HAL Id: jpa-00224708
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224708
Submitted on 1 Jan 1985
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
SEGREGATION AND DIFFUSION OF SULPHUR IN SOME POLYCRYSTALS AND BICRYSTALS :
INFLUENCE OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC FACTORS
M. Pierantoni, B. Aufray, F. Cabane
To cite this version:
M. Pierantoni, B. Aufray, F. Cabane. SEGREGATION AND DIFFUSION OF SULPHUR IN SOME POLYCRYSTALS AND BICRYSTALS : INFLUENCE OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC FAC- TORS. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1985, 46 (C4), pp.C4-517-C4-522. �10.1051/jphyscol:1985457�.
�jpa-00224708�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C£, supplement au n ° 4 , Tome 46, avril 1985 page C4-517
SEGREGATION AND DIFFUSION OF SULPHUR IN SOME POLYCRYSTALS AND BICRYSTALS : INFLUENCE OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC FACTORS
M. Pierantoni, B. Aufray and F. Cabane
Laboratoire de Métallurgie, Equipe de Recherche , Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Rue Henri Poincarê, 13397 Marseille Cedex 13, France
RESUME - Nous déduisons de données expérimentales, le rôle essentiel de la structure intergranulaire sur la diffusion et la ségrégation dans des bi- cristaux et des conséquences sur le sens des mesures dans les polycristaux.
ABSTRACT - From experimental data, we show the main role of intergranular structure on diffusion and segregation in bicrystals and some consequences on the data obtained in polycrystals.
Most experimental studies relative to grain boundaries (G.B.) are performed with polycrystalline materials ; the data are then interpreted on the assumption that a set of grain boundaries can be represented by a single grain boundary which is a homogeneous slab of matter, about 6 = 5.10 cm thick, between two adjacent crystals
(1). In this way, we have studied G.B. diffusion and segregation of sulphur in some f.c.c. metals(2,3,4). Actually, the various grain boundaries of a polycrystalline sample are likely very different with respect to segregation and diffusion. Conse- quently, it is difficult to give a precise meaning, at the atomic scale, to quantities measured in polycrystals.
In order to study the influence of crystallographic factors, we have performed expe- riments on bicrystals ; we have carried out a new technique to study G.B. segregation and diffusion ; for the first time,all these data could be obtained from only one experiment on a bicrystal (5). Presently, we describe on the one hand, the results we have obtained in Cu, Ag and Ni bicrystals and on the other hand, measurements made in polycrystalline alloys with different grain size and G.B. appearance. The experimental procedures have been described elsewhere in details so that we are going to only recall some points of particular interest for this study.
I - MATERIALS
High purity metals (99,999%) have always been used ; bicrystals were prepared through melting and solidification under appropriate conditions ; the crystallographic cha- racteristics of their grain boundaries are given in Table I ; note that the twin boundary Cu(tw), was the only grain boundary to be strictly straight ; the others were slightly bent or sinuous.
Polycrystalline samples were made from CuNi solid solutions of various nickel concen- tration Cj,(Ni) ; they have been elaborated with three different methods :
- method N° 1 ( C U N D T : melting of CuIJi mixture in a HF furnace, solidification, rolling and annealing at high temperature, under pure hydrogen.
- method N°2 (CuNi)j-j- : the last anneal was made in hydrogen containing very small amounts of hydrogen sulphide.
- methode S° 3 (CuNi)j-|--]- : nickel was diffused in pure copper previously annealed in pure hydrogen.
As shown in table II, the grain size depends on the preparation and in some cases on the Ni concentration.
+ Associee au C.N.R.S.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1985457
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
I1
-
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUESR a d i o a c t i v e s u l p h u r ( 3 5 ~ ) , was i n t r o d u c e d by means of a (E2S-H2) m i x t u r e t h e compo- s i t i o n of which was s o t h a t n o s u l p h i d e c o u l d form on t h e sample (6). Then t h e d i s - t r i b u t i o n of s u l p h u r i n t h e sample was d e t e r m i n e d from r a d i o a c t i v i t y measurements A, e a s i l y r e l a t e d t o s u l p h u r c o n c e n t r a t i o n C (7), b7hithin t h i s frame, t h r e e t e c h n i q u e s have been used.
