C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
M AXWELL O. R EADE
E LIGIUSZ Z LOTKIEWICZ
On values omitted by univalent functions with two pre-assigned values
Compositio Mathematica, tome 24, n
o3 (1972), p. 355-358
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1972__24_3_355_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1972, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
355
ON VALUES OMITTED BY UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH TWO PRE-ASSIGNED VALUES
by
Maxwell O.
Reade 1
andEligiusz Zlotkiewicz 2
Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing Printed in the Netherlands
1. Introduction
Let 9N denote the set of all functions
f(Z)
which areanalytic
andunivalent in the unit dise 0394 and which are normalized
by
the conditionsf(0)
= 0 andf(Z0)
=Zo ;
hereZo
is a fixedpoint
ind, Z0 ~
0. Forthe class
8ll,
thefollowing
result was establishedrecently.
LEMMA.
If f ~ 9,
then theimage
domainf(0394)
contains the disc[W||W| t(l-IZoI)2].
The constant(1-|Z0|)2 ~ R0 is the
bestpossible
one[2,3].
Let
CR
denote the circle[W||W| = R],
letf ~ m.
and letm(R,f)
~m[CRBf(0394)
nCR ]
be theLebesgue
measure of the set ofvalues on
CR
not taken onby f(z).
It follows from the Lemma thatm(R,f)
= 0 for 0 ~ RR o
andm(R,f)
= 2nR for R > 1.In this note we shall evaluate the
expression
for R
fixed, R0 ~ R
1. The result we obtain isanalogous
to one ob-tained
by
Jenkins[1 ] :
he considered the class S of univalent functionsf(z) subject
to the usualnormalization f(0)
= 0and f’(0)
= 1. Ourresult reduces to that of Jenkins if we allow
Zo -
0.2. The
principal
resultIf Q is a
simply-connected
domain in thecomplex
domainS2,
and if aand b are two
points
inQ,
thenp(a, b, 03A9)
will denote thehyperbolic
distance between the
points a
and b with respect to Q.If Q is a
simply-connected
domain in thecomplex domain,
and if Qcontains the
points a
andb,
then Q* denotes the domain obtained from1 The first author acknowledges support received under National Science Foun- dation Grant GP-11158.
2 The second author acknowledges support received from I.R.E.X.
356
Sz
by
circularsymmetrization
with respect to the half-line[a, b, oo ],
whichhas its finite
end-point
at a and passesthrough
thepoint
b.The
symbol J(R, t)
denotes the ’fork-domain’ definedby
Here R is
fixed, R0 ~
R1,
and t isfixed,
0 ~ t 1t.Our
principal
result is thefollowing
one.THEOREM. The bound in
(1)
isgiven by
theformula
where
for R fixed, (|-1Z0|)2 ~ R0 ~ R
1. Theextremal function for
thisproblem
maps L1 onto asuitably-chosen fork-domain.
PROOF.
Compactness
considerationsyield
the result that there exists atleast one extremal
function;
later considerations will show that there isonly
one extremal function.Let f(Z)
be an extremal function for the bound(1).
In view of the conformal invariance of thehyperbolic distance,
we haveIf/(J)*
is the domain obtainedfrom f(0394) by
circularsymmetrization
with respect to the half-line
[0, Zo, oo ),
then it is well-known thatholds. Now it is
geometrically
clearthat f(0394)*
is contained in a fork-domain
J(R, t)
for some t, and for thisJ(R, t)
we haveFrom
(4), (5)
and(6)
we obtain theinequality
which is our fundamental one. Since
p(0, Zo, J(R, t))
is anincreasing
function of t
,it
follows from(7)
that in order to determinem(R)
it issufficient to determine to so that
holds. In order to do
this,
we shall find a functionf ~
3R that mapsLi onto the fork-domain
J(R, to).
It is easy to show that the function isunique.
There is no loss in
generality
intaking Zo
= d > 0. Now we obtain the function that maps L1 ontoJ(R, to)
as acomposition W(Z) =
W(03B6(Z)), where 03B6 = 03B6(Z)
and W =W(03B6)
are determinedby
and
respectively.
Here D is a real constant, 0 D1,
to be determinedby
the condition
The
function ( = 03B6(Z)
in(9)
maps L1 onto the slit-discThe function W =
W(03B6)
in(10)
maps A* onto the fork-domainJ(R, to)
with to =2D2-1.
Therequirement (11),
with(9)
and(10),
nowyields (2).
Thiscompletes
theproof.
PROOF. If we take
Zo
= 0 in thepreceding theorem,
then 9N becomesthe well-known class
S,
whileR0 = 1 4
and D =2R -1.
Thus we obtainthe earlier result due to
Jenkins,
alluded to in apreceding paragraph,
fromthe present one
by
asimple limiting
process.3. Final Remark
It is well-known that circular
symmetrization
preserves the starlikeness of a domain. Hence it ispossible
to try to obtain theanalogue
of ourtheorem for the class of starlike functions
m*,
a subclass of 3R. However the calculations are soformidable,
that we have not been able tocomplete
them.
REFERENCES J. A. JENKINS
[1 ] "On Values Omitted by Univalent Functions", American Journal of Mathematics, 75, 1953, 406-408.
Z. LEWANDOWSKI
[2] "Sur Certaines Classes de Fonctions Univalentes dans le Cercle Unité", Annales UMCS, 13, 1959, 115-126.
358
MAXWELL O. READE AND ELIGIUSZ ZLOTKIEWICZ
[3 ] "Koebe Sets for Univalent Functions with Two Preassigned Values", Bulletin AMS, 77, 1971, 103-105.
(Oblatum 12-111-1971) The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
U.S.A.
and
Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Lublin, Poland