• Aucun résultat trouvé

MOVE in dialogue: first research results

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "MOVE in dialogue: first research results"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

MOVE in dialogue:

first research results

Emilia Kmiotek-Meier

University of Luxembourg, coordinating partner Zagreb

25 January 2018

(2)

Focus

• Mobility (mobiles & non-mobiles)

• Hindering factors / obstacles for mobility

• Mobile / non-mobile

• Mobility types

• Discussion

(3)

Mobility rates

*mobile: at least 2 weeks abroad other than holiday or family visit

Country mobile % non-mobile % N

Luxembourg 59.2 40.8 742

Spain 43.1 56.9 978

Norway 29.0 71.0 875

Germany 39.0 61.0 992

Romania 33.4 66.6 1006

Hungary 28.4 71.6 1016

ALL 37.6 62.4 5499

Sex mobile % non-mobile % N

female 37.2 62.8 2935

male 38.1 61.9 2567

ALL 37.6 62.4 5499

(4)

Main hindering factors

(mobile & non-mobile together)

Obstacles %

1 Lack of sufficient language skills 2 Lack of support or information

3 Difficulties to register in education/training

4 Obstacles or differences in recognition of qualifications 5 Difficulties finding a job abroad

6 Difficulties to obtain a work permit abroad 7 A worse welfare system (pensions/healthcare) 8 My partner is not willing to move

9 Psychological well-being (fear of suffering from stress/loneliness/sadness)

10 Financial commitments in my current place of residency (e.g.

bank loans or owning a property)

11 Lack of financial resources to move abroad

18.3 % N

O O BSTA

CLE S

(5)

Main hindering factors

(mobile & non-mobile together)

Obstacles %

1 Lack of sufficient language skills 2 Lack of support or information

3 Difficulties to register in education/training

4 Obstacles or differences in recognition of qualifications 5 Difficulties finding a job abroad

6 Difficulties to obtain a work permit abroad 7 A worse welfare system (pensions/healthcare) 8 My partner is not willing to move

9 Psychological well-being (fear of suffering from stress/loneliness/sadness)

10 Financial commitments in my current place of residency (e.g.

bank loans or owning a property)

11 Lack of financial resources to move abroad

81.7 % S OM

E O BSTA

CLE S

(6)

Obstacles % 1 Lack of sufficient language skills

2 Lack of support or information

3 Difficulties to register in education/training

4 Obstacles or differences in recognition of qualifications 5 Difficulties finding a job abroad

6 Difficulties to obtain a work permit abroad 7 A worse welfare system (pensions/healthcare) 8 My partner is not willing to move

9 Psychological well-being (fear of suffering from stress/loneliness/sadness)

10 Financial commitments in my current place of residency (e.g.

bank loans or owning a property)

11 Lack of financial resources to move abroad

Main hindering factors

(7)

Obstacles MOBILES %

(N=1,644) NON-MOBILES % (N=2,846)

1 Lack of sufficient language skills 38.7 49.8

2 Lack of support or information 29.5 27.6

3 Difficulties to register in education/training 14.8 10.3 4 Obstacles or differences in recognition of

qualifications 19.0 12.4

5 Difficulties finding a job abroad 20.0 19.2

6 Difficulties to obtain a work permit abroad 11.7 10.4

7 A worse welfare system (pensions/healthcare) 14.8 10.8

8 My partner is not willing to move 13.4 15.4

9 Psychological well-being (fear of suffering from

stress/loneliness/sadness) 24.3 24.5

10 Financial commitments in my current place of

residency (e.g. bank loans or owning a property) 11.6 12.6

11 Lack of financial resources to move abroad 29.0 44.0

Main hindering factors

*mobile: at least 2 weeks abroad other than holiday or family visit

(8)

Obstacles 1 Lack of suffici

ent langu

skillsage

2 Lack of supp ort or

infor matio n

4 Obstacles or differenc

es in recogniti

on of qualifica

tions

5 Diffic ulties findin

g a abroajob

d

9 Psycholo

gical well- being (fear of suffering from stress/lo neliness/

sadness)

10 Financial commitmen

ts in my current place of residency (e.g. bank loans or owning a property)

11 Lack of financi

al resour

ces to move abroad

Primary & Secondary 39.0 28.8 33.1

Vocational Training 27.5 30.8 23.1

Credit students 31.6 31.2 32.9

Degree students 29.0 24.6 32.6

Language courses 43.5 26.8 30.4

Voluntary work 43.4 30.3 32.9

Work-related 50.2 34.2 31.6

Main hindering factors

*mobile: at least 2 weeks abroad other than holiday or family visit

(9)

Findings from Interviews

• Positive experiences

• Self-development

• Widening of horizons

• “Mastering a challenge”

• Great memories

(10)

Findings from Interviews

• Positive experiences

• Self-development

• Widening of horizons

• “Mastering a challenge”

• Great memories

BUT

…also: struggle…

(11)

Findings from Interviews

• Language

• Organisation / administration

• Information

• Financial support

• Social networks (pupil, student, VET & employment)

• Living in a bubble (just national and/or international)

• Family situation (entrepreneurship & employment)

• Career outlook: Skills / knowledge transfer (student, VET &

employment)

(12)

Each mobility type has its own dilemma(s)

…AND…

Each country

has its own dilemma(s)

…or maybe not???

(13)

Each mobility type has its own dilemma(s)

…AND…

Each country

has its own dilemma(s)

…or maybe not???

(14)

What can a mobility?

• Integrate the integrated ?

• Support the supported ?

(15)

What can a mobility?

• Integrate the integrated ?

• Support the supported ?

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020),

• Societal Challenge 6 – Europe in a changing world:

inclusive, innovative and reflective societies,

• Call YOUNG-2-2014, topic "Youth mobility: opportunities,

impacts, policies"

(16)

Discussion groups

Groups will be split into different stages of mobility, focusing on challenges and solutions / policy

recommendation:

• Before mobility experience;

• During mobility experience;

• After mobility experience; and

• Non-mobile young people.

(17)

Final Conference

8th and 9th of March 2017 - Final Conference

Dr. Valentina Cuzzocrea Youth and Mobility Prof. Dr. Bridget Anderson

Youth migration and precarious employment of young people Prof. Dr. Martin Kahanec

Economic perspectives on migration and mobility

Prof. Dr. Rubén Hernandez-Leon

Cross border US/Mexico in comparison to third country immigration EU

(18)

THANK YOU for

YOUR

contribution!!!

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

What about the relationship between hands movement quantity and difference in head movement quantity from free to blocked condition. •

ىلع دمتعت يتلا ةينلاعلإا تاقصلملا امأ .ةفلتخم ةيذغأ عم ةضورعم اهنكلو ،نزاوتملاو عونتملا .ةيلحملا تافاقثلا بسانت يك ةقدب اهميمصت نيعتيف ةبوتكملا تاداشرلإا نم

21-23 Multiple other reports and cross-national com- parisons have highlighted the cost savings—estimated at several billion dollars—of a national universal drug insurance

Les informations fournies concernant la réduction des émissions peuvent être utiles autant pour la perception politique que publique du principe zéro émission par l’utilisation

h Les aspects du présent (présent simple et présent en BE + V-ing) : Britain is reaching, the blueberries and fine beans are now reaching our shops, they’re looking for, is

Blastocyst culture and transfer are usually performed in cases of good prognosis patients but many centers keep transferring cleavage-stage embryos for most of their patients because

These include the subjective and context- dependent nature of the models: peers will learn different trust values based on their own experiences (and who they receive