• Aucun résultat trouvé

A variant of the differential gravimetry approach for low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking based on angular velocities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A variant of the differential gravimetry approach for low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking based on angular velocities"

Copied!
25
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A variant of the differential

gravimetry approach for low-low

satellite-to-satellite tracking based on angular velocities

(2)

Solution strategies

2

Variational equations In-situ observations

Classical

(Reigber 1989, Tapley 2004)

Celestial Mechanics approach

(Beutler et al. 2010, Jäggi 2007)

Short-arc method

(Mayer-Gürr 2006)

Energy Integral

(Han 2003, Ramillien et al. 2010)

Differential gravimetry

(Liu 2010)

LoS Gradiometry

(Keller and Sharifi 2005)

(3)
(4)

Rummel et al. 1978

Differential gravimetry

4

(5)

Differential gravimetry

5

Range observables:

Multiplication with unit vectors in along-track, cross-track and radial direction:

(6)
(7)
(8)

Differential gravimetry in the IRRF

Inertial: IRRF:

with and introducing :

(9)

Which IRRF?

Most useful implementation at the current stage:

(10)

Which IRRF?

Note the equivalence:

Most useful implementation at the current stage:

(11)
(12)

Ideal case:

LOS

CoM CoM

PhC PhC

Reality: variations in mutual alignment

measured ρ

Problem 1: inter-satellite pointing

• time dependent

• measurable via GPS but with insufficient precision

12

CoM CoM

(13)
(14)

Laser ranging instrument

Sheard et al., 2012, JGeod

Possible solution: LRI

(15)

Laser ranging instrument

Differential wavefront sensing/steering mirror

Sheard et al., 2012, JGeod

Possible solution: LRI

(16)

BENEFIT OF

(17)

Simulation

Most useful implementation at the current stage:

(18)

Simulation with white noise

(19)

Summary

• Derivation of the acceleration approach based on rotations

 creating the chance of using star cameras/LRI instead of GPS

• (Free) choice of the moving frame

• Determination of and allows for a second (observed) component; additional determination of a third direction. • Explanation/description of the low East-West sensitivity

• Necessity for GPS observations remains (frame)

• Open questions: can be determined with sufficient precision from the LRI?

(20)

A variant of the differential

gravimetry approach for low-low

satellite-to-satellite tracking based on angular velocities

(21)
(22)

Instantaneous relative reference frame

Need for moving frame quantities:

What about ?

(23)

Relative motion

23

absolute motion neglected!

Epoch 1

Epoch 2 K-Band

(24)

What is the optimal choice for the IRRF?

Obviously given:

“Ambiguity” for : • radial direction of GRACE A • radial direction of GRACE B • radial direction of midpoint • …

Other considerations: • accessibility • accuracy

• simplification

(25)

Relation cross-track to East-West direction

Références

Documents relatifs

We formulate the problem of minimizing on-board implementation cost (multiplications) of a beamformer as a second order cone programming problem with help of ` 1 norm constraint on

Previous solution strategies based on the differential gravimetry approach for GRACE-type observations are not directly applicable to laser interferometry based

University, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A. Abstract - When a slow multiply charged ion captures electrons from a neutral target the angular distribution of the products is sensitive

The Decade of the Geopotential – techniques to observe the gravity field from space.. Matthias Weigelt Tonie van Dam

a combination of 10 years of data of the satellite pseudo-constellation CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE.. Matthias Weigelt, Tonie van Dam

11 Span of the difference degree RMS with respect to GGM02 S of the monthly static solutions for GRACE (dark gray) and CHAMP (light gray): the worst monthly solution of each data

Index Terms—Frame based Precoding; Physical layer Multi- group Multicasting; Per-antenna Power Constraints; Multicast Aware MMSE; Weighted Max Min Fair Optimization;.. I

AIUB tested the sensitivity of GOCE to temporal gravity field variations by (1) derivation of monthly solutions and (2) by estimation of mean annual amplitudes from