R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
B IAGIO R ICCERI
Carathéodory’s selections for multifunctions with non-separable range
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 67 (1982), p. 185-190
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1982__67__185_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1982, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
with Non-Separable Range.
BIAGIO RICCERI
(*)
Introduction.
Let
(S, 8)
be a measurable space, X aparacompact topological
space, Y a Banach space and I’ a multifunction from into Y.
Our
problem
is to find aCarath6odory
selection forI’’,
that is asingle-
valued function
f
from into Y such that:i) f (t, x) E F(t, x)
foreach the function
t -~ f ( t, x)
is 8-measurable for eachx E X ; ii)
the functionx --~ f (t, x)
is continuous for eachThere are
already
some papers devoted to thisproblem (see [1],
[2], [3], [4]). Nevertheless,
in all of these papers theseparability
of X is assumed and
then,
fromit,
theseparability
of follows(see Proposition 2.2).
The aim of the
present
paper is to establish two theorems in whichno
hypothesis
ofseparability
of X neither of is needed.Moreover,
someparticular
values of the multifunction .F are allowed to be non-convex.In Section 1 we
put
notations and basicdefinitions,
while Sec- tion 2 contains the main results.(*)
Indirizzo dell’A.: Seminario Matematico, Citta Universitaria - Viale A. Doria 6 - 95125 Catania.Lavoro
eseguito
nell’ambito del G.N.A.F.A. del C.N.R.186
1. Notations and basic definitions.
Given two sets
A’, A" ~ ~6,
we denoteA" )
the set of allfunctions from A’ into A". Given a function F from A’ into the
family
of allnon-empty
subsets ofA",
we say that F is a multifunc- tion from .A.’ into A"and,
for each A C A’ and weput:
topologized,
we say that a multifunction F from A’ into A" is lower semicontinuous whenever the setF-(12)
is open in A’ for each openset Q c
A".Moreover,
if 8 is aa-algebra
of subsets ofA’,
we say that the multifunction is 8-measurable whenever the set.F-(S~) belongs
to 8 for each open set Q C A". Now let
(Z, d)
be a metric space. For each xE 1:, Q, ,S~’,
and r ER+,
weput: r)
=~y
E ~: 3z EE ,~:
d(y, z) r}; d(x, ,~°)
= infJ) : y
Ed*(Q’,
= sup{d(z, Q"):
z EQ’I.
If(E, II .11) )
is a normed space, we will consider 1: with the metric d inducedby
the norm11 II. Furthermore, given
a setA ~ ~6,
weput
and weconsider
Fb(A, E)
as a normed space with the usual norm:Ilfllb
== sup
f E ,~b(A, ~). Finally,
we denoteby db
the metric inducedt EA
by
the normjib
2. The main results.
We
begin
this sectionby proving
an usefulproposition.
PROPOSITION 2.1. Let
(S, 8)
be a measurable space,(Z, d)
a metricspace and
F,
G two 8-measurablemultifunctions f rom
S into E such thatF(S)
andG(S)
areseparable. If
r E l~+ is such thatIr(t)
=F(t)
r)r1
Bà( G(t), r)
#ø for
each t E8,
then themultifunction Ir
is E-measurable.PROOF. Put
P(t)
=F(t)
XG(t)
for each t e S.Thus,
for eachSZ’,
we have
Moreover,
y for each we haveNow our claim f ollows from
(2)
and( 1 )
since any open set inF(S)
is the union of a countablefamily
of sets oftype
Q’x S2’,
with open
sets, respectively,
in-F(S)
and6"(~).
A We now prove thefollowing
selection theorem:THEOREM 2.1. Let
(S, 8), X, Y,
.F’ be as in the Introduction and let be a sequence such that a subsetof X,
withdimg (Zj c 0 (1);
M an b-measurablefunction f rom
S intoR+;
asequence in
X X, llg+),
with limÂn(x, y)
= 0for
each x E X and eachn E
N. Moreover,
let thefollowing
conditions besatisfied:
1)
the setF(t, x)
is closedfor
each(t, x)
E S X X and convexfor
each
(t, x)
E S X(.X - Z) ;
2)
the setF(Sn, x)
isseparable
and boundedfor
each xE X,
n EN;
3 )
themultifunction
t -F(t, x)
is E-measurablefor
each xE X ; 4)
we haved*(F(t, x), F(t, y) ) M(t) y) for
each t ESn,
x,n E N.
Under such
hypotheses,
there exists aCarathgodory
selectionfor
F.PROOF. For each m, n E N
put: M(t)
Rear-range the
non-empty
members of thefamily
as asingle
sequence
{S*k}. Obviously, S:
for each k E N and S= U S§ .
Fixk=1
kEN and denote
by 6*~
thefamily
of all subsets ofSk belonging
to 6.Furthermore, put Ak== 199 Y): 9?
isEk-measurable
andis
separablel
and observe that.~k
is a closed linearsubspace
of theBanach space
5;-b(S*, k Y).
For each x E Xput {9?
EAk:
EEF(t, x),
"It E From1), 2), 3)
and from the Kuratowski andRyll-Nardzewski
selectiontheorem,
it follows thatHk(x) =I=- ø,
and sowe can consider the multifunction x
-+Hk(x)
from ~Y intodtk.
Weclaim that this multifunction is lower semicontinuous.
