• Aucun résultat trouvé

Climatic Information for Building Design in Canada: 1977: Supplement No. 1 to the National Building Code of Canada

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Climatic Information for Building Design in Canada: 1977: Supplement No. 1 to the National Building Code of Canada"

Copied!
31
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CLIMATIC INFORMATION

for

BUILDING DESIGN IN CANADA

SUPPLEMENT No.

1

TO THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE

OF CANADA

Issued

by

the

Associate Committee on the National Building Code

National Research Council of Canada

Ottawa

-

----

4 -

- - -

..

.-

- . - ~-,

-

,- - i I b - l

.

.

,,.21

i!i:,YfERIAL

Price $1.00

NRCC No. 15556

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(2)

ASSOClATE COMMITTEE O N

THE NATIONAL BLllLDlNG CODE

A .

G. Wilson (Chuirniun)

H.

B.

Dickens

( D e p u ~ , '

C k u i r n i ~ ~ n )

B.

A .

Bonser

R . F.

Buckingham

S.

D. C . Chutter

D.

E.

Cornish

S.

C u m m i n g

R . F.

D e G r a c e

M. G . Dixon

J .

T . G r e g g

R.

V. Hebert

D ' A .

G . Helmer

J. S. Hicks

M .

S. H urst

(v.v

o/j;c.io)

H . K . Jenns

H. T.

Jones

P.

M . Kettnleyside

J . Longworth

Retired*

J.

A.

McCambly

W.

M . McCance

R .

C . McMillan

J. M c Q u h a e

D. 0.

Monsen

(cn.v o[/~!licio)

F.-X.

Perreault

G .

B.

Pope

R .

A .

W.

Switzer

R . T.

Tamhlyn

D.

L. Tarlton

A .

D. T h o m p s o n

J .

E.

Turnhull

N . G . Vokey

D. W .

Boy

J

(

Re.srcrrr,h

A

dvisor-

Merc~orolog,,')

R . H .

D u n n (Sec.rerurlsj

*Committee term completed d u r i n g preparation

of

1977 Code.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(3)

CLIMATIC

INFORMATION

for

BUILDING DESIGN IN

CANADA

1977

SUPPLEMENT No.

1

TO THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE

OF CANADA

--

REFEFENCE

MATERIAL

i

1

DO

NOT

R E M O V E

I

1

Issued

by

the

Associate Committee on the National Building Code

National Research Council of Canada

Ottawa

NRCC No.

15556

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(4)

First Edition 1953

Second Edition 1960

Third Edition 1965

Fourth Edition 1970

Fifth Edition 1975

Sixth Edition 1977

: . '

ONational Research Council of Canada 1977

World Rights Reserved

Printed in Canada

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(5)

TABLE

OF

CONTENTS

...

Preface

vii

...

Abbreviations

ix

...

January Design Temperatures

1

...

July Design Temperatures

2

...

Heating Degree-Days

3

...

Rainfall Intensity

3

...

One-Day Rainfall

4

...

Annual Total Precipitation

4

...

Snow Loads

4

...

Wind Effects

6

...

Seismic Zones

7

...

References

8

...

Table of Design Data for Selected Locations

9

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(6)

vii

PREFACE

The great diversity of climate in Canada has a considerable effect on the performance of build-

ings, consequently, their design must reflect this diversity. The purposes of this Supplement are to

explain briefly how the design weather values are computed and to present recommended design

data for a number of cities, towns and smaller populated places. It is through the use of such data

that appropriate allowances can be made for climate variations in different localities of Canada

and that the National Building Code can be applied nationally.

The design data in this Supplement are based on weather reports supplied by the Atmospheric

Environment Service, Department of the Environment (formerly the Meteorological Branch,

Department of Transport). They have been collected and analysed, where necessary, for the Asso-

ciate Committee on the National Building Code by Donald

W.

Boyd, Department of the Environ-

men t Meteorologist with the Division of Building Research, National Research Council of

Canada. Mr. Boyd has also devised appropriate methods and estimated the design values for all

the locations in the Table of Design Data for Selected Locations in Canada where weather obser-

vations were lacking or inadequate.

The weather data in this edition are provided in SI metric units in line with current practice of

reporting weather information and in recognition of the decision to work towards the adoption of

SI units in construction. These values may be converted to imperial units if required using the

appropriate conversion factors given in the National Standard of Canada CAN3-2234.1-76,

"Canadian Metric Practice Guide."

As it is not practical to list values for all municipalities in Canada, recommended design

weather data for locations not listed can be obtained by writing to the Meteorologist, Division of

Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K I A OR6. It should

be noted, however, that these recommended values may differ from the legal requirements set by

provincial or municipal building authorities.

The information on seismic zones has been provided by the Earth Physics Branch of the

Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. The table now includes the ground acceleration

ratio "A" as well as the seismic zone designation. Information for municipalities not listed may be

obtained by writing to the Seismology Division, Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy,

Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Ontario K I A OE4.

The Charts included in previous editions of this Supplement have been omitted since they are

not intended to be used for design purposes and their inclusion may imply such use. Two of these

Charts, one showing seismic zones and the other permafrost distribution, have been included in

Supplement No. 4 to the 1977 National Building Code in Commentaries J and L, respectively.

Comments on this document are welcomed by the Associate Committee and should be for-

warded to the Secretary, Associate Committee on the National Building Code, National Research

Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OR6.

Le Code national du bitiment, ses supplements et les documents qui s'y rattachent sont disponi-

bles en franqais. On peut se les procurer en s'adressant au Secretaire, ComitC associe du Code

national du bitiment, Conseil national de recherches du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 A OR6.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(7)

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviations of words and phrases in this Supplement have the following meanings:

ACNBC

. . .

Associate Committee on the National Building Code

A

. . .

Acceleration ratio

ann.

. . .

annual

OC

. . .

degree(s) Celsius

. . .

OF

degree(s) Fahrenheit

dept.

. . .

department

gnd.

. . .

ground

Kg/m3

. . .

kilogram(s) per cubic metre

kN/m2

. . .

kilonewton(s) per square metre

min.

. . .

minute(s)

m/s

. . .

metre(s) per second

NBC

. . .

National Building Code of Canada

pcpn.

. . .

precipitation

psf

. . .

pound(s) per square foot

p

. . .

Page

Rain.

. . .

Rainfall

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(8)

CLIMATIC INFORMATION

for

BUILDING DESIGN IN CANADA

The choice of climatic elements tabulated in this Supplement and the form in which they are

expressed have been dictated largely by the requirements for specific values in several sections of

the National Building Code of Canada. Heating degree-days and annual total precipitation are

also included. The following notes explain briefly the significance of these particular elements in

building design, and indicate what observations were used and how they were analysed to yield

the required design values. To estimate design values for location where weather observations

were lacking or inadequate, the observed or computed values for the weather stations were plotted

on large-scale maps. Isolines were drawn on these working charts to show the general distribution

of the design values.

In the Table, design weather data are listed for over

600

locations, which have been chosen for a

variety of reasons. Incorporated cities and towns with populations of over 5 000 have been

included unless they are close to other larger cities. For sparsely populated areas many smaller

towns and villages have been listed. The design weather data for weather stations themselves are

the most reliable and hence these stations have often been listed in preference to locations with

somewhat larger populations. A number of requests for recommended design weather data for

other locations have been received, and where most of the elements were estimated, they were also

added to the list. In some cases the values obtained from the large-scale charts have not been

rounded off.

