• Aucun résultat trouvé

Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00209330

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00209330

Submitted on 1 Jan 1981

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies

S. Bliman, S. Dousson, B. Jacquot, D. van Houtte

To cite this version:

S. Bliman, S. Dousson, B. Jacquot, D. van Houtte. Charge exchange cross sections of argon ions colliding with rare gas targets at keV energies. Journal de Physique, 1981, 42 (10), pp.1387-1391.

�10.1051/jphys:0198100420100138700�. �jpa-00209330�

(2)

Charge exchange

cross

sections of argon ions colliding

with

rare

gas targets

at

keV energies

S. Bliman

(*),

S. Dousson

(**),

B.

Jacquot (*)

and D. Van Houtte

(*)

(*) Département de Recherche sur la Fusion Contrôlée.

(**) Département de Recherche Fondamentale, CPN.

Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de Grenoble, 85 X, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France

(Reçu le 23 mars 1981, accepté le 9 juin 1981)

Résumé. 2014 Les sections efficaces d’échange de charge ont été mesurées pour les ions Arq+ de charge initiale 2 ~ q ~ 12 incidents sur des gaz rares : hélium, néon et argon. Les sections efficaces mesurées dans le domaine

d’énergie 2 q-10 q keV sont indépendantes de l’énergie. On observe que les valeurs des sections efficaces oscillent autour d’une variation moyenne linéaire en charge. Les sections efficaces présentent une dépendance par rapport

au potentiel d’ionisation de la cible.

Abstract. 2014 Single electron capture cross sections have been measured for argon ions with initial charge 2 ~ q ~ 12 incident on rare gas targets of helium, neon and argon. The cross sections measured in the energy range 2 q-10 q keV

are quasi energy independent. It is observed that the cross sections show oscillations about a mean linear variation in charge. The cross sections show a dependence on the target ionization potential.

Classification Physics Abstracts 34.70

1. Introduction. - Electron capture

by

low energy

multiply charged

ions

colliding

on neutral atoms has

become a

subject

of considerable interest in connection with fusion research

[1,

2] and

astrophysical problems [3-6].

A great number of calculations have resulted,

which are based on different models

[7-9].

Even

though

the interest of

experimentalists

has been focussed on

the studies of

charge exchange

on. atomic

hydrogen [10-12]

in the low and

high

energy range and on mole- cular deuterium

[13,

14], a great number of measu-

rements have been

performed utilizing

various gaseous

targets [15, 16]. From these results, a

scaling

law has

been deduced for

practical

purposes

[17].

The

object

of this paper is to report experimental

values for the

single

electron capture cross sections for Arq+ ions

(2 q 12),

incident on He, Ne and Ar

at

laboratory

kinetic

energies

in the range 2

q-10 q

keV.

In section 2, the

experimental

and data evaluation

procedures

are

presented ;

the main features of the ion source have been

presented

elsewhere

[18].

In

section 3, the cross sections for the capture of one electron are

given

for the collision of Ar ions on the different gas targets He, Ne and Ar ; their accuracies

are discussed. A

comparison

with

previously published

data and theoretical

predictions

is made.

2.

Experimental

and data evaluation

procédures.

-

The

experimental

set up has been described elsewhere

[19].

Briefly,

a well collimated beam of argon ions

with initial

charge 2 q

12 is directed into a

collision cell

containing

the target gas (He, Ne or

Ar).

The pressure in the collision cell is

adjusted, utilizing

an automatic pressure

regulated

admission valve in the range 5 x 10-’-5 x 10- 5 torr. The ion energy range extends from

2 q

to

10 q keV where q

is the

incident ion

charge.

The cross sections are measured

utilizing

a standard beam target method. In the

single

collision

approximation,

the

slope

of the linear part of the curve :

gives

the

charge exchange

cross section of electrons from the target to the incident ion of initial

charge

i

and final

charge

f. The associated currents 1i(0) and If(0) are measured in the limit of zero target thickness

n = no 1.

(no

is the target number

density,

1 its

length.)

Hereafter we consider

only single

electron

charge exchange ; q being

the initial

charge

of the

projectile,

the cross section may be written as :

The estimate of the errors in a cross section value is

typically

of the order of

± 20 %

as in

previously

obtained results [20].

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198100420100138700

(3)

1388

3. Results and discussion. - 3.1 RESULTS. - As is

usually

observed in

charge exchange

collisions of

multiply charged

ions on atomic or molecular targets

at velocities v vo, for a

given

incident ion

charge,

the cross sections for one or many electron

exchange

are

weakly

energy

dependent [16,

20, 21]. The incident

charge dependences

of the cross section for argon ions

colliding

with He, Ne and Ar are shown in

figures

1,

2 and 3

respectively.