The Secfinning and Cauvtting Technique (S.C.T.) was t h e more c l a s s i c a l one t o s t u d y G.B. d i f f u s i o n ; i t allowed t o d e t e r m i n e t h e G.B. d i f f u s i o n p a r a m e t e r ( 3 ) P= a6D gb i n g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s p e r p e n d i c u l a r t o t h e s u r f a c e . As shown i n f i g . 1, t h e superficial a c t i v i t y (A) was measured a s s l i c e s were removed p a r a l l e l t o t h e s u r f a c e . The para- m e t e r P was deduced from t h e a c t i v i t y v a r i a t i o n w i t h d e p t h .
REMOVAL OF SLICES
-
PP,RALLCL TO THE SURFACE
TIG. 1 : S e c t i o n i n g and Counting Technique (S.C.T.) f o r d i f f u s i o n
s t u d y w i t h r a d i o t r a c e r s such a s 3 5 s .
The FLUX Boundmy Technique (F.B.T.) (8) e n a b l e d u s t o a n a l y s e g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s pa- r a l l e l t o t h e s u r f a c e ; i n p r a c t i c e , a sample c o n t a i n i n g a f l a t boundary was made by s i n t e r i n g a p l a t e and a p l a t e l e t of t h e same m e t a l and s u b m i t t i n g t h e sample t o s e g r e g a t i o n t r e a t m e n t s . The b u l k c o n c e n t r a t i o n Cb of s u l p h u r n e a r t h e f l a t boundary, t h e g r a i n boundary C and t h e s e g r e g a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t were deduced from t h e a c t i v i t y v a r i a t i o n s w i t h deptR ( f i g . 2 ) .
FIG. 2 : The F l a t Boun- d a r y Technique (F.B.T.) : a = (Amax-%)
/%.
~8( f i i s t h e a b s o r p t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t f o r 35~-L3 r a y s by t h e m e t a l ) '
The Scanning Radiochexkcd E/lictroanuLynD (S.R.M.) r e c e n t l y developped i n o u r l a b o r a - t o r y ( 9 , 5 ) , e n a b l e d u s t o s t u d y g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s ~ e r p e n d i c u l a r t o t h e s u r f a c e i n b i - c r y s t a l s ; t h e r a d i o c h e m i c a l a n a l y s i s was performed t h r o u g h a narrow s l i t (45 um) p a r a l l e l t o t h e g r a i n boundary, moving a l o n g t h e s u r f a c e ( f i g . 3 ) . I n a g e n e r a l man- n e r , t h e a r e a s under t h e A/A = f ( x ) c u r v e s r e p r e s e n t e d t h e amount of s u l p h u r con- c e r n e d by s e g r e g a t i o n (S )Ofor a n a l y s i s performed on t h e s u r f a c e o r v e r y n e a r t o i t , by s e g r e g a t i o n and
G%!
d i f f u s i o n (Sseg+Sd, ) f o r a n a l y s i s performed d e e p e r(Y > 0 ) ; A, was t h e b u l k a c t i v i t y f o r y = 0. &e f i r s t a n a l y s i s ( Y % 0) was s u f f i -
c i e n t t o o b t a i n a and t h e s e g r e g a t e d amount ; w i t h t h e second a n a l y s i s , we o b t a i n e d i n a d d i t i o n Db and Dgb. Thus,we were a b l e t o o b t a i n a l l t h e d a t a r e l a t i v e t o G.B.
d i f f u s i o n and s e g r e g a t i o n i n a s i n g l e :rain boundary,from one e x p e r i m e n t i n a b i c r y s t a l
.
