A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
J OÃO B. P ROLLA
Weighted approximation and slice products of modules of continuous functions
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 3
esérie, tome 26, n
o2 (1972), p. 563-571
<
http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1972_3_26_2_563_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1972, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (
http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (
http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
OF MODULES OF CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS by JOÃO
B. PROLLA1. Introduction.
If .E is a
completely regular
Hausdorff space and V is a directed fa-mily
ofnon-negative
upper semicontinuous functionson E,
the Nachbinspace
OV 00 (E)
is the set of all continuous scalar-valued mapsf
defined on.~ such that
vf
vanishes atinfinity
for every v EV, equipped
with the lo-cally
convextopology
determinedby
theseminorms j.’-+
supv (x) f (x) I
;X E E)
forfEOVoo(E).
If 31 is a subset of thealgebra C (E)
of all conti-nuous scalar-valued maps defined
on E,
a vectorsubspace
W e issaid to be an if
mf E
W for every 1n and Theweighted approximation problem
for M-modules consists indescribing
the closure in of such llTmodales. Westudy
thisproblem
in the case M is itselfa
being
thesubalgebra
of0 (E)
of all continuous and bounded scalar-valued maps on .~. Our main results are Theorem 2.2 for the moregeneral
Nachbin spaces of cross sections and Theorem 2.8 for thecase of scalar-valued functions. In Section 3 we
apply
this tostudy
sliceproducts
of modules.2. Closure of Modules.
Let be
completely regular
Hausdorff space and MeC (E)
aCb (E)-
module. In all that
follows,
thefollowing lemma,
due toNachbin, plays
acapital
role. This lemma was the main tool for theproof
of Nachbin,sweighted
Dieudonné theorem fordensity
in tensorproducts. (See
Nachbin[5], § 23,
Lemma2).
--- ____
Pervenuto alla Redazione il 31 Maggio 1971.
564
2.1. LEMMA. Let be a
compact
subset suchthat, for
every t EK,
M
for
which g(t) =F Ai
c E(i
=1, 2,
...,n)
an opencovering of K,
there are gi E M such that gi = o outsideAi
andgi
0 on E(a - l, 2,
...,n), I gi
-1 on K and Z 1 oil -E.Let
(E, E))
be a vectorfibration,
i. e. for each x EE, h’x
is areal
(resp. complex)
vector space, and letx E E)
be a Nachbinspace
of
crosssections,
with itsweighted topology Wv
determinedby
thedirected
family
ofweights
V(see [6]
fordefinitions).
The vector space of allcross-sections
is a module overM,
under thefollowing multiplication operation:
iff = ( f (x) ; x E .~ )
is a cross-section and thengj
is thecross-section
(g (x) f (x) ; x E E).
Given afamily
V ofweights,
we shall con-sider each
Fx equipped
with thetopology
determinedby
thefamilly
of se-minorms V
(x)
=j (y ;
v EV}.
2.2. THEOREM. Let be a vector
stibspace
which is a sitbmoditleover ll and suppose such that
for
evei-y x E Efor
u’hich 2U(x) #
0f0T
E
~~,
there is g E such that g(x) ~
0. Across-section f°E belongs
to tdae closure
oj W if,
a,ndonly if, f (x) belongs
to the closureof W (x)
infor
each x E E.PROOF. : The condition is
obviously
necessary.Conversely,
be such that
j" (X) belongs
to the closure ofTV (x)
ir~ for each xEE.Jael v E F and s
> 0
begiven.
Then K ----~x
EE ; v (.v) [ f (x)] ~ ej
is acompact
subset of E. For each t E
K,
there is a wt E T~ such that v(t) [ f (t)
- wt(t)]
e.Since t E
K, wt (t) #
0. Hence there isgt E
M such thatgt (t) =t=
0. Notice thatthe
mapping
x(x) [ f (x)
- tvt(x)]
is uppersemicontinuous. Therefore,
anopen
neighborhood
of t can be found such that for x EUt
we havev
(x) [ f (x)
- wt(x)l
8.By compactness
ofK,
there aret1 ~ ... , tn
E K suchthat
Ai == Uti (i
=1, 2,
...,it)
form an opencovering
of 2T.By
Lemma2.1,
there are gi E M such
that gi
= 0 outside ofA.i
and gi~> 0
on E(i = 1,~,..., 1 it),
=1 on .~ 1 on .~. Let
hi
=(i = l, 2, ... ,
We claimthat
for all x E E.
