Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1948-08-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=91d32ee5-5598-4952-88d9-3621d46eb5b8 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=91d32ee5-5598-4952-88d9-3621d46eb5b8
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20331664
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Stripping of clay from the south end of the "B" Orebody at Steep Rock
Iron Mine, Ontario
http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
S t r i p p i n g o f C l a y f r o m S o u t h E n d o f t h e “ B ”
O r e b o d y a t S t e e p R o c k I r o n M i n e , O n t a r i o
D B R - R 1 2
S u t h e r l a n d , H .
A u g u s t 1 9 4 8
The material in this document is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. For more information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/C-42
Les renseignements dans ce document sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, par les lois, les politiques et les règlements du Canada et des accords internationaux. Ces dispositions permettent d'identifier la source de l'information et, dans certains cas, d'interdire la copie de documents sans permission écrite. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements : http://lois.justice.gc.ca/fr/showtdm/cs/C-42
4 Hugh
B,
SutherhmlTCJ:
PI,
S, Fot,l~erLnghmRe:
STUPPINGOF
CLAY
PW1.1THE
SUUTH &ND
OF TIG, ''8'' OREEODHThe following mtes have been written a f t e r study of
a
plan presentedby
M
r
,W.
Samuel regarding the clay stripping from t h e South end of the l'B'l Orebody, I+, Samuel proposes to reduce the varved clay to a l e v e l of appro-xhn*,ely
U1+5
feu&
i n two operations, the clay s o removed flowing t o Falla y e The slopes $0 the p i t are then to be formed by sZul.c5ng and pumping the material t.o l%lls 'day,llodifica-ki.ons ko this plan are suggested, rnodificntions which c a l l
for less removal ?f material. Lirnltlng he5ghL.s of banks for particular slopes
of banks are also suggested.
The Analysis of t h e Stabil3.-3.-1r 0.C Earth S l o ~ e g ,
If
an earth rnass csrlrriats of a granular material such as sand orgravel and it is devf red to cut a slope i n i t , then the mass w i l l always be
h
stable despite the $eight of t he cut slope, provided the
s h o e
ia less than theangle
of repose of %hematerial,
the angle of repose being equal to theangle of i n t e r n a l f r i c t i o n of t h e materid. i n its loosest s t a t e , Such a cond- i t i o u i i.s not true
Tor
a
cohesive material, !:F~kh suchsoil,
a cut40
feet highat a s ? . o p of 1 i n 3 nay be stable wMle a s i m l l n r slope
ir!.
the same material80 f e e t h-lgh may -Tail, The soil. at Steep b c k Lake comes i n t o the cohesive
ca.tegoxy. 'The problge of stabilizing the slopes therefore does not become one of f'ixing one given irlcLlnatLon and s t i c k i n g Lo it throughout but is one of
addusting slopes i n t h e l i g h t of t h e depLh to which they are cut, and imposing
h
lLi11t wallleer on the geight to which ia given slope should be cut.
no. S l ; r i p p u of Clay fzom the
South End
of tth w"8Orgr,&.
:
Ia&;e 2 )first ie faiLure by a l i d l n g of the e o i l o n
a
olrouler arc, ThB aecond by thestructure
of
the a011 breaking down and afailure
by rgreacl ar Plow resultingoEaoh
of
ttmm typ08or
r ~ i i u ~
i a
dmorlbed in detail in thai o ~ o w i n g
notoo
and
an
at-%is
made to present amdy%ioal methodsfor
deallog with eaohtype(. The seoond t y p of failure, by
flow
and spread, peeants a d i f f i c u l t problan of u 4 ~ 8 i s due to the unknomr quantity v l z , the water pressure b t bparea of the 0011., ThiB
form of
fail-is
that whioh ha8 oawed most trouble at Steep Rook andall
p o a s i b b saf'egumds m u a t be taken to
prevent aTBClWFWlC8 o
l a1
Failure by slid in^ along a Ckroularmc
The f b a t analyses of the aawee of failure of earth la pea
werep
undertakenes
a rseult OX a number of diaaatroua failuresIn
rail soadmbaPhnenta b 3.poeden' Inveetlgatiom of the surfam
ale%
oelhiah failure rook plaw ahowad that it approximated t o a oircralar a r o , and as a result tbb Circular Arc Method of Analysis waa developed, Referenoa t o F l g o 1 ahowsuoh
a form of failure, The surfaoe A B C of f a i l w e 18 presumed t o be circu- lar an8 failure takes place by the ser$h ma88 AB
C D movbg about the aantre of mtat 10x1 0 , disturbiagmoment
oauelng failure is therefore the woighaof the earth a~arse t h e e the distanoe between perallel. line0 &&mi though i*
oentroid and point 9 .
