• Aucun résultat trouvé

Bayesian inference for material parameter identification

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Bayesian inference for material parameter identification"

Copied!
19
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Bayesian inference for material parameter identification

Hussein Rappel, Lars Beex, Jack Hale, Stephane Bordas

(2)

Introduction

Mathematical model

Parameters

Computational

(3)

Introduction

Mathematical model

Solver

Discretisation

Computational

model

Model reliability

(4)
(5)

Error minimisation

Least squares method(conventional

(6)
(7)

Frequentist inference

(8)

Frequentist inference

Pr (head ) =

10

16

Pr (tail ) =

6

(9)

Frequentist inference: Young’s modulus identification

Method of maximum likelihood

(10)
(11)
(12)

Bayesian inference: Young’s modulus identification

Bayes’ formula:

σ

i

= E 

i

+ Ω

Ω : noise in stress measurement

π(E |σ

i

) =

π(E )π(σ

π(σ

i

|E )

i

)

=⇒ π(E |σ

i

) =

π(E )π(σ

i

|E )

C

(13)
(14)

Why do we pick BI?

BI treats with the parameters as random variables

You probably will not test hundreds of specimens and then the prior

prior

) may have a positive influence

For inverse problems, the prior (π

prior

) regularises the system (avoids

(15)

What have we accomplished?

E (GPa) 0 100 200 300 400 500 : 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 :(E) :(Ej<m)

Least squares method

0 #10!3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 < (G P a) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

(16)

What have we accomplished?

240 220 E (GPa) 200 180 0.2 <y0(GPa) 0.25 0.4 1 0.8 0.6 0.2 0 0.3 #10!3 : #10-4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 #10!3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 < (G P a) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

(17)

What have we accomplished?

240 220 E (GPa) 200 180 0.2 <y0(GPa) 0.25 60 20 40 80 0.3 H (G P a) #10-3 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 #10!3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 < (G P a) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

(18)

What have we accomplished?

<

(G

P

a)

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

(19)

Références

Documents relatifs

An alternative identification method is the Bayesian approach which explicitly accounts for the experimental noise and consequently gives a probabilistic estimation of the

Under the Bayesian methodology for statistical inverse problems, the posterior distribution encodes the probability of the material parameters given the available

the mean values of the maximum force and dissipated energy are higher for both cases with the identified joint PDF than for the cases with the true joint PDF. However, this is not

We concentrate on two algorithms, namely EGO (for Efficient Global Optimization) and IAGO (for Informational Approach to Global Optimization), and describe how they can be used

Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method: parameter space. too

The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm and a method based on a system of dynamical stochastic differential equations were considered and applied to a simplified pyrolysis model to

Error minimisation cannot take statistical info of measurement device into account..

Bayesian Inference (BI) uses the Bayes’ posterior whereas Logical Bayesian Inference (LBI) uses the truth function or membership function as the inference tool.. LBI