• Aucun résultat trouvé

Single bubble deformation and breakup in simple shear flow

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Single bubble deformation and breakup in simple shear flow"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

E R R A T U M

Single bubble deformation and breakup in simple shear flow

Nadina Mu¨ller-FischerÆ Philip Tobler Æ

Marco DresslerÆ Peter Fischer Æ Erich J. Windhab

Published online: 4 August 2009

Ó Springer-Verlag 2009

Erratum to: Exp Fluids (2008) 45:917–926 DOI 10.1007/s00348-008-0509-1

Unfortunately, a published article contains error in the bubble dimension data. The modified analysis for the error was given below.

In the publication ‘Single bubble deformation and breakup in simple shear flow’ (2008) we report on the bubble deformation and bubble breakup in simple shear flow. The obtained results were compared to the previous findings by Canedo et al. (1993) and Rust and Manga (2002) (Figure 6 of Mu¨ller-Fischer et al. 2008). The deviations of the deformation parameters D and L/xB between our results and those by Canedo et al. and Rust and Manga were explained by ‘higher curvature effects due to confinement and bound flow conditions, limitation in image analysis, the influence of surfactants, and limited validity of the used models’. Revisiting the original data files, however, leads to the conclusion that we used for the calculation of the bubble deformation the diameter of the bubble and not the bubble radius. As a consequence, all

deformation data are corrupted by the factor of two. Equations 5 and 10 in (2008) have to be rewritten as: L affi 3:45  Ca 0:5 ð1Þ L a¼ 3:1  Ca 0:43 ð2Þ

with a as bubble radius (instead of xBas bubble diameter). Using the correct bubble dimensions Figure 6 of Mu¨ller-Fischer et al. (2008) can be redrawn as shown in Fig.1 showing the deformation parameter parameter L/a as a function of the Capillary number Ca.

Both models by Hinch and Acrivos (1980) (Eq. 1) and Canedo et al. (1993) (Eq. 2) are used to describe the measured data. The model of Hinch and Acrivos is fitting the experimental data well for Ca B 20 but fail at large bubble deformations. The same result has been indicated in

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00348-008-0509-1.

N. Mu¨ller-Fischer P. Tobler  M. Dressler  P. Fischer (&)  E. J. Windhab

Institute of Food Science & Nutrition, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

e-mail: peter.fischer@ilw.agrl.ethz.ch N. Mu¨ller-Fischer

Bu¨hler AG, 9240 Uzwil, Switzerland

e-mail: nadina.mueller-fischer@buhlergroup.com 1.0 10.0 6.393 10 1.878 10 1.292 10 Hinch and Acrivos Canedo et al. -7 -7 -7 L /a [-] L /a = 3.45·Ca L /a = 3.1·Ca 100.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Ca [-]

Fig. 1 Deformation parameter L/a as a function of the Capillary number Ca for bubbles in simple shear. Symbols represent measured values, the solid line represents the model prediction by Hinch and Acrivos (1980), the dashed line the model for Canedo et al. (1993)

123

Exp Fluids (2009) 47:549–550 DOI 10.1007/s00348-009-0722-6

(2)

Rust and Manga (2002). On the other hand, i.e., above Ca C 25, Eq. 2 by Canedo et al. (1993) can match the experiment results well. The validity of both models in the different Ca number regime is related to the assumptions made. Hinch and Acrivos (1980) take only circular bubble cross-section into account, which is not correct for large bubble deformations as shown by Canedo et al. (1993). The latter authors assume an ellipsoidal cross-section, which fit the high deformation regime of our bubble deformation experiments well. In conclusion, Eq.1 can be used to describe the bubble deformation for Capillary numbers smaller than 20 and Eq.2can be used when the Capillary numbers are larger than 25 (k 1 and Re  1).

Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Malin Liu, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing

100084, China for pointing out the mistake in the droplet dimension analysis.

References

Canedo E, Favelukis M, Tadmor Z, Talmon Y (1993) An experi-mental study of bubble deformation in viscous liquids in simple shear flow. AIChE J 39:553

Hinch E, Acrivos A (1980) Long slender drops in a simple shear flow. J Fluid Mech 98:305

Mu¨ller-Fischer N, Tobler P, Dressler M, Fischer P, Windhab E (2008) Single bubble deformation and breakup in simple shear flow. Exp Fluids 45:917

Rust A, Manga M (2002) Bubble shapes and orientation in low Re simple shear flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 249:476

550 Exp Fluids (2009) 47:549–550

Figure

Fig. 1 Deformation parameter L/a as a function of the Capillary number Ca for bubbles in simple shear

Références

Documents relatifs

This thematic issue clearly shows that “advanced hybrid nano- materials” is not just hype, it is a real and powerful toolbox towards advanced materials for highly diverse fields,

The model does not describe in detail the statistical features of the SARAS signature, although, the occurrence statistics, results pertaining to the propagation velocity and

Entre 2005 y 2007 el Ministerio de Desarrollo Social del Uruguay implementó el Plan de Atención Nacional a la Emergencia Social (PANES). Uno de los resultados

The left column presents the observed and predicted distributions based on the model using subjective probabilities of proposers in the ultimatum game while the right column

Spindle microtubules Localization of GFP-tagged Xenopus and human candidate proteins was observed in live A6 and HeLa cells, respectively.. ExPASy - ExPASy Proteomics

Using these two original algorithms, together with meth- ods for computing exact squared Euclidean distance transform and exact Eu- clidean medial axis, we proposed a

To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian procedure with noise estimated from a single photon-count trace using the block-transformation, we apply Approach 2 to TACFs calculated

I review how the process of factor upgrading is described in the literature on clusters and cluster policy, and I explore the extent to which cluster