A. D. P
OLLINGTON
R. C. V
AUGHAN
The k-dimensional Duffin and Schaeffer conjecture
Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, tome
1, n
o1 (1989),
p. 81-88
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=JTNB_1989__1_1_81_0>
© Université Bordeaux 1, 1989, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux » (http://jtnb.cedram.org/) implique l’accord avec les condi-tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti-lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte-nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
The
k-dimensional
Duffin and Schaeffer
conjecture.
par A.D. POLLINGTON AND R.C. VAUGHAN
Résumé - Nous montrons que la conjecture de Duffin et Schaeffer est
vraie en toute dimension supérieure à 1.
Abstract 2014 We show that the Duffin and Schaeffer conjecture holds in all
dimensions greater than one.
In 1941 Duffin and Schaeffer
[1]
made thefollowing
conjecture:
CONJECTURE. Let
{an}
denote a sequence of real numbers withthen the
inequalities
have
infinitely
many solutions for almost aII x if andonly
ifdiverges.
If
(2)
converges then iteasily
follows from the Borel-Cantelli lemma that the set of x’ssatisfying
infinitely
many of theinequalities
(1)
hasLebesgues
measure zero. Duffin and Schaeffer gave conditions on the an for which the
conjecture
is true and showed that the condition(a, n)
= 1 is necessary. In1970 Erd6s
[2]
showed that theconjecture
holds if an= 1
or 0. This waslater extended
by
Vaaler[6]
who showed that an =O( n )
is sufficient. Inhis book on metric number
theory
[5]
Sprindzuk
considers a k-dimensionalanalogue
of theconjecture
in which(1)
isreplaced by
where the measure is now
k-dimensional
Lebesgues
measure. He states that thestudy
of suchapproximations
subject
to the conditions(~i ,~) = "’ =
(ak, n)
= 1 isprobably
aproblem
of the samedegree
ofcomplexity
as the case n = 1. Thisappears not to be the case. For we can now prove the
k-dimensional
analogue
of the Duflin and Schaefferconjecture.
We prove thefollowing
result:THEOREM. Let k > 1 and let denote a sequence of real numbers with
and suppose that
diverges.
Then theinequalities
have
infinitely
many solutions for almost all x ERk .
Unfortunately
our method does notreadily
extend to the case k = 1. Weare able find some more sequences for which the
conjecture
holds,
forexample
if an - 0 or 1 « an, but not to settle the dimension one case.In the k-dimensional
case, k >
2,
Vilchinski haspreviously
shown that wemay take an =
0(n-^f)
forany I > 0. Put
where
Thus
(4)
becomesdiverges.
We are interested in
By
anergodic
theorem ofGallagher
[3],
seeSprindzuk
[5],
this is eitherzero or one.
Gallagher
proves his result for dimension one. Thecorrespon-ding
k-dimensional result isproved by
Vilchinski[7].
In order to prove the theorem it therefore suffices to show that(8)
is not zero.Since
(7)
diverges,
and.Bk(En) -~
0 as n - oo,given
any 1 > 1/ >0,
forevery N we can find a finite set Z so that if z E Z then z >
N,
andBy
theCauchy-Schwarz inequality
this is Lemma 5 of
Sprindzuk
[5].
Soprovided
there is some absoluteThus we need to bound
In the
subsequent
discussion constants in theVinogradov « symbol
de-pend
at most on the dimension k.Note that
and
We now concentrate on k = 1 and use
(12)
and(13)
to obtain a bound fork>1.
We wish to obtain an estimate for
Put
and
Then
By
estimating
LEMMA 1. With
En
as above and d =(m, n)
there is an absolute constantc so that
Let
g(n)
be defined as the least number so thatPut
Then
by
Lemma 1In
particular
if2= > t
thenNow
We now return to the k-dimensional case.
By
(12)
and(13)
Recall that m n so
(c)
isimpossible.
We will consider the other threecases
seperately.
The first casecorresponds
to the situation consideredby
Erdos .Case
(a).
We have A
We need to consider
pairs
m, n withLet denote that
part
of the sumfor which
g(m’)
= u andg(n’)
= v.Then, by
Lemma 1 and(22)
Where
L(u)
means the sum of those m’ withg(m’) = u
and m = m’d.then
To estimate the inner sum we will use the
following
result due to Erd6s which also appears in Vaaler[6].
LetN(~,
v,x)
be the number ofintegers
n x whichsatisfy
-Then
LEMMA 2. For any E > 0 and
any ~
> 0 there exists apositive
integer
vo =vo(~, c)
such that for all x > 0 and all v >vo,
where
log /3
=~.
Applying
this resultwith ~
= 1 and,C~(1 - c)
= 2
we haveCOROLLARY. Given x > 0 and v > 1
Using
(23)
andpartial
summationApplying
(23)
again
The other cases are similar and we have
where c is a constant
depending only
on k. Thiscompletes
theproof
of theTheorem .
REFERENCES
1. R.J. Duffin and A.C. Schaeffer, Khintchine’s problem in metric Diophantine
ap-proximation, Duke Math. J. 8 (1941), 243-255.
2. P.Erdös, On the distribution of convergents of almost all real numbers, J. Number
Theory 2 (1970), 425-441.
3. P.X. Gallagher, Approximation by reduced fractions, J. Math. Soc. of Japan 13
(1961), 342-345.
4. Halberstam and Richert, "Sieve methods," Academic Press, London, 1974. 5. V.G. Sprindzuk, "Metric theory of Diophantine approximations," V.H. Winston
and Sons, Washington D.C., 1979.
6. J.D. Vaaler, On the metric theory of Diophantine approximation, Pacific J. Math.
76 (1978), 527-539.
7. V.T. Vilchinski, On simultaneous approximations, Vesti Akad Navuk BSSR Ser
Fiz.-Mat (1981), 41-47.
8. , The Duffin and
Schaeffer
conjecture and simultaneousapproxi-mations, Dokl. Akad. Nauk BSSR 25 (1981), 780-783.
Mots clefs: Diophantine approximation, k- dimensional, Lebesgues measure, Duffin and Schaeffer conjecture.
Imperial College