A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION C
B. N AJMAN
The nonrelativistic limit of the nonlinear Dirac equation
Annales de l’I. H. P., section C, tome 9, n
o1 (1992), p. 3-12
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPC_1992__9_1_3_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section C » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpc) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
The nonrelativistic limit of the nonlinear Dirac equation
B. NAJMAN
Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, P.O. Box 635,
41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,
Vol. 9, n° 1, 1992, p. 3-12. Analyse non linéaire
ABSTRACT. - It is
proved
that there exist solutions of the nonlinear Diracequation,
smooth intime,
on a time interval which isindependent
of c. Moreover after
multiplication by
aphase
factor(dependent
onc)
these solutions converge to the solution of a
coupled system
of nonlinearSchrodinger type equations.
Key words : Nonlinear Dirac equations, nonrelativistic limit, Schrödinger equation.
RESUME. - La limite non
relativistique
del’équation
de Dirac non linéaire.- On montre
qu’existent
des solutions de1’equation
de Dirac nonlineaire, regulieres
entemps,
sur un intervalle entemps independant
de c. Enplus, apres
lamultiplication
avec un facteur dephase (c-dépendant)
ces solutionsconvergent
vers la solution d’unsysteme couple d’equations
dutype Schrodinger
non lineaire.Classification A.M.S. : 35 Q 20, 35 B 25, 81 C 05.
Research supported by Fond za znanost Hrvatske.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire - 0294-1449 Vol. 9/92/O 1 /03/ 10/$3.00/ © Gauthier-Villars
INTRODUCTION
We consider the initial value
problem
for thenonlinear
Diracequation
where ~, and c are
positive constants,
T is afunction
fromfR3
intoC~,
aV stands and
a,
andP
are 4x4matrices satisfying
j= i
a,
ock + ocka~
= 2I, a, p
+pa,
=0, p
isdiagonal
and = I.This
equation has first
beeninvestigated by
thephysicists;
see thereferences
in[I], [2], [3].
L.Vazquez,
T.Cazenave et
al.([3], [2], [1]) recently
started theinvestigation
of the existence oflocalized (or stationary)
solutions of (1).
We are
interested
in the solutions of theequation
witharbitrary (i.
e.not
necessarily radially symmetric
as in theabove references)
initial condi-tions
and their convergence as thespeed
oflight
cincreases
to 00 .Introducing ~=1 2c2,
wewrite (1)
inthe equivalent
formWe
first
prove theexistence
of a classical solution of(2)
on an intervalindependent
of E.In the
following theorem
as well as in the rest of this paperH~
stands for the Sobolev spaceHS ((~3)4
andL~
stands forLz ((~3)~.
THEOREM 1. - Let Assume that and
Then there
exists
an interval J =[
-T, T]
such thatfor
every E with 0 E ~ ~Q there exists aunique
solutionof the initial value
problem (2).
Next we
investigate
thenonrelativistic
limit E -~-> 0[i.
e. c --~ oo in( I )].
Since cannot be
expected
to converge, motivatedby
the lineartheory (see [5], [6]),
weintroduce
the newfunction ~
= 2 t~EInserting
thisAnnales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
5
THE NONRELATIVISTIC LIMIT
into (2)
we obtain anequivalent
initial valueproblem
with
~~ ~
= 2 E.Theorem 1
evidently
holds verbatim for~~. Differentiating (3)
withrespect
to t we conclude that the smooth solutions of(3) (their
existenceis shown in Theorem
1)
is also the solution of the initial valueproblem
Conversely,
as the initial valueproblem (3)
isequivalent
to the initial valueproblem (2)
which has askew-adjoint
linearpart,
standardarguments
show that a solution of(4)
which isC2
in time is also a solution of the first ordersystem (3).
This
suggests
that the solutions~£
of(3)
converge to the solutionDo
of the nonlinear
Schrodinger type equation
We shall prove an existence result for
~o
and the convergence of~£
to
THEOREM 2. - Assume that Then there exists an interval J
= ~ - T,
such that the initial valueproblem (5)
has aunique
solutionTHEOREM 3. - Let 0. Assume that E
H2 (0 _ E -_ Eo)
and moreoverVol. 9, n° 1-1992.
