C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
V. M. B HISE
Certain properties of Meijer-Laplace transform
Compositio Mathematica, tome 18, n
o1-2 (1967), p. 1-6
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1967__18_1-2_1_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1967, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
1
by V. M. Bhise
1
A
generalization
of the classicalLaplace
transformhas been introduced
by
the author[1,
p.57]
in the formand denoted
symbolically by ~(p)
=G[f(t);
am, nm,a].
Certainrules and recurrence relations have also been established
[2]
forthe transform
(1.2),
which we shall call asMeijer-Laplace
trans-form.
Setting aj
=0, i
= 1, 2, ..., m-1.(i)
and am = 0, ar = 0,(1.2)
reduces to(1.1)
(ii)
and am= -m’-k, nm
=m’-k,
or = -m’-k weget (1.2)
reduced to
Meijer’s
transform[3,
p.730],
(iii) and am
=1 2-m’-k, nm
=2m’, 03C3
= 0 weget (1.2)
reducedto Verma’s transform
[4,
p.209]
We denote
(1.1), (1.3)
and(1.4) symbolically by
respectively.
In this paper we have obtained a theorem for the
Meijer- Laplace
transform(1.2),
which is ageneralization
of the well-known Tricomi’s theorem
[5,
p.564].
Variousparticular
caseshave been
given
and the theorem is illustratedby
anexample.
2
THEOREM : If
then,
where 1
provided
n, s arepositive integers s
>n; arg ys/pn| (s-n)03C0/2;
min
(Re
~j, Rep )
+ n min(Re ni/s,
Reals)
> -1 - Re 03BB >-
Re(~j+03B1j+03BB)-2
for i = 1, 2, ...,m; j =
1, 2,..., /À; 1
= 0,1, ...,
n -1;
v = 0, 1, ..., s -1. theintegral
in(2.1)
isabsolutely
and
uniformly convergent
and theMeijer-Laplace
transform ofItÀ ~0 F(t, y)dyl |
exists.PROOF: From
(1.2), replacing
pby p-"’8
andmultiplying by
pn/s-03BB,
we obtainBut we have from
[6]
1 For the sake of brevity the symbol
has been employed to denote
Hence
substituting
from(2.3)
in theintegrand
on the R.H.S. of(2.2),
andchanging
the orderof integration
weget
the result(2.1 ).
To
justify
thechange
of order ofintegration
we see that thet-integral
in(2.3)
isabsolutely
anduniformly convergent
as nand s are
positive integers,
the
y-integral
in(2.1)
isabsolutely
anduniformly convergent
and the
repeated integral
isabsolutely convergent
as theMeijer- Laplace
transform ofItA ~0F(t, y)dyl
exists. Henceby
De LaVallee Poussin’s Theorem
[7,
p.504]
the inversion of the order ofintegration
isjustified.
3. Particular cases
In all the
following
cases we assume n, s aspositive integers
with s
> n, arg ys/pn| (s-n)03C0/2
and theintegrals
involvedare
absolutely
anduniformly convergent.
(i) With aj
=0, y =
1, 2, ...,m-1; am
=-m’-k; 0’ = -m’-k, nm
= m’-k wehave;
If
then
where
4
min
for
Further with If
then
where
min
(Re ~j,
Re03C1)+
Re03BB+1
> 0, Re(~j+03B1j)
> -1for j = 1, 2, ..., 03BC; l = 0, 1,
..., n -1; v = 0, 1, ..., s -1.(ib)
Further with k =±m’ and 03B1j
=0, i
- 1, 2, ..., IÀ; p = 0we obtain If
then
With n = s = 1 we
get
the well-known Tricomi’s theorem[5,
p.564].
(ii) Setting 03B1j
=0, j
= 1, 2,...,m-1; am
=1 2-k-m’; nm
=2m’,
a = 0 we haveIf
then
where
for j = 1, 2, ..., 03BC; l = 0, 1, ..., 03C0=1; v = 0, 1, ..., s-1.
With 03B1j = 0, j = 1, 2, ..., 03BC-1; 03B103BC = 1 2-03BC’-03BB’; ~03BC = 203BC’; 03C1 = 0
and n = s = 1 we
get
after somesimplification
the resultby
R.Narain
[8,
p.316].
EXAMPLE: The function
K(z)
of Boersma J.[9]
is definedby
where 03BCj, vk are natural
numbers; i
=0, 1,
...,03BCj-1; j = 1, 2, ..., y; l
= 0, 1, ...,vk-1;
k = 1, 2,..., t and const.Let
in case
(ia)
of the theorem.6
Then
(3.1) gives,
where
F(t, y)
isgiven by (3.2), provided
n, s arepositive integers,
for j = 1, 2, ...,03BC; l = 0, 1, ..., n -1; v = 0, 1, ..., s-1;
03BCr, vtare natural
numbers, 03A303BCj ~ 1+03A3vk; s
> n.1 am thankful to Dr. B. R. Bhonsle for his
help
in the prepara- tion of this paper. 1 am also thankful to the referee for his valuablesuggestions
inimproving
the paper.REFERENCES V. M. BHISE
[1] Jourl. Vikram Univ. 3, No. 3, (1959), p. 57201463.
[2] Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., India, 32A (1962), p. 3892014404.
[6] Communicated for publication.
J. BOERSMA
[9] Compositio Math., 15 (1961) p. 34201463.
BROMWICH T. J. I. ’A.
[7] Introduction to the theory of Infinite Series, London (1931).
C. S. MEIJER
[3] Proc. Ned. Acad. V. Weten. Amsterdam, 44 (1941), p. 7272014737.
R. NARAIN
[8] Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico dell’Universita e del Politecnico di Torino, 15 (1955201456), p. 3112014328.
F. TRICOMI
[5] Rendic. Acc. dei Lincei, 22 (1935), p. 5642014571.
R. S. VERMA
[4] Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, India, 20A (1951), p. 2092014216.
(Oblatum 20-5-66) Department of Mathematics, G. S. Technological Institute,
IndoTe (India).