The Table of design values should not be expected to give a complete picture of the variations

of these climatic elements. If application is made to the Building Research Meteorologist as men-

tioned in the Preface, values will be estimated for locations not listed in the table using the list of

observed or computed values for weather stations, the large-scale manuscript charts and any other

relevant information that is available. In the absence of weather observations

at

any particular

location, a knowledge of the local topography may be important. For example, cold air has a tend-

ency to collect in depressions, precipitation frequently increases with elevation and winds are gen-

erally stronger near large bodies of water. These and other relationships affect the corresponding

design values and will be taken into consideration where possible in answering inquiries.

All the weather records that were used in preparing the table were, of necessity, observed at

inhabited locations, and hence interpolations from the charts or the tabulated values will apply

only to locations at similar elevations and with similar topography. This is particularly significant

in mountainous areas where the values apply only to the populated valleys and not to the moun-

tain slopes and high passes, where, in some cases, very different conditions are known to exist.

JANUARY

DESIGN TEMPERATURES

A building and its heating system should be designed to maintain the inside temperature at

some pre-determined level. To do this it is necessary to know the most severe weather conditions

under which the system will be expected to function satisfactorily. Failure to maintain the inside

temperature at the pre-determined level will not usually be serious if the temperature drop is not

great and if the duration is not long. The outside conditions used for design should, therefore, not

be the most severe in many years, but should be the somewhat less severe conditions that are occa-

sionally but not greatly exceeded.

Winter design temperature is based on an analysis of winter air temperatures only. Wind and

solar radiation also affect the inside temperature of most buildings, but there is no convenient way

of combining their effects with that of outside air temperature. Some quite complex methods of

taking account of several weather elements have been devised and used in recent years, but the use

of average wind and radiation conditions is usually satisfactory for design purposes.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(9)

The winter design temperature is defined as the lowest temperature at or below which only a

certain small percentage of the hourly outside air temperatures in January occur. In previous edi-

tions of this Supplement the January design temperatures were obtained from a tabulation of

hourly temperature distributions for the ten-year period 1951 to 1960 for 11

8 stations prepared by

the then Meteorological Branch of the Department of Transport. Hourly data summaries(') (which

include temperature frequency distributions) based on the 10-year period 1957 to 1966 have been

published for several stations each year since 1967 and are now available for 109 stations. They

provide a second set of January design temperatures. For the 69 stations that appeared in both

lists the current design temperature is the average of these 2, and is, therefore, based on the 16-

year period 1951 to 1966 with a 4-year overlap. For the 89 stations that appeared in only

1

of the

lists, the design temperatures were adjusted to make them more consistent.

The January design temperatures for all the other locations in the table are estimates. The esti-

mates in earlier editions of this Supplement have all been considered and, where necessary,

adjusted to make them more representative of the 16-year period. Most of the adjustments were

less than one Celsius degree and only about 16 exceeded one and a half degrees.

The 2 tabulations and the calculations above were all in Fahrenheit degrees. These were con-

verted to Celsius and rounded off to the nearest degree.

The adjustments mentioned above are an indication of the variation in the design temperature

from one decade to another. The design temperatures for the next 20 or 30 years may differ from

the tabulated values by one or two Celsius degrees and, of course, the year to year variation will be

much greater. Most of the temperatures were observed at airports. Design values for the core areas

of some large cities could be a degree or two milder but values for the fringe areas are probably

about the same as for the airports. No adjustments have been made, therefore, for the city effect.

The 2% per cent January design temperature is the value ordinarily used in the design of heating

systems. In special cases when the control of inside temperature is more critical, the 1 per cent

value may be used.

JULY DESIGN TEMPERATURES

A building and its cooling and dehumidifying system should be designed to maintain the inside

temperature and humidity at certain pre-determined levels. To do this it is necessary to know the

most severe weather conditions under which the system will be expected to function satisfactorily.

Failure to maintain the inside temperature and humidity at the pre-determined levels will usually

not be serious if the increases in temperature and humidity are not great and if the duration is not

long. The outside conditions used for design should, therefore, not be the most severe in many

years, but should be the somewhat less severe conditions that are occasionally but not greatly

exceeded.

The summer design temperatures in this Supplement are based on an analysis of July air tem-

peratures and humidities only. Wind and solar radiation also affect the inside temperature of most

buildings and may in some cases be of more importance than the outside air temperature. It

seems, however, that no method of allowing for variations in radiation has yet become generally

accepted. When requirements have been standardized, it may be possible to provide more com-

plete weather information for summer conditions, but in the meantime only dry-bulb and wet-

bulb design temperatures can be provided.

The frequency distribution of combinations of dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures for each

month from June to September have been tabulated for 33 Canadian weather stations by

Bo~ghner.'~)

If the summer dry-bulb and wet-bulb design temperatures are defined as the tempera-

tures that are exceeded 2Y2 per cent of the hours in July, then design values can be obtained

directly for these 33 stations.

The dry-bulb design temperatures in previous editions of this Supplement were based on the

values for these 33 stations and a relationship between the design temperatures and the mean

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(10)

et-

.c h

by

ra-

.ed

annual maximum temperatures. Hourly data summaries(') (which include temperature frequency

distributions) based o n the 10-year period 1957 to 1966 are now available for 109 stations. They

provide a second set of July dry-bulb design temperatures. For the 109 stations the current dry-

bulb temperatures are the averages of the values in these 2 sets. For all the other locations in the

table the previous values have been adjusted to make them consistent with the calculated values.

The adjustments exceeded one Celsius degree in only about 20 cases. All values were converted to

degrees Celsius and rounded off to the nearest degree.

The July wet-bulb design temperatures have been obtained in the same way, with one excep-

tion. The previous values were obtained directly for the

33

stations in Boughner's p ~ b l i c a t i o n , ' ~ )

and all the rest were estimated from these 33 without using any intermediate statistic. The current

values for the 109 stations with hourly data summaries are averages between the previous values

and the values from the hourly data summaries. For all the other locations the previous values

have been adjusted to make them consistent. The adjustments exceed one Celsius degree in only 6

cases. All wet-bulb values were converted to degrees Celsius and rounded off to the nearest degree.

HEATING DEGREE-DAYS

It has long been known that the rate of consumption of fuel or energy required to keep the inte-

rior of a small building at about 70°F (2 1.1 "C) when the outside air temperature is below 65°F

(18.3"C) is roughly proportional to the difference between 65°F and the outside temperature.

Wind speed, solar radiation, the extent to which the building is exposed to these elements and the

internal heat sources also affect the heat required, but there is no convenient way of combining

these effects. For average conditions of wind, radiation, exposure and internal sources, however,

the proportionality with the temperature difference still holds. Heating degree-days based on tem-

perature alone are, therefore, still useful when more complex methods of calculating fuel require-

ments are not feasible.

It has been decided that, for Canada, heating degree-days in the future will be the degree days

below 18°C. This is slightly below 65°F but for practical purposes the difference is not important.

Since the fuel required is also proportional to the duration of cold weather, a convenient

method of combining these elements of temperature and time is to add the differences between

18°C and the mean temperature for every day in the year when the mean temperature is below

18°C. It is assumed that n o heat is required when the mean outside air temperature for the day is

18°C or higher.

