• Aucun résultat trouvé

Elements of tight-binding method in terms of graph theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Elements of tight-binding method in terms of graph theory"

Copied!
17
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00246867

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246867

Submitted on 1 Jan 1993

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Elements of tight-binding method in terms of graph theory

N. Cotfas

To cite this version:

N. Cotfas. Elements of tight-binding method in terms of graph theory. Journal de Physique I, EDP

Sciences, 1993, 3 (11), pp.2269-2284. �10.1051/jp1:1993244�. �jpa-00246867�

(2)

J.

Phys.

I £Fonce 3

(1993)

2269-2284 NOVEMBER 1993, PAGE 2269

Classification

Physics

Abstracts

0210 6170R

Elements of tight-binding method in terms of graph theory

N. Cotfas

Department

of Mathematics,

Faculty

of

Physics, University

of

Bucharest,

P-O- Box 76-54,

Bucharest,

Romania

(Received

29 April 1993, revised 19

July

1993, accepted 28 July

1993)

Abstract. A description of the diamond structure in terms of grapb theory obtained by

using

an additional axis

(similar

to the additional axis one uses in the case of the

hexagonal lattice)

is presented. The group of all

graph-automorphisms

of the

graph

we use as model is

isomorphic

to the space group

O( (the

symmetry group of the diamond

structure)

and it admits natural representations in some mathematical spaces that can be associated to the

graph.

These spaces allow us to obtain

advantageous

mathematical formalisms for certain models and offer

new

possibilities

to extend them to

crystals

witb

impurities

or defects,

quasi-crystals,

etc. We

exemplify by considering

some elements of the

tight-binding

method.

1 Introduction.

The

advantages

of an additional axis in the

description

of the

hexagonal

lattice are well-known.

Similar

advantages

can be obtained in the case of the diamond structure if we use both the usual Cartesian reference

system (or

the

corresponding

orthonormal basis

I, j, k)

and a

system

of reference

having

four axes

(corresponding

to the vectors eo = -I

j k,

ei

= -I +

j

+

k,

e2 " I

j

+

k,

e3 " I +

j k).

Thus,

beside the usual Euclidean space

1t3,

we use as model the factor vector space P

lt~/W,

where W =

((I, I, I, I)

I E

lt)

11,

2].

=

Denoting by [To,

xi, x2,

x3] "((To

+

I,

xi

+1,

x2

+1,

x3 +

1)

1 E

lt)

the coset

correspond- ing

to

(To,

xi, x2,

x3),

the

correspondence

between the two models is the linear

isomorphism

q:P-it~

(3)

n

[To,

xi, x2, x31 =

(-To

xi + x2 + x3, -To + xi x2 + x3, -To + xi + x2

x3) (1.1)

n-~(x,v,z)

=

1°,(v

+

z)/2,(x

+

z)/2>(x

+

v)/21.

For each

point

of the space we have two

descriptions ((x,

y,

z)

E 1t3 and

[To,

xi, x2,

x3]

E

P),

and the

isomorphism

q allows us to choose in each situation the most convenient of them.

Particularly,

the usual scalar

product

in the two

descriptions

is

((xo>xi>x21x3j>ix(,x[,x[,x())

"

((x,y,z),(x',y', z'))

"

=x.x'+y.y'+z.z'=3~jxj

3

x(-~jxj xl. (1.2)

j=0 j#1

The usual

representation

of the

symmetry

group

O( (Fdlm)

of the diamond structure in the space P coincides

[I]

with the

subgroup generated by (A)

U

(A,

a E

G4)

in the group of all isometries of

P,

where G4 is the group of all

permutations

of the set

(0,1, 2, 3)

and

A,A,.P-P

A (To> Xl X2>X3j "

(~X0

+

1,

-Xl1~X2>

~X3j

l~«

iX0>Xl >X2>X3j " [X«(0)>

Tail)> X«(2)>X«(3)j (1.3)

The set

13

ti = n =

(no,

ni, n2,

n3)

E

Z~ ~j

nj E

(0;1)

j=0

where Z is the set of all

integers,

can be identified with the

O(-invariant

subset

([no, ni,n2,n3] (no,

ni,

n2,n3)

E

ti)

of P and the set R of the

corresponding points

of the space form the structure of diamond

ill.