Therefore,
let Qbe an open subset of
Ak
and letxEH¡;(Q).
We must prove that 53 is an interiorpoint
of.Hk (,S~).
For this purpose, chooseHk(x)
r1 Qand r ER+ such that
Bdb(9?,
Q.Now,
letm*,
n* E N be such that it follows that there exists a(1) dimx (Z)
0 means that dim(T)
0 for each Z which is closed in X, where dim(T)
denotes thecovering
dimension of T.188
neighbourhood
V of x such thatr/2m*
for each x EV,
x 0 x.
Therefore, by
virtue of4),
for each t E8*
and each x EV,
wehave
. On the other
hand,
since we have for eachand so,
by (3),
we haveF(~,~)n~(~(),~/2)~0
for eacht and each x E V. Now fix x E V. For each t E
SZ, put
==
F(t, x)
nBd(cp(t), r/2 )
and _ From1 ), 2 ), 3),
from thefact
that p
EAk
and fromProposition 2.1,
it follows that the multi- functionIr/2
isEk-measurable
and so the multifunctionÏr/2’
since wehave =
Ï;:¡2(W)
for each open set W ~ Y.Thus, by
virtue ofthe Kuratowski and
Ryll-Nardzewski
selection theoremagain,
thereexists y E Ak
such that EÏr/2(t)
for each t EsZ.
Given s E]0, r/2[, obviously,
for each t ESt ,
we haveF(t, x)
n~/2
+~).
and
-~-’E r
and soHence,
theneighbourhood
V of x is contained in and so ourclaim is
proved. Furthermore,
from1)
it follows thatthe
setH(r)
is closed for each x E X and convex for each x E X - Z.
Therefore, by
virtue of Theorem 1.1 of[5],
there exists a continuousselection hk
for
Hk.
Now fixt
eSt
andput hklt(x)
=hk(x)(t)
for each x More-over,
given
20Y,
for eachx E X,
define the function Y asfollows ,
Obviously,
Foreach p
ER+,
we haveFrom
(4)
it follows that the function r - iscontinuous,
sincethe function r -
hk(x)
is continuous. Nowput f k(t, x)
=hk(x)(t)
foreach
Thus,
thefunction fk
is aCarath6odory
selectionfor
Flskxx.
This holds for anyFinally, put:
Obviously,
the functionf
is the claimedCarath6odory
selectionfor
In a very similar way it is
possible
to prove thefollowing
furtherresult:
THEOREM 2.2. Let
(S, 8)
be a measurable space and a sequence such that and isf inite for
each n EN;
letX, Y,
Zbe as in Theorem 2.1 and let F be a
multi f unction f rom
S X X into Ywhich
satisfies
conditions1), 3 ) of
T heorem 2.1 and thefollowing
ones :2)
the setF(S, x)
isseparable for
each xE .X ;
4)
themultifunction
x -F(t, x)
is lower semicontinuousfor
eachtEs.
Under such
hypotheses,
there exists aCarathiorodry
selectionfor
F.Finally,
we want tojustify
ourassertion,
made in the Introduc-tion,
that the range of the multifunction I’ in Theorem 1 of[1]
isseparable (in fact,
in[2], [3], [4]
the whole space Y isalready
assumedto be
separable).
Indeed,
we have thefollowing
PROPOSITION 2.2. Let S be a
non-empty
set andX,
Y twotopological
spaces, with X
separable. Furthermore,
let A be a countable dense subsetof
X and F amultifunction f rom
S X X into Y such that:1)
the setF(S, x)
isseparable for
each x EA;
2)
themulti f unction
x --~F(t, x)
is lower semicontinuousfor
eacht E S.
Under such
hypotheses,
the setF(S X X)
isseparable.
PROOF. For each x E A choose a countable dense subset
Dx
ofF(S, x) .
We claim that the countable setU Dx
is dense inF(S x X).
xEA
Indeed,
let9
EF(S X X )
and let W be an openneighbourhood
ofy.
Let
(t, x)
E ~’ X X be such that9
EI’(t, x).
From2)
it follows that there exists aneighbourhood
TT of x such thatx)
r1 W # ø foreach x E TT. Since A is dense in
X,
there exists x* E A r1 TT. Butthen,
sinceF(t, x~‘)
r1W # #
andDx*
is dense inF(S, x*),
it followsthat
Dx*
r1W # 0,
and so our claim isproved. A
190
REFERENCES
[1]
A. CELLINA, A selection theorem, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ.Padova,
55(1976),
pp. 143-149.[2]
C. CASTAING, Sur l’existence des sectionsséparément
mesurables etsépa-
rément continues d’une
multi-application,
Séminaired’Analyse
Convexe,Montpellier, Exposé
n. 14 (1975).[3]
C.CASTAING, A
propos de l’existence des sectionsséparément
mesurables etséparément
continues d’unemultiapplication séparément
mesurable etsépa-
rément semi-continue
inférieurement,
Séminaired’Analyse
Convexe, Mont-pellier, Exposé
n. 6(1976).
[4]
A. FRYSZKOWSKI,Carathéodory
type selectorsof
set-valued mapsof
two variables, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom.Phys.,
25(1977),
pp. 41-46.[5]
E. MICHAEL - C. PIXLEY, Aunified
theorem on continuous selections, Pacific J. Math., 87 (1980), pp. 187-188.Manoscritto