Degree days below 18°C have been computed day by day for the 30-year period 1941 to 1970

for about 92 stations. The averages of the annual totals for these stations are given in the table to

the nearest degree day.

For all the other locations in the table the degree-days below 65°F in the previous edition of this

Supplement were converted to degree-days below 18°C and rounded off to the nearest 10 degree-

days. Adjustments ranging from 80 to 120 Celsius degree-days were made to allow for the differ-

ences between 65°F a n d 18°C.

A difference of only one Celsius degree in the annual mean temperature will cause a difference

of 250 to 350 in the Celsius degree-days. Since differences of half a degree in the annual mean tem-

perature are quite likely to occur between

2

stations in the same city or town, it is obvious that

heating degree-days can not be relied on to a n accuracy of less than about 100 degree-days.

RAIN

FALL

INTENSITY

Roof drainage systems are designed to carry off the rainwater from the most intense rainfall that

is likely to occur. A certain amount of time is required for the rainwater to flow across or down the

roof before it enters the gutter or drainage system. This results in the smoothing out of the most

rapid changes in rainfall intensity. The drainage system, therefore, need cope only with the flow of

rainwater produced by the average rainfall intensity over a period of a few minutes which can

be

called the concentration time.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(11)

In Canada it has been customary to use the 15-min. rainfall that will probably be exceeded on

the average once in 10 years. The concentration time for small roofs is much less than 15 min. and

hence the design intensity will be exceeded more frequently than once in 10 years. The safety fac-

tors included in the tables in the ACNBC Canadian Plumbing Code will probably reduce the fre-

quency to a reasonable value and, in addition, the occasional failure of a roof drainage system will

not be particularly serious in most cases.

d

The rainfall intensity values tabulated in the previous edition of this Supplement were based on

measurements of the annual maximum 15-min. rainfalls at 139 stations with 7 or more years of

record. They were the 15-min. rainfalls that would be exceeded once in 10 years on the average, or

the values that had 1 chance in 10 of being exceeded in any 1 year. They were computed or esti-

mated to the nearest tenth of a n inch. The current values in millimetres were obtained by a direct

conversion, and hence almost all the values end in 0 , 3 , 5 or

8.

It is very difficult to estimate the pattern of rainfall intensity in mountainous areas where precip-

itation is extremely variable. The values in the table for British Columbia and some adjacent areas

are mostly for locations in valley bottoms or in extensive, fairly level areas. Much greater intensi-

ties may occur on mountain sides.

ONE-DAY RAINFALL

If for any reason a roof-drainage system becomes ineffective, the accumulation of rainwater

may be great enough in some cases to cause a significant increase in the load on the roof.

Although the period during which rainwater may accumulate is unknown, it is common practice

to use the maximum 1-day rainfall for estimating the additional load.

For most weather stations in Canada the total rainfall for each day is published. The maximum

"I-day" rainfall (as it is usually called) for several hundred stations has been determined and pub-

lished by the Atmospheric Environment Ser~ice.'~)

Since these values are all for predetermined 24-

hr periods, beginning and ending at the same time each morning, it is probable that most of them

have been exceeded in periods of 24-hr including parts of 2 consecutive days. The maximum "24-

hr" rainfall (i.e. any 24-hr period) according to Hershfield and Wilson is, on the average, about

1 13 per cent of the maximum

"

1 -day" rainfall.(4)

Most of the 1-day rainfall amounts in the table have been copied directly from the latest edition

of Climatic Normals'j) where the record maximum values are tabulated in millimetres. Values for

the other locations have been converted to millimetres from the estimated values in the previous

edition of this Supplement. These maximum values differ greatly within relatively small areas

where little difference would be expected. The variable length of record no doubt accounts for part

of this variability, which would probably be reduced by an analysis of annual maxima instead of

merely selecting the maximum in the period of record.

ANNUAL TOTAL PRECIPITATION

The total amount of precipitation that normally falls in 1 year is frequently used as a general

indication of the wetness of a climate. As such it is thought to have a place in this Supplement.

Total precipitation is the sum in millimetres of the measured depth of rainwater and

1/10

of the

measured depth of snow (since the average density of fresh snow is about

' / l o

that of water).

Most of the average annual total precipitation amounts in the table have been copied directly

from the latest edition of Climatic Normals(j) where averages for the 30-year period 1941 to 1970

have been tabulated in millimetres. For all other locations the estimates in the previous edition of

the Supplement have been converted to millimetres and rounded off to the nearest 10 mm.

SNOW LOADS

The roof of a building should be able to support the greatest weight of snow that is likely to

accumulate on it. Some observations of snow loads on roofs have been made in Canada, but they

are not sufficiently numerous to form the basis for estimating snow loads throughout the country.

Similarly, observations of the weight or water equivalent of the snow on the ground are inade-

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(12)

3n

nd

LC-

re-

rill

ip-

:as

ter

'of.

ice

Im

lb-

24-

em

24-

3ut

Ion

for

3 U S

eas

)art

l

of

:ral

:nt.

the

try.

I

Lde-

quate. The observations of roof loads and water equivalent are very useful, as noted below, but the

basic information for a consistent set of snow loads must be the measured depth of snow on the

ground.

The estimation of the design snow load on a roof from snow depth observations involves the fol-

lowing steps:

1. The depth of snow on the ground which will be equalled or exceeded once in 30 years, on

the average, is computed.

2.

A density is assumed and used to convert snow depths to loads.

3. An adjustment is added to allow for the increase in the load caused by rainwater absorbed

by the snow.

4. Because the accumulation of snow on roofs is often different from that on the ground, cer-

tain adjustments should be made to the ground snow load to provide a design snow load on

a roof.

These steps are explained in more detail in the following paragraphs.

The annual maximum depths of snow on the ground for periods ranging from

5

to 3

1

years are

now available for about 480 stations. Many of these have such short records that they cannot be

considered reliable, but on the other hand they cannot be ignored. About a quarter of the stations

have records of at least 20 years which is much more information than was used for previous esti-

mates of snow loads. These data were assembled and analysed using Gumbel's extreme value

method as explained by Boyd.(5) The resulting values are the snow depths which will probably be

exceeded once in 30 years on the average, or which have a probability of

1

in 30 of being exceeded

in any one year.

The specific gravity of old snow generally ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 times that of water. It is usually

assumed in Canada that 0.1 is the average specific gravity of new snow. The 30-year maximum

snow depth will almost certainly occur immediately after an unusually heavy snowfall, and hence

a large proportion of the snow cover will have a low density. It therefore seemed reasonable to

assume a mean specific gravity under these unusual circumstances of 0.2 for the whole snow cover.

This is slightly higher than the 0.192 which was previously used for the sake of convenience when

working with inches and psf.

Because the heaviest loads in Canada frequently occur when early spring rain adds to an

already heavy snow load, it was considered advisable to increase the snow load by the load of

rainwater that it might retain. It is convenient to use the maximum 1-day rainfall in the period of

the year when snow depths are greatest. Boyd has explained how a 2- or 3-month period was

sele~ted.'~)

The results from a survey of several winters of snow loads on roofs indicated that average roof

loads were generally much less than loads on the ground. The conditions under which the design

snow load on the roof may be taken as 80 or

60

per cent of the ground snow load are given in Sec-

tion 4.1 of the National Building Code 1977. The Code also permits further decreases in design

snow loads for steeply sloping roofs, but requires substantial increases for roofs where snow accu-

mulation may be more rapid. Recommended adjustments are given in NBC Supplement No.

