in terms of absolute poverty and equity, tree crop smallholders’ situation was particularly worrying for a sector that was supposed to be

The kind of plant exchanged is not the only feature to explain the diversity of networks; preexisting social ties between partners as well as the cultural

of the party who makes the first price proposal (buyer or seller) and the possibility of bargaining (the ‘take it or leave it’ price or a negotiable price).  The distribution

Putting aside this situation which is unfavourable to the producer (i.e. if the price becomes negotiable or if the buyer is no longer informed on the producer’s reservation price),

In 2005, we started building up an electronic database of coffee genetic resources conserved at the Jimma Agricultural Research Centre (JARC), which is in charge of coffee research

Using molecular markers non-landrace entries showed the same polymorphism as landraces, with the majority of the AFPLP marker variation (89.9%) residing within accessions of