• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fire suppression technologies : a burst of innovation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fire suppression technologies : a burst of innovation"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Canadian Consulting Engineer, 49, May 3, pp. 29-30, 2008-05-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Fire suppression technologies : a burst of innovation

Kim, A. K.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=f4af9c68-1527-4414-b9ce-dbe14f020ac4 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=f4af9c68-1527-4414-b9ce-dbe14f020ac4

(2)

http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

F i r e s u p p r e s s i o n t e c h n o l o g i e s : a b u r s t o f

i n n o v a t i o n

N R C C - 5 0 4 6 3

K i m , A . K .

A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans: Canadian Consulting Engineer, v. 49, no. 3, May 2008, pp. 29-30

The material in this document is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. For more information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/C-42

Les renseignements dans ce document sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, par les lois, les politiques et les règlements du Canada et des accords internationaux. Ces dispositions permettent d'identifier la source de l'information et, dans certains cas, d'interdire la copie de documents sans permission écrite. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements : http://lois.justice.gc.ca/fr/showtdm/cs/C-42

(3)

he phase-out of halon fire suppressants for environ-mental reasons has resulted in a thrust to develop new technologies. The challenge has been to find substitutes for halon that have sufficient ability to sup-press fires in various applications without harming the envi-ronment and human health. This article gives an overview of several newly developed fire suppression systems.

Gaseous Systems

Gaseous systems use nozzles, pipes and pressurized cylin-ders to discharge a gaseous suppressant into an enclosed space. There are two types of gaseous agents available: halo-carbon agents and inert gases.

Halocarbon agents are chemicals similar to halon, but their molecular structure has been modified to reduce or eliminate the chlorine and bromine atoms that are respon-sible for ozone depletion. Halocarbon agents extinguish fires primarily by cooling. More than a dozen halocarbon chemicals have been tested recently. The tests examine not only the fire suppression capabilities of these agents, but also the concentrations of toxic by-products they produce during the fire suppression. The by-products can be an important factor in the safety of the building’s occupants, and also in global warming. The main component of the combustion by-products of halocarbon gaseous agents is hydrogen fluoride, which is toxic and very corrosive.

Inert gas agents extinguish fire by oxygen depletion. Inert gases are not subject to thermal decomposition when used in extinguishing fires, and hence, unlike halocarbon gases, they form no combustion by-products.

To suppress a fire, the inert gas needs to reduce the oxy-gen level to about 12.5%. This requires a concentration of approximately 40% of the inert gas in the enclosure.

There are three inert gas systems currently available: • Argonite (IG-55) which is a mixture of 50% nitrogen and 50% argon.

• Inergen (IG-541) which is a mixture of 52% nitrogen, 40% argon and 8% carbon dioxide.

• Argon (IG-01) which is 100% argon.

These inert gases are clean and naturally occurring in the atmosphere. They have zero ozone depletion potential and no global warming potential.

Water Mist

Water mist is fine water spray in drops with diameters less than 1000 microns. The efficacy of water mist systems for fire protection has been demonstrated in a wide range of applications and by numerous experimental programs. Their effectiveness is influenced by the fire size, the degree of obstruction, ceiling height and the ventilation conditions in the fire compartment. Performance is also affected by the characteristics of the water mist, such as drop size distribu-tion, flux density and spray momentum.

There are several water mist systems currently available. Some use high or intermediate water pressures through small orifices to produce water mist, whereas others use twin fluid nozzles (water and air). Research has demonstrated that the fire suppression performance of water mist can be further improved by using a cycling discharge, which

signif-May 2008 Canadian Consulting Engineer 29

fire protection

BY ANDREW KIM, PH.D.

Institute for Research in Construction/NRC

continued on page 30

FIRE SUPPRESSION

TECHNOLOGIES

A BURST OF INNOVATION

In recent years several new fire suppression technologies have been developed to have less of an impact on the environment and human health.

T

Above: water mist spray systems are non-toxic and have been shown to be effective, even for electrical fires.

(4)

side the protected area of a facil-ity. Commercial aerosol systems are available for fire suppression in spaces where people are not normally present, such as flam-mable liquid storage spaces or engine compartments.