Further assume that there exists some a E
[0, 1]
such thatLet J =
[
-T, T]
be such that there exists aunique
solution~E
EC2 (J, L2) n C1 (J, H1) (~
C(J, H2) of
the initial valueproblem (3) for
E > 0 and a
unique
solution EC1 (J, L2) (~
C(J, H2) of
the initial valueproblem (5).
ThenLEMMA 4. - There exists K > 0 such that
for
all u EH2 following inequali-
ties hold:
Proof. -
Let ti be the Fourier transform of u. The Plancherel Theoremimplies
thatLEMMA 5. - Assume Eo > 0 and
Then there exists an interval J =
[
-T, T]
such thatif for
each E E(0, ~o)
theinitial value
problem (2)
has a solutionB{If:
EC1 (J, L2) (~
C(J, H2)
thenAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
7
THE NONRELATIVISTIC LIMIT
Proof. -
It is sufficient to prove(11)
since(12)
follows from(11)
andthe
embedding
theorem. In fact it is sufficient to provesince
t E [ - T, 0]
is treatedsimilarly.
In the
proof
of(13)
we need the conservation ofL2
normwhich follows
easily
from(2) by
scalarmultiplication
inL2 by
Now we turn to the
proof
of(13). Apply
theoperator A
to both sidesof
(2).
It follows that ~ = 0~’ is the solution of the initial valueproblem.
Multiplying by (0
andtaking
theimaginary part
we findFrom
(9), (10)
and(14)
it follows thatFrom this it follows that if
KT
1 thenTogether
with(14)
thisimplies (13).
Let y be a matrix
and j, k E ~ 1, 2, 3 ~ .
Define the functionsLEMMA 6. - The
functions f ,
i =1 ,
...,6,
arelocally Lipschitz
continu-ous
functions from H2
toL2: for
every K>O there exists such that~ ~
uK, ( u ~ __
Kimply
Moreover
for
a = 0 and 1Vol. 9, n° 1-1992.
We omit the easy
proof (which repeatedly
uses Lemma 4 and the Embed-ding Theorem).
Define the
mappings N~ {~ >_ 0) by
LEMMA 7. -
(a)
For 8>0 themapping I~E
is alocally Lipschitz
continuousmap
from H2 to Hl: for
every K>O there exists such that~‘
c K imply
(b)
Themapping No
is alocally Lipschitz
continuous map onH~.
(c)
There exists C > 0 suchthat for
all~,
~i’ EH~
and a E[0, 1
the estimateProof - (a)
and(b)
arestraightforward
consequences of Lemma 6. To prove(c),
fix~,
~’ and define the linear mapR~, ~ by R~, ~ (8) _ ~)
8 +(~i ~ ~ 8)
~ +(8 ~
~. ThenIt is easy to show for
a = 0 and a== 1
(in
fact such estimate appears in theproof
of Lemma6).
Since is
linear,
the same estimate holds for all oc E[0, 1].
Proof of
Theorem 1. - As mentioned in theIntroduction,
it is sufficient to prove the statement of Theorem 1 for the solution of the initial valueproblem (4),
since it followsby
standard methods that this solution is also solution of(2).
The substitution
U = e - i a t~2£ ~
transforms the initial valueproblem (4)
into
Converting
thisequation
into anintegral equation (cf [4])
we find thatany smooth solution of
(4)
is also a solution ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
THE NONRELATIVISTIC LIMIT 9 with
and
A
thepositive
square rootof 1 ~2 (~A+1 4), A = - 1 20394, naturally
defined in
L2.
We shall use the
following
well known result: let j~ be am-dissipative operator
in a Hilbert space X and let D(d)
be its domain endowed with thegraph
norm. Let F be alocally Lipschitz
continuousmapping
onD (d).
