HAL Id: jpa-00245443
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00245443
Submitted on 1 Jan 1986
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Electrical properties of MOS radiation dosimeters
Gérard Sarrabayrouse, A. Bellaouar, P. Rossel
To cite this version:
Gérard Sarrabayrouse, A. Bellaouar, P. Rossel. Electrical properties of MOS radiation dosime- ters. Revue de Physique Appliquée, Société française de physique / EDP, 1986, 21 (4), pp.283-287.
�10.1051/rphysap:01986002104028300�. �jpa-00245443�
Electrical properties of MOS radiation dosimeters
G.
Sarrabayrouse,
A. Bellaouar and P. RosselLaboratoire d’Automatique et d’Analyse des Systèmes du C.N.R.S., 7, Avenue du Colonel Roche,
31077 Toulouse Cedex, France
(Reçu le 5 novembre 1985, révisé le 17 décembre, accepté le 23 décembre 1985)
Résumé. 2014 Des transistors MOS sont utilisés comme dosimère de rayonnement. La sensibilité obtenue couvre la gamme 20 mV/Gray (SiO2)-1,5 V/Gray (SiO2). La linéarité et la stabilité de la réponse est satisfaisante.
Abstract. 2014 MOS transistors are used for radiation dosimetry. The sensitivity obtained is ranging between 20 mV/
Gray (SiO2) and 1,5 V/Gray (SiO2). Good linearity and stability of the transistor response is obtained.
Classification Physics Abstracts
73. 60D
1. IntroductiorL
The use of MOS transistors for the detection and
dosimetry
ofionizing
radiation has beenpreviously proposed
in the literature[1-3].
This kind of detector has manyadvantages
among which its low cost, thepossibility
it offers to make either real time or inte-grated
measurement or its small sizeallowing precise
dose
mapping.
The
dosimetry
is madeby measuring
thecharge
stored
during
irradiation in theinsulating layer
of aMOS transistor and at the insulator semiconductor interface. For a
given
radiation dose the amount ofstored
charge depends
upon theprocessing
conditionsand most often the
goal
of the workpublished
upon thisdependence
was directed to minimize the radia- tion effects(hardening
of thedevice).
At theopposite
the
objective
here is to increase these effects. Howeverup to now the
properties
of the transistors have not beenoptimized
for this purpose andconsequently
thepotentialities
of the MOS transistor as a radiation dosimeter are not well known. As anexample
themaximum
sensitivity published
up to now is about0.85
V/Gray (Si02) [4].
In this paper we recall
briefly
thetechnological
process used in order to
optimize
thesensitivity
of thedevice to irradiation as well as its
stability
with time.The detailed process flow issued from an
analysis
of the results in the literature and from our own
experience
has beengiven already [5].
Then the electrical
properties
of the dosimetersare
presented. Mainly
thelinearity
andsensitivity
are
emphasized.
2.
Technological
process.The
technological
process is thefollowing : ( 100 )
p-type 1-2 03A9. cm silicon substrate has been oxidized in dualsteam/dry 02
ambient in order to obtain afield oxide with thickness
ranging
between 0.5 and 1 J.1mdepending
upon the gate oxide thickness. Thenpatterning
and diffusion of both source and drain areperformed Phosphorus
isdeposited
from aPOC’3
source at 1050 °C and
subsequently
driven in steamat 1050 °C
during
5 min. The gate oxide is thenpattemed,
grown at 1 150 °C indry 02
and annealedin situ at the same temperature in argon
during
15 min. The obtained oxide thickness is
ranging
between
1000 A
and 3000 A.
Then contacts aredefined and chromium is
deposited by
thermalevaporation.
Drain, source and gate electrodes aredefined The same process but with
removing
the fieldoxide on the whole wafer before gate oxidation has been used to obtain devices with 5
000 A
and 7 000 A thick gate oxidelayers. Together
with the transistorscapacitors
have also been fabricated on the same substrate.3. Influence of irradiation.
3.1 CALIBRATION OF THE y AND X-RAY SOURCES. -
Irradiation of the devices bas been made
by
exposure either to a Co60 y source or to a 150 kVX-ray
gene- rator. The calibration inGray (Si02)
of the C060source has been
performed through
a Fricke’s dosi- metry[6]
corrected for the mass energyabsorption
coefficient
03BC/03C1.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rphysap:01986002104028300
284
Because the X-ray generator does not deliver a
monoenergetic
beam it has been first calibrated inGray
(air) by irradiation andanalysis of B4OLi2(Cu)
thermoluminescent detector [7]. Then the conversion in
Gray (Si02)
has been obtainedby adjusting
thesensitivity
S of a MOS transistor at infinite electric field for X-ray to the one for Co6° with the aid of thecurves
1jS(CoÓo) (Gray(Si02)/mV)
and1/S(X-ray) (Gray(air)!mV)
versus thereciprocal
of the electric fieldduring
irradiationEi,
[8].An
example
of the obtained curves is shown infigure
1. Thegood linearity
obtained confirms the recombination modelproposed by
Brown and Do- zier[9].