4,

"Commentaries on Part

4

of the National Building Code of Canada 1977."

The ground snow loads computed in kilonewtons per square nietre were all plotted on maps as

an aid in estimating values for the other locations listed in the table. All values are tabulated to the

nearest tenth of a kilonewton per square metre but some may be in error by 10 per cent.

Tabulated values cannot be expected to indicate all the local differences in ground snow loads,

even where these are known to exist. The values in the table are intended to apply only to the area

within a town or village and not necessarily to extended areas such as townships. This fact is par-

ticularly important in mountainous areas where much higher snow loads often occur on mountain

slopes or high passes.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(13)

WIND EFFECTS

All structures should be built to withstand the pressures and suctions caused by the strongest

gust of wind that is likely to blow at the site in many years. For many buildings this is the only

wind effect that needs to be considered, but tall or slender structures should also be designed to

limit their vibrations to acceptable levels. Wind induced vibrations may require several minutes to

build up to their maximum amplitude and hence wind speeds averaged over several minutes or

longer should be used for design. The hourly average wind speed is the value available in Canada.

The provision of "velocity pressures" for both average wind speeds and gust speeds for estimat-

ing pressures, suctions and vibrations involves the following steps:

1. The annual maximum hourly wind speeds were analysed to obtain the hourly wind speeds

that will have

1 chance in l0,30 and 100 of being exceeded in any 1 year.

2. An average air density was assumed in order to compute the "velocity pressures" for the

hourly wind speeds.

3.

A value of 2 was assumed for the "gust effect factor" to compute the "velocity pressures"

for the gust speeds.

The actual wind pressure on a structure increases with height and varies with the shape of the

structure. The factors needed to allow for these effects are tabulated in Section 4.1 of the National

Building Code of Canada 1977 and in Supplement No. 4. The other 3 steps are discussed in more

detail in the following paragraphs.

Until recently the only wind speed record kept at a large number of wind-measuring stations in

Canada was the number of miles of wind that pass an anemometer head in each hour, or the

hourly average wind speed. Many stations are now recording only spot readings of the wind speed

each hour, and these may have to be used for design at some future time. For the present, how-

ever, the older hourly mileages are the best data on which to base a statistical analysis. The annual

maximum hourly mileages for over 100 stations for periods from 10 to 22 years were analysed

using Gumbel's extreme value method to calculate the hourly mileages that would have one

chance in 10,30 and 100 of being exceeded in any 1 year.

Values of the

"1

in

30"

hourly mileages for the additional 500 locations in the table have been

estimated. To obtain the "1 in 10" and "1 in 100" values for these locations it was necessary to

estimate the value of the parameter l / a which is a measure of the dispersion of the annual maxi-

mum hourly mileages. The 100 known values were plotted on a map from which estimates of l / a

were made for the other locations. Knowing the "1 in 30" hourly mileages and the values of l / a ,

the "

1

in 10" and

"

1 in 100" values could be computed.

Pressures, suctions and vibrations caused by the wind depend not only on the speed of the wind

but also on the air density and hence on the air temperature and atmospheric pressure. The pres-

sure, in turn, depends o n elevation above sea level and varies with changes in the weather systems.

If V is the design wind speed in miles per hour, then the velocity pressure, P, in pounds per square

foot is given by the equation

P

=

cv2

where C depends on air temperature and atmospheric pressure as explained in detail by Boyd.@)

The value 0.0027 is within 10 per cent of the monthly average value of C for most of Canada in the

windy part of the year. This value (0.0027) has been used to compute all the velocity pressures cor-

responding to the hourly mileages with annual probabilities of being exceeded of 1/10, 1/30 and

1/100. The pressures were then converted from psf to kN/m2 and are shown in the table in col-

umns headed only by the numerical values of the probabilities.

The National Building Code requires the design gust pressures for structural elements to be

twice the corresponding hourly pressures in the table. Because wind speeds are squared to get

pressures, this statement is equivalent to saying that the gust factor is the square root of 2.

For buildings over 12 m high, the gust velocity pressures and suctions must be increased accord-

ing to a table in Section 4.1 of the National Building Code 1977 which is based on the assumption

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(14)

the

the

nal

ore

;

in

the

zed

)W-

ual

sed

me

sen

'

to

txi-

1

/ a

/ a ,

ind

res-

ms.

are

d.(6)

the

:or-

ind

:ol-

that the gust speed increases in proportion to the

'/lo

power of the height. The average wind speeds

used in computing the vibrations of a building are more dependent on the roughness of the under-

lying surface. A method of estimating their dependence on roughness and height is given in Sup-

plement No. 4.

The calculations for building vibrations in Supplement No. 4 have been drawn up for wind

speeds measured in metres per second. The equation

P

=

cv2

could be used to convert the tabulated pressures to wind speeds provided the constant C was con-

verted to SI units. If

P

is in newtons per square metre and V in metres per second, the value of C

would be 0.64689. In SI units, however, the equation can be written in the form

P

=

X P V 2

where

p

is the air density in kg/m3. The density of dry air at O°C and the standard atmospheric

pressure of 101.325 kPa is 1.2929 kg/m3. Half this value, or 0.64645, is very close to the converted

value of C. The difference (less than

1

in

1

000) is negligible and therefore the density of air at O°C

and standard atmospheric pressure has been adopted for converting wind pressures to wind

speeds. The following table has been arranged to give speeds to the nearest m/s for all pressures

appearing in the main table.

Note to Table:

( I )

P

=

0.00064645

V2

SEISMIC ZONES

CONVERSION OF WIND PRESSLRES TO WIND SPEEDS

The parameter in establishing the seismic zones is A,, defined as the ground acceleration that

has an annual probability of being equalled or exceeded of

1

in

The zones are based on the

statistical computer analysis of past earthquakes throughout the country for this century.(9) It is

corroborated by the results from a larger but less reliable seismic sample dating back to 1638.(')

The assigned zones reflect the opinion of experts in the fields of seismology, geology and engineer-

ing from industry, government and universities comprising members of the Canadian National

Committee on Earthquake Engineering and various relevant committees responsible to the Asso-

ciate Committee on the National Building Code.

The zones and the assigned horizontal design ground acceleration ratio, A, for each zone, as a

fraction of gravitational acceleration, are shown in the table. The zone boundaries in terms of

A,,

are shown in Table 5-2 of the Commentary on Effects of

earthquake^.'^)

p(1)

kN/m2

In the Arctic Region and other parts of the Northwest Territories, there are insufficient data for

a statistical study. The zone boundaries have been established by the Seismologists of the Depart-

ment of Energy, Mines and Resources from their knowledge of earthquake activity in these areas.

v

m/s

P

kN/m2

v

m/s

P

kN/m2

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(15)

REFERENCES

(1)

Hourly Data Summaries. Dept. of Transport, Meteorological Branch and later Dept. of

the Environment, Atmospheric Environment Service, various dates from May 1967 to March

1974.

( 2 )

Boughner, C.C. Percentage Frequency of Dry- and Wet-bulb Temperatures from June to

September at Selected Canadian Cities. Dept. of Transport, Meteorological Branch, Canadian

Meteorological Memoirs, No. 5, Toronto, 1960.