The

representation

of

O(

in P subduces a represen- tation

by permutations

of

O)

in ti. The group

O)

is

isomorphic

to the

subgroup (denoted

also

by O() generated by (A)

U

(A,

a E

G4)

in the group of all

permutations

of

ti,

where

A,A,.ti-ti

A

(no,

ni, n2, n3

=

(-no

+

I,

-ni, -n2, -n3

,

A, (no>

nl> n2>

n3)

"

(n,(0)> "«(1)1"«(2)> n,(3)) (1.4)

3

Let

So

= m =

(mo, ml,m2,m3)

E ti

~jmj

= 0

and,

for any m E

tic,

let tm P - P

j=o

(resp.

tm ti -

ti)

be the

mapping

(4)

N°11 TIGHT,BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2271

~m (To Xl X2>X3j " (To + m01Xl + ml1X2 + m21X3 +

m3j (1.5) (resp.

tm

(no,

ni, n2, n3

"

(no,

+mo, ni + ml, n2 + m2, n3 + m3

))

In the

representation

of

O)

in P

(resp. ti),

the

subgroup

of all translations

belonging

to

O(

coincides

[I]

with

(tm

P - P m E

Sol (resp. (tm

ti

- ti m E

Sol)

and it will be denoted

by So.

The

mapping

3

b ti x ti

-

N,

b

(n, n')

=

~j jnj n( (1.6)

j=o

is an

O(-invariant

distance on ti. We will prove

(Sect. 3)

that the group

ig

. ti - ti b

(g(n),

g

(n'))

= b

(n, n')

for all n,

n'

E

tip

of all isometries of the metric space

(ti, b)

coincides with

O).

The

point

n' E ti is a

neighbour

of order

j

of the

point

n E ti if and

only

if

bin, n')

=

j.

For each

point

n =

(no,

ni, n2,

n3)

E

ti,

the

points

"~

"

("0

+

6(")1

"1> n2>

n3)1 n~

=

(no>

nl +

6(n),

n21

n3)>

"~

"

("0>

"1> "2 +

6(")> "3)> n~

=

(no>

nl>n2> n3 +

6(n)), Il.?)

where

61n)

=

(-1)"°+"~+"~+"3,

are the first

neighbours

of n, the

points

~ji

~

(~J)~,

where

j #1>

are the second

neighbours

of n, the

points

n~~P

=

((nJ)~)~,

where

j #

i

#

p, are the third

neighbours

of n, etc.

The

O)-metric

space

(ti, b) represents

an abstract model for the diamond structure. It will

help

us to describe the diamond structure in terms of

graph theory.

The usual

applications

of the

graph theory

in

crystal physics [3,

4] can be extended to the case of the diamond structure

by using

this

description,

but we will consider

only

some elements of the

tight-binding

method.

(5)

2.

Theory

of the

quasibound

electron for diamond

type

semiconductors.

The diamond

(C),

silicon

(Si), germanium (Ge)

and tin

(a-Sn)

have the same structure

(namely,

the structure of

diamond)

and

they

will be called diamond

type

semiconductors. A solution

of the

Schr6dinger equation

for the electron in the

periodic

field of such a

crystal

has [5] the form of the Bloch wave

lbk(x)

=

exP(I(k,x))~Jk(x), (2.I)

where ~Jk P - C satisfies the condition

~Jk(x

+

n)

=

~Jk(x)

for any n E

So, (2.2)

and k E P

(the corresponding

wave

vector).

Certain values of the energy E

corresponds

to each wave vector k E

P,

and an

important problem

is to establish the

dependence

E

=

E(k).

In the case of the diamond

type semiconductors,

there are more accurate methods for

solving

this

problem [6-13],

but

important

informations can be obtained in a

simple

and

general

way

by using

the

theory

of the

quasibound

electron

[5, 14].