FIG. 3 : The Scanning Radiochemical M i c r o a n a l y s i s . I11
-
RESULTS111-1- Sulphur s e g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n i n b i c r y s t a l s
The e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s and d a t a r e l a t i v e t o b i c r y s t a l s of Ag, Cu and N i a r e c o l l e c t e d i n T a b l e ( I ) ( 2 , 3 , 5 ) ; t h e same q u a n t i t i e s , r e l a t i v e t o p o l y c r y s t a l s under t h e same c o n d i t i o n s a r e added f o r comparison. The e x p e r i m e n t a l t e c h n i q u e s a r e b r i e f l y i n d i c a t e d i n t h e p a r e n t h e s e s . R e c a l l t h a t t h e d a t a r e l a t i v e t o Cu ( 9 ) and Ag ( 1 0 ) were t h e f i r s t o n e s o b t a i n e d w i t h t h e S.R.M., when we had n o t y e t d e v e l o p e d a l l t h e p o s s i b i l i t i e s of t h e t e c h n i q u e . Thus t h e Cu t w i n b i c r y s t a l was o n l y a n a l y s e d v e r y n e a r t o t h e s u r f a c e where s e g r e g a t i o n c o u l d o n l y b e i n v o l v e d . The s i l v e r G.B. Ag(Rd) was r a t h e r s i n u o u s and t h e a n a l y s i s c o u l d n o t b e performed n e a r t h e s u r f a c e s o t h a t t h e r e s p e c t i v e c o n t r i b u t i o n of d i f f u s i o n and s e g r e g a t i o n was r o u g h l y known ; f o r t h e s e r e a s o n , w e h a v e g o t o n l y a n a p p r o x i m a t e v a l u e f o r a . N e v e r t h e l e s s i t i s c l e a r t h a t ct can be much more g r e a t e r o r s m a l l e r i n some b i c r y s t a l s t h a n i n p o l y c r y s t a l s of t h e same m e t a l .
A comparison of t h e f i r s t d a t a o b t a i n e d f o r tJi(2Oland NiftO) l e d t o admit l a r g e r s e g r e - g a t i o n i n t h e f i r s t one (19) ; i n d e e d , t h i s r e s u l t f a i l e d when more e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a were a v a i l a b l e f o r b o t h t h e s e b i c r y s t a l s : t h e p r e s e n t r e s u l t s have been o b t a i n e d re- c e n t l y and h a v e p r o f i t e d by v a r i o u s improvementsof t h e Scanning Radiochemical Xicro- a n a l y s i s : t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t p a r a m e t e r s , s u c h a s t h e s l i t w i d t h and t h e a c t u a l s h a p e of t h e g r a i n boundary, which g r e a t l y i n f l u e n c e t h e shape of t h e c u r v e
A/Ao - f ( ~ ) ~ , t r e a t m e n t of e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a i n o r d e r t o h a v e a smooth a n a l y s i s c u r - v e , u s e of s e v e r a l a n a l y s e s a t d i f f e r e n t d e p t h s ( y ) t o improve t h e r e s u l t s ( 5 ) . It a p p e a r s c l e a r l y ( t a b l e I ) t h a t s e g r e g a t i o n i s g r e a t e r and t h e d i f f u s i o n s l o w e r i n N i ( 4 0 ) t h a n i n Mi(2P) ; t h e amount of s e g r e g a t e d s u l p h u r remains always l a r g e i f com- p a r e ? t o t h e monolayer Z e f i n e d on t h e (100) s u r f a c e ( 1 1 ) . I t may b e s e e n t h a t , what- e v e r t h e t e c h n i q u e used, t h e G.B. d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s and t h e i r v a r i a t i o n s w i t h m i s o r i e n t a t i o n a r e w i t h i n t h e same r a n g e , which a c c o u n t s f o r t h e v a l i d i t y of t h e S.R.M. ; i n d e e d t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s f o u n d by S.C.T. a r e always s l i g h t l y s m a l l e r t h a n t h o s e found by S.R.M. ; t h i s r e s u l t i s w e l l e x p l a i n e d by some d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e d i f - f u s i o n t r e a t m e n t b e f o r e S.C.T. o r S.R.M. i s u s e d ( 1 2 ) .
111-2- Sulphur s e g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n i n CuNi p o l y c r y s t a l s
A l l t h e i n f o r m a t i o n s a r e c o l l e c t e d i n t a b l e 11. S e g r e g a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s and d i f f u - s i o n p a r a m e t e r s have b e e n d e t e r m i n e d u n d e r t h e same e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , r e s p e c - t i v e l y by t h e F l a t Boundary Technique (F.B.T.) and by t h e S.C.T.