An

interesting

feature is seen on these

figures :

the mean cross section variation is

satisfactorily

described

by

Qq,q _ 1 ~ const. x q. In this

proposed

fit, as may be seen from

comparison

of Q9,q_ 1 in

figures

1, 2 and 3 the target is different : from He to Ne and to Ar, the ionization

potential

decreases.

In

figure

4 are

given

for

comparison

the measured cross sections for

single

electron

exchange

in the

collision of ions on He :

triangles designate

argon ions up to

charge

7

[15],

crosses Xe ions up to

charge

8

[15].

Our values for argon ions are

slightly

smaller than those of Salzborn and Müller. In

figure

5 are

given

for

comparison,

the measured cross sections for

single

electron

exchange

in the collision of different ions on

Ne : Xe ions [15]

(closed

circles) up to

charge

8;

Ar ions up to

charge

7 (open

triangles) [ 15]

and present data. The agreement between measured values for

Fig. 1. - One electron charge exchange cross sections of argon ions (2 q 12) colliding He atoms as a function of projectile charge (open circles 0). Comparison to theoretical results. Open

square : 0 Ref. [7] ; closed points : Ob Ref. [8] ; crosses : x Ref. [9] ;

open triangles : A Ref. [15].

Fig. 2. - One electron capture cross section in the charge exchange

collision of Arq+ ions (2 q 12) on Ne as function of projectile charge (symbols are as in Fig. 1).

J.l1B,;IUt:’IH luii 4

Fig. 3. - One electron capture cross section in the charge exchange

collision of Arq+ ions (2 q 12) on Ar as function of projectile charge (symbols as in Fig. 1).

(4)

Fig. 4. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of différent ions on He. 0 open circles : present data Ar’l+ (2 q 12); A triangles : Ar’l+, Ref. [21]; x crosses : Xeq+, Ref. [15].

charges

up to 8 is

good. Recently

in the energy range 7-45 eV, the total electron capture of Nelo+ on Ne has been measured

by

Vane et al.

[22]. They

have

shown that the total cross section

(of

order

2.4 x 10-15 cm2 + 30

%)

is

velocity independent.

It is

interesting

to notice that Nelo+

undergoing charge exchange

with Ne behaves as Arlo+

colliding

on Ne,

giving

a cross section of the same order of

magnitude. Considering

the present data and estimated

uncertainty,

since 03C3q,g _ 1 is

always

less the total

exchange

cross section

(03C3q,q-k

for k > 1 have to be

added

to

03C3q,q - 1 ),

it is observed that the agreement is

good (on

Fig.

5, Ne 10 + exchange cross section is

represented by

a

star).

Figure

6 summarizes the measured cross section values 03C3q,q - 1 for different ions

impinging

on Ar.

Gardner et al.

[23]

have used C, N and 0 ions up to

charge Z - 2 (Z atomic number). For

higher charges

Salzborn et al.

[15J

have utilized Ar ions up to

charge

+ 7 and Xe up to charge + 8 ; it has been noticed

Fig. 6. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of différent ions on Ar : 0 open circles : present data Ar9+ (2 q K 12); . closed points : Xeq+, Ref. [15]; 0394, V, D : Oq-, N’9+, 0+, Ref. [23].

IF DEPHYSIQUE-T 42 NO10 OCTOBER 1981

Fig. 5. - Comparison of measured one electron capture cross sections of different ions on Ne : 0 open circles : present data Arll+ (2 - q - 12); f:}. triangles : Arq+, Ref. [21] ; closed circles :

Xeq+, Ref. [15] ; * star, Ref. [22].

(5)

1390

that these values have been overestimated

(for

char-

ges > 4)

by

as much as

40 % [23,

20].

Correcting gives

values in agreement with the present data.

3.2 DISCUSSION. - On

figures

1, 2 and 3 the results of différent theoretical calculations are repre- sented for

comparison

with the present data.

The cross sections, calculated by Presnyakov

et al. [7], show

a q2

dependence. In the

limiting

case

where v vo, the single electron capture cross section is expressed as :

with ao = 0.53 A and LP.

(eV)

ionization

potential

of

the target

(q

is at least >

3).

On the afore mentioned

figures

open squares are associated with this formula.

It is

recognized

that, for

interpretation,

this model is of limited use.