Within their model the initial hole
density
pi in the cloud of carriers createdby
theimpinging particle
andits value pf after a duration
during
which the electron and hole distributionsoverlapp
are linkedby
therelation :
where a is a constant.
Consequently
theprobability f(Ei,)
for a hole toescape recombination is
given by :
Neglecting
interface stategeneration during
irradia-tion and
making
thehypothesis
of a storage of the created holes in a thin sheet at a distanceXc
from theSi02-Si
interface the thresholdvoltage
shift with gatepositively
biased can be written[10] :
where,e,
is thepermittivity
of vacuum, Box the dielectric constant for silica, D the radiationdose, f
theproba- bility
for a hole to betrapped
in thesheet, q
the elec-tron
charge, g
the electron-holepair generation
rateequal
to 7.9 x 1012cm- 3/Gray (Si02) [10]
andD0X
the thickness of the oxide
layer.
From
(3)
thesensitivity
S, defined as0394VTO D,
canbe written
Consequently
it appears from(4)
that thesensitivity
at infinite electric field Sm is
independent
of the type andenergy of the incident
particle.
So any difference between
S.C,60 expressed
inGray(Si02)
andSmX expressed
inGray(air)
must beattributed to the mass-energy
absorption
coefficientsFig. 1. - Variation of the reciprocal of the sensitivity S
with the reciprocal of the electric field Ei, - (Dox = 3 000
Á).
ratio
0Rx
for X-ray such that :3.2 GENERAL ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS. -
Figure
2 shows the response of the transistor as a function of the received dose. The curves are charac- terizedby
a linear part at low dose followedby
asaturation
region.
This behaviour has been observed whatever is the oxidelayer
thickness.The saturation value has been found
proportional
to the
voltage V Girr applied
on the gate for electric field in the oxide lower than 1 MV cm-1. Anexample
of the variation of the maximum threshold
voltage shift A V Tmax versus V Girr
is shown infigure
3.This
proportionality
indicates that the saturationoccurs because of a zero electric field in the oxide
layer [10].
Furthermore theslope
of the curvegives
thevalue of the centroid of the
trapped
charge[9].
Fig. 2. - Influence of the irradiation dose D on the threshold voltage shift A V T. (Dox = 1 000
Â.)
Fig. 3. - Influence of the gate bias V Girr upon the maximum threshold voltage shift for three values of Ei, - (D.. =
1000 A).
A mean value of
XC
= 65 A is obtained in agree-ment with
previous
results[11].
3. 3 INFLUENCE OF THE VOLTAGE APPLIED ON THE GATE.
- The extension of the linear part of the curve at low dose is
increasing
with theapplied
bias. If this exten-sion is dehned as the dose
DL
for which theexperimen-
tal curve deviates 5
%
from the linear curve, its varia-tion with the
applied voltage
isrepresented
infigure
4in the case where
Dox
=1000A.
As it can be seenincreasing
theapplied voltage
has alarge
beneficialinfluence.
Another benefit concerns the
sensitivity
of the MOStransistor. As shown in
figure
2 thesensitivity
of thedevice defined as the
slope
of the linear part of thecurve increases
greatly
with the gatevoltage.
As it has been recalled before, this influence is due to the
dependence
of theprobability
for a hole toescape recombination upon the electric field
E;r.
The variation of
f(Eir)
versusEir
obtainedexperimen- tally
from curves similar to those shown infigure
1through
the relation :Fig. 4. - Extension of the linear region versus the gate bias VGirr during irradiation. (Dox = 1000
A.)
Fig. 5. - Probability to escape recombinatiôn for electrons
versus the electric field Ei,.
is shown in
figure
5. It appears that under 1MV/cm f(Eir)
increasesrapidly
with the electric field andincreases
slightly
above 1MV/cm.
A
negative
influence of the gatevoltage
affects thestability
of the device with time. This parameter is veryimportant
as far asintegrated
dose or low dose rate[12J
are concemed.
Indeed irradiation creates a
negative
shift of thethreshold
voltage.
After irradiationVT
evoluates back with time towards morepositive
values. This recovery has been shown todepend
upon the insulator thickness and the gatevoltage.
Because this effect can be present even
during
theexposure it must be minimized in order to
improve
the
performances
of the dosimeter.The relative
amplitude
of thepositive post-irradia-
tion recovery is
depicted
infigure
6 as a function oftime and the influence of the gate
voltage
isclearly
shown.
286
Fig. 6. - Relative amplitude of the post-irradiation reco-
very AVT
versus time. (D ox =1500 Å)-ambient
temperature.So there is a
compromise
to reach between sensi-tivity
andstability. Figure
5 shows thatincreasing
the gate electric fieldbeyond
1MV/cm
induces a smallsensitivity gain
whatever is the oxidelayer
thicknesswhereas
figure
6 does not show any saturationbeyond
1
MV/cm. Consequently applying
a gatevoltage
inorder to obtain a 1
MV/cm
electric field in the oxidelayer
appears agood compromise.
