Groupe de travail
d’analyse ultramétrique
Y ASUO M ORITA
A non-archimedean analogue of the discrete series
Groupe de travail d’analyse ultramétrique, tome 9, n
o3 (1981-1982), exp. n
oJ13, p. J1-J4
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=GAU_1981-1982__9_3_A14_0>
© Groupe de travail d’analyse ultramétrique
(Secrétariat mathématique, Paris), 1981-1982, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la collection « Groupe de travail d’analyse ultramétrique » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
A NON-ARCHIMEDEAN ANALOGUE OF THE DISCRETE SERIES
By
Yasuo MORITA(Y.
GoCHRISTQL,
PoROBBA)
9e année, 1981/82,
fasc.3,
n°J13,
4 p.Journée d’Analyse p-adique [1982. Marseille-Luminy]
septembre 1982
[ Tohoku University]
The purpose of this papers is to define a non-archimedean
analogue
of the discrète séries of We will refer to what isconjectured,
what can beproved,
andwhat are the difficultien in
studying
ourreprésentations.
Forproofs
anddetails, we quote MORITA-MURASE [ 5 ]
>1 o Cl.assical case.
Let (3 and R be
complex
number field and the real numberfield, respective- ly.
For any fieldF 00FF
letP (F) =
F u be the one dimensionalprojective
spaceover F . Then
P ( C) - P (R)
is thedisjoint
union of the upper halfplane
H == (2:
eC ; Im(z)
>0}
and the lower halfplane H = {z ~ C ; Im(z) 0) .
Forany
integer
s ~-- 2 ~ put
f E
V+
and z = x +iy (x ,
y ER) .
ThenV+
becomes a Hilbert space withs - s
the and is a uni
tary operator
onV+ . s
Hence defines a uni-representation
oi thelocally compact
group onif’ .
can also define1
by modifying
the normsuitably. Further,
if we use H instead ofH ,
then-1 "’ - +
Ble obtain another
unitary representatinn
anyinteger s ~ -
1 . It is wellTHEOREM C. - The irreducible
representations
oFSL2(R) ,
and notwo of
tnem for various s are
equivalent.
20 Definition of rr
p-adic
cases.s - --
Now we are
going
to constructp-adic analogues
of the s idereplace R by
- afinite extension L of the
p-adic
numberfield Qp ,
andreplace C by
a non-archimedean field
(k, ! I. 1) containing
L such that k iscomplete
withrespect
(*) Yasuo MORITA, Institut,
TohokuUniversity, SENDAI 900
J13-02
(
andalgebraically
closed. Hence we consider continuousreprésentations
ofG =
SL2(L)
on lineartopological
k-vector spaces.Put D =
pl (le) - P (L) .
Since L islocally compact, P (L)
iscompact. Hence,
for any
positive integer
m ~P (L)
is coveredby (z e P (k) ; ) z ( > )p" ) )
anda finite number of
mutually disjoint
open ballsPut
Then
{D m}~m=1
is anincreasing
sequence of subsets of D and D =~m D .
Letbe the space of k-valued functions on
Dm
nf the fnrmm
..
vhere c
m and
c
are elements ofk ,
end we assume that this limit converges(uniformly)
onD .
It is known that becomes a Banach space with the supre-inum
norm |f|
=supDm| ) f(z) j .
We say that a k-valued function f on D is
analytic if,
andnnly if,
the res-trictinn nf f to each
D
mbelnngs
to;(D ) .
m(This
is the définition ofanalytic
functions in the
theory
nfrigid analytic
spaces(cf.
MORITA[4]).)
Let V be the space nf all k-valued functions nn D. Hence V is theprojective
limit of theo(D )
withrespect
to the restriction mapo(D )
2014>0(D ) .
Therefore V has anatural
Fréchet topology.
Inparticular,
V is acomplete
lineartopological
space.consider this space V as the
analogue
nfV±
3 for any s .s s
Let s be a
négative integer.
