• Aucun résultat trouvé

Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients. Intraoperative period

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients. Intraoperative period"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02626515

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02626515

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients.

Intraoperative period

Gaelle Cheisson, Sophie Jacqueminet, Emmanuel Cosson, Carole Ichai,

Anne-Marie Leguerrier, Bogdan Nicolescu-Catargi, Alexandre Ouattara, Igor

Tauveron, Paul Valensi, Dan Benhamou

To cite this version:

Gaelle Cheisson, Sophie Jacqueminet, Emmanuel Cosson, Carole Ichai, Anne-Marie Leguerrier,

et al..

Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients.

Intraoperative period.

Anaes-thesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Elsevier Masson, 2018, 37 (Supplement 1), pp.S21-S25.

�10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.018�. �hal-02626515�

(2)

Guidelines

Perioperative

management

of

adult

diabetic

patients.

Intraoperative

period

Gae¨lle

Cheisson

a

,

Sophie

Jacqueminet

b

,

Emmanuel

Cosson

c,d

,

Carole

Ichai

e,f

,

Anne-Marie

Leguerrier

g

,

Bogdan

Nicolescu-Catargi

h

,

Alexandre

Ouattara

i,j

,

Igor

Tauveron

k,l,m,n

,

Paul

Valensi

c

,

Dan

Benhamou

a,

*

,

working

party

approved

by

the

French

Society

of

Anaesthesia

and

Intensive

Care

Medicine

(SFAR),

the

French

Society

for

the

study

of

Diabetes

(SFD)

a,

*

a

Departmentofsurgicalanaesthesiaandintensivecare,SouthParisuniversityhospital,hoˆpitaldeBiceˆtre,AP–HP,78,rueduGe´ne´ral-Leclerc,94275Le Kremlin-Biceˆtre,France

b

Instituteofcardiometabolismandnutrition,Departmentofdiabetesandmetabolicdiseases,hoˆpitaldelaPitie´-Salpeˆtrie`re,AP–HP,75013Paris,France

c

Departmentofendocrinology,diabetologyandnutrition,hoˆpitalJean-Verdier(AP–HP),Paris13university,SorbonneParisCite´,CRNH-IdF,CINFO, 93140Bondy,France

dUMRU1153Inserm,U1125Inra,CNAM,SorbonneParisCite´,Paris13university,93000Bobigny,France e

Departmentofversatileintensivecare,hoˆpitalPasteur2,CHUdeNice,30,voieRomaine,06001Nicecedex1,France

f

InsermU1081,CNRSUMR7284(IRCAN),UniversityHospitalofNice,06001Nice,France

g

Departmentofdiabetologyandendocrinology,CHUdeRennes,hoˆpitalSuduniversityhospital,16,boulevarddeBulgarie,35056Rennes,France

h

Departmentofendocrinologyadmetabolicdiseases,hoˆpitalSaint-Andre´,Bordeauxuniversityhospital,1,rueJean-Burguet,33000Bordeaux,France

i

Bordeauxuniversityhospital,DepartmentofAnaesthesiaandCriticalCareII,MagellanMedico-SurgicalCentre,33000Bordeaux,France

jInserm,UMR1034,BiologyofCardiovascularDiseases,universite´ deBordeaux,33600Pessac,France

kDepartmentofendocrinologyanddiabetology,ClermontFerranduniversityhospital,58,rueMontalembert,63000Clermont-Ferrand,France l

UFRme´decine,ClermontAuvergneuniversity,,28,placeHenri-Dunant,63000Clermont-Ferrand,France

m

UMRCNRS6293,InsermU1103,GeneticReproductionanddevelopment,Clermont-Auvergneuniversity,63170Aubie`re,France

n

Endocrinology-Diabetology,CHUG.-Montpied,BP69,63003Clermont-Ferrand,France

Perioperativehyperglycaemiaisassociatedwithanincreasein morbidityandmortalityindiabeticandnon-diabeticpatients.It

results in delayed healing and an increase in the frequency of infections.Correctionofhyperglycaemiaimprovestheprognosisof thesepatientsandobjectivesforthebestbenefit/riskratioshould bedetermined.

