HAL Id: jpa-00209330
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00209330
Submitted on 1 Jan 1981
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies
S. Bliman, S. Dousson, B. Jacquot, D. van Houtte
To cite this version:
S. Bliman, S. Dousson, B. Jacquot, D. van Houtte. Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies. Journal de Physique, 1981, 42 (10), pp.1387-1391.
�10.1051/jphys:0198100420100138700�. �jpa-00209330�
Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding
with
raregas targets
atkeV energies
S. Bliman
(*),
S. Dousson(**),
B.Jacquot (*)
and D. Van Houtte(*)
(*) Département de Recherche sur la Fusion Contrôlée.
(**) Département de Recherche Fondamentale, CPN.
Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de Grenoble, 85 X, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France
(Reçu le 23 mars 1981, accepté le 9 juin 1981)
Résumé. 2014 Les sections efficaces d’échange de charge ont été mesurées pour les ions Arq+ de charge initiale 2 ~ q ~ 12 incidents sur des gaz rares : hélium, néon et argon. Les sections efficaces mesurées dans le domaine
d’énergie 2 q-10 q keV sont indépendantes de l’énergie. On observe que les valeurs des sections efficaces oscillent autour d’une variation moyenne linéaire en charge. Les sections efficaces présentent une dépendance par rapport
au potentiel d’ionisation de la cible.
Abstract. 2014 Single electron capture cross sections have been measured for argon ions with initial charge 2 ~ q ~ 12 incident on rare gas targets of helium, neon and argon. The cross sections measured in the energy range 2 q-10 q keV
are quasi energy independent. It is observed that the cross sections show oscillations about a mean linear variation in charge. The cross sections show a dependence on the target ionization potential.
Classification Physics Abstracts 34.70
1. Introduction. - Electron capture
by
low energymultiply charged
ionscolliding
on neutral atoms hasbecome a
subject
of considerable interest in connection with fusion research[1,
2] andastrophysical problems [3-6].
A great number of calculations have resulted,which are based on different models
[7-9].
Eventhough
the interest of
experimentalists
has been focussed onthe studies of
charge exchange
on. atomichydrogen [10-12]
in the low andhigh
energy range and on mole- cular deuterium[13,
14], a great number of measu-rements have been
performed utilizing
various gaseoustargets [15, 16]. From these results, a
scaling
law hasbeen deduced for
practical
purposes[17].
The
object
of this paper is to report experimentalvalues for the
single
electron capture cross sections for Arq+ ions(2 q 12),
incident on He, Ne and Arat
laboratory
kineticenergies
in the range 2q-10 q
keV.In section 2, the
experimental
and data evaluationprocedures
arepresented ;
the main features of the ion source have beenpresented
elsewhere[18].
Insection 3, the cross sections for the capture of one electron are
given
for the collision of Ar ions on the different gas targets He, Ne and Ar ; their accuraciesare discussed. A
comparison
withpreviously published
data and theoretical
predictions
is made.2.
Experimental
and data evaluationprocédures.
-The
experimental
set up has been described elsewhere[19].
Briefly,
a well collimated beam of argon ionswith initial
charge 2 q
12 is directed into acollision cell
containing
the target gas (He, Ne orAr).
The pressure in the collision cell is
adjusted, utilizing
an automatic pressure
regulated
admission valve in the range 5 x 10-’-5 x 10- 5 torr. The ion energy range extends from2 q
to10 q keV where q
is theincident ion
charge.
The cross sections are measuredutilizing
a standard beam target method. In thesingle
collision
approximation,
theslope
of the linear part of the curve :gives
thecharge exchange
cross section of electrons from the target to the incident ion of initialcharge
iand final
charge
f. The associated currents 1i(0) and If(0) are measured in the limit of zero target thicknessn = no 1.
(no
is the target numberdensity,
1 itslength.)
Hereafter we consider
only single
electroncharge exchange ; q being
the initialcharge
of theprojectile,
the cross section may be written as :
The estimate of the errors in a cross section value is
typically
of the order of± 20 %
as inpreviously
obtained results [20].
