• Aucun résultat trouvé

A SIMPLE PROOF OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL BORG-LEVINSON TYPE THEOREM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A SIMPLE PROOF OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL BORG-LEVINSON TYPE THEOREM"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02406382

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02406382

Preprint submitted on 12 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

A SIMPLE PROOF OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL

BORG-LEVINSON TYPE THEOREM

Mourad Choulli

To cite this version:

Mourad Choulli. A SIMPLE PROOF OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL BORG-LEVINSON TYPE

THEOREM. 2019. �hal-02406382�

(2)

A SIMPLE PROOF OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL BORG-LEVINSON TYPE THEOREM

MOURAD CHOULLI

Abstract. We provide a simple and short proof of a multidimensional Borg-Levinson type theorem. Precisely, we prove that the spectral boundary data determine uniquely the corresponding potential appearing in the Schödinger operator on an admissible Riemannian manifold. We also sketch the proof of the case of incomplete spectral boundary data.

1. Introduction

Let M = (M, g) be a smooth compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n ≥ 3 and with boundary ∂M. We recall that, in local coordinates, the usual Laplace-Beltrami operator is given by

∆g= 1 p|g| n X j,k=1 ∂xj  p|g|gjk ∂xk ·  .

We define, for q ∈ L(M, R), the unbounded operator L = L(q) acting on

L2(M) as follows

L = −∆g+ q with D (L) = H01(M) ∩ H 2(M).

As L is self-adjoint operator with compact resolvent, its spectrum is reduced to a sequence of eigenvalues:

−∞ < λ1≤ . . . λk ≤ . . . and λk → ∞ as k → ∞.

Of course λk= λk(q), k ≥ 1.

In addition, there exists (φk), φk= φk(q), k ≥ 1, an orthonormal basis of L2(M)

consisting of eigenfunctions. Each φk is associated to λk, k ≥ 1.

For simplicity convenience, we use the notation

ψk= ∂νφk|∂M, k ≥ 1,

where ν is the unit normal vector field on ∂M with respect to g.

When q ∈ L∞+(M) = {q ∈ L(M, R); q ≥ 0}, 0 is not in the spectrum of L and

all the eigenvalues of L are positive. Then, for f ∈ H1/2(∂M), the BVP

(1.1) (−∆g+ q)u = 0 in M and u = f on ∂M

Date: December 12, 2019.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35R30, 35J10.

Key words and phrases. Admissible Riemannian manifold, boundary spectral data,

Borg-Levinson type theorem, Dirichlet-to-Neumann map.

The author supported by the grant ANR-17-CE40-0029 of the French National Research Agency ANR (project MultiOnde).

(3)

2 CHOULLI

admits a unique solution u = u(q, f ) ∈ H1(M) with ∂νu ∈ H−1/2(∂M). Moreover

k∂νukH−1/2(∂M) ≤ Ckf kH1/2(∂M),

where the constant C is independent of f . In other words, the mapping Λ(q) : f ∈ H1/2(∂M) → ∂νu ∈ H−1/2(∂M)

defines a bounded operator. The operator Λ(q) is usually called the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map associated to q.

For ˜q ∈ L∞+(M), we set ˜λk = λkq), ˜φk = φkq) and ˜ψk = ψkq). We introduce

then the notation

D(q, ˜q) =X k≥1 λk− ˜λk + X k≥1 k ˜ψk− ψkkL2(∂M).

We aim to prove the following result:

Theorem 1.1. Let ℵ > 0. If 0 ≤ q ≤ ℵ, 0 ≤ ˜q ≤ ℵ and D(q, ˜q) < ∞, then

Λ(q) − Λ(˜q) extends to a bounded operator on L2(∂M) and

kΛ(q) − Λ(˜q)kB(L2(∂M))≤ CD(q, ˜q),

where the constant C only depends on n, M and ℵ.

Let (M , g) a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary ∂M . We say that M is admissible ifM b R×M0, for some (n-1)-dimensional simple manifold (M0, g0),

and if g = c(e ⊕ g0), where e is the Euclidean metric on R and c is a smooth positive

function on M . We recall that (M0, g0) is simple if it is a compact Riemannian

manifold with boundary and, for any x ∈M0, the exponential map expx with its

maximal domain of definition is a diffeomorphism onto M0, and ∂M0 is strictly

convex (that is, the second fundamental form of ∂M0,→M0is positive definite).