It f o l l o w s from r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d i n ( C U N ~ ) ~ , t h a t t h e s u l p h u r s e g r e g a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t ct d e c r e a s e s when t h e a d d i t i o n of n i c k e l i s acconpaned w i t h a c o a r s e n i n g of t h e g r a i n s . From r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d i n ( C U P J ~ ) ~ ~ and ( C U N ~ ) ~ ~ ~ i t may b e s e e n t h a t on t h e c o n t r a r y , ct i n c r e a s e s w i t h t h e n i c k e l c o n c e n t r a t i o n .
C4-520 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
TABLE I : C a t a r e l a t i v e t o G.B. s e g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n e x p e r i m e n t s i n Ag,Cu,Ni S i c r v s t a l s and ~ o l v c r v s t a l s .
1
M a t e r i a lI
S i l v e rI
CopperI
N i c k e lBulk c o n c e n t r a t i o n
C b ( a t / a t ) ~ 1 0 6
I
. 6 71
8.1BICRYSTALS :
g r a i n boundary random" t w i n boundary a s s y m e t r i c
13
001 t i l td e f i n i t i o n
1 1
1 t i l t1
g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s0 = 36"57' 6= 1O0C+1O030' 1 0 = 20°+19"3
O f s u r f a c e m o n o 1 % 3 0
1
90Il a y e r i n t h e G.B.
---
--- --- --- --- ---
P a . 6 (cm3xs-l) gb
(s.R.H.) 7.4 1 0 - l ~ 1.7 I S - ' ~
(s.c.T.) 1.6 r 10-l3 3 . 7 1 9 - l ~
(S.C.T) 3.5 x 10-I
POLYCRYSTALS :
a (P.B.T.)
TABLE I1 : D a t a r e l a t i v e t o s e g r e g a t i o n e x p e r i m e n t s i n ( C u ~ i ) p o l y c r y s t a l s . ANNEALING
CONDITIONS
P r e p a r a t i o n Cb(Ni) ( a t l a t ) Cb ( S )
( a t / a t ) x l O 6 a (F.B.T.)
G r a i n s i z e C ( a t / a t ) x l o 6
---
gb Z o f s u r f a c c monolayer i n G.6,p(H2S)/p(H2) = 1 - 7 10 -4 ; T = 600°C
...
Mkthode I
,
( C U N ~ ) ~M6th.111 (CuNi)LII
7 x 1.28
21000
-
s m a l l
-- -
26900
-- -
14.6:
---
1.1 x 1 o 2 . 7 8
5100 l a r g e r 4000
---
2.2%
0 .7
10500 sma 11 7350
---
4 z
Pt6thoZe I1 , ( C U N ~ ) ~ ~ .5 x 1 c 2
.74
8100 l a r g e 6000
---
3.3R
0
- 7
10000 s m a l l 7000
4%
.5 x l o 2 -74
s m a l l
1.1 x 1 c 2 - 7 8
15000 s m a l l 11700
6.4%
I V - DISCUSSION
It f o l l o w s form r e s u l t s g i v e n h e r e , t h a t c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s i n f l u e n c e G.B. se- g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n of s u l p h u r i n b i c r y s t a l s and p o l y c r y s t a l s of m e t a l s .
IV-I-Origin of t h e d i f f e r e n c e s o b s e r v e d i n b i c r y s t a l s '
There a r e s i m i l a r mean amounts of s e g r e g a t e d s u l p h u r i n Cu and Ag p o l y c r y s t a 1 s ; t h e comparison of t h e d a t a o b t a i n e d r e s p e c t i v e l y f o r Cu(tw) and A g ( ~ d ) w i t h t h o s e o b t a i - ned i n p o l y c r y s t a l s l e a d s t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t t h e amount of s u l p h u r i s s m a l l e r i n a twinG.B.and l a r g e r i n a random G.B. t h a n t h e mean amount i n a s e t of G.B..This d i f f e r e n c e c a n b e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a n o b s e r v e d i n c r e a s e i n G.B. energy found i n aG.B.
of random m i s o r i e n t a t i o n i n comparison t o t h e G.B. e n e r g y found i n a t w i n G.B. ; t h i s i s e a s i l y e x p l a i n e d by t h e f a c t t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e between G.B. s i t e s and b u l k s i t e s i s g e n e r a l l y more marked i n t h e c a s e of a"randomt' G.B.than i n t h a t of a t w i n G.B..