ARTICLE INFO Articlehistory:

Availableonline16March2018 Keywords: Diabetes Perioperative Insulintherapy Insulinpump Glycaemiccontrol Insulinresistance ABSTRACT

Perioperative hyperglycaemia (>1.80g/L or 10mmol/L) increases morbidity (particularly due to infection)andmortality.Hypoglycaemiacanbemanagedintheperioperativeperiodbydecreasing bloodsugarlevelswithinsulinbetween0.90and1.80g/Lbutitmayoccurmorefrequentlywhenthe goalisstrictnormoglycaemia.Weproposecontinuousadministrationofinsulintherapyviaanelectronic syringe(IVES)intype-1diabetes(T1D)andtype-2diabetes(T2D)patientsifrequiredorincasesofstress hyperglycaemia.StoppingapersonalinsulinpumprequiresimmediatefollowonwithIVESinsulin.We recommend 4mg dexamethasonefor theprophylaxis of nausea and vomiting, rather than 8mg, combinedwithanotherantiemeticdrug.Theuseofregionalanaesthesia(RA),whenpossible,allowsfor bettercontrolofpostoperativepainandshouldbeprioritised.Analgesicrequirementsarehigherin patientswithpoorlycontrolledbloodsugarlevelsthaninthosewithHbA1c<6.5%.Thestruggleto preventhypothermia,theuseofRAandmultimodalanalgesia(whichallowforamorerapidrecoveryof bowelmovements),limitationofbloodloss,earlyambulationandminimallyinvasivesurgeryarethe preferredmeasurestoregulateperioperativeinsulinresistance.Finally,diabetesdoesnotchangethe usualrulesoffastingorofantibioticprophylaxis.

C 2018TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSASonbehalfofSocie´te´ franc¸aised’anesthe´sieetde

re´animation(Sfar).ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).

* Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:dan.benhamou@aphp.fr(D.Benhamou).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.018

2352-5568/ C2018TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSASonbehalfofSocie´te´ franc¸aised’anesthe´sieetdere´animation(Sfar).Thisisanopenaccessarticleunderthe

(3)

1. Consequencesofperioperativehyperglycaemia 1.1. Transversaldata

Most studies in this area have been conducted in cardiac surgery or intensive care units (ICUs). A significant positive relationhasbeenfoundbetweenmaximal perioperative hyper-glycaemiaandperioperativemortality[1],aswellasa10-times higher risk of complications when postoperative glycaemia was>2.5g/L (13.5mmol/L) [2]. In a retrospective study in 409 patients (20% diabetics), Gandhi et al. [3] concluded that perioperativehyperglycaemiawasanindependentriskfactorfor perioperativecomplicationsincludingmortalityandinfectionand thatanincreaseinglycaemiaof0.2g/L(1.1mmol/L)above1g/L (5.5mmol/L)increasedtheriskofpostoperativecomplicationsby 34%. Ouattara et al. found that in 200 diabetic patients who underwentcardiacsurgery,uncontrolledperioperative hypergly-caemia(>2g/Lor11mmol/L)wasassociatedwitha7-foldhigher riskofpostoperativecomplications[4].Innon-cardiacsurgery,a prospectivestudycomprising20%diabeticpatientsalsofoundthis link[5].

Perioperativehyperglycaemiaisanindependentriskfactorfor postoperativemorbidity/mortality[1,6].Inpatientswith undiag-noseddiabetes,hyperglycaemiawasassociatedwithanincreased risk of infection, re-interventions and intra-hospital mortality

[7,8].

In particular, a correlation exists between perioperative hyperglycaemia and the frequency of infections in diabetic patients.Incardiacsurgery,thereisanincreasein sternalbone infections in patients with mean preoperative blood sugar levels>2g/L(11mmol/L)[9].ForZerretal.,patientsdeveloping postoperativemediastinitis presented mean blood sugar levels thatweresignificantlyhigherduringthe48hpost-surgery(2.1vs 1.9g/L,P<0.003)(11.4vs10.5mmol/L)[8].

The prognosis of hyperglycaemia appears to be different depending on whether it is stress hyperglycaemia or chronic imbalanceinapatientwithpre-existingdiabetes.Inacohortof patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, Krinsley et al. [10]

reporteda differentglycaemiathresholdabovewhichmortality wassignificantlyincreased,whetherthepatientwasdiabetic(i.e. 1.8g/L or 10mmol/L) or not (i.e. 1.4g/L or 7.8mmol/L). Many studieshavereportedthatperioperativestresshyperglycaemia,at asamelevelofglycaemia,waspotentiallylessharmfultoapatient whowaspreviouslyknowntobediabetic[7,11].