i,a, the dis%urbing moment e
M
;cFailure is resisted by t h e shear strength of the eofl that is mobilized along
the m a A
B
C a d the reslating mawent is t h i s t o t a lshear
strength t-a theradiue of the uiraular ara along whioh failure tekes plaaefi The e o i l m y have
v w i n g ehear strength along a r o A B C and this ehcrriLa be taken acoomt of i n
the ana1y;ajs..
R e : Strippins o f Clay
f r o m
the SouthEnd
of the RBw Ombody {page 3) Whare B Tb.e ahear cr trengbh of the s o i l , assuming it t o b e homogeneowA 1 L e m h of the ax0 A
B
0 PIr
JJ Radiue off
allure airoleThe factor
of
Safety agalnet failureQ TheReeiatlngmoment 2 a o l u r t ,
TBs
Disturbing momentmK'-
While a f aoeor of 8afei;y of 3 or 4 ie usual in Struo.torrel Engheerlng deai*, PdLiias greater than 1,,5 care
unusual
i n the design of earth Blopee,e=th
Qama
and eimilm etruoturee,Earth
dame tha% hambeen
designed recentlyin t h e United States have had factors of safety o f l , 8 f a 1,3,
fn
suchetruotures rigid control o f the compaction of the placed 8011 bxeercised during uoaatructlon,
When checking the stabllllty of' exiating earth slopert, the two faut-
osa which m u e t be determined are the radius of the oircle of f a i l m e and t h s shear etrength of
the
BoiloThe radius of the failure oirole mwt be determined by trial and error 80 a8 t o give the smallest value of faetor of saf'aty,
Re
o S t r i a i n g o m c w z a y from the SoutkEnd o f the "13" O r e b o si
p a ~ r 41
A fspsptdish 'IEp)ginoerQ F e l l c r s i ~ ~ who invsertiga%sd the early slope
failures which occurred
i n
his couzltry, has gublirshed a table which a s e i e t s ina more r a p i d determination sf the oen3re of %he oircle of f a i l u r e
where %M
a o i looncesned is hcrm~geneoua and unifom,
D l
W , Taylor bas published la grephi,ocal form a method whereby %he stability of an a a t h rslopa o f homogeneous maeerba2. quickly be determined, ;Professor Tay%or Goes notc.h&
that his method, and the assumptions made,give@ a exmot; m e : conpleteXy acczarate method of mabysia- Hovmver, the very
na'tupe of e o i l , m2.a the varlatioms, j33, it, i s such @B t o make my theoxeticaX aaakfais ~tabjact Lo error when applied t o a practicab p r ~ b l @ $ & ~ I%% intelligent
w e
o f tSs T a y l o l ~ nethold, I n conguxrction with thorough inveatigntion8 of a a i t g 8howBw aio e s e e n t i d l y homo~eneow s o i l , sbouLd give infox-mtion to Chct s a i l engineer whierb cw:~ aerm aa a very uoaful guideJn
design, The !S'qilar curveshave been wad ir! $ha sl.ops analyefa carried Q U ~ i~ t h i s mmorandm, t h l o
am2.yais heilcng ca; ceruedl on3.y of courercs w i t h :stability agalast failure along a
ulscular a r c
lFha 8k@axn strength of a oil can bo determined
i n
a number of weye,the two mast important a d frequently ursed be-big the dfrec.9; action shear
box
and the f r i - a x i d oomyression alpparat- T'kaa ehem box and the natureof " t h e tests performed with i t E h a w been cliscwsed in a previous memorandum t o
MF
K LC
MoRorie W i t h tha tri-2axlaff. cmprension apparatus, the sgacimn i a pbacedkn~idgs ca lucite cylinder, a cylindsx xhich an aAx GOT water preeuwe can b e