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198100420100138700
1388
3. Results and discussion. - 3.1 RESULTS. - As is
usually
observed incharge exchange
collisions ofmultiply charged
ions on atomic or molecular targetsat velocities v vo, for a
given
incident ioncharge,
the cross sections for one or many electron
exchange
are
weakly
energydependent [16,
20, 21]. The incidentcharge dependences
of the cross section for argon ionscolliding
with He, Ne and Ar are shown infigures
1,2 and 3
respectively.
An
interesting
feature is seen on thesefigures :
the mean cross section variation is
satisfactorily
described
by
Qq,q _ 1 ~ const. x q. In thisproposed
fit, as may be seen fromcomparison
of Q9,q_ 1 infigures
1, 2 and 3 the target is different : from He to Ne and to Ar, the ionizationpotential
decreases.In
figure
4 aregiven
forcomparison
the measured cross sections forsingle
electronexchange
in thecollision of ions on He :
triangles designate
argon ions up tocharge
7[15],
crosses Xe ions up tocharge
8[15].
Our values for argon ions areslightly
smaller than those of Salzborn and Müller. Infigure
5 aregiven
forcomparison,
the measured cross sections forsingle
electron
exchange
in the collision of different ions onNe : Xe ions [15]
(closed
circles) up tocharge
8;Ar ions up to
charge
7 (opentriangles) [ 15]
and present data. The agreement between measured values forFig. 1. - One electron charge exchange cross sections of argon ions (2 q 12) colliding He atoms as a function of projectile charge (open circles 0). Comparison to theoretical results. Open
square : 0 Ref. [7] ; closed points : Ob Ref. [8] ; crosses : x Ref. [9] ;
open triangles : A Ref. [15].
Fig. 2. - One electron capture cross section in the charge exchange
collision of Arq+ ions (2 q 12) on Ne as function of projectile charge (symbols are as in Fig. 1).
J.l1B,;IUt:’IH luii 4
Fig. 3. - One electron capture cross section in the charge exchange
collision of Arq+ ions (2 q 12) on Ar as function of projectile charge (symbols as in Fig. 1).
Fig. 4. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of différent ions on He. 0 open circles : present data Ar’l+ (2 q 12); A triangles : Ar’l+, Ref. [21]; x crosses : Xeq+, Ref. [15].
charges
up to 8 isgood. Recently
in the energy range 7-45 eV, the total electron capture of Nelo+ on Ne has been measuredby
Vane et al.[22]. They
haveshown that the total cross section
(of
order2.4 x 10-15 cm2 + 30
%)
isvelocity independent.
It is
interesting
to notice that Nelo+undergoing charge exchange
with Ne behaves as Arlo+colliding
on Ne,
giving
a cross section of the same order ofmagnitude. Considering
the present data and estimateduncertainty,
since 03C3q,g _ 1 isalways
less the totalexchange
cross section(03C3q,q-k
for k > 1 have to beadded
to03C3q,q - 1 ),
it is observed that the agreement isgood (on
Fig.
5, Ne 10 + exchange cross section isrepresented by
astar).
Figure
6 summarizes the measured cross section values 03C3q,q - 1 for different ionsimpinging
on Ar.Gardner et al.
[23]
have used C, N and 0 ions up tocharge Z - 2 (Z atomic number). For
higher charges
Salzborn et al.[15J
have utilized Ar ions up tocharge
+ 7 and Xe up to charge + 8 ; it has been noticed
Fig. 6. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of différent ions on Ar : 0 open circles : present data Ar9+ (2 q K 12); . closed points : Xeq+, Ref. [15]; 0394, V, D : Oq-, N’9+, 0+, Ref. [23].
IF DEPHYSIQUE-T 42 NO10 OCTOBER 1981
Fig. 5. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of different ions on Ne : 0 open circles : present data Arll+ (2 - q - 12); f:}. triangles : Arq+, Ref. [21] ; closed circles :
Xeq+, Ref. [15] ; * star, Ref. [22].
1390
that these values have been overestimated
(for
char-ges > 4)
by
as much as40 % [23,
20].Correcting gives
values in agreement with the present data.
3.2 DISCUSSION. - On
figures
1, 2 and 3 the results of différent theoretical calculations are repre- sented forcomparison
with the present data.The cross sections, calculated by Presnyakov
et al. [7], show
a q2
dependence. In thelimiting
casewhere v vo, the single electron capture cross section is expressed as :
with ao = 0.53 A and LP.