Theprognosticimpactofperioperativehyperglycaemia justi-fiesits earlydetectionby performingregular measurementsof bloodsugarlevels,anditscorrection,particularlyinat-risksurgical patients (age>60-years, existence of a metabolic syndrome, previous history of transitory hyperglycaemia, cardiovascular history)[12].

1.2. Glycaemicobjectives:observationalstudies

Furnaryetal.[6]showedin4051aortocoronarybypasspatients studied between 1987 and 2001 that the management of hyperglycaemiaintheperioperativeperiodofthe26%ofpatients withdiabetesdecreasedthemortalitytoalevelcomparabletothat of non-diabetic patients. The management of hyperglycaemia evolved duringthestudy frommanagement thatwas uniquely postoperativethen perioperative, to perioperative until 3 days post-surgery,includingcontinuousadministrationofinsulinwith regularly reduced glycaemic objectives (1.5–2g/L or 8.25– 11mmol/L,then1–1.50g/Lor5.5–8.25mmol/L).Themeanblood sugar levels decreased to 1.77g/L (9.73mmol/L) compared to 2.14g/L (11.8mmol/L) inthehistoric group.Themortality rate decreasedby36% comparedtotheexpectedvalue,and by57%

comparedtothehistoricgroup(2.4vs.4.0%),reachingthatof non-diabetics(whichremainedstableduringthestudy).Thedecrease inmortalityincludedmortalityofcardiacoriginandacorrelation wasshownbetweenthedegreeofhyperglycaemiaandmortality. Comparableresultswerefoundinretrospectivestudieswherethe incidenceofmediastinitisandmortalitywasdecreasedby37%and 29%,respectively,ingroupswithaglycaemicobjectiveof<2g/L (11mmol/L) [8,13]. In a retrospective case-control study, D’Alessandro et al. [14]concluded that control of blood sugar levelsbetween1.5and2g/L(8.25to11mmol/L)isbeneficial,but onlyinpatientswithaEUROSCORE>4.

Aninitialmeta-analysisstudyin2004reporteda15%decrease in mortality in ICU when glycaemia wascontrolled by insulin therapy [15]. In diabeticpatients in theperioperativeperiod,a reduction of blood sugar levels to <1.8–2g/L (10–11mmol/L) decreased morbidity, in particular bone infections, duration of hospital stay and mortality of cardiac origin, particularly in patientswithbloodsugarlevels>1.75g/L(9.6mmol/L)[6].

Studies comparing different blood sugar levels in surgery regarding strictvs. moderate control,suchas theretrospective studyof4658diabeticpatientsbyBhamidipatietal.demonstrated thatpatientswithbloodsugarlevelsbetween1.26g/Land1.79g/L (7–10mmol/L) had a better prognosis than patients with levels<1.26g/L (7mmol/L) during aortocoronary bypass

[16]. Similarly, moderate control of glycaemia (<1.8g/L or 10mmol/L) decreased the number of hypoglycaemic episodes comparedtostrictcontrol(0.8–1.2g/Lor4.4–6.6mmol/L)without anydifferencesinmorbidity/mortalityincardiacsurgery[17,18]. 1.3. Glycaemicobjectives:randomisedinterventionalstudies

In a randomised study, Lazar et al. reported a significant decreaseinmorbiditywhencomparinginfectionsatthecardiac operative site (0% vs. 13%, P<0.01), in the treated group (glycaemic objective between 1.2 and 1.8g/L or 6.6 and 10mmol/L) compared to the untreated group (glycaemic objective<2.50g/Lor13.7mmol/L).Themeanbloodsugarlevels of the two groups were 1.38g/L (7.6mmol/L) and 2.26g/L (12.4mmol/L), respectively [19]. Tight perioperative glycaemic controlstartedbeforeinductionofanaesthesiaandcontinueduntil the twelfth hour post-surgery (1.26–2.00g/L or 7–11mmol/L), improved perioperative haemodynamic control. Follow-up five yearslaterdemonstratedabeneficialeffectonlong-termmortality

[19].

