• Aucun résultat trouvé

The Internet of the future: What could it be

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The Internet of the future: What could it be"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Daniel Kofman

Prof. at Telecom ParisTech CTO – RAD Data Communications

1st Japan EU Symposium on the "New Generation Network" and the "Future of the Internet"

BRUSSELS - June 9th, 2008

The Internet of the future: What could it be

and what are the challenges

(2)

From Internet towards Multiservice IP networks

First generation, before 1992

Research network, “nice” users (no major security issues)

Telnet, Email, File Transfer, no stringent QoS constraints

Low traffic, low number of users, low socio-economic impact

Second generation, the ’90s

Commercial services, ISPs – business stakes

Web and basic peer-to-peer

Traffic and number of networks explosion

Mainly Best Effort approach and simple engineering rules

Main issue: capacity (transmission and addressing)

(3)

From Internet towards Multiservice IP networks

Third generation: today

Triple play, Quad play

• Internet access, Telephony, IPTV, Mobile convergence,…

• Fix and mobile broadband connectivity increasing fast

1 Billion broadband mobile users by 2011

Service overlays

• Skype,…

Multimedia digital content and end user empowerment

• YouTube, Daily Motion, Facebook, MySpace…

Coexistence of two models

• NGI, NGN

• The question of neutrality

The Internet plays today a major socio-economic role

It was not designed, for witch it was not designed for.

(4)

Third generation, from now on: Services evolution and global convergence

Network and services ubiquity

• Personalized services

• Location and Context Awareness

• Services composition, services networking (new BM, new SLAs)

Global Mobility

Services Mobility across terminals, technologies and administrative domains

Vertical Handover, Always Best Connected

Any terminal is your terminal (bio identification, ...)

Community services, spontaneous and opportunistic networking

Random Connectivity may behave as permanent connectivity depending on the density of communicating devices

Last mile under the control of the end users?

The Future Networked Society

(5)

Multi-Network Services

Multiple services agnostic to the diversity of access technologies

Ensure networks and services ubiquity WiMAX

WiFi

FTTx ngSDH/Ethernet

DWDM IP/(G)MPLS Core

Ethernet xDSL Transport

Cellular 2G, 3GLTE DVB-H

Ad-Hoc WSN

Vehicular

Services Ubiquity and

Global Mobility

(6)

Third generation, from now on: Services evolution and global convergence

Network and services ubiquity

• Personalized services

• Location and Context Awareness

• Services composition, services networking

Global Mobility

Services Mobility across terminals, technologies and administrative domains

Vertical Handover, Always Best Connected

Any terminal is your terminal (bio identification, ...)

Community services, spontaneous and opportunistic networking

Last mile under the control of the end users? (Mesh, Ad-hoc, etc)

Random Connectivity may behave as permanent connectivity depending on the density of communicating devices

The Future Networked Society

(7)

The Future Networked Society

Third generation, from now on: Services evolution and global convergence

Merging the real/physical and digital worlds

• Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and Actuators

• Augmented reality, Virtual reality environments (3D Internet)

• Network transparency

Machine to machine and ambient intelligence

Beyond RFIDs

Towards the Internet of things

Providing integrated experience

Autonomous Networking, Cognitive networks and self management, etc.

Mastering the complexity

(8)

Third generation, from now on: Services evolution and global convergence

Network Virtualization and Programmability

• Service and application enablers move into the network

Storage, caching, transcoding, etc,

• Application awareness, Semantic routing

from nice to have functionality towards a networking paradigm that may challenge the supremacy of IP networking

Home networking: beyond “just” networking

• Convergence of: Communication, Information, Entertainment, Home automation and Persons and goods security

Infrastructure services: virtualization (beyond VPNs), services overlays, etc.

Support new business processes and new business models between operators, service providers and other players.

The Future Networked Society

(9)

New requirements for the network of the future

Well adapted to the explosion of the number and diversity of connected devices

From hundreds of millions of wired devices towards tens of billions of wireless devices (trillions?)

Urbanization: granularity (nano robots) + extension (planetary networks)

An architecture that deals natively with mobility and infrastructure less systems

Contribute to ABC solutions, deals with networks of variable topology, with large terminals and technology heterogeneity

The core concepts of the Internet architecture are challenged : Addressing and routing

Addressing capacity and structure, Separation of identification and location, New routing paradigms

Identification management

A large diversity of entities to identify: devices, applications, things, programs, ...

(10)

Security and privacy in the network of the future (Michel Riguidel)

New threats, examples

Computers talking each other never killed a man, what will happen once the physical and digital worlds will be merged?

What are the consequences of the mass of Mips that will be available to any citizen?