The open

triangles

represent the

experimental fitting

law for

single

electron transfer as

proposed by

Salzborn et al.

[15, 17] ;

the cross section is written as

For targets with

high

ionization

potentials

(He,

Ne)

this fit is

satisfactory

but we would

prefer

a linear

variation

in q

as

represented (dot

dashed

line).

The crosses on

figures

1, 2 and 3 represent the results of Grozdanov et al.

[9]

calculations. Their cross

section variation is linear

in q

and

parallel

to our dot

slash line.

The filled circles are the results of the theoretical evaluation of Olson et al.

[8] : they

are closer to the present values for Ar than those of Grozdanov et al.

These theoretical evaluations

[8,

9] give values gene-

rally

too

large compared

to present and other

experi-

mental values

(Figs.

4, 5 and 6).

More

recently, using

the Bohr Lindhard cross

sections for the capture of one classical [24] electron combined with the statistical Bohr atom electron

distribution, Knudsen et al.

[25]

have derived a

simple

estimate of the

single

electron capture cross section : in their calculation

they

show that in the limit of low ion

velocity,

the cross section is linear in

projectile charge q (with q > 4)

and

independent

of

projectile velocity according

to

with z : target atomic number, LP. target ionization

potential, Io

atomic

hydrogen

ionization

potential

and

1- -B 1/2)

With a parameter to be

adjusted, they

obtain in the

er

compared

with our value of 3.37 x 10-16. In the case

of argon (a = 0.46)

they

obtain

capture ~ 10-15

our

q

value

being

6 x 10-16. It should be noted that the paramater a is found

by fitting

for each target atom the calculated cross sections to low

velocity high charge

ion data. In the case of argon atom target, the data have been taken from Salzborn et al.

[15] (their

values

are

overestimated)

and

Zwally et

al.

[26] (their

data

had been obtained with C4 + and were a factor of - 3 too

high

due to

experimental difficulties);

these

arguments considered would thus lead to a

larger

value for a

(- 0.6)

which thus

give

a lower acapture

q value.

We consider now

specifically

the case of Ar6 +

colliding

He for which theoretical estimate of the cross

sections have been made

utilizing

a molecular model

[27] ;

it appears that

summing

the cross sections for capture of one electron into 3d, 4s and

4p

states of Ar5 +

gives

a total-cross section of order

at 12 keV

decreasing

to 1.9 x lO-15 cm’ at 24 keV.

The present results are in excellent agreement with these theoretical

predictions :

the mean value of

2 x 10-15 cm’ shown in

figures

1 and 4 is in fact associated with a

slight

decrease over the

experimental

energy range : the extent of the cross section variation is of order ± 10

%

about the mean value ;

being

about

maximum at the lower limit of the energy

explored.

This has also been observed

by

Müller et al.

[28].

In the case of a Ne target a fit of the present data

to the

simplified theory

[25] cited above is

possible

for

ce = 0.5, in the

projectile

low energy limit.

Double electron capture on autoionization levels

can also occur

[15,

20] ; but since the double capture

cross sections are one order of

magnitude

smaller

than the

single

capture cross section, the values obtained for

single

capture are

only perturbed

to a

small extent. Furthermore after a

single

electron capture, the

(q - 1)

+ ion may be excited and if this excitation is

large enough,

autoionization may lead to

ionization of other electrons. If this process were to take

place prior

to post collision

charge analysis,

a lower capture cross section would be observed.

These two effects cannot

definitely

be ruled out but

it is reasonable to assume that the cross sections are not

largely

influenced

by

them.

4. Conclusion. - The evolution of

charge exchange

cross sections of argon ions

(2 q 12)

on different target atoms has been measured in the low energy limit. It has been shown to be ion

velocity independent

and

varying

as q

for q >

4. As

suggested by

Knudsen

et al.

[25],

the present data can be shown to fit with

(6)

for q >, 4. This leads to The oscillations around the mean variation line as

function

of q

are

probably

attributable to

specific

electronic

configurations

in the

colliding pair. They

have been

predicted

for

multiply charged

ions col-

liding

on atomic

hydrogen [27].

For the case

of Ar",

a relative minimum is observed which is associated with a Ne like ion structure.

References

[1] HULSE, R. A., POST, D. E. and MIKKELSEN, D. R., J. Phys. B 13 (1980) 3095.

[2] DE HEER, F. J., in Atomic and Molecular processes in Controlled thermonuclear fusion, edited by M. R. C. McDowell and E. M. Ferendeci (Plenum Press, New York) 1980,

p. 351.