Canisters contain solid rocket fuel. When electrically or ther-mally ignited, they discharge dry chemical particles and gas prod-ucts in aerosol form through end-plate delivery nozzles.

Based on automotive airbag technology, gas generators have been developed for fire suppres-sion applications. Gas generators are very compact and can provide very fast discharge (in a few mil-liseconds). There are two types of gas generators available. One is a conventional gas generator, which contains propellant and an electri-cal initiator. Another is a hybrid gas generator, which consists of an electrical initiator, a solid propel-lant chamber and a suppression agent chamber.

New Standards

New fire suppression technolo-gies require new standards to identify their limitations and proper use. Two standards have been developed recently for new fire suppression technologies by the National Fire Pro-tection Association (NFPA):

• NFPA 2001 “Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems,” and

• NFPA 750 “Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Sys-tems.”

NFPA 2001 deals with the design, installation, mainte-nance and operation of systems using the new clean agents that are being developed to replace halon, including halo-carbon agents and inert gas systems. The purpose of NFPA 750 is to provide protection from fire by standardizing the design, installation, maintenance, and testing requirements of water mist fire suppression systems.

The development of new standards for the new tech-nologies, means they can be reliably employed. CCE

Dr. Andrew Kim, Ph.D. is a senior research officer in the Fire Research Program of the National Research Council Institute for Research in Construction in Ottawa. E-mail andrew.kim@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

@ARTICLECATEGORY:1781;

icantly reduces extinguishment times and water requirements.

Water mist fire suppression systems have a number of advan-tages such as good fire suppres-sion capability, no environmen-tal impact and no toxicity. As a result, the use of water mist as a fire suppression system has been considered for a wide range of applications such as shipboard machinery spaces, where open doors and hatches can reduce the effectiveness of gaseous agents. Water mist also has the potential for extinguishing elec-trical fires, and may result in less equipment damage than the damage caused by the thermal decomposition products of gaseous halon replacement agents.

Compressed Air Foam

For decades, fire-fighting foams delivered from fixed-pipe sys-tems have provided effective fire suppression for the chemical and petroleum industries and military installations. The overall effectiveness of current fixed pipe foam systems can be signifi-cantly increased if compressed

air is used for generating the foam. Compressed-air-foam uses a much lower quantity of water and foam concentrates, and it is better able to penetrate fire plumes and reach the seat of a fire. As well, compressed air foam can be used with Class A foam concentrate, which is environmentally friend-ly, rather than Class B foam concentrate, which is used in traditional foam systems.

An effective compressed-air-foam system produces foam consisting of similar-in-size bubbles, it delivers the foam to nozzles without changing the foam properties, and it provides a means of uniformly distributing foam over a prescribed area. Specialized piping and nozzles have been developed to ensure the foam quality and dis-tribution over the target area.

Compressed-air-foam has good potential, and pre-engi-neered systems suitable for a variety of commercial applica-tions have been developed.

Aerosol and Gas Generators

Fire extinguishing aerosols are usually delivered either directly (on contact with the fire) or via devices located

out-30 www.canadianconsultingengineer.com May 2008

fire protection

continued from page 29

Top: compressed air foam (CAF) system suppressing a fire in a large, 4.6-m2pool of heptane, a highly flammable liquid

hydrocarbon. Above: discharge nozzles for gaseous fire suppression systems.

Références

Documents relatifs

Au commencement du long processus qu’implique le Travail de Bachelor, il a fallu trouver un thème. Cette première étape n’a pas été facile pour moi. Plusieurs idées me venaient à

Anticipatory capacity is the capacity of an organization to continuously develop and apply knowledge acquired through a structured approach to anticipate changing

To test the functional role played by altered levels of acH3K14 in the NAc, groups of mice subjected to chronic (10 d) social defeat stress and nonstressed control mice were, on day

Oregon (Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2011) Water for human consumption 170 United States: Idaho Iowa Vermont Virginia.. (Idaho Department

4 School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University,

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Dans cette session, des intervenants de référence du domaine ont discuté du rôle de la plasticité de la cellule cancéreuse et de l’hétérogénéité intra-tumorale

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des