• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rebuttal: Should Canadians be offered systematic screening for colorectal cancer?: YES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Rebuttal: Should Canadians be offered systematic screening for colorectal cancer?: YES"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

674

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 54:  may • mai 2008

Debates

A

ccording  to  Dr  Turcotte,  this  program  “would  have  no  effect  on  the  absolute  risk  of  dying”  and  there- fore  should  not  be  implemented  because  it  contradicts  a  principle  of  public  health  practice.  There  is  no  refer- ence to support this statement, and its rigorous applica- tion  would  mean  the  end  of  most  of  Canada’s  existing  public health programs. As Dr Turcotte accepts that 30% 

of  deaths  from  colorectal  cancer  (CRC)  would  be  elimi- nated through this program, it is hard to understand why  we would reject a measure that could eliminate approxi- mately 3000 premature deaths each year.  

Dr  Turcotte’s  second  point  concerns  the  anxiety  caused  by  false-positive  screening  results.  He  neglects  to  mention  the  anxiety  and  suffering  experienced  by  those  forced  to  live  through  a  long  and  slow  decline  with metastasizing CRC that was diagnosed too late. He  also  fails  to  take  into  account  the  anxiety  and  suffer- ing  of  these  people’s  families  and  friends.  If  any  situa- tion is as nightmarish as he says, it is surely this and not  screening.

His  third  point  concerns  the  misuse  of  public  health  resources.  Once  again,  Dr  Turcotte  makes  no  mention  of the cost of investigating lesions at a more advanced  stage  than  T1N0M0  or  the  cost  of  treating  them  with 

surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. From a strictly  economic  point  of  view,  111 300  potential  years  of  life  are lost to CRC.1 If a screening program made it possible  to save 30% of those years, that would be an additional  33 390  years  of  life.  In  Canada,  if  we  chose  $50 000  as  an  acceptable  threshold  of  health  investment  for  each  additional  year  of  life,  that  would  represent  a  total  of 

$1 700 000 000  (111 300  x  30%  x  $50 000).  Clearly,  with  this  amount  of  money,  the  health  authorities  would  be  able to offer every Canadian an excellent CRC screening  program. 

Dr Pineau is Vice President of the Quebec Division of the Canadian Cancer Society.

Competing interests None declared

Correspondence to: Dr Gilles Pineau, 453 Wiseman, Outremont, QC H2V 3J9; telephone 514 272-3800;

e-mail gpineau@bellnet.ca Reference

1. Canadian Cancer Society, National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian can- cer statistics 2007. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society, National Cancer  Institute of Canada; 2007. 

These rebuttals are responses from the authors of the debates in the April issue (Can Fam Physician 2008;54:504-6).

YES

Gilles Pineau

MD

Rebuttal: Should Canadians be offered systematic screening for colorectal cancer?

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 676.

✶ ✶ ✶

Références

Documents relatifs

As with all health profession- als, when the patient’s situation or condition is beyond their independent scope of practice, they consult with the appropriate health

D r  Verma  argues  that  moonlighting  fills  a  void  in  medical  services  produced  by  system  changes.  Are  residents  supposed  to 

Family  physicians  work  across  a  vast  area,  and  there  will never be enough subspecialists to meet the needs  of  patients.  Do 

It is high time that Canadian doctors rid themselves  of  erroneous  beliefs  about  screening,  particularly  cancer  screening.  First  of  all,  it  is 

cause?  Given  the  bottlenecks  that  are  already  affect- ing  too  many  health  care  sectors,  how  can  we  justify  preparing  for  what  could  be 

cause?  Given  the  bottlenecks  that  are  already  affect- ing  too  many  health  care  sectors,  how  can  we  justify  preparing  for  what  could  be 

1-4   These  include  low- ering  the  risks  of  human  papillomavirus,  penile  cancer,  cervical  cancer  in  female  sexual  partners, 

L et’s  be  clear.  We  need  to  acknowledge  at  least  one  point:  the  introduction  of  systematic  screening  for  prostate  cancer  substantially