• Aucun résultat trouvé

WHO-ITU global standard for safelistening devices and systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "WHO-ITU global standard for safelistening devices and systems"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International

Telecommunication Union (ITU) are concerned about the rise in hearing loss.

WHO-ITU global standard for safe listening devices and systems

Summary

Implementing the WHO-ITU standard

Many different types of entities can play a role in facilitating adoption of the WHO-ITU standard for safe listening devices. Firstly,

governments

can do so through policy, regulation or legislation as part of national consumer protection efforts. Secondly,

manufacturers

can adopt the standard voluntarily at the point of manufacture, producing safe listening devices that already include the features noted in the following page. Thirdly,

civil society

, in particular professional associations and other organizations which promote hearing care, can advocate towards governments and manufacturers for adoption of the standard and towards the public so that people understand the importance of safe listening practices and demand products that help them to practice safe listening.

Regarding the latter, the WHO-ITU toolkit for implementation of the global standard for safe listening devices provides practical guidance in this respect.

Therefore, they have developed a stan- dard for the manufacture and use of per- sonal audio devices such as smartphones and MP3 players. The standard covers these devices and the systems of which they are a part, including the earphones and headphones that facilitate listening.

The

aim

of the standard is to reduce the risk of hearing loss among users of such products. The standard was developed over two years based on the latest evidence and in consultation with a range of stakehold- ers, including experts from government, industry and civil society as well as users of personal audio devices.

The standard

sup- ports WHO’s Make Listening Safe

initia- tive which seeks to improve listening practices in particular for young people, both when they are exposed to music and other sounds at noisy enter- tainment venues and as they listen to music and other audio content through personal audio devices.

The WHO-ITU standard focuses on the latter.

!"#$%&'()$*'*+%,"-$

(2)

Features of safe listening devices

The WHO-ITU standard offers recommendations on the following aspects of personal audio devices:

Dosimetry function: The personal audio device will include software that tracks the level and duration of the user’s exposure to sound as a percentage used of a reference exposure, also known as a user’s “sound allowance”. The user will have the option to choose one of two modes that determine the total sound dose he or she can safely consume:

• Mode 1 for adults: 80 dB for 40 hours per week.

• Mode 2 for children: 75 dB for 40 hours per week.

Personalized information: Based on the user’s listening practices, the personal audio device will generate an individualized listening profile. This profile informs the user of how safely (or not) he or she has been listening to music through the device.

The software that allows this will summarize listening activity in terms of a percentage of sound allowance and give cues for action to the user based on this information.

Volume limiting options: The personal audio device will offer users options which aim to limit the volume, including:

• Automatic volume reduction, which reduces the listening volume based on

information from the user’s profile. If the user has been listening at a high volume for too long, the volume will automatically be reduced.

• Parental volume control, which allows a parent to set the volume to a certain level.

This control is password protected.

General information: The personal audio device will provide general information and guidance to users to make safe listening choices. This includes information on safety listening practices, both through personal audio devices and in the context of other leisure activities, as well as the risks for hearing loss that users face when these practices are not followed.

WHO-ITU global standard for safe listening devices and systems

Download here: https://www.who.int/deafness/world-hearing-day/2019/en/

1. ITU-T H.870 Guidelines for safe listening devices and systems https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.870 2. Safe listening devices and systems: a WHO-ITU standard https://goo.gl/9qrxX6

3. Toolkit for implementation of the WHO-ITU H.870 global standard for safe listening devices and systems https://goo.gl/Dw4eqK

© World Health Organization 2019. Some rights reserved. This work is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO licence.

WHO/NMH/NVI/19.4

Références

Documents relatifs

The candidate material was included in the study coded as Sample A and potency estimates were obtained using clotting assays against human plasma and purified fibrinogen.. A

(87) In practice, however, the access of young people who inject drugs to information and harm- reduction services is affected by significant legal and policy constraints,

audio device is one factor that determines their risk of hearing loss. While this is a choice made by the individual, the responsibility for creating an environment that promotes

Regularly listening to music or other audio content at high volume through personal audio devices and being exposed to loud sounds in nightclubs, discotheques, bars or

Government regulation: The relevant government department (technology, health, consumer protection etc.) should define a mechanism to enforce such policies or

Participants performing semi-quantitative Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) Gelation Assays were provided with 3 vials of the IS and 3 vials of each of the 4

The medical devices law should allow reliance and recognition techniques to be used by the regulatory authority to determine whether a medical device complies with the

The New Zealand Immigration and Protection Tribunal made a point of saying that the effects of climate change were not the reason for granting residency to the family, but