b u i l t ug to m y d f a h e d value, fi'hexl this lateral preosurcr is b u i l t up,
arn
ezid.pressure i a s~lgp1it.d to the cylindrical. specimen by means of a platon and the
epecimea l.8 2.0adaC %O friiXureo The mia.b preuaure, c d l e d the mgor principel
aOrsss corresponding t o the lateral pressure, callecl the minor p r i n o i p d e t * 0 ~ 8 ~ l a determined For a number of l a t e r a l gressures,
P&;m2&"frarm the South End o l the "Bfl O r e b o z [ p a g e 5)
v
The major and ninor prinoipal stresaea are p i ~ t t e d and a r e l a t i o n s h i p can
than be ob"Lb6~..~ f o r the shear s t r e n g t h of the s a i l ,
axid\ ) > * r g 4 ~ ~ f ~
2aEE-L
(hap; p r i ~ c ; p o J stress)il
i49r-2 ; c 5 keQci. 3 _I__._ 1CI, Uncon6ir\e i = o v - + ~ c ~ s 1 c . e-
tes? ; c0rre5ponding m a j o r principa
~ W S S ( a * ; a \ p r t % ~ r e )Ef t::re slpec?inaen fs not d l m d t o conslolidate under the lateral
or €ixI@, E ~ T ~ E I E ~ ~ , a w&~k t e a t R kaalalts,
If
f u l l consolidation is allovredunder tihe %ateas1 a-&rme alone, a Wcoeerqlidatled quick tseSPs results, Sf
full. oonaaslidatlun l e allow@b m d a r bath XatsraP and -2.191 stresass t h e result- ing tost l.es c a l ;sd a t e s t w , The signiffieanca of the t e a t rc;sultu has 39en o q l a f n e d l u a preview Fnsmo on %he shear box,
Botil the ahem box and the t r i - m i a b @ompression apparatus are ezpeneivs pieoas of agpliratw and are not a v a i l a b l e a t Steep RackJ A mod-
i f i e d farm of the tri-axial, compreeeion e,pparatus oan easily b e conatruoted
6 0 that, "quiak t e a t e m crm be
run,
Thie is known a8 t h e unaonfined compreesionRo : 6 t b - o f C l a y from the South End of 1;he "Rr: Orebodx f page 6 )
presswe arad o i l y
an
axial pressure is applied to give failurs, Born the plote, a f the dt.fferent typos of teats aham .in Figme 2, it can b e seen that the shear strength equaba one half the compressfon stress i n theWquiok* t e a t ~ , e , the plot 0% shear strength Is a line parallel t o the
baae and with :5
=
o.Qbaer~ations of iailuros of earth allopes and d a m in Great Britain and the U n i t e d S t a t e s have shorn that w h o m such f a i l u s 8 occurred In c l a y
materlal that :he ahem strength along tho arc s f fallura wae e c p i l "c one half tho maocl'ined compreasslon tost i , a , equal to the shear s?,reng.th value obtained from the t v q ~ ~ i c k r 9 tost,
A n unconfined campress~.on device he8 beon c o n ~ t m c t e d in the machine
a'
p ~ at Stoep o r'iock, m d the values of s%ne,ar s t r e n g t h B Q U ~ P t o one half thei;ncor,%ined com:>ressdon a9Jreagtlb have been used i i z atxhil.iLty computations,
Taw& Weeults
Clg tc the time of" writing (late Ju.ne 1948) ,, osa1.y r e l a t i v s l y f e w
uzcanfined co~~l:,rasslon t e s t s have been mad@, These t e s t s , about, 30 in
nrmber, give3 ~ ~ ~ 1 3 average value of sh@~a? ~ t r e n g t h of about 4 Ib, psr spa in,
"
556 lb per ,3q, ft, =I(? t h i a vaiu(3 has been used thrauqghout In the c d -ohilations+ Re ~laatsd checks 8hod.d be mado cf t h i s valm a8 the test fr.s a simple one to ,erfom, a;l some modif l a a t i o n may be nsc0sae.q to t h i s ~ a l \ l w e