(3) Canadian Normals, Vol. 2-SI, Precipitation 1941-1970. Dept. of the Environment, Atmo-

spheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, 1975.

(4)

Hershfield, D.M. and Wilson, W.T. Generalizing Rainfall

-

Lntensity -

Frequency Data.

International Association of Scientific Hydrology, General Assembly, Toronto, Vol. 1, 1957, pp.

499-506.

(5)

Boyd, D.W. Maximum Snow Depths and Snow Loads on Roofs in Canada. Proceedings,

29th Annual Meeting, Western Snow Conference, Spokane, Wash., April 1961.

(6) Boyd, D.W. Variations in Air Density over Canada. National Research Council of Cana-

da, Division of Building Research, Technical Note No. 486, June 1967.

(7) Commentary on Effects of Earthquakes, Supplement No.

4

to the National Building Code

1977.

(8) Milne, W.G. and Davenport, A.G. Distribution of Earthquake Risk in Canada, Bulletin of

Seismological Society of America, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 729-754, April 1969, also Fourth World Con-

ference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, January, 1969.

(9) Whitham,

K.,

Milne, W.G. and Smith, W.E.T. The New Seismic Zoning Map for Canada,

1970 Edition, The Canadian Underwriter, June 1970.

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(16)

DESIGN DATA

FOR

SELECTED LOCATIONS IN C A N A D A

.

of

rch

no-

na-

1

of

on-

Prov~nce and Location Britlsh Columbia Abbotsford ... Agassiz ... Albemi ... Ashcroft ... Beatton River ... BurnsLake ... CacheCreek ... Campbell River ... Carmi ... Castlegar ... Chetwynd ... Chilliwack ... Cloverdale ... Cornox ... Courtenay ... Cranbrook ... Crescent Valley ... Crofton ... DawsonCreek ... Dog Creek ... Duncan ... Elk0 ... F e r n ~ e ... Fort Nelson ... FortSt.John ... Glac~er ... Golden ... GrandForks ... Greenwood ... Haney ... Hope ... Kamloops ... Kaslo ... Kelowna ... Kimberley ... KitimatPlant ... KltirnatTownsite ... Langley ... Lillooet ... Lytton ... Mackenzie ... McBride ... McLeodLake ... Masset ... Merritt ... ... Miss~on City ... Montrose ... Nakusp ... Nanairno ... Nelson ... ... New Westminster ... North Vancouver ... OceanFaUs ... 100 Mile House ... Osoyoos ... Penticton ... Port Alberni ... PortHardy PortMcNeill ... PowellRiver ... Column I Ann . Tot Pcpn

..

mm 1502 1648 2019 224 435 513 250 1 539 563 710 410 1741 1 270 1206 1 452 438 786 . 1029 425 393 1043 580 1 082 446 450 1 493 473 450 478 1926 1601 268 785 320 378 2826 2377 1501 391 463 430 525 460 1409 254 1 573 630 790 1085 763 1 520 1 791 4390 460 342 296 2 009 1730 1270 1017 9 Gnd . Snow Load

.

k N / m 2 2.4 3.1 2.6 1 . 3 3.2 2.5 1.4 2.8 3.4 3.4 2.2 2.8 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.4 3.4 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 3.5 4.6 2.4 2.5 7.6 3.8 2.0 1.9 2.3 3.4 1.8 3.0 1.9 3.0 3.5 4.5 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.6 3.4 2.5 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.2 3.6 2.6 3.3 2.1 2.2 3.0 2.6 1.4 1.3 2.6 2.1 2.4 3.0 Degree Day5 Below 18°C 3 150 2960 3 180 4 060 7010 5720 4080 3 200 5 2 10 3747 5890 2970 3 030 3203 3 250 4 762 4 320 3140 5890 5 1 10 3200 4900 4 980 7 063 6119 5 730 4 950 4050 4520 3280 3 150 3 756 4110 3680 4890 4110 4130 2980 4130 3 220 5 950 5 720 5720 3720 4190 2 980 4 080 4 130 3010 3920 2 930 3 090 3520 4 900 3 530 3514 3 180 3661 3480 2900 6 Design January 2'.r%

.

" C -10 -13 -5 -25 -37 -30 -25 -7 -24 -19 -35 -12 -8 -7 -7 -27 -20 -6 -36 -28 -6 -28 -29 -40 -36 -27 -28 -20 -20 -9 -16 -25 -23 -17 -26 -16 -16 -8 -23 -19 -35 -34 -35 -7 -26 -9 17 -24 -7 -20 -8 -7 -12 -28

-

16 -16 -5 -5 -5 -9 2 1%

.

"C - 1 1 -15 . -7 -28 -39 -33 -28 -9 -26 -22 -38 -13

-

10 -9 -9 -30 -23 -8 -39 -30 -8 -31 -32 -42 -38 -30 -3 1 -22 -22 - 1 1 -18 -28 -26 -20 -29 -18 -18 -10 -25 -22 -38 -37 -37 -9 -29

-

1 1 -20 -27 -9 -24

-

10 -9 -14 -31

-

18 -18 -7 -7 -7 - 1 1 3 Temperature July Dry

.

"C 29 31 31 34 25 25 34 26 33 32 27 30 29 27 28 32 3 1 28 27 29 29 29 29 28 26 27 29 35 35 30 32 34 29 33 31 23 23 29 33 35 26 30 27 17 34 30 32 31 26 31 29 26 23 30 33 33 31 20 22 26 4 15 Min . Rain

..

mm 10 8 10 10 13 10 10 10 10 10 15 8 8 10 10 10 10 8 18 10 8 13 13 13 15 10 8 10 10 10 8 13 10 10 10 13 13 8 10 10 10 13 10 13 8 13 10 10 8 10 10 10 13 10 10 10 10 13 13 8 7 2'11% Wet

.

"C 20 2 0 18 20 18 17 20 ' 18 20 20 18 20 20 18 18 ' 19 19 18 18 18 18 19 19 18 18 17 17 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 19 16 16 20 20 20 17 18 17 I5 20 20 20 19 18 19 19 19 16 18 20 20 18 16 17 18 5 One Day Rain .. mrn 83 116 125 45 50 48 63 105 98 51 63 122 102 113 103 43 52 76 67 47 110 54 106 81 80 71 59 41 107 117 106 57 51 64 49 185 119 I18 114 77 63 50 63 76 57 98 51 51 92 66 132 100 234 51 35 45 140 131 127 80 8 1/100 k N

,

m'2 0.71 1.00 0.70 0.43 0.34 0.43 0.43 0.72 0.44 0.39 0.44 0.83 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.37 0.37 0.69 0.44 0.44 0.69 0.50 0.55 0.29 0.42 0.35 0.38 0.48 0.52 0.77. 0.73 0.45 0.36 0.53 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.73 0.49 0.49 0.35 0.38 0.35 0.68 0.49 0.77 0.4 1 0.37 0.71 0.37 0.68 0.68 0.65 0.43 0.59 0.68 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.71 Seismic . Zone 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 2 3 3 3 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 3 3 3 1 1 I 1 1 3 1 3 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1/10

.

k N / m 2 0.42 0.55 0.47 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.46 0.24 0.23 0.32 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.22 0.22 0.48 0.31 0.3 1 0.48 0.27 0.33 0.19 0.31 0.24 0.27 0.26 0.29 0.47 0.41 0.30 0.22 0.34 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.45 0.32 0.3 1 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.49 0.32 0.47 0.22 0.24 0.47' 0.22 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.47 0.49 0.49 0.42' Data ation Ratio

.