On the other handthis value is less than the mean breakdown field of the oxide which has been found constant and
equal
to 7.5 MV/cm as shown in
figure
7.3.4 INFLUENCE OF THE OXIDE LAYER THICKNESS. -
The oxide
layer
thickness is known as akey
parameter which controls thesensitivity
of the transistor. Its influence has been examined in the range 1 000 A-7 000
A. Figure
8 shows the thresholdvoltage
shiftas a function of the dose with a 1
MV/cm
electric field in the oxideduring
irradiation.Fig. 7. - Mean value of the observed breakdown voltage
of the oxide layer versus the thickness Dox.
Fig. 8. - Threshold voltage shift versus irradiation dose as a function of Dox.
It can be seen that the
linearity
is maintained within the whole range.The
sensitivity
increasesrapidly
withDox
and asshown in
figure
9 it varies asDox
with n very close to two in agreement with relation(3).
This agreement shows that both dose enhancement effect and interface state
generation
have a smallinfluence.
Another argument for
neglecting
the first effect isthat the Co60 and X-Ray curves in
figure
9 areparallel
with
S(Co6°)
>S(X-Ray).
Indeed dose enhancement does not occur with
Co6° irradiation and it has been shown
[4]
thatenhancement occurs
mainly
for small thicknesses.As far as the
stability
is concemedfigure
10 showsthat
increasing
the oxidelayer
thickness has a bene- ficial effect on thepost-irradiation
recovery. For thicknesseslarger
than 5 000 A the shift has not been detectable.4.
Sensitivity
of the oxide layer.The
sensitivity
of the oxidelayer
to irradiation isa function of
Dox, f(Eir)
andf, -
In order to test thedegree
ofoptimization
of thetechnological
process it is necessary to détermine the valueof ft.
This can be done from the curve S =
f(D2ox).
As faras
Dox ~ X01
theslope
of this curve isgiven by :
Taking
into account the value off(Eir)
for Eir =1
MV/cm gives f
= 0.97 for Co6° irradiation and 1.04-1.09 for X-rays.Of
course f
cannot be greater than one. The excessvalue for X-ray may be due to a small dose enhan- cement. More
probably,
this is due toexperimental
errors associated with instabilities of our
X-ray
generator. However the values very close to one for both Co6° and X-ray show that thetechnological
process is
satisfactorily optimized
in view of ahigh
sensitivity.
Fig. 9. - Influence of the oxide layer thickness on the sensitivity to irradiation dose.
5. Conclusion.
In this paper we have shown that MOS transistors
can be used as
ionizing
radiation dosimeter withgood linearity
andstability
and with asensitivity
ashigh
as 1.5
V/Gray (Si02).
Thetechnological
process has been foundsatisfactorily optimized leading
to a valuevery close to one for the
probability
that a createdhole be
trapped
near theSi02-Si
interface.Fig. 10. - Influence of the insulating layer thickness on the post-irradiation recovery. Electric field in the oxide during
recovery : 1 MV/cm.
The
general
behaviour of the dosimeter is con-sistent with a first order theoretical
analysis
and noexperimental
limitation has been found for thesensitivity.
Work is now in progress to evaluate the
stability
of MOS transistors with an oxide
layer
thicker than 1 gm.Acknowledgments.
The authors
acknowledge
the skillful assistance of F. Rossel and T. Do Conto forfabricating
the devicesand L. Thores and S. Lorrain for
irradiating
thesamples.
References
[1] ADAMS, L. and HOLMES-SIEDLE, A. G., IEEE Trans.
Nucl. Sci. NS 25, 6, (1978) 1607.
[2] AUGUST, L. S., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS 29, 6 (1982)
2000.
[3] FRANKAND, H. and PETR, I., Jaderna Energie 23, 7 (1977) 258.
[4] OLDTRAM, T. R. and MACGARRITV, J. M., IEEE Trans.
Nucl. Sci. NS 30, 6 (1983) 4377.
[5] BELLAOUAR, A., SARRABAYROUSE, G. and ROSSEL, P.,
13th Yougoslav Conference on Microelectronics (MIEL 85). Ljubljana, 8-10 May 1985.
[6] EL DESSOUKY, A., Contribution à l’étude de la Radiolyse
des cétones fréryliques dans le propanol, Thèse de
3e Cycle, N° 159, Université de Toulouse III, 1982.
[7] KATZ, E. B., Application de la dosimétrie par RTL à
l’étude expérimentale de l’indice equivalent de dose, Thèse N° 2421, Université de Toulouse III, 1980.
[8] DORIE, C. M. and BROWN, D. B., IEEE Trans. Nucl.
Sci. NS 28, 6 (1981) 4137.
[9] BROWN, D. B. and DOZIER, C. M., IEEE Trans. Nucl.
Sci. NS 28, 6 (1981) 4142.
[10] HOLMES SIEDLE, A. G. and FREEMAN, R., Radiation effect Engineering handbook, ESA Report N° 2871/
76/NL/HP, April 1978.
[11] CURTIS, J. L., SROUR, J. R. and CHIU, K. Y., J. Appl.
Phys. 45 (1974) 4506.
[12] SARRAHAYROUSE, G., BELLAOUAR, A. and ROSSEL, P., Dérives temporelles post-irradiation dans les dosi-
mètres MOS de rayonnement (to be published).