The studies mentioned above have determined the upper limitfortheglycaemicobjective,butdoesnormoglycaemiacarry a supplementary benefit? In 2001, van den Berghe et al. publishedthefirstrandomisedstudy(1558patientsinsurgical ICUs;60%incardiacsurgery,13%diabeticpatients)tocompare the strict objective (0.8–1g/L or 4.4–5.5mmol/L) versus the conventional objective (1.8–2g/L or 10–11mmol/L), demon-stratingadecreaseinmortalityof8%andadecreaseinmorbidity (including septicaemia and duration of antibiotic therapy)

[20]. van den Berghe et al. conducted a second study in a medicalICU(samerandomisationmodel,sameobjective)butdid notfindanybenefitofintensivetreatmentuponmortalityand septicaemia. The mortality decreased only in patients with a hospital stay>3 days, except for diabetics who represented approximately17%ofthepopulation.Intermsofmorbidity,they noted a decrease in the rate of renal failure, much earlier withdrawalofventilation,ashorterstayintheICUandearlier dischargefromhospital[21].

The VISEP study [22] in septic shock, and the Glucontrol study [23] in ICUs were stopped early due to more frequent severe hypoglycaemias in the group receiving intensive treat-ment. The NICE-SUGAR [24] multicentre, randomised study

G.Cheissonetal./AnaesthCritCarePainMed37(2018)S21–S25 S22

(4)

carriedouton6104patientsinsurgicalandmedicalICUs(20% diabeticpatients), comparing twoglycaemic objectives: 0.81– 1.08g/L(4.4–6mmol/L)vs. 1.8g/L(10mmol/L),showed the absenceofbenefitintermsofmorbidity. Incontrast,mortality was increased (+2.8%) as well as the number of severe hypoglycaemias in the group receiving intensive treatment. Themean bloodsugarlevelsobtainedin thetwogroupswere 1.15g/L (6.3mmol/L) vs. 1.44g/L (8mmol/L), respectively. In 2008, a meta-analysis [25] of the largest randomised studies concluded not only that there was no benefit of intensive managementinICUsbutalsothattherewasanincreasedriskof hypoglycaemia.

Itshouldbepointedoutthatinthemostrecentrandomised studies(NICE-SUGARinparticular),thegroupreceiving conven-tionaltreatmenthadmeanbloodsugarlevelsthatwereclearlyless than2g/L(11mmol/L).Intensivetreatmentwasnotsuperiorto conventional treatment but enabled blood sugar levels to be maintainedat<1.8g/L(10mmol/L),atthelevelsobtainedduring establishmentoftheprotocolinolderstudiesthatdemonstrateda benefitonmorbidity/mortality.

Finally, in a randomised study of 300 patients undergoing aortocoronarybypass, Umperriezetal. [26]compared different glycaemic objectives including strict control (1.1–1.4g/L or 6– 7.7mmol/L)andmoderatecontrol(1.4–1.8g/Lor7.7–10mmol/L) ofglycaemia.Nodifferencesinmorbidity,sternalinfectionrate, mortalityand duration of hospital staywere found, but hypo-glycaemic episodeswere morefrequent in the groupreceiving intensivetreatment.

1.4. Overall,whatglycaemicobjectivesareproposed?

Hyperglycaemia(>1.80g/Lor10mmol/L)inthe periopera-tive period increases morbidity (in particular infections) and mortality. The control of glycaemia should start in the preoperativeperiod and be continuedinthe early days after theoperation. Patients benefit from a reductioninglycaemia rather than intense insulin therapy and the objective of normoglycaemia (0.80–1.20g/L or 4.4–6.7mmol/L) increases the rate of severe hypoglycaemia and possibly mortality. Moderate glycaemic control (1.40–1.8g/L or 7.7–10mmol/L) appears,tobethebestcompromiseresultinginadecreasein morbidity/mortalitywithoutincreasingthefrequencyof hypo-glycaemia.

Maintainingstablebloodsugarlevelsbetween1.40and1.80g/L (7.7–10mmol/L)requirescomplexprotocolsemployingIVinsulin andthesearedifficulttoexecute,intheabsenceofa computer programme.

A broaderobjective is desirable:glycaemic control between 0.90and1.80g/L(5–10mmol/L),acut-offleadingtotherapeutic adjustment,toavoidhypoglycaemiaand tomaintainglycaemia below1.80g/L(10mmol/L).

(PracticalsheetsG,H,J,K,L,O).