(eV)
ionizationpotential
ofthe target
(q
is at least >3).
On the afore mentionedfigures
open squares are associated with this formula.It is
recognized
that, forinterpretation,
this model is of limited use.The open
triangles
represent theexperimental fitting
law forsingle
electron transfer asproposed by
Salzborn et al.
[15, 17] ;
the cross section is written asFor targets with
high
ionizationpotentials
(He,Ne)
this fit is
satisfactory
but we wouldprefer
a linearvariation
in q
asrepresented (dot
dashedline).
The crosses on
figures
1, 2 and 3 represent the results of Grozdanov et al.[9]
calculations. Their crosssection variation is linear
in q
andparallel
to our dotslash line.
The filled circles are the results of the theoretical evaluation of Olson et al.
[8] : they
are closer to the present values for Ar than those of Grozdanov et al.These theoretical evaluations
[8,
9] give values gene-rally
toolarge compared
to present and otherexperi-
mental values
(Figs.
4, 5 and 6).More
recently, using
the Bohr Lindhard crosssections for the capture of one classical [24] electron combined with the statistical Bohr atom electron
distribution, Knudsen et al.
[25]
have derived asimple
estimate of the
single
electron capture cross section : in their calculationthey
show that in the limit of low ionvelocity,
the cross section is linear inprojectile charge q (with q > 4)
andindependent
ofprojectile velocity according
towith z : target atomic number, LP. target ionization
potential, Io
atomichydrogen
ionizationpotential
and1- -B 1/2)
With a parameter to be
adjusted, they
obtain in theer
compared
with our value of 3.37 x 10-16. In the caseof argon (a = 0.46)
they
obtaincapture ~ 10-15
ourq
value
being
6 x 10-16. It should be noted that the paramater a is foundby fitting
for each target atom the calculated cross sections to lowvelocity high charge
ion data. In the case of argon atom target, the data have been taken from Salzborn et al.
[15] (their
valuesare
overestimated)
andZwally et
al.[26] (their
datahad been obtained with C4 + and were a factor of - 3 too
high
due toexperimental difficulties);
thesearguments considered would thus lead to a
larger
value for a
(- 0.6)
which thusgive
a lower acaptureq value.
We consider now
specifically
the case of Ar6 +colliding
He for which theoretical estimate of the crosssections have been made
utilizing
a molecular model[27] ;
it appears thatsumming
the cross sections for capture of one electron into 3d, 4s and4p
states of Ar5 +gives
a total-cross section of orderat 12 keV
decreasing
to 1.9 x lO-15 cm’ at 24 keV.The present results are in excellent agreement with these theoretical
predictions :
the mean value of2 x 10-15 cm’ shown in
figures
1 and 4 is in fact associated with aslight
decrease over theexperimental
energy range : the extent of the cross section variation is of order ± 10
%
about the mean value ;being
aboutmaximum at the lower limit of the energy
explored.
This has also been observed
by
Müller et al.[28].
In the case of a Ne target a fit of the present data
to the
simplified theory
[25] cited above ispossible
force = 0.5, in the
projectile
low energy limit.Double electron capture on autoionization levels
can also occur
[15,
20] ; but since the double capturecross sections are one order of
magnitude
smallerthan the
single
capture cross section, the values obtained forsingle
capture areonly perturbed
to asmall extent. Furthermore after a
single
electron capture, the(q - 1)
+ ion may be excited and if this excitation islarge enough,
autoionization may lead toionization of other electrons. If this process were to take
place prior
to post collisioncharge analysis,
a lower capture cross section would be observed.
These two effects cannot
definitely
be ruled out butit is reasonable to assume that the cross sections are not
largely
influencedby
them.4. Conclusion. - The evolution of
charge exchange
cross sections of argon ions
(2 q 12)
on different target atoms has been measured in the low energy limit. It has been shown to be ionvelocity independent
and
varying
as qfor q >
4. Assuggested by
Knudsenet al.