This

theory, developed

here in classical terms, will be reconsidered

(Sect. 5)

in a new mathematical

formalism,

suitable for extensions to distorted

crystals, crystals

with

impurities

or

defects,

etc.

Let k =

[ko, ki, k2,

k3] E

P,

and let

Kj

=

(k,ej)

= 3

kj ~j ki, (2.3)

1#j

for any

j

E

(0,1,2,3). Following

the

general theory

of the

quasibound

electron

[5, 14],

we

consider the Hamiltonian

/~2

H = -6 +

~j ((x n)

+

W(x), (2.4)

where

H~

/~2

= --6 +

((x) (2.5)

is the Hamiltonian in the case of an isolated atom and

W(x)

is a "correction" necessary for the

self-consistency

of lattice

potential

field. We choose as zero

approximation

for the solution of the

Schr6dinger equation

H~fi

= E~fi

(2.6)

a sum of atomic wave functions ~fi~(x

n), namely

1fi° P -

c, q~°(z)

=

~ exp(I(k, n)) q~~(z n), (2.7)

where

Halba(x)

=

Ea lba(x). (2.8)

(6)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2273

One can remark that

~b°(x

+

n)

=

exp(I(k, ni)~b°(x), (29)

foranynEtio.

It is known

that,

in this case, the first

approximation

for energy

E(~)

satisfies the

equation

lfi2 GA

~

jj

v&(X

"')

+

w(X) 16°(X)

"

Ei~~ '16°(X). (2.1°)

~,

As usual

[5],

we assume that

~fia(x n)

is non-zero

only

in the

vicinity

of n

(the overlap

of the

wave functions

~fia(x n)

can be

neglected

even for nearest

atoms)

and the electron

exchange

between any two atoms of the

crystal

takes

place by

way of a chain of nearest

neighbour exchanges.

More

exactly,

we assume the existence of two real constants A

(the exchange

energy between nearest

atoms)

and B

(B

m

0)

such that

/~fi] (x nJ) ~fia(x n)dx

=

B, (2.ll)

P

/

~fi]

(x

nJ

~j

( (x n')

+

W(x) ~fia(x n)

dx

= A

(2.12)

~ n'#n

foranynEti, jE(0,1,2,3).

Since

~o*j~)~oj~)

~~

2

p

n ~

+

£ exp(-I(k, n))~fi](x n) exp(I(k, n))~fia(x n)

+

~j

exp

(I (k,

nJ

))

~fia

(x

nJ dx 2 =

~

n j=

3 3

=

~j

I + B

£

cos

((k,

n nJ

))

=

£

I + B

~j

cos

Kj

m

N,

" J"° " J"°

where N is the number of atoms of the

crystal,

from

(2.10)

we

get

in a similar way

(7)

El~)

=

/ ~fi°*(x)H~fi°(x)dx

=

£ Ea

+

/

~fi]

(x n) £ ( (x n')

+

(x)j

~ ~ ~ x

"

~ "'#"

x~fia(x n)dx

+

(

exp

(I (k,

nJ

n) Ea /

~fi]

(x n)~fia (x

nJ dx +

/

~fi](x n)