It i s n o t s o e a s y t o e x p l a i n t h e d i f f e r e n c e o b s e r v e d between Mi(20) and N i ( 4 0 ) f o r t h e G.B. e n e r g i e s a r e q u i t e t h e same f o r t h e s e two G.B. i n f . c . c . m e t a l s ( 1 3 ) , and wehave t e s t e d i t was s o i n n i c k e l . Hence, G.B. e n e r g y i s n o t a s u f f i c i e n t p a r a m e t e r t o e x p l a i n a l a r g e r s e g r e g a t i o n i n ~ i ( 4 0 ) t h a n i n N i ( 2 0 ) . A c t u a l l y , G.B. energy i s a sum, e x t e n d e d t o t h e v a r i o u s G.B. s i t e s , of t e r m s (Ni/N) x E i , p r o d u c t o f t h e pro- p e r e n e r g y E i of e v e r y s i t e by t h e p r o p o r t i o n of t h e s e s i t e s i n t h e G.B.,Rence seve- r a l G.B. w i t h e q u i v a l e n t e n e r g i e s , c a n b e d e s c r i b e d w i t h d i f f e r e n t s t r u c t u r e s and s e v e r a l s t r u c t u r e s a r e o f t e n p o s s i b l e f o r t h e same G.B. ( 1 4 ) .
A c r i t e r i o n c o n n e c t e d t o G.B. s t r u c t u r e c a n t h e r e f o r e a c c o u n t f o r d i f f e r e n t beha- v i o u r s of G.B. s u c h a s N i ( 2 0 ) an2 N i ( 4 0 ) . I h i t h i n t h i s frame, c a l c u l a t i o n s made f o r Bi s e g r e g a t i o n i n Cu ( 1 5 ) , showed t h a t t h e energy a s s o c i a t e d t o s e g r e g a t i o n v a r i e s from one s i t e t o a n o t h e r , f o r low G.B. c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ; s e g r e g a t i o n might t h e n e l i - m i n a t e some of t h e p o s s i b l e s t r u c t u r e s and f a v o u r o t h e r s . As t h e s e g r e g a t e d amount i n c r e a s e s , i n t e r a c t i o n s between s e g r e g a t e d atoms o c c u r and change t h e p r o p e n s i t y t o s e g r e g a t i o n of unoccupied s i t e s , G.B. atoms move a s i d e t h e i r i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n s and f i n a l l y a two d i m e n s i o n a l o r d e r t a k e s p l a c e s o t h a t t h e mean d i s t a n c e s Bi-Bi and Cu-Bi come t o agreement w i t h t h e i n t e r a c t i o n s between t h e s e atoms. It i s o b v i o u s t h a t t h i s s t r u c t u r a l a s p e c t i s much more i m p o r t a n t f o r s u l p h u r t h a n f o r a m e t a l i n a n o t h e r m e t a l ; i t was shown, f o r i n s t a n c e , t h a t G.B. e m b r i t t l e m e n t of n i c k e l by s u l p h u r , i s n o t s t r i c t l y a f u n c t i o n of c o n c e n t r a t i o n b u t of t h e s t r u c t u r e a s w e l l ( 1 6 ) . Indeed t h e marked c o v a l e n t c h a r a c t e r of t h e Ni-S bond on t h e s u r f a c e (1 7 ) l e a d s t o e x p e c t some d i r e c t i v i t y f o r Ni-S bond i n t h e G . B . , t h a t d e t e r m i n e s t o a g r e a t ex- t e n t , a s t r u c t u r e f o r t h e s e g r e g a t e d g r a i n boundary which i s n o t e q u a l l y p o s s i b l e f o r a l l t h e G.B. and depends on s t r u c t u r a l f a c t o r s more t h a n on e n e r g e t i c a l ones. F i n a l - l y , s t r u c t u r e q u i t e d i f f e r e n t f o r N i ( 2 0 ) and N i ( 4 0 ) i n p u r e M i ( l a ) , c o u l d b e t h e o r i g i n of t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n a . Note moreover t h a t f o r such h i g h c o v e r a g e s ( 0 . 3 a n 3 0 . 9 rnonolayer),atwo i i m e n s i o n a l Xi-S phase p r o b a b l y forms, t h e s t r u c t u r e of which i s c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e Ni-S c h e m i c a l bond and w i t h t h e G . B . c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s . The t r a n s f e r of m a t t e r a l o n g a g r a i n boundary r e s u l t s from a c o m p e t i t i o n between d i f - f u s i o n i n t h e G.B. and b u l k d i f f u s i o n from t h e G.B..For t h i s r e a s o n , i t i s g e n e r a l l y a d m i t t e d t h a t s e g r e g a t i o n , which i m p l i e s a t t r a c t i o n of s o l u t e atoms towards G.B., f a v o u r s G.B. d i f f u s i o n . T h i s enhancement a p p e a r s t h r o u g h t h e e x p r e s s i o n P = a&?
