Contents
Acknowledgements i
Abstract iii
Contents v
List of Figures ix
List of Tables xiii
Nomenclature xv
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Global warming and energy transition . . . . 2 1.2 The advantages of a distributed generation . . . . 4 1.3 Low-carbon energy production: Carbon Capture Utilization
and Storage . . . . 5 1.4 Framework and scope of the PhD thesis . . . . 6
2 Literature review 11
2.1 State-of-the-art mGT cycles . . . . 12 2.2 Humidified mGT cycles: advantages and limitations . . . . 14
v
vi CONTENTS
2.3 State-of-the-art carbon capture technologies . . . . 19
2.3.1 Post-combustion carbon capture . . . . 20
2.3.2 Pre-combustion carbon capture . . . . 20
2.3.3 Oxyfuel combustion . . . . 21
2.4 CO
2separation methods . . . . 22
2.4.1 Absorption . . . . 22
2.4.2 Adsorption . . . . 22
2.4.3 Cryogenic distillation . . . . 23
2.4.4 Membrane separation . . . . 23
2.4.5 Chemical looping combustion . . . . 24
2.4.6 Hydrate separation . . . . 24
2.5 Recent developments in carbon capture technologies for GT power generation . . . . 24
2.5.1 Humidification to improve carbon capture efficiency 25 2.5.2 Semi-closed oxy-combustion combined cycles . . . . 25
2.5.3 Supercritical CO
2Brayton cycles . . . . 26
2.5.4 Exhaust Gas Recirculation on GTs and mGTs . . . 27
2.6 Conclusions . . . . 28
3 Exhaust Gas Recirculation on mGT cycles 31 3.1 Methodology . . . . 32
3.1.1 Traditional mGT and mHAT models . . . . 32
3.1.2 Dry and wet mGT simulations with EGR . . . . 34
3.1.3 Numerical results . . . . 38
3.2 CO
2injection in a real mGT cycle . . . . 43
3.2.1 Experimental design of mGT with CO
2injection . . 43
3.2.2 Experimental results of a mGT with CO
2injection . 46
CONTENTS vii
3.3 Experimental investigation on the mGT combustion with EGR 50
3.3.1 Turbec T100 combustor . . . . 50
3.3.2 Atmospheric premixed combustor at Lund University 51 3.3.3 Combustion emissions varying the EGR
ratio. . . . . 55
3.3.4 Flame characterization varying EGR
ratio. . . . 57
3.3.5 CO emissions and LBO prediction with OpenSMOKE++ . . . . 62
3.3.6 Conclusions . . . . 67
4 Design of a CC unit for mGT applications 69 4.1 Methodology . . . . 71
4.1.1 Chemical solvent carbon capture plant design for mGT cycles . . . . 71
4.2 Results . . . . 76
4.2.1 Carbon capture unit design optimization . . . . 77
4.2.2 mGT and mHAT coupled in series with a carbon cap- ture unit . . . . 79
4.2.3 Optimal layout and operating strategy of the system 84 4.2.4 Sankey and Grassmann diagrams of the different op- erating strategies . . . . 88
4.3 Conclusions . . . . 101
5 Robust optimization of a mGT cycle with CC 103 5.1 Gaussian process-based surrogate model . . . . 104
5.2 Single- vs. Multi-objective optimization . . . . 107
5.3 Deterministic vs. Stochastic optimization . . . . 109
5.4 Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II . . . . 110
5.5 Summary of the RDO routine . . . . 114
5.6 Results . . . . 117
viii CONTENTS