A f a o ~ o r of safalty of X,25 haaabeen &oped throughout
in
t h t p oa%culat ions,AG-
a Str-8 c f' C : l ~ f ' ~ ~ l ~ $A@ South End 0% Pill@ *ISm O r e b a d g ~--
--
-,-:
b1
Balbmaabg--ad
P'bow of %he P a n e d ClaxThe fc~m of f a i l u r e desoribad under IaeadSsg (a)
viz,
the f a i l -w along a circular a r c , l a the tyge of failwe met o o m n in homo-
geweala slays aohesive nxlerials, With materials 8uch as varved cBags
where thorn ax2e.G layers of silt o~ similar relatively ooaxse material
a
which i a water tomiag, %&@:re oocwu different type o f faiPurs,, Psnet- rnti0.a of water ;Worn an adjaoent higher water tabla into these layers a l l o m a water pesaure to be b u i l t
zap
in. the pores of the material, The s t a b i l i t yof 'tihe, soil, masa i s depe~denl, an the shear strength of %be aoiPo T ~ ? A 8bcmr
atrength Is a funotion of the e f f e a t l v ~ pressure i , , s , the p r s s a u e trm,.emitted
From g r a u t o g x s l n In %Go eoi.7, naaBo A PGFB preesrwe a e t a opposite to %he
effective prsaawo asld ao rsdc~oes i t , thm r@duoIng the @hem strength 0 %
%he sol% aad tba a.;cab:'ilA-t-.:= of.' ihs slope, A chmacterie$ie of t h i s
fom
offalaP;~a i e the stddamosr? with which I t takes plaoe and if %he material in
whish it occurs has a ssu!:~Ltlvs slra,ctwe ( w oonditian wuaZly associated
w i t h high n . a % ~ ~ 1 water aalo.%ent), then a flow of viscoue material.. sesrults,
f
The mat nevore o f the 8Rope failures Bshich have ocuurred at Stsep Rook ham
corn ,in20 thA8 category, and have beeu associated with prioUe 09 high rain-
*
fall or aP%h pexantiration of ~ u T a c c drainage into the e o i l mes, Both %hem uondftiom build, pore water preseure in the water bearing lay8r6, Big, 3
i l l w t r a t e s the
Porn
of failure,fai \dfcr by C\OW
s%,-.ripping
h e SouthEnd
of the Orebok (page 8 )The qufistion has been raised a t time8 as t o the effect o f t b natural d i p
of
tSis varved clay, The direction of the d i p oannot ,&%csct the mschanioa of a stlsbiPPliy analyois as neithsr the t o t a l mass (oonstituting thedistiurbixq elenmrsXn (;he s l i d i n g cirale f ailura) nor the pore water preesme (the di~turbing e.Lemen% i n the f l o w or spreaa failure) i s influenced,
However, the mxtt nt o f the s l i d e where f l o w or spread occurs i s effected b y
the d l r e c t l o n 02 bhe srarvaa as ahom in Figure 4;
Flowaw~q of mdi er9aZ
$ss?Ji6&4bcd try dope Natesfal em
U s ,
a d o ~ o t resiatosroe fLowanag t o eso
Pn
Figare 4, ( i 1 w i t h the V B R V ~ B lying w i t h the slope the materieloaoe failed f l o w ~ Q W E the alope a d lgada %o pragressivs failure by sv.ttipe5
ba.a,lk of the a i o p s . :l'f a p.l.t of open sxcava$ion Riea some distanoe down tbe
slope, then the r ? 3 o o w g l a t a ~ l a l uan flow i n t o %he p i t Zf as
in
[ii) above.tb slops 0% the irmves is ogposits io t h e earth
m m s
elope,, then the spreadma%srial tsnds t~ f l o ~ "kipn the v-ves and b u i l d s up a tog which 0- oifer
soae reaistwue f a further f l o w aad progressive breaking back of the material
in t h e slope.