A 0.08 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.08 0 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.04 0.02 0 0.02 0 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 . 0 0 0.08 0 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 1 5 ) Wind Pressures 1/30

kN/n;Z

0.55 0.75 0.58 0.35 0.27 0.36 0.35 0.58 0.33 0.30 0.37 0.63 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.29 0.29 0.58 0.37 0.37 0.58 0.37 0.43 0.24 0.36 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.39 0.60 0.55 0.37 0.28 0.43 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.58 0.39 0.39 0.29 0.32 0.29 0.58 0.39 0.60 0.30 0.30 0.58 0.29 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.36 0.43 0.52 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.55 1 0 ~ 1 1 ( I 2 ( 1 3 ~ 1 4

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(17)

DESIGN DATA FOR SELECTED LOCATIONS IN CANADA

Province and Locat~on Prince George ... PrinceRupert ... Princeton ... Qualicum Beach ... Quesnel ... Revelstoke ... Richmond ... Salmon Arm ... Sandspit ... Sidney ... Sm~thers ... SmithRiver ... Squamish ... Stewart ... Taylor ... Terrace ... Tofino ... Trail ... Ucluelet ... Vancouver ... Vernon ... Victoria ... . .... WiU~ams Lake ... Youbou ... Alberta Athabasca ... Banff ... Barrhead ... Beaverlodge ... Brooks ... Calgary ... Campsie ... ... Camrose ... Cardston ... Claresholm ... Cold Lake ... Coleman ...

.

.

... Coronation ... Cowley ... Drum heller ... Edmonton ... Edson ... ... Embarras Portage ... Fairview ... Fort Saskatchewan ... Fort Vermilion ... Grande Prairie ... Habay ... Hardisty ... High River ... Jasper ... Keg River ... LacLa Biche ... Lacombe ... Lethbridge ... McMurray ... Manning ... MedicineHal ... Peace River ... Penhold ... Column I Degree Days Below 18°C 5388 4117 4560 3 250 4940 4073 2920 4 090 3 650 3090 5 290 7610 3 140 4710 5890 4430 3250 3 650 3250 3007 4 040 3076 5 105 3360 6 280 5719 6 000 5820 5 290 5 345 6010 5720 4830 5 120 6 450 5 120 5906 5 150 5 570 5589 5910 7 490 6170 5 890 7 170 6 145 7050 5950 5 320 5532 6820 6 140 5 740 4718 6778 6600 4874 6424 5845 6 Grid. Snow Load

.

kN/m2 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.7 4.6 1.9 2.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.2 8.4 2.5 5.1 2.5 3.2 2.4 1.9 2.0 1.5 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.8 2.2 2.1 1.6 0.9 2.3 1.7 1.8 1.0 1.5 2.6 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 2.4 1.6 2.1 1.5 2.0 2 . 1 2.5 1.8 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.8 2.5 1.4 2.4 1.5 Design January 21/.?o. " C -33 -14 -27 -7 -33 -26 -7 -23 -6 -6 -29 -46 - 1 1 -23 -36 -20 -2 -17 -2 -7 -20 -5 -31 -5 -35 -30 -34 -35 -32 -3 1 -34 -33 -30 -3 1 -36 -31 -31 -31 -3 1 -32 -34 -41 -38 -32 -41 -36 -41 -33 -3 1 -32 -40 -35 -33 -30 -39 -39 -31 -37 -32 2 IS

.

"C -36 -16 -30 -9 -35 -29 -9 -26 -7 -8 -31 -48 -13 -25 -38 -22 -4 -20 -4 -9 -23 -7 -34 -7 -38 -32 -37 -38 -34 -33 -37 -35 -33 -34 -38 -34 -33 -34 -33 -34 -37 -44 -40 -35 -43 -39 -43 -35 -33 -35 -42 -38 -35 -33 -41 -41 -34 -40 -35 3 Temperature July2'/:R Dry

.

"C 28 19 32 27 30 32 27 33 15 26 25 26 29 23 26 25 19 33 19 26 33 24 29 31 28 27 28 28 32 29 28 29 29 29 28 28 30 29 29 28 28 27 27 28 28 27 28 30 28 28 28 28 29 31 28 27 33 27 29 4 Ann . Tot Pcpn .. mm 621 2415 359 1 270 514 1096 1450 53 1 1 261 790 502 465 2061 1843 398 I200 3061 664 2690 1324 393 657 402 1650 442 477 460 455 353 437 445 394 495 460 433 537 373 504 358 446 554 399 422 430 360 442 360 384 489 402 403 460 456 436 435 360 348 351 449 9 15 Min . Rain .. mm 15 13 10 10 10 13 8 13 13 8 13 8 10 13 15 13 13 10 13 10 13 5 10 10 18 18 20 25 18 23 20 20 20 15 15 15 20 15 20 23 18 10 15 20 13 23 13 20 I8 10 13 15 23 20 13 13 23 15 23 7 - Wet.' "C 18 15 20 18 17 19 19 20 15 18 17 17 20 16 18 16 16 20 16 19 20 17 17 19 19 17 19 18 19 17 19 19 18 18 20 18 19 18 18 19 18 19 18 19 18 18 18 19 17 18 18 19 18 18 19 18 19 18 18 5 One Day Rain

..

mm 50 141 37 102 72 78 114 43 80 102 60 68 112 178 56 117 174 5 1 140 94 40 81 37 114 88 53 102 101 89 95 1 1 1 92 102 97 94 62 99 74 73 114 79 82 64 78 60

.

78 63 56 1 1 1 108 60 82 71 93 61 51 122 48 124 8 1/100 k N / m ' 2 0.36 0.59 0.42 0.72 0.34 0.35 0.67 0.43 0.74 0.66 0.44 0.33 0.65 0.48 0.44 0.51 0.74 0.43 0.74 0.67 0.49 0.70 0.41 0.66 0.45 0.52 0.49 0.40 0.57 0.54 0.49 0.39 1.15 0.96 0.44 0.87 0.43 1.13 0.49 0.51 0.50 0.45 0.39 0.49 0.32 0.52 0.28. 0.42 0.72 0.50 0.29 0.44 0.40 0.91 0.38 0.32 0.60 0.36 0.44 1/10

.

k N / m 2 0.25 0.42 0.24 0.46 0.25 0.24 0.45 0.29 0.54 0.46 0.31 0.19 0.38 0.32 0.32 0.36 0.54 0.23 0.54 0.45 0.32 0.48 0.30 0.46 0.30 0.39 0.32 0.27 0.39 0.40 0.32 0.21 0.74 0.66 0.3 1 0.54 0.23 0.73 0.32 0.32 0.36 0.3 1 0.26 0.3 1 0.22 0.37 0.20 0.24 0.5 1 0.37 0.19 0.31 0.24 0.64 0.27 0.21 0.39 0.24 0.31 Seismic Zone 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 3 0 3 3 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 W i n d Pressures 1/30

.

k N / m 2 0.30 0.50 0.32 0.58 0.29 0.29 0.55 0.35 0.63 0.55 0.37 0.25 0.50 0.39 0.37 0.43 0.63 0.32 0.63 0.55 0.39 0.58 0.35 0.55 0.37 0.45 0.39 0.33 0.48 0.46 0.39 0.29 0.93 0.80 0.37 0.69 0.32 0.91 0.39 0.40 0.43 0.37 0.32 0.39 0.26 0.44 0.24 0.32 0.60 0.43 0.24 0.37 0.3 1 0.76 0.32 0.26 0.49 0.29 0.37 I O ~ I I ~ I 2 ~ 1 3 Data ation Ratio

.