x

~~~ P P

x

~j ( (x n')

+

(x)l~fia (x nJ)

dx

+

f

exp

(I (k,

n nJ

))

x

'#nY

~ j=0

x

Ea /

~fi]

(x nJ) ~fia(x n)dx

+

/

~fi]

(x nJ) ~j ( lx n')

+

W(x) ~fia(x n)dx

~ ~

"'#"

~~jlEa+C+(B.Ea+A)fcosKj

mEa+C+AfcosKj,

~

n j=0 j=0

where

C

=

/ ~fi](x n) ~j ( (x n')

+

(x)l~fia(x n)dx. (2.13)

~ ~l#~

Particularly,

El~~

=

Ea

+ C + 4A for k

=

[0, 0, 0,

0]

and

E(~)

=

Ea

+ C 4A for k =

[0,1r /2,1r/2, 0].

One can remark

that,

in the

crystal,

the energy level

Ea

is lowered

by

the amount C and

split

into a band of width

8(A(

3

El~~

=

Ea

+ C + A

~j

cos

Kj. (2.14)

j=o

3. A

description

of the diamond

type

semiconductors in terms of

graph theory.

It is usual to describe a

crystal

in terms of an Euclidean vector space and to think of a

crystalline symmetry

in terms of a

rigid displacement,

but a less

rigid description

in terms of

graph theory

may be

enough

accurate to be useful in

modelling

and

enough general

to be

suitable

for extensions to distorted

crystals [15]

or to

crystals

with

impurities

or defects.

Let G

=

(ti,L)

be the

graph (we

use the

terminology

from

[3])

whose set of all

points

is ti and whose set of all lines is

L

=

((n,

nJ

j

n e

s, j

e

jo,1, 2, 3j)

,

(3.1)

(8)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2275

and let G be the group of all

graph-automorphisms

of

G,

that

is,

of all

bijections

g ti - ti such that

(gin), gin'))

E

L,

for any

(n, n')

E L.

Evidently,

a

k-step

walk

having

n E ti as

starting point

can be written

In,

n~i

(n~i,

n~i~2

(n~i~2...~k-1,

n~i~2...~k-i~k

,

(3.2)

where

iii12, ...,ik

E

(0,1, 2, 3).

It will be denoted

by (n;ii12.. ,ik)

A closed walk

(n; ijkijk)

with I

# j #

k

#

I will be called a

hexagonal

walk.

One can prove

[1,

2] that

b(n, n')

is the

length

of the shortest walk

having

n as

starting point

and n' as end

point.

Particularly, (n, n')

E L if and

only

if b

(n, n')

= I.

Obviously, A, A,

E

G,

for any a E

G4,

and hence

O)

C G. We prouve that G

=

O).

Let g E

G,

m E ti be fixed elements and let m'

=

g(m).

Since g

((mJ j

E

(0,1,2,3)))

=

(m'J j

E

(0,1, 2, 3)),

It follows that there exists a E G4 such that

g

(mJ

=

m"lJ) (3.3)

for any

j

E

(0,1,2,3).

We prove that there exists h E

O)

such that

h(m)

=

m',

h

(mJ)

=

m"lJ),

for any

j

E

(0,1, 2, 3),

and then we prove that g

= h.

The

mappings

Azj

ti -

ti, Azj

=

Ajoj~

o A o

Ajofl

o

A(oz)

o A o Aoz

(3.4)

where

I, j

E

(0,1, 2, 3), (0k)

E G4

represents

the

identity

for k

= 0 and the

corresponding transposition

for k E

(1, 2, 3),

can be written

nk

+ I if k =

j Azj (no nl1n21n3)

"

(n~> "~> "~> "~)

i

"~

" "k l if k

~ ~

(~.~)

nk if k

f (I, j)

Since the group

O)

is

generated by (A)

U

(A,

a E

G4),

the

mapping

h can be

easily

obtained

by using

the

mappings Azj.

Evidently,

the groups G and

O)

leave invariant the class of

hexagonal

walks

(see Fig. I).

Let m" be a fixed

point

with I

# j.

The

images by

g or h of the two

hexagonal

walks

(m; ijkijk),

k E

(0,1, 2, 3) ( (I, j),

which pass

through

m,

m~,

m" and do not pass

through

mJ must be the two

hexagonal

walks

(m'; a(I)aba(I)ab)

which pass

through m', m"l~)

