• Aucun résultat trouvé

Noise Control in Wood-Frame Construction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Noise Control in Wood-Frame Construction"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1967-10-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20359187

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Noise Control in Wood-Frame Construction

Northwood, T. D.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=cd092d54-099b-4fdb-932d-9e037768f80d https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=cd092d54-099b-4fdb-932d-9e037768f80d

(2)

No.

DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARGH

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA

504

NOTlE

'JrEClHI N ][CAlL

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION

PREPARED BY

T. - D. Northwood CHECKED BY APPROVED BY R. F. L. October 1967 PREPARED FOR

Visiting Housing Missions to DBR/NRC

SUBJECT

NOISE CONTROL IN WOOD-FRAME CONSTRUCTION

In Canada wood-frame construction is used extensively in single-family dwellings and is permitted in most regions for small multi-family dwellings including double houses, row houses and small apartments of up to 3 storeys.

Little consideration is given to sound insulation within a single-family dwelling. It is assumed that the individual householder can control the noises within his own household; furthermore, the usual open planning used within modern dwellings is not compatible with the requirements for sound insulation.

For multi-family units, there are mandatory requirements in Re sidential Standards (Supplement No. 5 to the National Building Code of Canada) covering party walls and floors that separate

dwelling units. At present, only airborne noise is subject to mandatory regulation, chiefly because there is no satisfactory standard for impact noise. The Standards contain a list,

however, of acceptable constructions and this list provides some guidance on the performance of floors under impact noise. Standards

..

' .

Acoustical standards· in Canada have been developed in conjunction with standards groups in the United States, and the same documents are used. Of partic:ular impoJ::tance

(3)

- 2 ..

is ASTM E90-66T, "Tentative Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions." It will be noted that this Standard covers the performance of a partition installed in the laboratory rather than in an actual building. It is our view that it is essential to provide guidance at the design stage and, thus, it is necessary to provide data based on a laboratory test of a building component rather than on the finished' product. There are two reasons for this:

(I) generally, when a structure is completed, it is too late to make major improvements in sound insulation; (2) in Canada there is no corps of competent acousticians that would be required to make measurements on all

buildings. DBR/NRC is interested, however, in the performance of buildings, and this is a major field of research for the

Building Physics Section.

It is our understanding that in other countries, for example France, the building requirements are based on the sound transmission losses averaged in three frequency ranges. The requirements for party walls and floors in France in

the three frequency ranges are as follows: Frequency - Low 100-315 Hz. Sound Separations 36 dB Between Dwellings Medium 400-1250 Hz. 48 dB High 1600-3150 Hz. 54 dB

On this continent, a single -figure rating known as the Sound Transmission Class (STC) is used. This. is obtained by comparing the graph of sound transmis sion los s with a

standard contour which gives greater emphasis to the middle and high frequency ranges than to the low frequency range. There is no exact corre spondence between the two methods of rating, but it appears that the French requirement is about equivalent to STC 50. The main distinction is that the Canadian requirement is more flexible in the interpretation of results for various frequency ranges. For lightweight constructions, for example, it would be possible to achieve STC 50 and yet not meet the low frequency requirement of the French'セエ。ョ、。イ、N ' . . In Canada the mandatory minimum is STC TUセ but STC 50 is

(4)

3

-Wall Construction

The simplest type of wood frame wall consists of 2 in. by 4 in. (S cm by 10 cm) wood studs and

i

in. (13 mm) gypsum plasterboard nailed to each side. Such a partition would be rated at about STC 33. The addition of mineral wool or glass fibre would bring this wall up to STC 36 to 38 and it would then be limited by coupling through the wood studs. To improve the wall still further requires that the connection from surface-to-surface through the studs be interrupted. One of the standard procedures is to use two sets of studs, one for each wall

surface with no direct connection from face to face. Such a wall, with mineral wool or glass fibre, will provide STC 47, but it will still be slightly deficient at low frequencies for purposes of the French standard. It could be made to meet the French requirement by additional weight on the surfaces (for example, two layers of plasterboard laminated together) or by increasing the spacing between wall surfaces.

An alternative way of reducing coupling through the studs is to introduce a layer of softer material, such as glass-fibre board or soft wood glass-fibreboard on one or both sides

before the final plasterboard is applied. This is reasonably effective, and the glass-fibre board may serve the additional purpose of acting as an absorbent filler in lieu of the mineral wool or glass fibre mentioned above. Another approach is to use a resilient metal furring strip between the studs 。ョセ the plasterboard.

Floor Construction

For floors, the Division is concerned not only with airborne sound, but also with impact sounds such as footsteps. The same airborne sound requirement applies, and, the con-struction requirements are similar to those for patty walls. In addition, for impact there are a number of recommended constructions designed to minimize impact sound, although it is not mandatory to employ these. Two approaches are used, both designed to reduce structural continuity between the finished floor and the ceiling below. One is to introduce a relatively soft layer between the sub-floor and the finished floor. This soft layer might consist of a soft wood fibreboard, cork, or a

(5)

,

..

4

-relatively dense glas s -fibre board similar to that which is used for thermal insulation of roof decks. This might support furring strips on which another sub-floor and finished floor, or a heavy hardwood floor, might be applied. The alternative procedure is to support the lower ceiling on separate joists or on resilient suspension elements. In either case, it is

important to introduce mineral wool or glass fibre in the space. Here, as in the case of the walls, the exact amount of absorbing material is not critical. Typically, in Canada a thickness of 2 or 3 in. (50 to 75 mm) is used.

Either of these procedures meets the Canadian requirement of STC 45, and brings it in the "recommended" category for

impact sound. To meet the low frequency requirement for France would require that the ceiling consist of two or more layers of plasterboard.

More detailed information on the various aspects of noise control in wood-frame construction is contained in a

publication of the Division entitled "Noise Control in rセ sidential Buildings" ("Reglementation du Bruit dans les Batiments

Références

Documents relatifs

This condition is based on the results in [3] where the switching behavior in time-optimal trajectories for multi-input control-affine systems is characterized (see also [11] for

The sparse data structure gives an efficient memory representa- tion to store the compressed function and provides random accesses efficient enough to make the reconstruction

Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées.. Si vous n’arrivez pas

The experiments conducted during this study showed that the urban block porosity has a strong impact on the flow characteristics of the surrounding streets (up to 70% difference

I also explain that the key uncertainty is over economic impact, about which we know very little, and which may, in fact, be in the realm of the “unknowable.” In Section 4, I

This paper revisits the decomposition of a belief function into a combination of generalized simple support functions proposed by Smets [ 2 ] showing that it can be viewed as

Bonnet-Burgener, Brouze, & Chardonnens (2007) expliquent que l’alphabétisation émotionnelle favorise les relations interpersonnelles ainsi que la compréhension des

With, on the one hand, the rapid development of data science, encompassing big data and arti- ficial intelligence (AI), and, on the other hand, the exponential growth of accessible