For anyput
Then n s defines a continuous
représentation
of thelocally compact
group G on theFréchet
space V. This is ouranalogue
of the classical discrète séries.3’ Conj ecture.
Let U be the space of rational functions of z
(with
coefficients ink ) which
have nt)poles
in D . Then U is a densesubspace
of V. Further thesubspace
Uof V is G-invariant because
(bz
+d) belongs
to U for any g E G .Since k is
algebraically closed,
any élément f of U can beexpressed
as apartial
fractional séries of the formThen va can prove that U is a closed G-invariant
subspece
or U . Let V bes s
the closure in V of the
subspace
U . It is obvious that V is a closed a-s s
invariant
subspace
of V. Hence we obtainreprésentations
nf G nn V andV/V.
s s
Now we have the
following conjecture (cf.
TheoremC) :
CONJECTURE V.
(i)
V andV/V
are(topologically)
irreducible G-modules.s "’ s 2014 - ’* - ’- ’"-~---2014- 2014M~20142014
(ii)
No twn of them for varions s areG-equivalent.
4. The result and remarks.
Thnugh
we can not prove theconjecture
nnwy we can prove thecorresponding
asser-tion for the dense
subspace
U of V.Let g =
(X
=tr(X)
=O} ,
andput
Then this séries converges in
M~(L)
tn an élément of G if theeigenvalues
db X of X
satisfies X ) Ip1/( -1)1 .
It follows thatis well-defined for any X e g and and
d03C0s
is areprésentation
of theLie
algebra g
on the space V . It is obvious that any closed G-invariant sub-space of
U isLet 0 be the
integer ring
ntL,
andput
K =8L2(0) .
Then K is a maximalcompact subgroup
of G. Since K is an opensubgroup
ofG ~
a closed K-invariantsubspace
of U is( g ~ K)-invariant.
Now our main result can be stated as :
THEOREM U.
(i)
U andU/U
s arealgebraically irreducible (g, (i.
e.they
have no nontrivial
(g , K)-invariant k-subspaces).
(ii)
No two of them for varinus s areisomorphic
asObviously
this theoremimplies topological
irreduciblities of U andU/Us ,
andthe
non-équivalence
of them.Remark.
(i).
The difficulties inproving
theconjecture
lie in the tact that s lemmaJ13-04
does not hold in our case. Fnr
example,
we can prove that theonly intertwining
ope-rators t)f V are the scalar
operators, though
V has the closedG-invariant
sub- spaceV 5 .
We prove our theoremby corstructing
the space from any non-zero élément(cf.
MORITA-MURASE[5J, 3-3).
(il).
It is remarkable that U is infinité dimensional and irreducible as a K-s
nodule
though
K is acompact
group. Thisphenomenon
causes adifficulty
indefining
the admissible
représentations.
[1] Automorphic forms, representations
andL-functions, part
1-2. -Providence,
American mathematical
Society, 1979 (Proceedings
ofSymposia
in pure Mathema-tics, 33).
[2]
GEL’ FAND( I. M.),
GRAEV(M. I.)
and VILENKIN(N. Ya) . -
Generalizedfunctions,
vol., 5 :Integral geometry
andrepresentation theory. -
NewYork, London,
Aca-demic
Press, 1966
[3]
GERRITZEN(L.)
and VAN DER PUT(M.). - Schottky
groups and Mumford curves. -Berlin, Heidelberg,
NewYork, Springer-Verlag, 1980 (Lecture
Notes in Mathema-tics, 817).
[4]
MORITA(Y.). - Analytic
functions on an open subset ofP1 (k) ,
J.für
reineund angew.
Math.,
t.311-312, 1979,
p.361-383.
[5]
MORITA(Y. )
and MURASE(A.). - Analytic representations
ofSL over
ap-adic
number
field,
J. of Fac. ofSc.,
Univ. ofTokyo,
Section1A,
t.28, 1982,
p.