2. Perioperativemanagementofglycaemia 2.1. Generalprinciples(PracticalSheetsO,G,H,J,K)

Inthepreoperativeperiod,werecommendthatmanagementof diabeticpatientsbebasedonthefollowingprinciples[27–30]:  avoid prolonged fasting: schedule the diabetic patient for

surgeryasearlyaspossibleinthemorning;

 haveaglycaemicobjectiveof5–10mmol/L(0.9–1.8g/L).There is no consensuson theoptimum glycaemia threshold in the perioperativeperiod,butatargetbloodsugarlevelof<1.8g/L (10mmol/L)willhelptoavoidhypoglycaemia[31–35];

 ifinsulin is required: ultra-rapidshort-acting analogues are preferred,administeredcontinually,byIVES[36–38];always giveninassociationwithIVglucose(equivalentof4g/h)and electrolytesdependingontherequirementsandbeingcareful to avoid hypokalaemia induced by insulin. There is great variabilitydependingontheprotocolsusedpreoperativelyfor insulintherapy,withoutanyevidencethatoneissuperiortothe others;

 ifthe patientis using a personal insulin pump, it shouldbe removed with mandatory immediate follow-on with IVES insulinatthestartoftheintervention;

 monitoring of glycaemia by repeated measurement of blood sugar levels every 1–2hours and control of kalaemia every 4hours in the perioperative period under insulin. Measure-mentsshouldbecarriedoutinarterialorvenousbloodrather than in capillary blood using glycaemia readers, which overestimatebloodsugarlevels,especially inthepresenceof vasoconstrictionand in hypoglycaemia[39].Thus, a value of 0.7g/L(3.8mmol/L)onglycaemiareadersshouldbeconsidered ashypoglycaemiaandimposecorrectiveactionandverification ofthevaluebymeasurementinalaboratory;

 allsolutes maybeusedintheperioperativeperiod,including Ringerlactate;

 perioperativeglycaemiccontrolisconditionedbythree param-eters:thetypeofdiabetes,thepreoperativeglycaemiccontrol andthetypeofsurgery(practicalsheetsG,H,J,K,L).

2.2. ProtocolforIVESinsulintherapy(practicalsheetO)

WeproposeaprotocolforIVESinsulintherapydevelopedby the working party that can be used preoperatively and perioperatively in a continuous surveillance unit or ICU (Fig. 1). It can be used in all T1D and T2D patients or in cases of stress,hyperglycaemia in patients withoutdiagnosed diabetes.

3. Additionalprinciplesofmanagement 3.1. Prophylaxisofnauseaandvomiting

Thepreventionofnauseaandvomitingisanessentialpartof theperioperativestrategy.Itisparticularlymoresoinadiabetic patient,takingintoaccounttheimportanceoftherapid resump-tionoffeeding.Inthiscontext,itisvalidtoproposeananaesthesia strategy that minimises the risk of nausea/vomiting (propofol rather than halogenated agents, avoid N2O, avoid reversal of

neuromuscularblockingagentswithneostigmine,favourRA)as wellasbroad-spectrumantiemetictherapy.Amongthepowerful antiemetic drugs that have beenvalidated in theperioperative period, dexamethasone carries therisk of hyperglycaemia.In a recent retrospective study, the authors evaluated the risk of hyperglycaemiaaccordingtothedoseofdexamethasoneused.As expected,adoseof8–10mgwasassociatedwithanincreasedrisk of hyperglycaemia when compared to a lower dose and the differenceinbloodsugarlevelswasstillsignificantinthisgroup during the first 24-h [40]. A dose of 8mg dexamethasone is considered tobemoreantiemetic thana doseof4mg [41]but exposes the patient to a higher risk of hyperglycaemia. We recommendtheuseof4mgdexamethasoneinassociationwith anotherantiemetic,suchasdroperidolora5-HT3antagonistdrug. 3.2. Treatmentofpain

Theeffectivemanagementofpostoperativepainisimportant. Poorlycontrolledpainisariskfactorforhyperglycaemia.Theusual

(5)

analgesicsdonotaffectglycaemiccontrolandcanbeusedwithout any modification of indication or dose. It has recently been demonstratedhoweverthatdiabeticpatientswithpoorglycaemic control (as measured by HbA1c level) have higher analgesic requirementsthanthosewithHbA1c<6.5%[42].TheuseofRA shouldbefavoured,whenpossible,asitisassociatedwithbetter controlofpostoperativepain.