[3] FIELD, G. B., in Atomic and Molecular Physics and the Inter-

stellar matter, edited by R. Balian, R. Encrenaz and J.

Lequeux (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1975.

[4] DALGARNO, A., in advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics,

edited by D. R. Bates (Academic Press, New York) 1979, vol. 15, p. 37.

[5] PEQUIGNOT, D., ALDROVANDI, S. M. V. and STASINSKA, G., Astron. Astrophys. 63 (1979) 313.

[6] ULRICH, M. H. and PEQUIGNOT, D., The Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 45.

[7] PRESNYAKOV, L. P. and ULANTSEV, A. D., Sov. J. Quant.

Electron. 4 (1975) 1320, 1, Kvant. Elektron. (1974) 2377.

[8] OLSON, R. E. and SALOP, A., Phys. Rev. A 14 (1976) 579.

[9] GROZDANOV, T. P. and JANEV, R. K., Phys. Rev. A 17 (1978)

880.

[10] SEIM, W., MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 80A (1980) 20.

[11] CRANDALL, D. H., PHANEUF, R. A. and MEYER, F. W., Phys.

Rev. A 22 (1980) 379.

[12] MEYER, F. W., PHANEUF, R. A., KIM, H. J., HVELPLUND, P.

and STELSON, P. H., Phys. Rev. A 19 (1979) 515.

[13] BLIMAN, S., AUBERT, J., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 23 (1981) 1703.

[14] BLIMAN, S., DOUSSON, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., J. Physique 42 (1981) 399.

[15] SALZBORN, E. and MÜLLER, A., in Electronic and Atomic

Collisions, invited papers and progress reports - Kyoto 1979, edited by N. Oda and K. Takayanagi (North Hol- land, Amsterdam) 1980, p. 407.

[16] AUBERT, J., BLIMAN, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 22 (1980) 2403.

[17] MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 62A (1977) 391.

[18] GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and PAUTHENET, R., Revue Phys.

Appl. 15 (1980) 995.

[19] BLIMAN, S., CHAN TUNG, N., DOUSSON, S., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., Phys. Rev. A 21 (1980) 1856.

[20] BLIMAN, S., DOUSSON, S., GELLER, R., JACQUOT, B. and VAN HOUTTE, D., J. Physique 42 (1981) 705.

[21] KLINGER, H., MÜLLER, A. and SALZBORN, E., J. Phys. B 8 (1975) 230.

[22] VANE, C. R., PRIOR, M. H., MARRUS, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 46

(1981) 107.

[23] GARDNER, L. D., BAYFIELD, J. E., KOCH, P. M., SELLIN, A., PEGG, D. J., PETERSON, R. S., MALLORY, M. L. and CRAN-

DALL, D. H., Phys. Rev. A 20 (1979) 766.

[24] BOHR, N. and LINDHARD, J., K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Nat. Pys.

Medd 7 (1954) 28.

[25] KNUDSEN, H., HAUGEN, H. K. and HVELPLUND, P., Phys. Rev.

A 23 (1981) 597.

[26] ZWALLY, H. J. and KOOPMAN, D. W., Phys. Rev. A 2 (1970)

1851.

[27] OPRADOLCE, L., VALIRON, P. and MCCARROLL, R., in Electronic and Atomic Collisions 2014 Abstracts of Contributed Papers, XIth I.C.P.E.A.C. Kyoto, 29 Aug.-4 Sept. 1979. Edited by K. Takayanagi and N. Oda. The Society for Atomic Collision research (Japan).

[28] MÜLLER, A., SALZBORN, E., Phys. Lett. 59A (1976) 19.

[29] RYUFUKU, H. and WATANABE, T., Phys. Rev. A 20 (1979) 1828.

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Fig.1 shows the 3.5, 3p and 3d sum cross sections deduced from our photon emission measurements together with translational energy spectroscopy results for the 3s and

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A. Abstract - When a slow multiply charged ion captures electrons from a neutral target the angular distribution of the products is sensitive

a constant internuclear distance so that, in this rigid model, the molecule can be considered as an atom and the energy loss is then given by. In order to directly

To minimize ambiguities in the course of the analysis care has to be taken in the choice:(i) of bound state wave functions, since Sj depends strongly on the

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Fig. 2 shows the ratio of the level popula- tions to the corresponding l=O-population as a function of the ion velocity behind the foil for LiI, LiII and HeI. For all three