Observing that

kΛ(q) − Λ(˜q)kB(H1/2(∂M),H−1/2(∂M))≤ kΛ(q) − Λ(˜q)kB(L2(∂M))

and D(q, ˜q) = D(q − λ, ˜q − λ), for any λ not belonging to the spectrum of L(q) and L(˜q), we deduce as a consequence of Theorem1.1and [8, Theorem 1] the following stability inequality:

Corollary 1.1. Let ℵ > 0, t ∈ (0, 1/2) and assume that M is admissible with

M b R × M0. Then there exist two constants C > 0 and 0 < c < 1, only

depending on n, M and ℵ, so that, for any q, ˜q ∈ L(M, R) ∩ Ht(M) satisfying

kqkL(M)∩Ht(M)≤ ℵ,qkL(M)∩Ht(M) ≤ ℵ and D(q, ˜q) ≤ c, we have kq − ˜qkL2(R,H−3(M 0))≤ C ln h D(q, ˜q) + |ln (D(q, ˜q))|−1i −t/4 .

In particular, this corollary says that in an admissible manifold the spectral boundary data (λk(q), ψk(q))k≥1 determine uniquely q ∈ L(M, R) ∩ Ht(M): Theorem 1.2. Let t ∈ (0, 1/2) and assume that M is admissible. If q, ˜q ∈ L(M, R) ∩ Ht(M) satisfy

λk(q) = λkq) and ψk(q) = ψkq), k ≥ 1,

(4)

Results of the same kind as Theorem1.2are known in the literature as multidi-mensional Borg-Levinson type theorems.

The paper by Nachman, Sylvester and Uhlmann [18] was the starting point of new developments and results on multidimensional Borg-Levinson type theorems. We quote here the following short list of references: [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10,12, 13,

14, 15,16, 17]. Of course many other works on spectral inverse problems exist in the literature. A short survey on multidimensional Borg-Levinson type theorems can be found in [4]. The case of unbounded potentials was considered by Pohjola in [19]. We also mention that a new stability inequality for the two dimensional case was recently established by Imanuvilov and Yamamoto in [11].

2. Proof of the main result

Henceforward, the usual scalar products on L2(M) and L2(∂M) are denoted

respectively by (·|·) and h·|·i.

From [4, Lemma 3.1], the solution of the BVP1.1is given by

u = −X

k≥1

hψk|f i

λk

φk.

This identity yields

X k≥1 |hψk|f i|2 λ2 k = kuk2L2(M).

Pick (ρk) an orthonormal basis of L2(M), s ≥ 0 and define

Hs=    w ∈ H2(M), X k≥1 k4s/nk4/n|(w|ρk)|2+ |(∆gw|ρk)|2  < ∞    .

We have by Parseval’s identity X k≥1 k4s/nk4/n|(w|ρk)|2+ |(∆gw|ρk)|2  = X k≥1 k2(s+1)/n(w|ρk)ρk 2 L2(M) + X k≥1 k2s/n(∆gw|ρk)ρk 2 L2(M) .

In consequence, the left hand side of this identity does not depend on the choice of the orthonormal basis (ρk). We endowHs with the norm

kwkHs = kwkH2(M)+   X k≥1 k4s/nk4/n|(w|ρk)|2+ |(∆gw|ρk)|2    1/2 .

It is not hard check thatHscontains all the eigenfunctions (ϕk) of the operator

−∆g, under Neumann boundary condition, and therefore it contains also the

clo-sure, with respect to k · kHs, of the vector space spanned by these eigenfunctions. This can be easily seen just by taking ρk= ϕk, k ≥ 1, in the definition ofHs.

We associate toHsthe trace space

(5)

4 CHOULLI

that we equip with its natural quotient norm

kgkHs = inf {kwkHs; w|∂M= g} .

Lemma 2.1. We fix s > n/4. Then, for any g ∈ Hs, the series P

k≥1 hψk|gi λk φk converges in H2(M) with (2.1) X k≥1 |hψk|gi| λk kφkkH2(M)≤ CkgkHs,

where the constant C is independent of g.

Proof. Let g ∈ Hsand w ∈Hsarbitrary so that w|

∂M= g. From Green’s Formula,

we have hψk|gi = ˆ ∂M ∂νφkgdσ = ˆ M ∆gφkwdv − ˆ M φk∆gwdv. = ˆ M (−λk+ q)φkwdv − ˆ M φk∆gwdv.

