• Aucun résultat trouvé

Cloning Standard for Mammalian BioBrick Parts and Devices

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Cloning Standard for Mammalian BioBrick Parts and Devices"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

BBF RFC 45 Mammalian BioBricks

BBF RFC 45: Cloning Standard for Mammalian BioBrick

Parts and Devices

Michael Bartoschek, Douaa Mugahid, Anne Rademacher, Hannah Meyer, Lars Velten, Yara Reis, Jens Keienburg and Roland Eils

19th of October 2009

1. Purpose

To introduce a common cloning standard for BioBrick parts that find application in mammalian cells.

2. Relation to other BBF RFCs

Comments upon and extends RFC-12; Replaces RFC-10, RFC-20, RFC-21, RFC-25 for use in mammalian cells.

3. Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The BioBricks Foundation (2009). All Rights Reserved.

4. Definition

RFC-12 (Tom Knight's Bbb proposal) SHOULD be applied to Parts and Devices for use in mammalian cells.

5. Rationale

The existence of multiple cloning standards presents a problem to biological engineers. Considering the weaknesses of the original BioBrick standard (does not allow for protein fusions), it is not surprising that a multitude of cloning standards has been proposed. As current discussion shows, each of the proposed alternatives has several disadvantages [1], but still, each standard is applied, for most registry parts are in the original BioBrick standard and compatibility is desired. RFC-12 is recognized as the most advanced standard with no disadvantages other than incompatibility with existing standards [1]. On the other hand, the registry contains a very small number of mammalian parts and devices. By introducing RFC 41-43, we hope to set a process in motion that will alter this fact. In mammalian systems, the ability to perform protein fusions is a central

requirement. For example, eukaryotic cells are compartmentalized and protein targeting can only be achieved by fusing proteins to targeting sequences.

(2)

6. Promoter structure

In eukaryotic cells, promoters can be subdivided into a core and a proximal promoter[2]. We suggest that core and proximal promoter MAY be separated by a HindIII site. This allows for rapid swapping of core promoters (alters strength [3]) and proximal promoters (alters regulation).

7. Author’s Contact Information

Michael Bartoschek (michael@bartoschek.org) Douaa Mugahid (douaa.mugahid@gmail.com)

Anne Rademacher (anne.Rademacher@stud.uni-heidelberg.de) Hannah Meyer (Hannah.meyer@stud.uni-heidelberg.de)

Lars Velten (velten@stud.uni-heidelberg.de) Yara Reis (y.reis@dkfz-heidelberg.de)

Jens Keienburg (jens.keienburg@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de) Roland Eils (r.eils@dkfz-heidelberg.de)

References

[1]

http://openwetware.org/wiki/The_BioBricks_Foundation:Standards/Technical/Formats [2] Heintzman ND, Ren B. The gateway to transcription: identifying, characterizing and understanding promoters in the eukaryotic genome. Cellular and Molecular Life Science 64, 386-400 (2007).

[3]

http://2009.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement#Different_core_promoters_ result_in_different_expression_strength

Références

Documents relatifs

Piri Reis’s fate thus represents a powerful argu- ment against the image of the Ottoman Empire as fully engaged in the exploration and discovery of the world as

FOXL2 and PISRT1 are also expressed in goat developing eyelids (studied at 36 dpc), but their transcriptional levels are not a ff ected by the PIS mutation, in accordance with the

The aim of this paper is to push this line of research one step further, by combining Stein’s method with an appropriate discrete version of Malliavin calculus, in order to study

According to them, the condensation processes are one to one as previously predicted, there is no energy loss in the condensation into phonons or rotons but the emission probability

The standard sup- ports WHO’s Make Listening Safe initia- tive which seeks to improve listening practices in particular for young people, both when they are exposed

[r]

Among several examples, such as random variables which depend on infinitely many Rademacher variables, we provide three main applications: (i) to CLTs for multilinear forms belonging

Instead of using the sieve of function classes given in advance, as it is common in the traditional approach to structural risk minimization and as we did in the previous section,