A 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.08 0 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I5

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(18)

DESIGN DATA FOR SELECTED LOCATIONS IN CANADA

e r mlc Data Acceler- ation Ratio

.

A 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.08 0 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 I5 Prov~nce and Locat~on ... Pincher Creek ... Ranfurly ... Red Deer ... RockyMountainHouse Slave Lake ... Stettler ... Stony Plain ... ... Suffield Taber ... ... TurnerValley Valleyview ... Vegreville ... Vermilion ... Wagner ... ... Wainwright ... Wetaskiwin ... Whitecourt ... Wimborne ... Saskatchkwan Assiniboia ... Battrum ... Biggar ... Broadview ... Dafoe ... Dundurn ... Estevan ... Hudson Bay ... Humbolt ... Island Falls ... Kamsack ... Kindersley ... Lloydminster ... MapleCreek ... Meadow Lake ... Melfort ... Melville ... MooseJaw ... Nipawin ... North Battleford ... Prince Albert ... Qu'Appelle ... .... Regina ... Rosetown ... Saskatoon ... .... Scott ... Strasbourg ... Swift Current ... UraniumCity ... Weyburn ... Yorkton ... Manitoba Beausejour ... Boissevain ... Brandon ... Churchill ... Dauphin ... Fhn Flon ... Girnli ... Island Lake ... Column I G n d Snow Load

.

k N / m 2 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.4 I . 8 1.8 1 . 1 1.4 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.5 2.2 1.6 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.3 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.7 2.4 2.2 1.3 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 2.1 1.2 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.8 2.9 2.2 2.3 2.1 3.1

-

10 2 Ann . Tot Pcpn . mm 55 1 434 442 543 473 420 510 323 373 584 460 410 399 465 380 472 522 430 360 360 354 454 414 369 421 448 352 486 384 301 402 349 380 402 408 375 398 365 389 466 398 348 353 361 406 390 354 376 435 563 499 488 397 506 458 537 510 9

-

Design January 2h%. "C -32 -34 -32 -31 -36 -32 -32 -32 -31 -31 -37 -34 -35 -36 -33 -33 -35 -31 -32 -32 -34 -34 -36 -35 -32 -37 -36 -39 -35 -33 -35 -31 -36 -37 -34 -32 -38 -34 -37 -34 -34 -33 -35 -34 -34 -32 -44 -33 -34 -33 -32 -33 -39 -33 -38 -34 -36 One Day Rain .. mm 128 89 154 77 76 165 102 69 93 82 51 69 75 72 63 78 89 89 78 63 104 104 67 122 68 62 76 69 116 91 104 77 63 101 59 81 60 93 74 104 102 85 84 68 100 66 47 97 95 66 146 141 52 100 77 125 63 - 8 Degree Days Below 18°C 5 010 5980 5700 5550 6 220 5 590 5780 5360 4750 5700 6 110 6000 6 140 6180 6000 5670 6130 5620 5340 5400 5890 6080 6360 5 840 5542 6 470 6280 7 100 6290 5710 6280 5 180 6 550 6390 6 170 5400 6550 6 050 6 562 6 060 5920 5 860 6077 6260 5 890 5 482 8210 5720 6 239 5830 5 6 10 6037 9 2 13 6150 6 780 6030 7210 6 1%

.

"C -34 -37 -35 -33 -39 -34 -35 -34 -33 -33 -40 -36 -38 -39 -36 -35 -38 -34 -34 -34 -36 -36 -39 -37 -34 -39 -39 -41 -37 -35 -38 -34 -39 -40 -36 -34 -41 -36 -4 1 -36 -36 -35 -37 -36 -36 -34 -46 -35 -37 -35 -34 -35 -41 -35 -40 -36 -38 Temperature July Dry

.

"C 29 29 29 28 27 30 28 33 31 28 27 29 29 27 29 29 27 29 32 32 31 30 29 3 1 32 29 28 26 29 32 29 31 28 28 29 32 28 30 29 30 31 32 30 31 30 32 26 32 29 28 32 31 24 30 27 29 26 I5 Mln . Rain., mm 18 18 23 20 IS 20 23 20 20 20 18 18 18 15 20 23 20 23 33 28 23 25 20 I0 36 18 20 10 20 23 18 28 I5 18 23 28 18 20 20 25 28 25 23 20 25 33 8 33 23 28 33 36 8 25 13 28 13 7 2Y2% Wet

.

"C 18 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 17 1.8 19 20 19 19 19 18 18 21 20 20 22 21 20 22 2 1 21 20 22 20 20 20 20 21 2 1 21 21 20 2 1 2 1 21 20 20 20 2 1 20 19 22 2 1 23 23 22 18 22 20 23 20 5 k N / m ' 2 . 1 08 0.36 0.44 0.39 0.41 0.42 0.51 0.64 0.82 0.71 0.51 0.40 0.34 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.48 0.45 0.63 0.74 0.76 0.37 0.41 0.57 0.62 0.41 0.44 0.70 0.44 0.73 0.46 0.71 0.55 0.40 0.43 0.51 0.43 0.83 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.7 1 0.54 0.75 0.46 0.69 0.54 0.53 0.44 0.45 0.63 0.54 0.72 0.44 0.65 0.45 0.50 13 Seismic Zone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 kN/;Z 0.70 0.23 0.31 0.26 0.28 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.57 0.51 0.35 0.25 0.23 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.30 0.44 0.49 0.48 0.28 0.28 0.39 0.42 0.28 0.29 0.45 0.32 0.45 0.30 0.47 . 0.36 0.26 0.32 0.36 0.27 0.45 0.26 0.34 0.34 0.47 0.36 0.44 0.33 0.46 0.37 0.38 0.32 0.31 0.44 0.37 0.48 0.31 0.42 0.30 0.37 1 1 Data Acceler- ation Ratio

.