no
r e l l s b l a opinion can be R o m d concerning the iaoeor of safetyo f %ha slope with sesgac% t o flow and spreading mleas the pore water pressure
Re:: S%r=%sf G k ~ " r a ? a t h e South Pad of the "8" Oreb~Q (page 3 )
---
-
This gresome can only be determined
In
the f i e l d by pressure gauge obser-vation@, h r i o i f i o obsematian of the gauge48 oould give warning of a s l l d e , If the obeervo'tions ovsr a period indigatedl a low faator ef erafety, 6rainqe
o o d d be installed to keep the pore water gressuro down to safe lilQit8,
Both ~ h . e a e prsoautione w e expansive a d t ime consuruin&,
W o r t -
unatew
this type of f a i l w e appears to ba that whioh has oocurred mostRr~1quenafily at. :;keep Hook,,
T%r ., Tk:r%n&rll, %he inta~nat ionnb authori%y on ao il mechanics, ha8
in~sratigs.%ed p ~ o b l s m a~hd propouad a p r ~ o a u t l o n a g rcaaawe ta g t i a d
agaimt f a i % u ? a . , A.6 m@at%oned eaxlisr in t h i a amor or an dew,. t h e r e l e a oxit-
i c a l b i g h t t u :%%luh a g i w n slope OW 'be cut
i n
a ccahoafv@ ma-harial, D L ,Tsrzaghi has 6k~m ~ i ; h ~ ~ r @ % i e a l l y . that if the maximuria haigb% 0% olope in a.
V S S W I P ~ 02ay i n kept dsvm %o the
rnmimwm
height fo ~ i c s h a vertiml. @u% o mbe m ~ G e !.n t b . ~ naterial, %hen a ~ a l e g w r d o m bs grovided againat fa91me by 8pread. Rna :?'Bowo Stna'la a liml.tatiaa, applied in a o n j u u t i o n wlth EWA
analysla f o r Lho @ircrll..a.r a r c type of fail-~ase el$ould giv@ protaol"cfcala waJ~et failure, 32 7:l.o~ caf p o m d Hater tcpwwds %ha aPay can hrs readil-J Wiv@rtad th3a 8huh~Ld bs done arn such water can ,enstrate %be water bewing layers of srmd ox sA::.t and b u i l d up a prasewe In She p4aros,
1n a ~.oaationm In the United S t a t s a vshichcas v a ~ v e d clay dopoaittl
,
$Pow failurea have basn edb~csswed at ixntar-aabs of abcr* 20 yeam, corraep-
ond:lng ta ~ r . : o d a Q P at~xdmarm ralnfaill. The frequenuy of such failures,
o f couree, deq~snds on conditfoaa of' arxisti~g water table lavelbs and the
faotor of safety exiotfng ,,si*o-p increased pore water ~ ~ B B ~ U T B , , and the
Ee: S t s i p p i a . ~
---
of Clqy from tlas South %b of the"B1*
Orebody [ p q e 2.0)&p%yilag
Dr,
TerzaghiFe method, the critical, height t o which avertical o u t
can
be made i n tihe varved o l a y at Steep Rook is approximately22 feet. This value ie based on the relatively small number of
uncoaf
imd oompreesion t e s t s .that have been performed, and may be aubjeot to revi~fonas further teats m e performed,
morn
this data, I suggeet that thef i n a l
bench intervtxL8 b e 20 feet apart v e r t i c a l l y , This should give protection a$alnst the periodic buS.lding up of pore water grsasure, ExamLnatisn o f
Section8
B
t o 9 shorn t b t i n ths more recent ~ t r i p p f - n g operation8 -the beneb b t e r v a l s ere approximately 20 feet, thus conforming to thes e o o ~ r P 8 a t io.no
Tae method of ealcuAa%ioa of the maxianurn ~ e : ~ % i c a l c u t i n a o l a ~
bank f a ahm8 at -bhe end of %heat3 no%eo, "srd a
c o w
ofProfessor TayAorP
ege:
St-i Caa3f fron the South End of t h e ItB" Orebody (PageXI)
cor~cz,usI
ON
After
an
examilnation of Mr. Samuel's proposed scheme, I should l i k et o make t h e following comerltiat
I
am of t h e opinion t h a t the clay need not be removed t o such an extentas