Indeed,
if x EK,
thenand
(I)
follows from valid for E E andthen
and
(1)
follows from gi(x)
v(x) [hi (x)]
-::::~-- gi(x)
28 valid for all x E E and i ==1, 2, ... ,
7 it.Since Z
gihi belongs
to cW,
it follows from(1)
thatf belongs
to the closure of W.2.3. COROLLARY. Under the
hypothesis of 2.2,
suppose thatTV (x)
is dense inFz for
each x E E. Then W ~is dense inLet V
>
0 be a directedfamily
ofweights
on E in the sense of Nach-bin
[5],
and let F be alocally
convex Hausdorff space.By considering
thevector
fibrationFa;
=F,
for all x EE,
Theorem 2.2implies
thefollowing.
2.4. THEOREM. Let W c 0
Vm (E; F)
be a vectorsubspaces
which is anccnd suppose M is such that
for
every x E Efor
which w(x) ~
0jor
some iv ETiT,
there is sucla that 9(x) ~
0. Afunction f E
CF)
to tlae closure
of
Wif,
andonly if, for
every x E E the vectorf (x)
is in the closure
of W (x)
in F.2.5. COROLIJARY. Let be a vector
subspace
which is anM and suppose M is such that
for
every x E Efor
which w(x) #
0for
some w E W there is such thatg (x) ~
0.If
W is dense inOV 00 (E),
then
WQ9F
is dense inparticular,
is densein
PROOF : It is clear that W
Q9
~’ is an M-module and that thepair
l~and
W Q9
~’satisfy
thehypothesis
of Theorein 2.4. f,et nowf
E CY~ (E; F)
and x E E. 0 and p a continuous seminorm on ~’ be
given.
If(x))
=0,
there isnothing
to prove. If p( f (x)) # 0,
choose g~ E .~’ suchthat p ( f (x))
= 1. Then t I--~ g(t)
= cp( f (t))
defined on Ebelongs
to0 V 00 (.E).
Choose v E V such that w
(x) >
0and ð >
0 such that6p ( f (x))
8.By hypothesis
there is some E ~~ such that~‘’ (x) belongs
to the closure of( yV ~ F ~ (x)
in F andby
Theorem 2.4 it l’ollowsthat f belongs
to the closure of WQ9
F. To prove the last asser-tion,
consider M =:Cb (E)
and W =(E).
2.6. COROLLARY.
If -lfl 18 locally
then~~ ~’
is dense in566
PROOF: If E is
locally compact,
denotes the vectorsubspace
of all those
f E C (E )
which havecompact support. 9l (E)
is an ideal inhence a is dense in
by Propo-
sition
2, § 22,
Nachbin[5], taking
M = inCorollary 2.5,
itfollows that is dense in
2.7. REMARK. A more
general
result than the aboveCorollary
2.6 canbe obtained. Let W and be as in Theorem 2.4. Let
== f E
f =
99F’,
w EW),
and supposef (D
ybelongs
to W foreach f E Wo
and
y E F.
IfWo
is dense inC ~~ (E ),
then W is dense inC V~~, (.E ; .~).
Indeed,
the linear spanWs
ofWo
is dense in andby
thehypothesis made,
andCorollary
2.5 thenimplies
that W is dense.If
W = ~ (~ ) ~ lf’,
then and we obtainCorollary
2.6.We also remark that Theorem 2.4
generalizes
Theorem7, §
7 of BierstedtTo see this take M = and notice that M is dense in
OV 00 (E).
The last statement ofCorollary
2.5 wasproved
in Prolla[7] by
a different method
(see Corollary 3.2, [7]).
2.8. THEOREM. Let F
== K (If
=R or C)
and let W be as in Theoreem2.4..~e~
for
allw E Wj. belongs
to the closure
of
Wify
andonly if, f
vanishes onNw.
PROOF : i The condition is
obviously
necessary. vanishon Let x E E be
given.
If thenobviously f (x)
E W(x).
If~ 0,
thenx ~ M wand
there exists w E fV such that w(x) 4=
0. Considerg =
(.v))
w E W.(x),
i. e.f (x)
E W(x). By
Theorem2.4, f belongs
to the closure of W in2.9. REMARK. In many instances M and
} satisfy
thefollowing properties: (1)
for eachx E E,
there is such thatg (x) ~ 0 ; (2) given
a E E a closed subset not
containing a,
there issuch that
f (a) ~
0 andf (x)
= 0 for all x E X.2.10. THEOREM. Let M and
satisfy
conditions(1)
and~2) of
Remark 2.9. Then
for
every closed M-module(E)
there is aunique
closed subset such that W =
{ f E (~ ) ; f (x)
= 0f or
all x EPROOF: Let
w (x) == 0
for all w EW).
Since W isclosed,
Theorem 2.8
implies
thatW = ( f E C ~~ (E ) ; f (x) = 0
for all Letbe any other closed subset of E such that
j(x) = 0
for allx E N I - Obviously, Suppose
that the inclusion isproper; i. e. there exists a E
NW
suchthat a ~
N.By
condition(2)
of Re-mark
2.9,
there such and = 0 for alli. e.
f ~ W and f
vanishes onN, a
contradiction HenceN = N w .
