• Aucun résultat trouvé

Overview and rationale Indicator 23. Number and geographic distribution of NGOs, public and private bodies, and private persons involved by the Committee in an advisory or consultative capacity Assessmen t factors

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Overview and rationale Indicator 23. Number and geographic distribution of NGOs, public and private bodies, and private persons involved by the Committee in an advisory or consultative capacity Assessmen t factors"

Copied!
2
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

Overview and rationale

Indicator 23. Number and geographic distribution of NGOs, public and private bodies, and private persons involved by the Committee in an advisory or consultative capacity

Assessmen t factors

This indicator is assessed on the basis of three global-level factors monitored and reported by the Secretariat:

23.1 Number of NGOs accredited to provide advisory services, their geographic distribution and their representation of different domains.

Article 9 OD 93 23.2 Percentage of accredited NGOs that participate in the sessions

and working groups of the Convention’s governing bodies, and

their geographic distribution. OD 96

23.3 Number of occasions and activities in which accredited NGOs are involved by the Committee for consultative purposes, beyond the evaluation mechanisms.

Article 8 OD 96 Relation

with SDGs and other indicators

Sustainable Development Goals: The present indicator directly supports SDG Target 17.17, ‘encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships…’ and potentially contributes to SDG Target 16.7 ‘ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels.’ By contributing to the governance of the Convention, it responds to SDG Target 11.4, ‘strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage.’

Relation to other indicators: Several other indicators address the contributions of non-governmental organizations at the country level: Indicator 4 (capacity building), Indicator 8 (inventorying), Indicator 21 (safeguarding of ICH in general and of specific elements) and Indicator 22 (country-level monitoring), the present indicator focuses on the extent to which the Committee avails itself of the knowledge and experience of non-governmental organizations and others, acting in an advisory or consultative capacity.

Rationale for action

Article 9 lays out a process for the ‘accreditation of nongovernmental organizations with recognized competence in the field of the intangible cultural heritage to act in an advisory capacity to the Committee,’ while Article 8.4 authorizes the Committee to invite such non-governmental organizations to its meetings, together with other ‘public and private bodies, as well as private persons…in order to consult them on specific matters.’ In addition to their specified role in the work of the Evaluation Body charged with evaluating nominations, proposals, requests and reports (OD 96), non-governmental organizations and others may thus be charged by the Committee to provide such consultative or advisory services.

Key terms  NGOs

 Domains of ICH

Specific guidance on monitoring and periodic reporting

Benefits of

monitoring

Monitoring this indicator at the global level helps to inform the Committee whether it is benefitting as fully as possible from the advisory and consultative services potentially offered by non-governmental organizations, public and private bodies, and private persons. Moreover, global-level monitoring can assess whether the

1

(2)

various regions of the world are well-reflected among the non-governmental organizations accredited to the Committee, whether they adequately represent the different domains of ICH, and whether the Committee might wish to undertake initiatives to increase the representation of those regions or domains that might be under-represented.

Data sources and collection

This indicator is monitored at the global level by the Secretariat, which maintains a database with detailed information about all of the non-governmental organizations accredited to provide advisory services to the Committee, including their country of domicile and the scope of their activities. The Secretariat also maintains information about the participation of such non-governmental organizations in the sessions and working groups of the Committee and General Assembly, as well as the occasions on which the Committee avails itself of their consultative services.

Possible data sources

 Database maintained by the Secretariat

 Website and social media sites of the NGO Forum and other civil society networks involved in ICH

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( DOCX - 2 Page - 33.45 KB )

Documents relatifs

Overview and rationale Indicator 4. Extent to which both formal and non-formal education strengthen the transmission of ICH and promote respect for ICH Assessmen t factors

Programmes to train teachers and non-formal educators will typically be operated by teacher training institutions, with supervision from the Ministry of Higher Education,

Overview and rationale Indicator 7. Extent to which inventories reflect the diversity of ICH and contribute to safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Inventorying is primary among the obligations of each State Party, addressed in the requirement of Article 11(b) that a State Party ‘identify and define the various elements of the

Overview and rationale Indicator 9. Extent to which research and documentation, including scientific, technical and artistic studies, contribute to safeguarding Assessmen t factors

9.3 Practitioners and bearers of ICH participate in the management, implementation and dissemination of research findings and scientific, technical and artistic studies, all done

Overview and rationale Indicator 10. Extent to which research findings and documentation are accessible and are utilized to strengthen policy-making and improve safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Research and documentation, as well as scientific, technical and artistic studies, are important resources that can inform policy-making, particularly by tracing

Overview and rationale Indicator 16. Extent to which the importance of safeguarding ICH is recognized through inclusive plans and programmes that foster self-respect and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

Monitoring can help a State to determine the extent to which its safeguarding plans and programmes are as fully inclusive as possible, and whether there may exist unintended barriers

Overview and rationale Indicator 17. Extent to which communities, groups and individuals participate widely in raising awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding Assessmen t factors

17.2 The free, prior, sustained and informed consent of communities, groups and individuals concerned is secured for conducting awareness-raising activities concerning

Overview and rationale Indicator 19. Extent to which public information measures raise awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding and promote understanding and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

Relation to other indicators: The present indicator looks at the content and purposes of awareness-raising and public information measures and their impacts. It

Overview and rationale Indicator 20. Extent to which programmes raising awareness of ICH respect the relevant ethical principles Assessmen t factors

Those principles are complemented by relevant ethical codes or standards developed by professional organizations and associations whose members are involved in