A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 . Pressures

.

k N / m 2 0.88 0.29 0.37 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.40 0.52 0.69 0.60 0.43 0.32 0.28 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.39 0.37 0.52 0.60 0.60 0.32 0.34 0.48 0.51 0.34 0.36 0.56 0.37 0.58 0 3 7 0.58 0 45 0.32 0.37 0.43 0.34 0.62 0.34 0.39 0.39 0.58 0.44 0.58 0.39 0.56 0.45 0.45 0.37 0.37 0.52 0.45 0 59 0.37 0.52 0.37 0.43 12

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

(19)

DESIGN DATA FOR SELECTED LOCATIONS IN CANADA

-

-1

Gnd . Snow Load

.

k N / m 2 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2 . 1 2.3 2.1 2.8 2.2 2.0 2.6 2.6 . 2 1 2.0 2.3 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.8 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.8 2.9 2.9 2.3 3.4 2.9 2.2 2.5 2.0 1.8 2.1 3.2 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.2 3.3 1.6 1.7 2.5 2.6 3.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.0 3.5 1.4 3.2 3.6 2.5 2.9 10 . Ann . Tot Pcpn

..

mm 510 458 524 479 574 5 13 484 539 5 10 560 510 410 548 5 10 471 430. 5 10 465 510 535 970 810 940 760 840 760 738 790 560 740 827 810 860 860 860 940 810 l 0.20 760 798 770 810 968 790 910 772 783 891 820 710 810 799 790 998 814 802 760 890 890 970 9 Province and Location LacduBonnet ... Lynn Lake ... Morden ... Neepawa ... P~neFalls ... Portage la Prairie ... Rivers ... St . Boniface ... St . Vital ... Sandilands ... Sekirk ... SplitLake ... Steinbach ... Swan River ... ThePas ... Thompson ... Transcona ... Virden ... Whiteshell ... Winnipeg ... Ontario Ailsa Craig ... Ajax ... Alexandria ... Alliston ... Alrnonte ... Ansonville ... Arrnstrong ... Arnprior ... Atikokan ... Aurora ... Bancroft ... Barrie ... Barriefield ... Beaverton ... Belleville ... Belrnont ... Bowmanv~lle ... Bracebridge ... Bradford ... ... Brampton ... Brantford ... Brighton ... ... Brockville ... Brooklin ...

.

.

.... BurksFalls ... Burlington ... Caledonia ... Cambridge ... Campbellford ... CampBorden ... Cannington ... Carleton Place ... Cavan ... Centralia ... ... Chapleau ... Chatham ... Chelmsford ... Chesley ...

.

.

... Clinton ... Coboconk ... Column I One Day Rain

..

mm 76 77

.

143 . 85 67 131 139 101 89 89 89 51 83 85 78 51 89 104 76 84 89 76 76 114 76 63 99 76 93 102 83 127 114 140 106 89 76 114 114 178 103 76 89 76 102 77 104 108 1 1 1 114 127 69 76 80 104 107 76 76 89 127 8 Degrre Days Below 18°C 5950 7 820

.

5 490 5950 6000 5 890 5940 5 830 5 830 5 890 5890 7880 5 830 6 280 6852 7930 5 830 5890 5950 5 889 3 980 4080 4580 4 520 4 740 6 220 6892 4800 6040 4 300 4960 4470 4240 4 580 4190 3980 4130 4 800 4410 4 200 3 920 4240 4300 4240 5070 3700 392'0 4 130 4410 4470 4580 4690 4470 3940 5950 3 530 5 290 4 240 4 130 4740 Design January 21/2%. "C -34 -40 -3 1 -32 -34 -3 1 -34 -33 -33 -32 -33 -38 -33 -36 -36 -42 -33 -33 -34 -33

-

17 -20 -24 -23 -26 -33 -39 -27 -34 -2 1 -27 -24 -22 -24 -22 -17 -20 -26 -23 -19 17 -21 -23 -20 -26 -17 -17 -18 -23 -23 -24 -25 -22 -17 -35 -16 -28 -19

-

17 -25 I5 Min . Rain .. mm . 28 8 28 33 25 36 33 28 28 28 28 10 28 20 15 10 28 33 28 28 25 23 28 28 25 20 23 23 25 28 25 28 23 28 23 25 23 25 28 28 23 23 25 23 25 23 23 25 25 28 28 25 28 25 23 28 25 28 23 25 7 . 1/100 kN/m'2 0.41 0.71 0.56 0.49 0.43 0.5 1 0.51 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.47 0.71 0.44 0.42 0.52 0.68 0.49 0.51 0.41 0.49 0.62 0.64 0.45 0.38 0.46 0.45 0.29 0.42 0.29 0.50 0.36 0.39 0.52 0.42 0.48 0.58 0.66 0.33 0.42 0.49 0.44 0.60 0.49 0.59 0.34 0.51 0.44 0.39 0.47 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.50 0.60 0.31 0.48 0.53 0.55 0.60 0.37 13 Seismic Zone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 1/10 kN,

A 2

0.28 0.47 0.40 0.33 0.29 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.3 1 0.33 0.51 0.3 1 0.30 0.35 0.49 0.35 0.36 0.28 0.35 0.40 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.27 0.21 0.30 0.23 0.21 0.35 0.24 0.32 0.35 0.46 0.19 0.24 0.32 0.3 1 0.42 0.32 0.38 0.20 0.36 0.31 0.26 0.29 0.21 0.24 0.30 0.31 0.37 0.19 0.32 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.22 1 1 I%. "C -36 -42 -33 -34 -36 -33 -36 -35 -35 -34 -35 -40 -35 -38 -38 -45 -35 -35 -36 -35

-

19 -22 -26 -25 -28 -36 -42 -29 -37 -23 -29 -26 -24 -26 -24 -19 -22 -28 -25 -2 1 - 19 -23 -25 -22 -28 -19 -19 -20 -26 -25 -26 -27 -25 -19 -38 -18 -30 -2 1 - 19 -27 Temperature July Dry. "C 28 27 3 1 30 28 30 30 30 30 29 29 27 30 29 28 26 30 30 28 30 30 30 30 29 30 29 28 30 29 30 29 29 27 30 29 30 30 29 30 30 30 29 29 30 29 31 30 29 30 29 30 30 30 30 27 31 29 29 29 29 2 3 4 5 6 Data 'ation Ratio

.

A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0 0.04 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 15 HOuT1y W i n d Pressures 1/30

.

k N / r n 2 0.34 0.58 0.48 0.40 0.35 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.37 0.39 0.60 0.37 0.35 0.43 0.58 0.42 0.43 0.34 0.42 0.50 0.52 0.37 0.29 0.37 0.37 0.25 0.34 0.25 0.39 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.32 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.37 0.50 0.39 0.48 0.26 0.43 0.37 0.32 0.37 0.29 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.48 0.25 0.39 0.39 0.43 0.48 0.29 I2 2lh% Wet

.

"C 23 19 23 22 23 23 22 23 23 23 23 19 23 22 21 19 23 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 2 1 21 23 22 23 22 22 23 22 23 23 23 2 23 23 23 23 23 23 21 23 23 23 23 22 23 23 23 23 21 24 2 1 22 23 22

Copyright

©

NRC

1941

- 2019

World

Rights

Reserved

©

CNRC

1941-2019

Droits

réservés

pour

tous

pays

Références

Documents relatifs

The sparse data structure gives an efficient memory representa- tion to store the compressed function and provides random accesses efficient enough to make the reconstruction

The experiments conducted during this study showed that the urban block porosity has a strong impact on the flow characteristics of the surrounding streets (up to 70% difference

I also explain that the key uncertainty is over economic impact, about which we know very little, and which may, in fact, be in the realm of the “unknowable.” In Section 4, I

This paper revisits the decomposition of a belief function into a combination of generalized simple support functions proposed by Smets [ 2 ] showing that it can be viewed as

Bonnet-Burgener, Brouze, & Chardonnens (2007) expliquent que l’alphabétisation émotionnelle favorise les relations interpersonnelles ainsi que la compréhension des

With, on the one hand, the rapid development of data science, encompassing big data and arti- ficial intelligence (AI), and, on the other hand, the exponential growth of accessible

with the first three cracks, as well as the Cracking activity in optically transparent calculated strain components, particularly S-2 ice samples (50 x 100 x 250 mm) was

[r]