The above
Theorems,
2.8 and2.10, provide
a one-to-onecorrespondence
between the closed ideals of several
algebras
of continuous functions and the closed subsets of.E,
when .E islocally compact.
Indeed letAi = C (E)
with the
compact-open topology, A2 == Ob (E)
with the stricttopology # (see
Buck
[3]) ;
andA3
==Coo (E)
with the uniformtopology.
Let ~T c:Ai (i === 1, 2, 3)
be a closed ideal. Then there exists a
unique
closed subset NC E such thatI = ~
= 0 for allI (i == 1, 2, 3). Indeed,
(i ~ 19 2, 3),
where1~~
is the set of all characteristic functions ofcompact
subsets ofE; V,
=Clj (E);
and~3
~ where v(x)
= 1 for all x E E.Then
Vi > 0 (i =: 1, 2, 3)
and toapply
Theorem2.10,
considerM = 9( (E),
the set of all continuous functions on .~ with
compact support.
Suppose
nowthat LV 00
is an M-module itself and that for any x E E there isa g E
M suchthat g (x) ~
0.2.1 ~. THEOREM. Let be a proper closed There exists a closed M-submodule
of
codimension one in which contains lVand,
moreover, W is the intersectionof
all suchPROOF : Let
f E L V 00
be outside of W. Since W isclosed,
there existsby
Theorem 2.2 somepoint
such thatf (x)
does notbelong
to theclosure of
W (x)
inBy
the Hahn-Banach theorem there exists a linear functional q E suchthat qJ ( f (x)) # 0, while 99 (w (x))
= 0 for all w E W.Let
9K = (g
EL Y~ ; g~ (g (x))
=0;.
Themapping 6x ff 1-+f (x)] ]
fromLV 00
into is
obviously
continuous. Hencebeing
the kernel of y o y isa closed linear
subspace
of codimension one in such that W e while It remains to prove thatem
is an M-module. Let9 E Cfll
andm E
fl5.
Since .L is an = nig E LT~~ .
On the other hand g(h (x))
= cp(m (x) g (x))
= 1U(x) 99 (g (x))
= 0. Hence hE9X,
which ends theproof.
2.12. THEOREM.
Suppose
that C(E ; F)
is an M-module and let W CF)
be a _proper closed There exists a closed moduleof
codimenszon one inCV, (E; .F)
which containsWand,
moreover,W is the intersection
of
all such submodules.PROOF : Theorein 2.12 follows from Theorem 2.4 in the same manner as Theorem 2.11 follows from Theorem 2.2. The
continuity
of for eachx E
E, being
now a consequence of theassumption V >
0.568
3.
Slice Products.
Let F), i
=1, 2,
..., n, be Nachbin spaces of F-valued fun- ctions withVi > 0,
i=1, 2,
... , n, where F is alocally
couvex Hausdorffspace. Let P~ denote the set of maps
(xi , ... , Xn)
E E1--+
(xl)
Vn(xn)
for each choice of vi EVi,
i= 1, 2,...,
n. IfWi
C( C Vi)oo (.E~, ; F) (i
=1~ 2,
... are vectorsubspaces,
the slicepi-oduct T~1
# ... #Wn
is thevector
subspace oi all/6 I~’ )
such that themapping
1-+f (aft,
...... , a~_1. ... ,
an) belongs
toWi
for each choiceof aj
EEj (,j =}== i),
i
= 1, 2,
... , n. It is clearthat,
if eachWi
is anmodule,
whereMi
c:is a
Cb (Ei) - module,
then # ... #lvn
is an .~1module,
where M =Mi
# ......~7~.
If eachpair
andsatisfy
thehypothesis
of Theorem2.4,
then for every x E E for which w
(x) =~
0 for some w E # ... # y thereis g E such
that g (x) # 0,
i. e., if andWi
#... #satisfy
thehypothesis
of Theorem 2.4 too. From now on we shall assume that all
pairs
andWi, i =1, 2,
... , n,satisfy
thehypothesis
of Theorem 2.4.3.1.
~i
#... #Wn
==... , an)
E ~7. Theclosure in F
of W (a) is equal
to the intersectionof
the closures in Fof
~-=~-e~,...~~2.
PROOF : Let z E ~
belong
to the closure of ~(a).
Given e>
0and jp
a continnous seminorm on .F’ there exists w E 1iT such that
p (z
- w(ac))
8.The
Ei -+ wi (xi)
= w~(~~ ~
* I I , ai-l , xi , ... ,an) belongs
toWi
and= ’W
(a),
for all i= ~, 2,...,
n. Hence zbelongs
to the closure ofz
belongs
to the closure ofB7i (ai)
for all i =1, 2,
..., n.conversely,
letz ~ W (a). By
the Hahn-BanachTheorem,
thereis 99 E F’
such that for all w E
W.