Therefore, taking into account that λk ∼ k2/n as k → +∞ (by Weyl’s asymptotic

formula), we get |hψk|gi| ≤ C  k2/n|(φk|w)| + |(φk|∆gw)|  , k ≥ 1,

where the constant C is independent of w. But kφkkH2(M) ≤ Cλk for any k ≥ 1. Hence

|hψk|gi| λk kφkH2(M)≤ Ck−2s/n h k2s/nk2/n|(φk|w)| + |(φk|∆gw)| i , k ≥ 1,

Whence, the seriesP

k≥1

hψk|gi

λk φkconverges in H

2(M) and using Cauchy-Schwarz’s

inequality we find X k≥1 |hψk|gi| λk kφkkH2(M)≤ CkwkHs.

As w ∈Hs is chosen arbitrary so that w|

∂M= g, inequality (2.1) follows. 

Proof of Theorem 1.1. In this proof C is a generic constant depending only on n,

M and ℵ.

In light of Lemma2.1, we have

Λ(q)(f ) = −X k≥1 hψk|f i λk ψk, f ∈ Hs and Λ(˜q)(f ) = −X k≥1 h ˜ψk|f i ˜ λk ˜ ψk, f ∈ Hs.

We split Λq(f ) − Λq˜(f ), f ∈ Hs, into three terms:

(6)

with A1= X k≥1  1 ˜ λk − 1 λk  h ˜ψk|f i ˜ψk, A2= X k≥1 h ˜ψk|f i − hψk|f i λk ˜ ψk, A3= X k≥1 hψk|f i λk ˜ ψk− ψk .

Then it is straightforward to check that kA1kL2(∂M)≤ C X k≥1 λk− ˜λk kf kL2(∂M), kA2kL2(∂M)+ kA3kL2(∂M)≤ C X k≥1 k ˜ψk− ψkkL2(∂M)kf kL2(∂M).

Therefore, under the assumption D(q, ˜q) < ∞, the operator Λq− Λ˜q extends to

a bounded operator on L2(∂M) with

q− Λq˜kB(L2(∂M))≤ CD(q, ˜q).

The proof is then complete. 

3. The case of incomplete spectral boundary data

We explain briefly in this short section how we can get a Borg-Levinson type theorem for incomplete spectral boundary data. For this purpose, we assume that M is simple. In that case it is known that there exists another simple manifold M1 so that M1c M. Let q, ˜q ∈ L(M, R) satisfying p = (q − ˜q)χM∈ H1(M1), kqkL(M)≤ ℵ,qkL(M)≤ ℵ and kpkH1(M1)≤ ℵ. From [5], we have (3.1) kpk4 L2(M)≤ C  1 |=λ|+ |=λ|kΛq−λ− Λq−λ˜ kB(L2(∂M))  , λ ∈ C \ R,

where the constant C only depends on n, M and ℵ.

Now if, for some fixed integer ` ≥ 1, (λk, ψk) = (˜λk, ˜ψk), k ≥ `, then the

calculations in the preceding section yield (3.2) kΛq−λ− Λq−λ˜ kB(L2(∂M))≤ C ` X k=1 λ2 k |λk− λ| + ` X k=1 ˜ λ2 kλk− λ| ! .

Again, the constant C only depends on n, M and ℵ.

We deduce by combining together (3.1) and (3.2) that there exist two constants

C > 0 and κ > 0, only depending on n, M, ℵ and `, so that

(3.3) kpk4 L2(M)≤ C  1 |=λ|+ |=λ| |λ|  , λ ∈ C \ R, |λ| ≥ κ.

We find by taking in this inequality λ = (τ + i)2= (τ2− 1) + 2iτ , with τ ≥ 1

sufficiently large, kpk4 L2(M)≤ C  1 τ + τ τ2− 1  .

(7)

6 CHOULLI

Taking the limit, as τ → ∞, in this inequality, we obtain p = 0. In particular, we proved that the spectral boundary data (λk, ψk)k≥` determine uniquely q ∈

L(M, R) ∩ H01(M), for any arbitrary fixed integer ` ≥ 1:

Theorem 3.1. Let ` ≥ 1 be an integer and assume that M is simple. If q, ˜q ∈ L(M, R) ∩ H1

0(M) satisfy

λk(q) = λkq) and ψk(q) = ψkq), k ≥ `,

then q = ˜q.