[25],
the present data can be shown to fit withfor q >, 4. This leads to The oscillations around the mean variation line as
function
of q
areprobably
attributable tospecific
electronic
configurations
in thecolliding pair. They
have been
predicted
formultiply charged
ions col-liding
on atomichydrogen [27].
For the caseof Ar",
a relative minimum is observed which is associated with a Ne like ion structure.
References
[1] HULSE, R. A., POST, D. E. and MIKKELSEN, D. R., J. Phys. B 13 (1980) 3095.
[2] DE HEER, F. J., in Atomic and Molecular processes in Controlled thermonuclear fusion, edited by M. R. C. McDowell and E. M. Ferendeci (Plenum Press, New York) 1980,
p. 351.
[3] FIELD, G. B., in Atomic and Molecular Physics and the Inter-
stellar matter, edited by R. Balian, R. Encrenaz and J.
Lequeux (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1975.
[4] DALGARNO, A., in advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics,
edited by D. R. Bates (Academic Press, New York) 1979, vol. 15, p. 37.
[5] PEQUIGNOT, D., ALDROVANDI, S. M. V. and STASINSKA, G., Astron. Astrophys. 63 (1979) 313.
[6] ULRICH, M. H. and PEQUIGNOT, D., The Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 45.
[7] PRESNYAKOV, L. P. and ULANTSEV, A. D., Sov. J. Quant.
Electron. 4 (1975) 1320, 1, Kvant. Elektron. (1974) 2377.
[8] OLSON, R. E. and SALOP, A., Phys. Rev. A 14 (1976) 579.
[9] GROZDANOV, T. P. and JANEV, R. K., Phys. Rev. A 17 (1978)
880.
[10] SEIM, W., MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 80A (1980) 20.
[11] CRANDALL, D. H., PHANEUF, R. A. and MEYER, F. W., Phys.
Rev. A 22 (1980) 379.
[12] MEYER, F. W., PHANEUF, R. A., KIM, H. J., HVELPLUND, P.
and STELSON, P. H., Phys. Rev. A 19 (1979) 515.
[13] BLIMAN, S., AUBERT, J., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 23 (1981) 1703.
[14] BLIMAN, S., DOUSSON, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., J. Physique 42 (1981) 399.
[15] SALZBORN, E. and MÜLLER, A., in Electronic and Atomic
Collisions, invited papers and progress reports - Kyoto 1979, edited by N. Oda and K. Takayanagi (North Hol- land, Amsterdam) 1980, p. 407.
[16] AUBERT, J., BLIMAN, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 22 (1980) 2403.
[17] MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 62A (1977) 391.
[18] GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and PAUTHENET, R., Revue Phys.
Appl. 15 (1980) 995.
[19] BLIMAN, S., CHAN TUNG, N., DOUSSON, S., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 21 (1980) 1856.
[20] BLIMAN, S., DOUSSON, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., J. Physique 42 (1981) 705.
[21] KLINGER, H., MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., J. Phys. B 8 (1975) 230.
[22] VANE, C. R., PRIOR, M. H., MARRUS, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 46
(1981) 107.
[23] GARDNER, L. D., BAYFIELD, J. E., KOCH, P. M., SELLIN, A., PEGG, D. J., PETERSON, R. S., MALLORY, M. L. and CRAN-
DALL, D. H., Phys. Rev. A 20 (1979) 766.
[24] BOHR, N. and LINDHARD, J., K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Nat. Pys.
Medd n° 7 (1954) 28.
[25] KNUDSEN, H., HAUGEN, H. K. and HVELPLUND, P., Phys. Rev.
A 23 (1981) 597.
[26] ZWALLY, H. J. and KOOPMAN, D. W., Phys. Rev. A 2 (1970)
1851.
[27] OPRADOLCE, L., VALIRON, P. and MCCARROLL, R., in Electronic and Atomic Collisions 2014 Abstracts of Contributed Papers, XIth I.C.P.E.A.C. Kyoto, 29 Aug.-4 Sept. 1979. Edited by K. Takayanagi and N. Oda. The Society for Atomic Collision research (Japan).
[28] MÜLLER, A., SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 59A (1976) 19.
[29] RYUFUKU, H. and WATANABE, T., Phys. Rev. A 20 (1979) 1828.