New security technologies and architectures

Requirement for a joint protection of a large diversity of heterogeneous technologies, a “system approach” is required.

Signatures: how can they be guaranteed over long time periods (a contract may be for 99 years, digital signatures are not well suited for such large time scales)

Does cryptography scale to the capacity of the networks of the future?

Who are the major defenders of privacy?

Identity management, accountability, responsibility (persons, objects,

“virtual entities”), protection of private sphere

Contribute to the global privacysecurity/trust/ architecture

Allow for a configurable trade off between security and privacy

In a very dynamic environment Page 10

New requirements for the network of the future

(11)

New requirements for the network of the future

Easy to use, cheap to operate: Self configuration and self organization

Dependability: Provide various levels of robustness, including those required for critical services

Transparency: Contribute to QoS provisioning, merged with the physical world

Efficient transport: Resources virtualization, Facilitate

multicast (e.g. for IPTV), Evolved traffic engineering and

traffic control

(12)

New requirements for the network of the future

Flexible to deal with the increase of capacity of devices interfaces and access networks

Introduce new networking paradigms: challenged networks (delay tolerant networks, disruption tolerant networks, etc.), coding networks, quantic networks, etc…

Designed considering socio-economical issues related with

governance, neutrality, privacy, security, IPRs, spam, viruses,

advertisement, …

(13)

Internet of the Future, Overview

Evolution of present Internet core and convergent access

The Internet of “networking capable” edge devices

The Internet of WSNs, actuators, things

The “basic” overlays, virtualization and programmability

Service enablers

Session stratum and other control facilities

Joint network/overlay design

• Additional functionality moving into the network

(14)

Challenges Overview

Technical

Technologies

High capacity, efficient, flexible and cognitive radio

Flexible and reconfigurable optical networking (e.g. OFS)

Energy provisioning and consumption

E.g. MIT chips operating at 0.3 volts..., targeting devices powered by “ambient energy”

Miniaturization (nano technologies)

Interfacing with the living world (biotechnologies)

Network and Service Architectures

Global convergence

Network transparency

Services evolutionarily

Dependability, security, trust, privacy

Cross-stratum, cross-layer, cross-technology, cross-terminal, cross-generation design

New networking paradigms

Evolutionary vs. Disruptive; Right question?

(15)

Challenges overview

Technical

Experimental platforms for

Removing any imitation in future networks design

Allowing end users to keep contributing on services and applications innovation

Indeed, Future Internet Services may be Designed by End Users

It happened in the past: web, chat, peer-to-peer, social networks, etc.

It was possible because the Internet was available and open

Extrapolation: if new network solutions based on new

technologies are made available, new services and usages will emerge

Let’s design and prototype the future Internet, integrating the previously cited concepts and being flexible for future evolutions

(16)

Challenges overview

Economical

Which pertinent markets?

See Google

New business models

Active role of end users

Content, Infrastructure-less communications, Last hop

Added value corporate services

Political

Governance, Regulation, ...

Promote innovation

Promote productive collaboration between the industry and academic worlds

Promote the required synergies between public and private investments in R&D

(17)

To conclude

A strategic domain

Core of the future networked society

With a very strong international competition

And a pertinent market that is broadening

Requiring advance multidisciplinary research and innovation

To maintain a leadership

With a strong requirement of international collaboration

• Being a leading voice in the international arena

Euro-NGI/NF: a set of research projects, a think tank and a

set of tools to contribute developing a leadership, creating

synergies and developing international collaboration.

(18)

Thank you for your attention

Discussion

Questions

Références

Documents relatifs

security mechanisms to the Internet of Things and developing solutions aiming at making Persons ubiquitous by sharing their identity, our work consists in defining a device identity

In this paper, we investigate the mean bit rate obtained by a data transfer when elastic traffic and unresponsive streaming flows are multiplexed on a same transmission link.. Along

”A good idea is not always a good idea.” Nevertheless, the IETF is very careful not to bypass any innovative idea, and manages to this end a parallel forum, called the Internet

surplus associated to the provision of the final good is shared across the two countries; in each country, an infrastructure manager is in charge of determining the levels of

In a more specific mean- ing a Boolean category should provide the abstract algebraic structure underlying the proofs in Boolean Logic, in the same sense as a Carte- sian

Any user looses his/her right to use computer resources and Internet service at GATE Lyon St-Etienne when his/her status as a GATE Lyon St-Etienne member expires in the case of an

Within the framework of the current level of IT monitoring system development, the data volume in MCC JSC Russian Railways is 11 terabytes, and this value

While MANGO contributed a gamification design based on the theoretical framework for the gamification of e-participation by Hassan (2017) and has additionally, theoretically