suggested, l e a , to a l e v e l varying from l l 4 7 , 5 at Section 10 t o 1UO at Section 15, S t a b i l i t y calculations on Section 10 t o 15 show t h a t benches can be formed at higher levels while s t i l l retaining t h e atabili'tyof: the slopes. Obss~vatioas of the condj.tions oxis'ting aL Secti.ona b to 9 show 42ia-k rngr propsc3d amendnents do no% incur any mre severe conditions
t h ~ i e x i s t i n k h e s e Y ~ C ' G ~ O ~ S , SecLions 13 t o 15 do not lie on the line of grsn%est. slope o f t h e clay, Therefore s.Lability calculatTons on these
anci;icmz c m bs zisleading, asd now sectLol~o should be drawn on the line of
,cgea.-test slope so . t h a t a plan of t h e propxed benches can be properly &:am,
However, I't is difficult; t.o draw a pl.ar? 7:i.e~ clt' -the 'benches p l ~ t t ~ i n g from seciions, as: tbs sand and gravel. levels v 3 ~ t o a great extent, P l o t t i n g a plan from t h e seetians gives an extrercely e r r a t i c arrar!gement o f benches due
.f;o t h e varinticns,
H
have dram up a sketch plan, which is attached t o t h i snermranclwn, in which t h e o f bench l o c a t i o n i s ahowno T h i s planp r&th
the approximate locat,ion of the benches shown thereon, w i l l serve as a guide
to t h e se'tting o.ut of the benches,
Pt
i s ~ * e a l i s e d that l o c a l conditions andexigencies m k a ii; d i f f i c u l t ta follow a set plan, and t h e sketch plan sub-
mitted i s in.ter:ded t o be, a general guide t o t h e scheme of t h e slopes rather
than a rigid specification,
Denna1::ds f o r production of ore may a l t e r the planning and c a l l for an accelsa:atior?. of the stripping programme, The following are gwneral rec- ommsndatlons tktat should be followed i n order t o afford s a f e t y against
Re: S t r i p Clay fi-om_the South k d o f the
"B"
Orebodg (page 12) the crand and g r ~ ~ e l l e v e l l i e 8 throughout a t approximately the same l e v e l axt h e t o e of t h e slope. Where the sand and gravel surface
parallels
the varved clay surface, these values are too severe and can be modified,In
such ta case individual slopes should be checked as shown i n Figure5 ,
Check
skabilityfrom
X t o C; Check s t a b i l i t y fromF
t&
AFissure
5
.,%
With slopev witr! 20 feat rises bsttmen benches,and w i t h berms 50 f e e t wfde,
8, l i m i t i n g t o t a l rise of
54
f e e t above t h e toe is recommended, Greater risesa r e p e d s ~ i b l s by widening the berrns and so f l a t t e n i w the overall slope, The
following table gives tho refationehip between rise and overall s l o p ,
Dfffersnce
in elmrationbetmg3 -LOB of slope and
c r e s t of s l o p , Horizonbal distance between t o e of shops and c r e s t of slope Feet Feet Eqluivalent overall slops measured from crest t o t o e o f slope
-
B y t h e use of these figures as a general guide, slopes can be l a i d out on section8 on the l i n e a of t h e greateat elope of t h e clay, Protection againat circular
arc
Bet S t X 0 i - i -. of C l a ~ f r o r n
-
the
S o u t h s o f - Orebody-O'JW
&31
f ~ i l u r a s can t h u s be given, By limiting difference
in
level between benchest,o 20 feet, an attempt can be m d e to etabjlise the slope against failure by
flow and swead, Using a 20 feet rise between benches at a slope of 1
in 3
'I
and knowing the total rise,the overall equivalent slope can be found from t h e above t a b l e and the necessary widths of benches determined,
!!'hes~_values have been baaed
on
a rela$Jxly small nunher of t e s t aconsidering t h e _extent of" t h o area i n v o P ~ e d ~ C h o c k t e s t s for tile unes,niined LB
coiupresaior.