References

[1] G. Alessandrini and J. Sylvester, Stability for multidimensional inverse spectral problem, Commun. Partial Diffent. Equat. 15 (5) (1990), 711-736.3

[2] M. Belishev, An approach to multidimensional inverse problems for the wave equation, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 297 (1987), 524-527.3

[3] M. Belishev and Y. Kurylev, To the reconstruction of a Riemannian manifold via its spectral data (BC-method), Commun. Partial Diffent. Equat. 17 (1992), 767-804.3

[4] M. Bellassoued, M. Choulli, D. Dos Santos Ferreira, Y. Kian and P. Stefanov, A Borg-Levinson theorem for magnetic Schrödinger operators on a Riemannian manifold, arXiv:1807.08857.3

[5] M. Bellassoued, M. Choulli, Y. Kian and E. Soccorsi, Borg Levinson type theorem with partial spectral boundary data, preprint.5

[6] M. Bellassoued, M. Choulli and M. Yamamoto, Stability estimate for an inverse wave equation and a multidimensional Borg-Levinson theorem, J. Diffent. Equat. 247 (2) (2009), 465-494.3

[7] M. Bellassoued, M. Choulli and M. Yamamoto, Stability estimate for a multidimensional inverse spectral problem with partial data, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 378 (1) (2011), 184-197.3

[8] P. Caro and M. Salo, Stability of the Calderón problem in admissible geometries, Inverse Problems and Imaging 8 (2014), 939-957.2

[9] M. Choulli, Une introduction aux problèmes inverses elliptiques et paraboliques, Mathéma-tiques et Applications, Vol. 65, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.3

[10] M. Choulli and P. Stefanov, Stability for the multi-dimensional Borg-Levinson theorem with partial spectral data, Commun. Partial Diffent. Equat. 38 (3) (2013), 455-476.3

[11] Oleg Yu. Imanuvilov and M. Yamamoto, Stability of determination of Riemannian metrics by spectral data and Dirichlet-to-Neumann map limited on arbitrary subboundary, Inverse Problems and Imaging 13 (6) (2019), 1213-1258.3

[12] H. Isozaki, Some remarks on the multi-dimensional Borg-Levinson theorem, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 31 (3) (1991), 743-753.3

[13] A. Katchalov and Y. Kurylev, Multidimensional inverse problem with incomplete boundary spectral data, Commun. Partial Diffent. Equat. 23 (1998), 55-95.3

[14] A. Katchalov, Y. Kurylev, M. Lassas, Inverse boundary spectral problems, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2001, 123, xx+290.3

[15] O. Kavian, Y. Kian, E. Soccorsi, Uniqueness and stability results for an inverse spectral problem in a periodic waveguide, J. Math. Pures Appl. 104 (2015), no. 6, 1160-1189.3

[16] Y. Kian, A multidimensional Borg-Levinson theorem for magnetic Schrödinger operators with partial spectral data, J. Spectral Theory 8 (2018), 235-269.3

[17] Y. Kian, L. Oksanen, M. Morancey, Application of the boundary control method to partial data Borg-Levinson inverse spectral problem, Math. Control and Related Fields 9 (2019), 289-312.3

[18] A. Nachman, J. Sylvester, G. Uhlmann, An n-dimensional Borg-Levinson theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 115 (4) (1988), 595-605.3

[19] V. Pohjola, Multidimensional Borg-Levinson theorems for unbounded potentials Asymptot. Anal. 110 (3-4) (2018), 203-226.3

Université de Lorraine, 34 cours Léopold, 54052 Nancy cedex, France

Références

Documents relatifs

We investigate this problem for the linear heat equation, extending Altm¨uller and Gr¨une (2012) by including the case of Neumann boundary control and comparing this case with

We give a simple proof of the “tree-width duality theorem” of Seymour and Thomas that the tree-width of a finite graph is exactly one less than the largest order of its brambles..

The objective of the proposed theme is the particular study of the chemical sensor type pH-ISFET use micro-sensor ISFET (Ion Selective Effect

It can be concluded that the proposed theory is accurate and simple in solving the free vibration behavior of laminated rectangular plate supporting a localized patch

étudiés;' ils sont le£ plus abondants et les plus recherchés pour. le contrôle bactériologiquý dt::s t::ýux de:

En effet, l'objectif principal de l’étude du dispatching économique est prendre en considéra- tion toutes les variables ayant effet sur la minimisation du coût, tel que la topologie

of the joint effects of predispersal seed predation, reproductive strategies (masting or non-masting) and seed dispersal patterns on the diversity of seed sources in expanding

Afin d’illustrer les diff´erences que peuvent induire deux d´efinitions possibles de la d´eformation (spatiale et mat´erielle), nous ´etudions la propagation d’ondes 3D