Then for everyXo ED (d)
the initial valueproblem
has a maximal classical solution
Moreover if 00 then
Fix E > o. We
apply
the above result to thespace X
= D xL2
=H~
xL2
endowed with the norm
to the
operator
A in X defined on x D(A£)
=H2
xH~ by
and to the
mapping
F definedby
Then d is
skew-adjoint
and F islocally Lipschitz
continuous onD (d) by
lemma 7. We conclude that there exists and aunique
classicalsolution
Dt
of(19)
on[0, TJ
and moreover thatSince
(19)
and(4)
areequivalent,
it follows that there exists aunique
classical solution
~E
of(4)
on[0, TJ
and moreover that ifT~
oo thenVol. 9, n° 1-1992.
Since
C,
is the solution of(3)
and since(3)
isequivalent
to(2),
we canapply
lemma 5 and conclude thatif T£ T (T
is the number in thatlemma)
then
consequently
lim(t)
II
= However the H1equation (2) implies C, (t)
which leads to a contradic- tion.This
implies
From thesymmetry
of theequation (19)
withrespect
to t we conclude that the maximal existence for
(hence
also for isin fact
(
-TE, TE).
Proof of
Theorem 2. -Using
the notation from theproof
of Theorem1,
the initial valueproblem (5)
can be written asSince - i
~3
A is a skewadjoint operator
inL2
andNo
is alocally Lipschitz
map on
D (A) = H2 by
Lemma7,
the conclusions of Theorem 2 are astraightforward application
of the classical existence result that was used in theproof
of Theorem 1.Proof of
Theorem 3. - DenoteThen the solution of the initial value
problem (23) [and consequently (5)]
satisfies also the
integral equation
note that
P,
A andIo (t)
arediagonal commuting.
Using
therepresentations (20)
and(24)
of the solutions and their difference can be written as6
where
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
THE NONRELATIVISTIC LIMIT 11
We shall prove
Since
03A600
E H°‘ andNo ( . ))
E C([0, T]; H2) by
Theorem2,
the state-ments
(251)
and(254)
followdirectly
from Lemma 2.2 in[5]. Noting
theestimate
we see that
(252)
is a consequence of(7).
Similarly,
the estimatetogether
with(6)
and the Sobolev ’embedding
theoremimply
limE~ 1 E = 0
in
H1,
therefore(253)
follows from(26).
Nexthence it follows from
(26)
and Lemma 4 thatUsing
Lemma 4 and Lemma 5[recall
that in(11)
and(12)
can bereplaced by CJ
it follows that~I L£5~ (t)
_ C tE1~2,
hence theequality (245)
is alsoproved. Using (26)
onceagain
we see thatIt follows that
with lim This
implies (8)
on[0, T];
theproof
for[ - T, 0]
is identical.E -~ 0
Vol. 9, n° 1-1992.
REFERENCES
[1] M. BALABANE, T. CAZANAVE, A. DOUADY and F. MERLE, Existence of Excited States for a Nonlinear Dirac Field, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 119, 1988, pp. 153-176.
[2] T. CAZENAVE and L. VAZQUEZ, Existence of Localized Solutions for a Classical Nonlinear Dirac Field, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 105, 1986, pp. 35-47.
[3] T. CAZENAVE, Stationary States of Nonlinear Dirac Equation, In Semigroups, Theory and Applications, Vol. I, H. BREZIS, M. G. CRANDALL, F. KAPPEL Eds., Pitman Research Notes in Math. Sciences, pp. 36-42, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, 1986.
[4] H. O. FATTORINI, Second Order Linear Equations in Banach Spaces, North Holland, 1985.
[5] B. NAJMAN, The Nonrelativistic Limit of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac Equations, In Differential Equations with Applications in Biology, Physics and Engineering, J. GOLD-
STEIN, F. KAPPEL, W. SCHAPPACHER Eds., Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., No. 133, 1991, pp. 291-299, Marcel Dekker.
[6] K. VESELI0106, Perturbation of Pseudoresolvents and Analyticity in 1/c in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 22, 1971, pp. 27-43.
(Manuscript received February 1 6th , 1990.)
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire