• Aucun résultat trouvé

Title: “Nourishment” Author: Vintilă Mihăilescu How to cite this article:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Title: “Nourishment” Author: Vintilă Mihăilescu How to cite this article:"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Title: “Nourishment” 

Author: Vintilă Mihăilescu 

How to cite this article: Mihăilescu, Vintilă. 2008. “Nourishment”. Martor 13: 143‐144. 

Published by: Editura MARTOR (MARTOR Publishing House), Muzeul Țăranului Român (The  Museum of the Romanian Peasant) 

URL:  http://martor.muzeultaranuluiroman.ro/archive/martor‐13‐2008/     

 

Martor (The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review) is peer‐reviewed academic journal  established in 1996, with a focus on cultural and visual anthropology, ethnology, museum studies and the dialogue  among these disciplines. Martor review is published by the Museum of the Romanian Peasant. Its aim is to  provide, as widely as possible, rich content at the highest academic and editorial standards for scientific,  educational and (in)formational goals. Any use aside from these purposes and without mentioning the source of  the article(s) is prohibited and will be considered an infringement of copyright. 

     

Martor (Revue d’Anthropologie du Musée du Paysan Roumain) est un journal académique en système peer‐review  fondé en 1996, qui se concentre sur l’anthropologie visuelle et culturelle, l’ethnologie, la muséologie et sur le  dialogue entre ces disciplines. La revue Martor est publiée par le Musée du Paysan Roumain. Son aspiration est de  généraliser l’accès vers un riche contenu au plus haut niveau du point de vue académique et éditorial pour des  objectifs scientifiques, éducatifs et informationnels. Toute utilisation au‐delà de ces buts et sans mentionner la  source des articles est interdite et sera considérée une violation des droits de l’auteur. 

             

Martor is indexed by EBSCO and CEEOL. 

(2)

Inaugurated these days by a double opening at the National Peasant Museum, the exhibition on nourishment completes and rounds off Horia Bernea’s vision. It is not by chance that it is taking place now, for „nourishment“ speaks about everything and can be found in every- thing. This is why this exhibition, held in the last room left of the „permanent exposition“, must have been hard to stage; and this is also why it took such a long time to mount it.

Nourishment, is not only food, nourishment is not only alimentation. Nourishment does not confine itself to food, it binds people together and unites them with God. Nourishment is not (only) a matter of biology, it brings society, cul- ture, economy and, last but not least, the sacred together in its deeds and words. Together with sexuality, nourishment is probably the most

„total“ social fact human sciences talk about.

(This must be the very reason why nourishment and sexuality have always and everywhere been viewed in terms of norms, taboos and celebra- tions, fasts and holidays...)

I firmly believe that it is nourishment which made man (for I cannot help imagining and won- dering what a lion or a wolf would look like when they called their companions by saying peacefully „you’re invited to dinner!“...). There- fore, nourishment binds people together

horizontally, that is to say, by the unwritten yet universal laws of hospitality– but it also unbinds them by the equally strict and complementary laws of hostility. There is also a kind of nourish- ment which vertically binds all mortals through their ancestors and through the sacred – but it also divides the waters between the sacred and the profane by the ways in which it is used. We should not forget „our daily bread“, which be- comes an everyday celebration by the Christian identification of bread and wine with Christ’s body.

Nourishment that binds, nourishment on Earth and nourishment in Heaven... The two concurrent exhibitions hosted by the Romanian Peasant Museum stage all this richness of facts and significations. Both refer to Romanian folk culture, but they transcend it via the unchanging universal values they resort to. They do it dif- ferently, from organically and stylistically dif- ferent perspectives and according to broad vi- sions which bear a strong subjective mark. The former, the permanent exhibition, stages a rather „vertical“, anthropologicalvision, materi- alised by an ascending spiral which enlivens the entire exposition. The rather minimalist scenery confers transparency to the objects that become a kind of second language that alludes to the Nourishment

Vintil` Mih`ilescu

(3)

many significations and deep meanings of the objects. The latter, the temporary exhibition, un- folds „horizontally“ in an opulent manner, dis- playing an extraordinary ethnographic richness in which every object and ensemble speaks for it- self and allows itself to be admired.

In this double opening, the Romanian Peas- ant Museum also tried to respond to a challenge:

turning „a conflict of interpretations“ (prevailing not only within the museum, but also in the ge-

neral opinions about our culture and traditions), into a „dialogue of visions“. In other words, the museum tried to break the patterns that present media – and cultural - practices have become used to establishing by means of talk-shows and other polemic formats in which the „toughest“

wins. We would rather believe in a kind of ecu- menical peace that enables – and urges – every- one to be free and to recognise themselves by their nature and preferences.

144 Vintil` Mih`ilescu

Références

Documents relatifs

The ‘old man’ and ‘old woman’ make no sound when parading except when they stop to persuade a householder to accept the team to play in his courtyard.. At this point they

The conclusion I drew after hav- ing visited the first halls is: “se la farina è ar- gento, la semola è oro” (if ordinary flour is like silver, the flour used for making pasta –

Such collections are thus ex- perienced closer to the heritage temporality, product- rather than process-oriented, rooting the objects and their public rather in the time- less time

It is no surprise then that the priests of this cultural creationism feel that nothing is superflu- ous and nothing should be replaced in this world of traditions, for the very sake

Martor   (The  Museum  of  the  Romanian  Peasant  Anthropology  Review)  is  a  peer‐reviewed  academic 

De ce point de vue il y a des différences sys- tématiques entre les trois pays concernées : Tout d’abord, la France a une longue tradition de la décentralisation, avec des lois dans

Martor   (The  Museum  of  the  Romanian  Peasant  Anthropology  Review)  is  a  peer‐reviewed  academic 

Therefore, the entire paradox of the Roma- nian Peasant Museum comes to life: as a muse- um of the Romanian peasant, it is a museum of the authentic peasant; as such, it is in fact