and do not pass

through m"(J)

This is

possible only

if a

=

a(j),

that is

g

(m"

=

m"l~l'(J)

= h

(m") (3.6)

By using

this

result,

one can prove that

g

(m~i~2...~~)

=

m"l~il'l~2).."(~kl

= h

(m~i~2...~k)

,

(3.7)

for any

ii,

12,

,

ik

E

(0,1, 2, 3),

and hence g = h.

A diamond

type

semiconductor

crystal,

considered infinite and without

impurities

or

defects,

can be

regarded

as a

graph (

=

(R,£)

whose set of all

points

is the set R of the

equilibrium positions

of all atoms of the

crystal

and whose set of all lines £ is the set of all covalent bonds in the

crystal (identified

with the set of all

pairs

of nearest atoms

(A, A')).

One can prove

[1,2]

that there exists a

family

A of natural

graph-isomorphisms

between

(

and

G,

that

is,

a

family

of

bijections

(9)

Aj

A

Aj

Fig.

1. A

regular

or distorted diamond type semiconductor is

regarded

as a

graph (R,£)

and is described by

using

the "numerical"

graph (§, L).

~j.R-ti

such that the

image

of each covalent bond

(A, A')

E £ is an element

(~Jj(A),

~Jj

(A'))

E L.

For any two

isomorphisms

~Ji, ~Q2 E A the

mapping

~J2 °

~oi~

ti - ti is a

graph-automorphism

of

G,

and hence it

belongs

to

O).

More than that 11,

2],

we have

O)

= (~a2 o

~a/~

ti - ti ~ai,

~Q2 E

A). (3.8)

The considered

crystals

can be

regarded

as a

crystallographic variety

modelled over the

"numerical"

graph

G with the structure group

O) by using

the atlas A. The

isomorphisms

~aj E A

represent

the

corresponding

charts.

A small deformation

(due

to a small pressure,

etc.)

of the

crystal,

which do not

destroy

the covalent

bonds,

leads to a distorted

crystal [15]. Evidently,

the structure of

crystallographic variety

of the

regular crystal

can be extended to the

corresponding

distorted

crystals,

that

is,

the "numerical"

graph

G is a model for

regular

and distorted diamond

type

semiconductors.

Since b ti x ti - N is an

O)-invariant distance,

that is

b

(g(n),g (n'))

= b

(n,n') (3.9)

for any g E

O),

n, n' E

ti,

it follows that

b

(~gi(A),

~gi

(A'))

= b (~g2 O

~gi~)

(~gi

(A)),

(~g2 O

~gi~)

(~gi

(A')))

= b

(~g2(A),

~g2

(A')) (3.io)

and

hence,

we can define a distance on R

b R x R -

N,

b

IA, Al)

= b

(~gi(A),

~gi

(A')) (3.ii)

by using

a chart ~Ji and

independently

of the chart we choose.

(10)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2277

Generally,

each

O)-invariant

mathematical

object

we can consider on the

graph G,

can be

brought

on

(

in an invariant way and it may be useful in

modelling.

We shall

give

some

examples

in the next section.

For n E

ti,

k E

N,

k

# 0,

the group of all

graph-automorphisms

of the

subgraph (S,L)

of

(ti, L),

where

S =

(n'

E ti b

(n', n)

<

k),

L

=

((n', n")

E L

n', n"

E

S) (3.12)

is

generated by (A,

a E

G4),

and hence it is

isomorphic

to the

complete

tetrahedral group

Td il].

This means

that,

in the case of the

graphs (ti,L)

and

(R,£),

the local

symmetry

is the

tetrahedral

symmetry.

4. A class of

O)-invariant selfadjoint operators.

Certain mathematical spaces can be associated to the

graph (

in a natural way, and

they

are useful in the

modelling

of the