3.3. Additionalmeasures

The degree of preoperative glycaemic control evaluated by HbA1c, the cessation of usual anti-diabetic treatments and preoperativefastinginthediabeticpatientwillallplayarolein theperioperativeglycaemicimbalance.Modulationof periopera-tiveinsulin resistanceis amajortherapeuticgoalasit helpsto significantly reducethe duration of postoperativehospital stay

[43].Thepreventionofhypothermia,theuseofRAandmultimodal analgesia (which will enable more rapid resumption of bowel movements),thelimitationofblood loss,earlyambulationand mini-invasivesurgeryareallmeasurestoprefer.

Thedogmaofprolongedpreoperativefastinghasrecentlybeen calledintoquestionbystudiesreportingthebeneficialeffectsof preoperativecarbohydrateadministrationonpostoperative insu-linresistanceinnon-diabeticpatients[43].Finally,diabetesdoes notaltertheusualrulesforantibioticprophylaxis.

Disclosureofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterest. Themembersoftheworkingpartyhavereceivedsupportfrom theFrenchSociety of Anaesthesia and IntensiveCare Medicine (SFAR)andtheFrenchSocietyfortheStudyofDiabetes(SFD)for

transportandaccommodationwhennecessary.Thetwonational bodieshavealsoprovidedhonorariafortranslationofthetexts.

References

[1]DoenstT,WijeysunderaD,KarkoutiK,ZechnerC,MagantiM,RaoV,etal. Hyperglycemiaduringcardiopulmonarybypassisanindependentriskfactor formortalityinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgery.JThoracCardiovsSurg 2005;130:1144.

[2]FishLH,WeaverTW,MooreAL,SteelLG.Valueofpostoperativebloodglucose inpredictingcomplicationsandlengthofstayaftercoronaryarterybypass grafting.AmJCardiol2003;92:74–6.

[3]GandhiGY,NuttallGA,AbelMD,MullanyCJ,SchaffHV,WilliamsBA,etal. Intraoperativehyperglycemiaandperioperativeoutcomesincardiacsurgery patients.MayoClinProcd2005;80:862–6.

[4]OuattaraA,LecomteP,LeManachY,LandiM,JacqueminetS,PlatonovI,etal. Poorintraoperative bloodglucose controlis associated witha worsened hospitaloutcomeaftercardiacsurgeryindiabeticpatients.Anesthesiology 2005;103:687–94.

[5]FrischA,ChandraP,SmileyD,PengL,RizzoM,GatcliffeC,etal.Prevalenceand clinicaloutcomeofhyperglycemiaintheperioperativeperiodinnoncardiac surgery.DiabetesCare2010;33:1783–8.

[6]Furnary AP,Gao G,Grunkemeier GL,WuY,Zerr KJ, BookinSO, et al. Continuousinsulininfusionreducesmortalityinpatientswithdiabetes undergoing coronary arterybypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1007–21.

[7]KwonS,ThompsonR,DellingerP,YanezD,FarrohkiE,FlumD.Importanceof perioperativeglycemiccontrolingeneralsurgery:areportfromtheSurgical CareandOutcomesAssessmentProgram.AnnSurg2013;257:8–14.

[8]ZerrKJ,etal.Glucosecontrollowerstheriskofwoundinfectionindiabetics afteropenheartoperations.AnnThoracSurg1997;63:356–61.

[9]FurnaryAP, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier GL, BookinS, KanhereV, Starr A. Continuousintravenousinsulininfusionreducestheincidenceofdeepsternal woundinfectionindiabeticpatientsaftercardiacsurgicalprocedures.Ann ThoracSurg1999;67:352–60[Discussion360-2].

[10]KrinsleyJS.Glycemiccontrol,diabeticstatus,andmortalityina heteroge-neouspopulationofcriticallyillpatientsbeforeand duringthe eraof intensiveglycemicmanagement:sixandone-halfyearsexperienceata university-affiliated community hospital. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;18:317–25.

Fig.1.PracticalsheetO–protocolforcontinuousIVinsulintherapy.Generalprinciples.T1D:type1diabetes;T2D:type2diabetes;G30%:30%glucose;Gly:glycaemia;IVD: intravenous,direct;IVES:intravenouselectronicsyringe;IU:internationalunits.