where P v a r i e s p r o p o r t i o n a l t o a ; t h i s e f f e c t , o f t e n o b s e r v e d , i s o n l y u n d e r s t a n d a - gb b l e i f t h e G.B. : ' i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t v a r i e s o n l y a l i t t l e w i t h t h e c h e m i c a l G.B.
c o m p c s i t i o n . F o r t h e N i b i c r y s t a l s we h a v e s t u d i e d , P i s s m a l l e r f o r N i ( 4 0 ) where s e g r e g a t i o n i s g r e a t e r
,
t h a n f o r N i ( 2 0 ) where s e g r e g a t i o n i s s m a l l e r u n d e r t h e same e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s . We must t h e n admit t h a t a v e r y s t r o n g solute-G.B a t t r a c t i o n ( a s f o r s u l p h u r ) i s accompanied w i t h a l a r g e d e c r e a s e of t h e G.B. m o b i l i - t y of t h e s o l u t e : s u l p h u r atoms a r e t r a p p e d on some s i t e s ; t h i s t r a p p i n g e f f e c t c o u n t e r b a l a n c e s t h e a t t r a c t i v e e f f e c t of t h e G.B..This i s o b v i o u s when l o o k i n g a t t h e Dfib v a l u e s which a r e lower f o r s u l p h u r t h a n f o r s e l f d i f f u s i o n i n p u r e n i c k e l (D b ( 1) % 10-8 cm2x s-I ( 1 9 ) ) and lower a s s e g r e g a t i o n i s g r e a t e r ; however, v a f u e s deduced from P,must b e used w i t h c a r e b e c a u s e t h e e x p r e s s i o n P = a6Dgb o b t a i - Dgb ned w i t h a v e r y s i m p l e G.B. model ( 1 ) , c a n n o t p r o b a b l y a c c o u n t e x a c t l y f o r t h e two o p p o s i t e e f f e c t s of s e g r e g a t i o n on G.B. d i f f u s i o n .C4-522 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
IV-2- C r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c e f f e c t s i n p o l y c r y s t a l s
I n Cu-Ni s o l i d s o l u t i o n ( t a b l e 1 1 ) , o p p o s i t e r e s u l t s have been a p p a r e n t l y o b t a i n e d ; inc'eed, i t can b e c o n n e c t e d t o t h e e f f e c t of c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s i f t h e f o l l o - wing o b s e r v a t i o n s a r e talceri i n t o a c c o u n t :
- i n t h e p r e s e n t work, a i s a n a v e r a g e v a l u e on a l l t h e g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s ;
-
G.B. c o a r s e n i n g i s l i k e l y accompanied by t h e l o s s of t h e h i g h e s t energy G.B.- Cu(tw) and Ag(Rd) b e h a v i o u r s l e a d t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t s e g r e g a t i o n o c c u r s g e n e r a l l y i n h i g h e s t energy G.B.
Thus, t h e v a r i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s performed i n ( C U N ~ ) ~ s e r i e s cannot be compared b e c a u s e t h e y a r e performed i n d i f f e r e n t s e t s of G.B.
.