physical phenomena occurring

inside the

crystal.

oJ

Let a N - ti be a

bijection,

and let u ti

- C be a

mapping.

If the series

~j (u(o(j))(

is

j=o

convergent,

then the

family (u(n))~~~

is called

absolutely

summable

[16],

and its sum is

~j U(n)

=

~j U(a(J)). (4.i)

nes

~0

One can prove that this definition does not

depend

on the

bijection

a N - ti we choose.

The vector space

l~(ti)

=

(u

ti - C

((u(n)(~)

~~ is

absolutely summable)

n

(vi

+

u2) (n)

=

ui(n)

+

u2(n)

(1 U)(n)

= I

(U(n)), (4.2)

Considered

together

with the scalar

product

(ui,u2)

"

~j ui(n) u2(n) (4.3)

neti

is a Hilbert space. A

unitary representation

of

O)

in

l~(ti)

can be obtained

by associating

the

mapping

Tg 12(s)

-

12(s), Tgu

= u o

g-~ (4.4)

to each g E

O).

Let

A,

C E lt be two real constants, and let V

l~(ti)

-

l~(ti)

be the

operator

3

(V u)(n)

= C

u(n)

+ A

~j

u

(nJ) (4.5)

j=0

(11)

By using

the

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality [17],

we prove that the operator V is defined on the whole space

l~(ti)

~

2

~j ((Vu)(n)(~

=

~j

C

u(n)

+ A

~j

u

(nJ)

<

neti neti

J=o

3

<

(C~

+ 4

A~) ~j (u(n)(~

+

~j ~j ju (nJ)

~

= 5

(C~

+ 4

A~) ~j (u(n)(~

nE§

J"°

nE§

nE§

and it is a

selfadjoint operator (V

ul

u2) 13

"

~

C ul

(n)

+ A

~

ul

(nJ u2(n)

=

~

C ul

(n) u2(n)

+

neti J=° neti

3 3

+A

~j £

vi

(nJ)

u2

In)

=

£

C

vi

(n)

u2

In)

+ A

£ £

vi

In)

u2

(nJ

=

J=° neti neti J=o ~~§

=

(vi,

V

u2)

One can see that for any k

=

[ko, ki, k2, k3]

E P such that

~j

3 sin

Kj

= 0

(4.6)

j=0

where

Kj

=

(k, ej)

= 3

kj ~j ki, (4.7)

1#j

the

mapping

uk . 5 -

C, uk(n)

=

exp(I(k, n)), (4.8)

which

belongs

to an extension of the space

l~(ti),is

an

eigenfunction

of V

corresponding

to the

eigenvalue

3

uk = C + A

~j

cos

Kj. (4.9)

j=0

For each w : N -

lt,

such that

(j

E N

w(j) # 0)

is a finite

set,

we consider the

operator

V~V

l~(ti)

-

l~(ti), (V~vu) (n)

=

~j

w

(b (n, n'))

u

(n'). (4.10)

n'eti

The

operator

V considered above is of this

type,

and it

corresponds

to w : N -

lt, w(o)

=

C,

w(I)

=

A, w(j)

= 0 for

j

> 2.

Computations

similar to those

presented

for V prove that the

operators

V~V are defined on the whole space

l~(ti)

and are

selfadjoint.

(12)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2279

The

operators

V~V are

O(-invariant operators. Indeed,

((Vw

O

Tg U) (n)

=

~j

W

(b (n, n')) (TgU) (n')

=

n, es

=

~j

w

(b (n,n'))

u

(g~~ (n'))

=

~j

w [b

(g~~(n), g~~ (n'))]

u

(g~~ (n'))

=

~,~§ ~,~§

=

~

w

(b (g-~(n), n'))

u

(n')

=

(vwu) (g~~(n)I

=

((Tg

o

vw) u) (n),

n> es

for any n E

ti,

u E

l~(ti)

and g E

O(.

The Hilbert space

l~(R)

is defined similar to

l~(ti),

and for any chart ~J E

A,

the

mapping

p 12js)

-

12jn)

u - u o ~

j4.ii)

is an

isometry.

The

operator

i~v l~(R)

-

l~(R), i~vfi

= (V~V

(fi

o

~J~~))

o ~J

(4.12)

can be associated to the

operator

V~V l~

(ti)

-

l~(ti), by using

a chart ~J E A and

independently

of the chart we choose.

Indeed,

let ~Ji, ~Q2 E

A,

and let g = ~J2 o ~Jp~ E

O).

Since

(V~VOT~)u=(T~OV~V)u,

it follows that

(~wU)

° ~9l ° ~92~ "

~w Ill

° ~9l ° ~92~)

(~.l~) whence,

for u

= fi o