If for some~(1~2~...~)~
I~i (a~i)
== 0 there isnothing
to prove, since then(wi (ai))
= 0 for all Ewhjie g (z) ~ 0, so z ~ Wi (ai).
Assume thatWi (a,i) #
0 for all i ~1, 2,
..., 7aand choose w2 E
-Wi
such thatwz (ai) ~. ~, i =-1, ~, ... , n.
Now let~jl~2,...~}
and
t E Wi (ai),
where Thent --- w (~),
where w =Hence (p (t)
- 0 for all t EWi
while g
~
0. Thereforez g Wi
3.2. COROLLARY. The closure
of
l.. # W~z .
PROOF : This follows from
Proposition
3.1 combined with Theorem 2.4.It is clear that
T~1 Q9
... is contained in~~1 ~ ... ~ Wn,
whenIf A is a set of vector - or scalar - va-
lued maps defined on a set
X,
let us denote for allf E A~
by Z (A).
Thehypothesis
of Theorem 2.4 now reads3.3. PROPOSITION.
3.4. THEOREM. The tensor
products
dense in 1PROOF : Let and , It is clear
that W is an
M- module,
whileProposition
3.3implies
thatsince
by hypothesis Z
c Z =1,..., n.
Letf E W, 0... # By Proposition
3.3(ii), f
vanishes on andtherefore by
Theorem2.8, f’
belongs
to the closure ofW1 ~ .,. @ W",.
3.5. THEOREM.
PROOF: We first remark that the slice
product ( C Y~;~ (~1 ) # ...
... is a
Cb (E)-module.
0V 00 (E)
and(a, ,
..., E.It follows from Lemma
1, § 23,
Nachbin[5]~
that the map xiE .E2
1-+... , ... ,
an) belongs
to( C
for each i ==1, 2,...,
n.If
(ai ~ ... , a~) E ~ ( 1~ ),
then Z for some i =1, 2,
... , n,by Proposition 3.3,
and therefore ... ,an)
~ o.By
Theorem 2.8 it followsthat
f belongs
to the closnre ofnr,
which is closedby Corollary
3.2.570
3.6. COROLLARY.
(
3.7. REMARK. For each i
= 1, 2,
... , n let Pi be the map defined on E whose value at a =:(at ,
... ,an)
is the map xi EEi
I--~ ... , x, , ai+l , ...... ,
an).
If X is a set of ma,ps on .E with values in a vector spaceF,
wedenote
by Xi
the linear span of the set of maps of the formf
oPi (a),
when
f E
X and a C E. It follows that if C C(E)
is aCb (E)-module,
thenC= 0
(E;)
is aCb
for each i=1, 2,
... , n. Also if W c CV,, (.~ ~,
then
Wi c ( C (Ei).
3.8. W e be an M-module.
If for
eachi -z= 1, 27 ..., n, (1) Wi
is an(2)
CZ ( Wi) ;
then
Wi Q9
...Q9 Wn
is dense in W.PROOF : It is clear that W is contained in
W, 0 ...
#Wn,
so the con-clusion follows from Theorem 3.4. Notice that
hypotheses (1)
and(2)
aresatisfied if
(~).
Notice also thatWi Q9 ... Q9 Wn
consists of all finitesums of functions of the form
)
where W and3.9. REMARK.
Corollary
3.6 is Nachbin’sweighted
Dieudonn6 theoremfor
density
in tensorproducts.
Ourproof
of Theorem2.2,
hence of Theo-rem
2.8,
is modeled on Nachbin’sproof
ofCorollary
3.6. For furtherproperties
of sliceproducts
ofsubspaces
ofweighted
spaces seeBierstedt
[1],
pp. 77 78. For sliceproducts
of functionalgebras,
see Birtel[2]
andEifler
[4].
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]
K. - D. BIERSTEDT, Gewichtete Räume Stetiger Vektor-wertiger Funktionen und das Injektive Tensorprodukt, Doctoral Dissertation, JohannesGutenberg
University, Mainz, 1970.[2]
F. T. BIRTEL, Slice algebras of bounded analytic functions, Math. Scand. 21 (1967), 54-60.[3]
R. C. BUCK, Bounded continuous functions on a locally compact space,Michigan
Math. J.5
(1958),
95-104.[4]
L. EIFLFR, The slice product of function algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 23(1969),
559-564.
[5]
L.NACHBIN,
Elements of Approximation Theory, D. van Nostrand Co.,Princeton,
1967.[6]
L. NACHBIN, S. MACHADO, and J. B. PROLLA, Weighted approximatiou, vector fibrationsand algebras of operators, J. Math. pures et appl. 50 (1971), 299-323.
[7]
J. B. PROLLA, The weighted Dieudonné theorem for density in tensor products, Indag. Math.33 (1971), 170-175.