• Aucun résultat trouvé

Overview and rationale Indicator 16. Extent to which the importance of safeguarding ICH is recognized through inclusive plans and programmes that foster self-respect and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Overview and rationale Indicator 16. Extent to which the importance of safeguarding ICH is recognized through inclusive plans and programmes that foster self-respect and mutual respect Assessmen t factors"

Copied!
3
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

Overview and rationale

Indicator 16. Extent to which the importance of safeguarding ICH is recognized through inclusive plans and programmes that foster self-respect and mutual respect

Assessmen t factors

This indicator is assessed on the basis of two country-level factors monitored and reported by each State Party:

16.1 ICH safeguarding plans and programmes are inclusive of all sectors and strata of society, including but not limited to:

 indigenous peoples;

 groups with different ethnic identities;

 migrants, immigrants and refugees;

 people of different ages;

 people of different genders;

 persons with disabilities;

 members of vulnerable groups.

OD 100, OD 102, OD 174, OD 194 EP 1, EP 2, EP 4, EP 9, EP 10

16.2 Self-respect and mutual respect are fostered among

communities, groups and individuals through safeguarding plans and programmes for ICH in general and/or for specific elements of ICH, whether or not inscribed.

Article 1, Article 2, Article 14(a) OD 100, OD 107, OD 155

Relation with SDGs and other indicators

Sustainable Development Goals: Indicator 16 complements several SDG Targets, including Target 11.4 to ‘strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage’ and Target 11.3, ‘enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries.’

Moreover, it responds to SDG Target 5.5, which concerns ‘women’s full and effective participation’ in decision-making, and SDG Target 5.c, which calls for the ‘promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels.’ The same spirit of inclusiveness is embodied more broadly in SDG Target 10.2, which advocates ‘the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status’ and SDG Target 10.3, which seeks to ‘ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome’. Finally, SDG Target 10.7 refers to the need for

‘orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people’.

Relation to other indicators: This indicator is transversal, setting out general principles of inclusiveness and equality, and the overall goal of promoting self- respect and mutual respect – core values that underlie safeguarding plans and programmes regardless of their specific scope or focus. It thus complements Indicator 11, which also concerns safeguarding plans, whether for ICH in general or for specific elements of ICH. Additionally, it lays out guiding principles underlying Indicators 17-20, which refer specifically to programmes to raise awareness of the importance of ICH and its safeguarding, as well as Indicator 22 concerning monitoring of ICH safeguarding programmes.

1

(2)

Rationale for action

This indicator relates to the core principles of the Convention, as captured in the Ethical Principles for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage. The requirement of ‘mutual respect among communities, groups and individuals’ figures into the Convention’s definition of ICH (Article 2.1), and the Convention’s purpose to

‘ensure respect for the intangible cultural heritage of the communities, groups and individuals concerned’ (Article 1(b)) implies respect for those people as well as their ICH. The principles of inclusiveness and non-discrimination are fundamental values of the United Nations, as of UNESCO, and are reiterated in the Operational Directives and Ethical Principles. Article 15, in referring to the

‘widest possible participation of communities, groups and, where appropriate, individuals’ in ICH safeguarding and management, also embodies the value of inclusiveness.

Key terms  Inclusive/inclusively

 Sectors and strata of society

 Indigenous peoples

 Groups with different ethnic identities

 Migrants, immigrants and refugees

 People of different genders

 Persons with disabilities

 Vulnerable groups

 Communities, groups or, in some cases, individuals

 Elements of ICH

 Inscribed (whether or not inscribed)

Specific guidance on monitoring and periodic reporting

Benefits of

monitoring

Monitoring can help a State to determine the extent to which its safeguarding plans and programmes are as fully inclusive as possible, and whether there may exist unintended barriers or obstacles impeding the widest possible participation of communities, groups or individuals. Moreover, monitoring can help the State ascertain that its safeguarding activities are indeed contributing to self-respect and mutual respect, in line with the Convention. It can also help the State to identify cases where safeguarding plans and programmes may have an unintended and opposite effect. At the global level, monitoring of this indicator can help States to determine together if there are any systematic or unintended gaps in the Convention’s outreach and participation, and to be confident that it strengthens self-respect and mutual respect rather than in any way diminishing them.

Data sources and collection

As with Indicator 15, those responsible for monitoring and reporting may need to look into a broad range of data sources to identify concrete examples of how inclusiveness is ensured within ICH safeguarding plans and programmes. Periodic surveys among various actors in the field of safeguarding ICH, or reviews of media coverage and academic research, could also be important means of gathering data. A consultative body or coordination mechanism, if any, would also be an important source of information for this indicator.

Possible data sources

 Reports on the implementation of safeguarding plans for ICH elements

(3)

inscribed on either of the Convention’s lists, or on national lists

 Reports of NGOs, community associations, and other actors on their safeguarding plans and programmes

 Newsletters, bulletins or websites of professional associations or networks of researchers

 Media coverage of safeguarding plans and programmes

3

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( DOCX - 3 Page - 34.19 KB )

Documents relatifs

Overview and rationale Indicator 7. Extent to which inventories reflect the diversity of ICH and contribute to safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Inventorying is primary among the obligations of each State Party, addressed in the requirement of Article 11(b) that a State Party ‘identify and define the various elements of the

Overview and rationale Indicator 9. Extent to which research and documentation, including scientific, technical and artistic studies, contribute to safeguarding Assessmen t factors

9.3 Practitioners and bearers of ICH participate in the management, implementation and dissemination of research findings and scientific, technical and artistic studies, all done

Overview and rationale Indicator 10. Extent to which research findings and documentation are accessible and are utilized to strengthen policy-making and improve safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Research and documentation, as well as scientific, technical and artistic studies, are important resources that can inform policy-making, particularly by tracing

Overview and rationale Indicator 17. Extent to which communities, groups and individuals participate widely in raising awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding Assessmen t factors

17.2 The free, prior, sustained and informed consent of communities, groups and individuals concerned is secured for conducting awareness-raising activities concerning

Overview and rationale Indicator 19. Extent to which public information measures raise awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding and promote understanding and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

Relation to other indicators: The present indicator looks at the content and purposes of awareness-raising and public information measures and their impacts. It

Overview and rationale Indicator 20. Extent to which programmes raising awareness of ICH respect the relevant ethical principles Assessmen t factors

Those principles are complemented by relevant ethical codes or standards developed by professional organizations and associations whose members are involved in

Overview and rationale Indicator 21. Extent to which engagement for safeguarding ICH is enhanced among stakeholders Assessmen t factors

Its spirit of coordination among various actors involved in safeguarding – including communities, groups and individuals, non-governmental organizations and

Overview and rationale Indicator 22. Extent to which civil society contributes to monitoring of ICH safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Monitoring of this indicator turns the spotlight onto the monitoring process itself, and can help a State determine whether that process is benefitting from