G.Cheissonetal./AnaesthCritCarePainMed37(2018)S21–S25 S24

(6)

[11]HuangCJ,KuokCH,KuoTB,HsuYW,TsaiPS.Pre-operativemeasurementof heartratevariabilitypredictshypotensionduringgeneralanesthesia.Acta anaesthesiolScand2006;50:542–8.

[12]CorsinoL,DhatariyaK,UmpierrezG.Managementofdiabetesand hypergly-cemiainhospitalizedpatients.In:DeGrootLJ,etal.,editors.Endotext..South Dartmouth(MA):MDText.com,Inc;2000.

[13]KrinsleyJS.Effect of anintensive glucose management protocol onthe mortalityofcriticallyilladultpatients.MayoClinProc2004;79:992–1000.

[14]D’AlessandroC,LeprinceP,GolmardJL,OuattaraA,AubertS,PavieA,etal. StrictglycemiccontrolreducesEuroSCOREexpectedmortalityindiabetic patientsundergoingmyocardialrevascularization.JThoracCardiovascSurg 2007;134:29–37.

[15]PittasAG,Siegel RD,Lau J. Insulintherapy forcritically illhospitalized patients:ameta-analysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials.ArchInternMed 2004;164:2005–11.

[16]BhamidipatiCM,LaParDJ,StukenborgGJ,MorrisonCC,KernJA,KronIL. Superiorityofmoderatecontrolofhyperglycemiatotightcontrolinpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:543–51.

[17]DesaiSP,HenryLL,HolmesSD,HuntSL,MartinCT,HebsurS,etal.Strictversus liberaltargetrangeforperioperativeglucoseinpatientsundergoingcoronary arterybypassgrafting:aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial.JThorac CardiovascSurg2012;143:318–25.

[18]LazarHL,McDonnellMM,ChipkinS,FitzgeraldC,BlissC,CabralH.Effectsof aggressiveversusmoderateglycemiccontrolonclinicaloutcomesindiabetic coronaryarterybypassgraftpatients.AnnSurg2011;254:458–63[Discussion 463–4].

[19]LazarHL,ChipkinSR,FitzgeraldCA,BaoY,CabralH,ApsteinCS.Tightglycemic controlindiabeticcoronaryarterybypassgraftpatientsimproves periopera-tive outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events. Circulation 2004;109:1497–502.

[20]vandenBergheG,etal.Intensiveinsulintherapyincriticallyillpatients.N EnglJMed2001;345:1359–67.

[21]vandenBergheG,WoutersP,WeekersF,VerwaestC,BruyninckxF,SchetzM,etal. IntensiveinsulintherapyinthemedicalICU.NEnglJMed2006;354:449–61.

[22]BrunkhorstFM,EngelC,BloosF,Meier-HellmannA,RagallerM,WeilerN,etal. GermanCompetenceNetworkSDepsis(SepNet).Intensiveinsulintherapyand pentastarchresuscitationinseveresepsis.NEnglJMed2008;358:125–39.

[23]PreiserJC,DevosP,Ruiz-SantanaS,Me´lotC,AnnaneD,GroeneveldJ,etal.A prospectiverandomisedmulti-centrecontrolledtrialontightglucosecontrol byintensiveinsulintherapyinadultintensivecareunits:theGlucontrolstudy. IntensiveCareMed2009;35:1738–48.

[24]StudyInvestigatorsNICE-SUGAR,FinferS,ChittockDR,SuSY,BlairD,FosterD, etal.Intensiveversusconventionalglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatients.N EnglJMed2009;360:1283–97.

[25]WienerRS,WienerDC,LarsonRJ.Benefitsandrisksoftightglucosecontrolin criticallyilladults:ameta-analysis.JAMA2008;300:933–44.

[26]UmpierrezG,CardonaS,PasquelF,JacobsS,PengL,UnigweM,etal. Random-ized controlledtrial of intensive versus conservative glucose controlin

patientsundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery:GLUCO-CABGtrial. DiabetesCare2015;38:1665–72.

[27]BagryHS,RaghavendranS,CarliF.Metabolicsyndromeandinsulinresistance: perioperativeconsiderations.Anesthesiology2008;108:506–23.

[28]BurgosLG,etal.Increasedintraoperativecardiovascularmorbidityin diabe-ticswithautonomicneuropathy.Anesthesiology1989;70:591–7.