sP;~&~~&h
of t h e s 9 o _ i l 3 $ ~ d be carrigd QU~, ?t every o p h u n i t y ,-
The I.nformation obtained from the foregoing analysis is inLended as a g1.13.de and mei; he combi-ned w i t n the observations and experience of t h e operators on t h c J D ~ , shod-d not be taken a s a rigid s p e c i f i c a t i o n but
shoulci bs ~ s s d ~ d ' t h good judgnen-b, as f l e x i b i l i t y of thought ~mst be retained
Be:
S t , - . -
from the South End--.
of the "Bn &@body (page14)
Specimen Calculations used j,n Slow Anal-mis]L3
To
f irld the height to which a bark can be saf s l y c u t to obaexlre t h efollowing conditions:
2 '
Average valueof shear s t r e n g t h of clay S
.
4B . / b
2576
i b / f t 2-
0 ! 9 p 3 d used3
by Ttwlor)Density of S l a y
-
j
-
= 105 lb/rtt.
Bank rises at 1 vartic.il to
3
horieontal for a vert-ical distance of 20 feethas a 50 feet h e m , rises a ~ a i n at 1 i n
3
for 20 feet e t c . T h i s givesan
onveraga o v e r a l l slope value of ngproxhatsly
13
Fsactcr o f safety against circular arc failure 1,25Ratio of distance f r j m slope crest Lo hard underlying aurface to vertical
F r o m Taylor '2s curvet3 :
' 0
Stab-Uity Nurnber for De 1 and D(
=
13
and @ o l aO,m
_,C
.0,81 o " , H p C-
-
576
=
54
Feet.FkH
E
k.
0,811,25x105X0081
' Height to which bank can be
carried
-
-
-
54
Feet.ge;: Stpi- ,,-. o n t h e South Ehd of t h e T3n
-
O m b o m (page 15)2 ,
To
find the height to which a bank can be cut vertically in a clay having the s m e properties asin
example 1,Crit:ical h e i p ? t t o which a clay can be cut vertically
3.85
2
Where S
=
shear strength of s o i l lb/%t 28
1
density of sooil ib/ft3.",
B 3.85 x4
approximately 22 feety05
A
%able is a t t a c h e d b e l o w showing the variation in t h i s critixal heightto w h l c l l a v e r t i c a l c u t can be nasda as the shear strength and density vaslbea,
Values of C e t i c t d l Height
L. a Q~IJ.'.:'~ o r ' :\lqt' C.
r,,,
2i* ,.-, , . -. ..-* -"".-L--.- , . -..''a7,;!ll 9;; f ~ r a?;?; bj...!ii;y ~ ) f ' c'.o:lc~ 3:; {: :A,: :I;. . i...kinixh S r:i.lc 1. ;is '~:3:~!:;o~?~i;:';.
u?