F i n a l l y , c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s can h i d e ( o r enhance) t h e e f f e c t of a n a l l o y i n g element ; c o n s e q u e n t l y , i t i s neces- s a r y t o b e s u r e t h a t a measurements a r e performed i n s i m i l a r G.B. b e f o r e comparison c a n b e made.C r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s p l a y a l s o a r o l e when s e g r e g a t i o n i s connected t o G.B. d i f - f u s i o n i n t h e same p o l y c r y s t a l . Thus, under t h e same e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , t h e d i f f u s i o n p a r a m e t e r P i n c r e a s e s from Ni(40) t o Ni(20) and t o Ni(Po1y) ( t a b l e I ) ; t h a t i s t o s a y , t h a t i n a p o l y c r y s t a l , G.B. t r a n s f e r of m a t t e r c h i e f l y o c c u r s t h r o u g h G.B. where s e g r e g a t i o n i s s m a l l . I n o t h e r words, P i s measured i n G.B. which l i t t l e c o n t r i b u t e t o a . It f o l l o w s from t h i s s i t u a t i o n t h a t s i m u l t a n e o u s d e t e r m i n a t i o n of
a and P i n p o l y c r y s t a l s o n l y l e a d t o a n a p p a r e n t Dgb v a l u e c a l c u l a t e d by P =aGDgb ; no p h y s i c a l meaning c a n be a t t r i b u t e d t o Dgb a t t h e atomic s c a l e , p r i n c i p a l l y when s e g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n g r e a t l y v a r y from one G.B. t o a n o t h e r , a s f o r s u l p h u r i n m e t a l s .
COPJCLUSION
Experiments of G.B. s e g r e g a t i o n and d i f f u s i o n of s u l p h u r i n f . c . c . m e t a l s e n a b l e d us t o l a y some emphasis on t h e r o l e of c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c f a c t o r s . I n b i c r y s t a l s t h e main a s p e c t s concern t h e p o s s i b i l i t y f o r a G.B. t o p r o v i d e a s t r u c t u r e i n agreement w i t h t h e s t r o n g somewhat c o v a l e n t Ni-S bond, and t h e l a r g e d e c r e a s e of t h e s u l p h u r m o b i l i t y when s e g r e g a t i o n o c c u r s . Both t h e s e e f f e c t s may i n f l u e n c e t h e r e s u l t s ob- t a i n e d i n p o l y c r y s t a l s and must b e t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t t o compare d i f f u s i o n and s e g r e - g a t i o n d a t a .
REFERENCES
( 1 ) FISHER J . C . , J. Appl. Phys.,
2,
74, (1951)( 2 ) AUFRAY B., CABANE-BROUTY F., CABANE J., Acta I l e t . ,
7,
1849, (1979) (3) IIOYA F., HOYA-GONTIER G.E., J. Phys.,36,
C4, 157, (1'275)( 4 ) PINEAU A . , AUFRAY B., CABAPJE-BROUTV F . , CABANE J., Acta Met., 31, 1047, (1983) ( 5 ) PIERANTONI PI., These Docteur I n g e n i e u r "Science d e s PlatCriauxl'
-
b l a r s e i l l e 1984 ( 6 ) OUDAR J . , MPtaux C o r r o s i o n I n d u s t r i e s , 397, (1960)( 7 ) SEIBEL G . , I n t e r n a t . , J. Appl. R a d i o i s o t o p e s ,
2,
679, (1964) ( 8 ) MOYA-GOMTIER G.E., MOYA F., S c r i p t a Met., S , 153, (1974) ( 9 ) AUFRAY B., CABANE J . , S c r i p t a Met., 15, 1339, (1981) (1 0 ) PIERANTOMI Pi., AUSPAY B . , CABANE F. , T i n p r e s s ) (11) PERDEREAU M., OUDAR J., S u r f . S c i . ,2,
83, (1970)(12) PIERANTONI PI., AUFRAY B . , CABAME F., ( t o b e p u b l i s h e d ) s e e a l s o ( 5 ) (13) HASSON G.C., GOUX C., S c r i p t a I l e t . ,
2,
889, (1971)(14) VITEK V . , SUTTON A.P., SMITE! D.A., POND R.C., Grain Boundary S t r u c t u r e and k i n e t i c s , Am. Soc. P l e t a l s , p. 115, (1980)
( 1 5 ) SUTTON A.P., VITEK V., Acta Met., 30, 2011, (19C2) (16) BRIANT C.L., MESSMER, R.P., J. Phys. 43, C6, 255, (1382)
(17) OUDAR J . , P r o c . Of 4 t h S.S. and 3 t h E ~ S S
-
Suppl."Le Vide, l e s couches minces"N0201, 645, (IYCO)
( 1 8 ) BALUFFI R.TJ., Net. Trans. A . ,