[29]HallGM.Managementofdiabetesduringsurgery:30yroftheAlbertiregimen. BrJAnaesth2009;103:789–91.

[30]LenaD,etal.Glycemiccontrolintheintensivecareunitandduringthe postoperativeperiod.Anesthesiology2011;114:438–44.

[31]FurnaryAP, CheekDB,Holmes SC,HowellWL,KellySP. Achievingtight glycemiccontrolintheoperatingroom:lessonslearnedfrom12yearsin thetrenchesofaparadigmshiftinanestheticcare.SemiThoracCardiovasc Surg2006;18:39–45.

[32]GandhiGY,NuttallGA,AbelMD,MullanyCJ,SchaffHV,O’BrienPC,etal. Intensiveintraoperativeinsulintherapyversusconventionalglucose manage-ment during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:233–43.

[33]IchaiC,PreiserJC.Internationalrecommendationsforglucosecontrolinadult nondiabeticcriticallyillpatients.CriticalCare2010;14:R166.

[34]LazarHL,McDonnellM,ChipkinSR,FurnaryAP,EngelmanRM,SadhuAR, etal. TheSocietyofThoracicSurgeonspractice guidelineseries: blood glucose management during adult cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:663–9.

[35]MoghissiES,KorytkowskiMT,DiNardoM,EinhornD,HellmanR,HirschIB, etal.AmericanAssociationofClinicalEndocrinologistsandAmericanDiabetes Associationconsensusstatementoninpatientglycemiccontrol.DiabetesCare 2009;32:1119–31.

[36]KadoiY.Bloodglucosecontrolintheperioperativeperiod.MinervaAnestesiol 2012;78:574–95.

[37]LipshutzAK,GropperMA.Perioperativeglycemiccontrol:anevidence-based review.Anesthesiology2009;110:408–21.

[38]MeneghiniLF.Perioperativemanagementofdiabetes:translatingevidence intopractice.ClevelandClinClinJMed2009;76(Suppl.4):S53–9.

[39]Dungan K, Chapman J, Braithwaite SS, Buse J. Glucose measurement: confoundingissuesinsettingtargetsforinpatientmanagement.Diabetes Care2007;30:403–9.

[40]LowY,WhiteWD,HabibAS.Postoperativehyperglycemiaafter4-vs8–10-mg dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in patientswithtypeIIdiabetesmellitus:aretrospectivedatabaseanalysis.J ClinAnesth2015;27:589–94.

[41]HenziI,WalderB,TramerMR.Dexamethasoneforthepreventionof postop-erativenauseaandvomiting:aquantitativesystematicreview.AnesthAnalg 2000;90:186–94.

[42]KimSH,HwangJH.Preoperativeglycosylatedhaemoglobinasapredictorof postoperative analgesic requirements in diabeticpatients: a prospective observationalstudy.EurJAnaesthesiol2015;32:705–11.

[43]NygreJ,ThorellA,LjungqvistO.Preoperativeoralcarbohydratenutrition:an update.CurrOpinClinNutrMetabCare2001;4:255–9.

Figure

Fig. 1. Practical sheet O – protocol for continuous IV insulin therapy. General principles

Références

Documents relatifs

Our in vivo results indicate that the differentiation be- tween UA-containing and non-UA-containing stones can be accurately performed using DE dual-source

Similarly, the relationship of the different medicinal floras was calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficient of the residuals (Moer- man et al.. Regression

This thesis is based on the sociological criticism approach that examines literature in cultural and social context, and which is used in this study as a tool to

Le présent travail fait prendre conscience de différents aspects au sujet des stéréotypes de genre et peut donc permettre à un enseignant de sensibiliser ses élèves à

Using GC/MS technique, IAA (Rivier and Pilet 1974) and ABA (Pilet and Rivier 1980) have been found in maize root tips, light exposed roots containing more ABA than those kept

Pour plus d’information, veuillez vous référer au rapport sur les infections transmissibles sexuellement au Ca nada : 2017 au Canada.ca ou sur le site des Maladies à

L’évolution a été favorable chez 18 patients, avec uniquement deux amputations : - l’une, mineure, de l’index droit ; - l’autre, majeure, de la main droite pour une

In summary, the hypertriglyc- eridemia, the decreased c-HDL, the elevated c-LDL and the significant decrease PON1 activity, confirm the increased cardiovascular risk among CAD