"ii!.ii:i5 j"1c'l.: ;?ecmi 9cr.re aB a m@:>ms >I' jud,?ilag ~~1.lt%i*l_os :f ~ j . X : i . ;
O L ~ P C
w l l 2 . b ~ ? ~~?ilc)U'bt~d:I',,y s E ; B b 3 , ~ ,ua.d.cu'f3'~ l:dl.;r m a t c~i-.~.c:. :, o.? 3f douZ:~i;i'ui, s L : i h l l l t y c If t )LC: 8% ~ibli.lt y appears doubtful
,
thof a c t o r of a u S b z ; ~ v h i l respect t o f a . i l u u s h o u l d he computed uccordinc to morc: dota1;lci; and oxpt:t dletfioda of co.lcu.k& ion,
~t ? c ecddorn p o ~ s i b l e is1 o t a b i l l t y problms 01' indeecl any enrthpaork p r o b 3 . m ~ to makc use
,i' ,3 lai6ge f a c t o r of s a f e t y , Val1r9s as h i g h as 1,s my 5 e w e d in d t 3 ~ i g n , b u t u s u a l l y
from eccmomic couejideratlons R valu.rt. this 1me;e Xs 30% aliowa31cio Soverd. la]-gr, earth
dam:: r c c e r ~ t l y constructed were ~ C S I : ~ I C ~ I tn ~ I V C a FacLor as s a f e t y in thc r e ~ i o n o r
r.e
t o 1 ~ 3 ~nhelte B n.> unit shct~r:ln(; s.tcarii;t;::~ p "=.' u:,p.l %eta ef.fL;zt ire st rlesc on t b.:, 813r7-T.c.26: 0 ;
~~:~;p%ur:: i a,v.ch nn due t :: -24c ovcx.bu.~~don j
r.: e u n i t a o h ~ i s i o n oP $'lo soil
4
t b cn$e oi' i.nicm~:.l. fr.%c.bisxi. of t h c soi:i.It must b e noted theit t h o v a l u e s for. cohesion arid img.2~ of :b-rt.:~nah f"xbfuet;bou. e r o not
necessari1.y constants f o r a given s o i l , but are iatondsd t o r q r a ~ o n t c_umtit ies whioh m:
be depe:nded upon to hold for a duf i n . i t e set of conditions,
The shear strength f o r a eoft clay often taken as one hn3.f the zomprossive strcngch
Eff e c t 3 of .3aturation.
A e l o w be eubjeotod to the followlne; condldions.
Case
I.
Caaplote Submergen~o~Tho free water rsurfaoo i a at tho t o p of tho sl.ope,--
a
tho s o i l i n f u l l y aaturat ad. U s e t h o su'hmcrceu u n i t wei,zht foro u l o u l t i t i c n ~ . Thi u aqualu
a.
and varies from 56 to 70Ib,
por oubu ft, for tho goncrccL n m of soils, T U B is t h o moot favourablc caoe,!:ern 2* S;idd~il D D - N Q W ~ O ~ : ~ ~ Th:io 10 t h e : 3 ~ 1 l e as 5330 I , but with the .~VOC mtor
.-
--__1--...su:lilonly rcnovuct , ToyJ.ar ou;l,;.;csce ?illat a r?.od.~r'lcii cu~;;,.I..c 61: ~r.ti;rn:'.l.. f r i c ? ; i c : .
bc: used i n t h i s c a w . K t is sn approrimat e oolut ion
,
but t h e error i~ on thi!cafe s l d e . The t a t a l u n i t w9ight shouJ,d bc usad i n the calcr3at-ions,
Case 3, Capillary Saturation, The c Is no fLow. no aup~:ly, no evaporation, The
-
gores of the soil, are fflleci w i t h Tr.laf;orvhol.d by capillarity, a condition
camon i n typical cohcsivc e o i l a . The total u n i t mei*t should be used in
calculat ions, a value givon by f a s
+
e]
m(l varying from IIt; to I30o a l c u l a t ion
1 -
a+ 0Ib.
ger cub. ft..
13 the unit weigh; of water,
-
8, i s the PPac~..'ic ~ r $ . v & y of t h o soil ~rains ~ % ~ a l l y fallin,: in tho r a g e 2,60 to 2=80
Jew
8
.+ i e t h ~ v o i d F ~ ' . ~ ~ ~f t h e e soil, and i s t h e r a t i o of t h e vol,un~s of t h c s a i d a tombhe
1 volmo of the s s Z L d ~ , r is the innit w o i ~ h f ; of L:'? 9
IU
mi is t h e natural mator c o n t ~ . - ; sf t h c soil andic the ratio of tho volume of t h e voids
LA
-to tho volw~o of tho 301idae )?DF 8 f u l l y saturated soil e equals VJ < :.ss
m
-
note: w, w e i g h t of water i n coil