C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
J. H. R UBINSTEIN C. G ARDINER
A note on a 3-dimensional homogeneous space
Compositio Mathematica, tome 39, n
o3 (1979), p. 297-299
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1979__39_3_297_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1979, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
297
A NOTE ON A 3-DIMENSIONAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACE
J.H. Rubinstein* and C. Gardiner
COMPOSITIO MATHEMATICA, Vol.
39,Fasc. 3,
@ 1979 Sijtho1I & Noordhoff International Publishers - Alphen aan den Rijn Printed in the Netherlands
We
give
a calculation of thehomeomorphism type
of the homo- geneous spaceSL(2, R)/SL(2, Z) using only elementary properties
ofSeifert manifolds
(cf.
p. 84 of Milnor’sbook,
Introduction toalgebraic K-theory,
for a differentproof).
As acorollary,
the well-knownpresentation
ofSL(2, Z)
follows.THEOREM: The
(right)
coset spaceof SL(2, Z)
inSL(2, R)
ishomeomorpic
to thecomplement of
thetrefoil
knot inS3.
PROOF: Since
SL(2, Z)
is a discretesubgroup
ofSL(2, R),
thecoset space which we denote
by
M is a 3-manifold withoutboundary.
Right multiplication
ofSO(2, R)
onSL(2, R)
commutes with leftmultiplication by SL(2, Z).
Therefore there is an induced action ofSO(2, R)
on M. We show that M is a Seifert manifold with twoexceptional
fibres ofmultiplicity
2 and 3 and with orbit surfaceequal
to an open disk. This
implies
that M and thecomplement
of the trefoil knot inS3
have the same Seifert invariants and so arehomeomorphic (see [2]
or[3]
for theproperties
of Seifertspaces).
Let A E
SO(2, R).
Then A is in the stabilizer of somepoint
of Mexactly
when theequation iS
= SA can be solvedfor £
ESL(2, Z)
and S E
SL(2, R).
In thiscase ~
=SAS-1
and tr A =tr !
is aninteger.
If
À,
y are theeigenvalues
ofA,
thenIÀI = 11’1 =
1 since A is ortho-gonal,
andÀy
= 1 as det A = 1. Therefore À =y and
because À + y isan
integer
we see that À is ann th
root ofunity
for n =1, 2, 3,
4 or 6.Consequently
An = I. Also -I actstrivially
on M and so we concludethat the stabilizer of every
point
of M isZ2, Z4
orZ6.
Consider the case when A is of order
4,
i.e. when .* The first author was supported by a Rothman’s Research Fellowship.
0010-437X/79/06/0297-03$00.20/0
298
Observe that
Then
BSS’B’
has itsoff-diagonal
entryequal
to ±n - p or ±m - p respec-tively.
Nowmn - p’= 1
and m> 0, n
> 0.Consequently
either m :5Ip 1
orn - Ip 1,
andby appropriate
choice of B weget
that theoff-diagonal
term ofBSStBt
has absolute valuestrictly
less thanIp 1.
So
by
a sequence of suchtransformations,
a matrixIl
ESL(2, Z)
canbe found for which
.!lsst.!i =
L Thisimplies
thatIls
ESO(2, R)
and the coset of S is in the same orbit of
SO(2, R)
as the coset of I.Therefore there is
only
one orbit ofSO(2, R)
in M with stabilizerZ4.
For the case when the stabilizer is
Z6,
let A be the matrix of rotationby ir/3.
ThenSAS-’ E SL(2, Z)
if andonly
ifV3 sst
is amatrix with
integer entries,
determinantequal
to3,
oddintegers
onthe
diagonal
and evenintegers
off thediagonal. By
the sameargument
as
above,
we can find a matrixIl E SL(2, Z)
so thatI1V3 SStl =
implies Sl’IIS
ESO(2, R)
and the coset of S is in the same orbit asthe coset of
Si. Consequently,
there isjust
one orbit with stabilizerZ6.
To
complete
theproof
we have to determine the orbit surface F ofM.
Every
matrix inSL(2, R)
can be writtenuniquely
as theproduct
of a real lower
triangular
matrix and a matrix inSO(2, R).
So there isa
homeomorphism
ofSL(2, R)
ontoR2 x S1
and the inclusion ofSO(2, R)
inSL(2, R)
induces anisomorphism
of fundamental groups.Since M =
SL(2, R)/SL(2, Z),
there is an exact sequence 1 ---> Z -->1Tt(M) SL(2, Z) ---> 1,
andSL(2, Z)
is thequotient
of1Tt(M) by
acyclic
normalsubgroup
withgenerator
a. Note that a is theimage
ofa generator of
irl(SO(2, R))
under themapping SO(2, R) ---> SL(2, R) --->
M. Let h be the
homotopy
class of an orbit in M of theSO(2, R) action,
with stabilizerZ2 (i.e.
anordinary
fibre in theterminology
of[3]).
Without loss ofgenerality a = h 2 and SL(2, Z)
is thequotient
ofirl(M) by
thecyclic
normalsubgroup generated by h2.
Consequently
there is anepimorphism
fromSL(2, Z)
toirl(F)
andalso from
H,(SL(2, Z))
toHI(F).
Now it is well-known thatSL(2, Z)
and
X 2
=y3 = -7,
we see thatHI(SL(2, Z))
has order at most 12.Therefore F must be an open
disk,
a2-sphere
or aprojective plane.
If F
= S2
then M is a lens space and so cannot be coveredby
SL(2, R). Suppose
next that F =RP2.
As M isorientable,
the relation299
matrix for
H1(M) (see [2]
or[3])
shows thath2
is nullhomologous
andHI(M)
has order at least 24.But h2 ’- 0 implies H1(M)
=HI(SL(2, Z)),
whichgives
a contradiction. Thiscompletes
theproof.
PROOF:
irl(M)
has generatorsh,
x, y and relations[h, x] = [h, y] = 1, x2h
=y3h
= 1(see [2]
or[3]).
ThenSL(2, Z)
isgiven by adding
the relationh2 = 1
toiri(M),
and so has thepresentation fx, y x4 = 1,
x2 = y3}.
REFERENCES
[1] J. MILNOR: Introduction to algebraic K-theory. Annals of Math. Studies #72, Princeton, 1971. MR50, #2304.
[2] P. ORLIK: Seifert manifolds. Lecture Notes in Math. #291, Springer, 1972.
[3] H. SEIFERT: Topologie dreidimensionaler gefaserter Raüme. Acta math. 60 (1933)
147-238.
(Oblatum 3-VIII-1977 & 20-X-1978) Department of Mathematics University of Melbourne Parkville, Victoria 3052 Australia