~J/~,

we

get

(V~V

(fi

o

~J/~

o ~Ji = (V~V

(fi

o

~Jp~)

o ~J~.

(4.14)

5.

Quasibound

electron

theory

for

regular

and distorted diamond

type

semicon- ductors.

In this

section,

we reconsider the

theory

of the

quasibound

electron in a mathematical formalism based on the

description

in terms of

graph theory presented

in section 3. As

usual,

we assume

that the electron may be

located,

with some

probability,

near any atom and it moves

"freely"

through

the

crystal jumping

from one atom to another

by exchange

process [5]. In

addition,

we

assume that the

description

we use in the case of an isolated atom can be

kept

in the

vicinity

of each nucleus in the

crystal.

Let

A,

C E lt be two constants and let d be the Euclidean distance between nearest atoms

in the

crystal.

We use as mathematical model the Hilbert space

7i =

1b

P x 5 - C

~ /~ lib(x, n)l~dx

< OO;

1b(x, n)

= 0 if ((x((

2 (1(5.i)

nes

(13)

with

(till>1fi2)

"

~ / till(Xin)

1fi2(X>n)dX (5.2)

nEli

~

and the Hamiltonian

[18]

H=Ha+V, (5.3)

where

Ha

is the Hamiltonian in the case of an isolated

atom,

and

3

(V~fi)(x, n)

= C

~fi(x,n)

+ A

~j

~fi

(x, nJ) (5.4)

j=0

3

Let k

=

[ko, ki, k2,

k3] E

P,

such that

~j

sin

Kj

= 0

(see (4.7)),

and let

Ea

be an energy j=o

level in the isolated atom

corresponding

to the

eigenfunction

~fia, that

is,

H~q~~ =

E~

q~~.

j5.5)

The function

1b : P x ti -

C, lbix, n) =lba(x) exp(ijk, n)) 15.6)

is an

eigenfunction

of H

(H1b)(x, n)

=

(Halba) (x) exP(I(k, n)) +lba(x) V(exp(I(k, n)))

=

3

=

Ea +C+A~cos ~j

.q~(x,n),

j=o

corresponding

to the

eigenvalue

E=Ea+C+A~jcosKj.

3

(5.7)

j=o

One can remark that the result is similar to that obtained in section

2,

and it is an

argument

for the existence of the energy bands in

regular

and distorted diamond

type

semiconductors.

This new formalism is more suitable for extensions to

crystals

with

impurities

or

defects,

zinc blende

type crystals,

or, more

general,

to

crystals

with

regular

or distorted tetrahedral structure

[15].

At the same

time,

it may be used as a basis for other more accurate models.

(14)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2281

6.

Regular

and distorted diamond

type

semiconductors with

impurities

or defects.

In the

previous sections,

we showed that a diamond

type

semiconductor

crystal (regular

or

distorted)

can be

regarded

as a

graph (

=

(R,£),

and described

by using

the "numerical"

graph

G

=

(ti,L)

and the atlas A. Some elements of a

possible

extension of these ideas to

crystals

with

impurities

or defects will be

presented

in this section.

Let

(E,fi4)

be a

graph,

ao E E be a fixed

point,

and let B C E be a fixed set. A

graph (E, M)

will be called a

subgraph

of

(E, fi4)

if E C E and M

=

((a, a')

E fi4 a, a' E

E).

The

subgraph (E, M)

will be called a

vicinity

of ao if

(a (ao, a)

E

fi4)

C E. The

graph (E, fi4)

will be called a

B-graph

if the

points

of B are considered as

privileged points

of

(E, fi4).

Let

(El, Mi ), (E2, M2

be two

subgraphs

of

(E, fi4).

A

graph-isomorphism

g

El

-

E2

will be called a local

automorphism

of

(E, fi4).

A pseu-

dogroup

of

automorphisms [19, 20]

of

(E,fi4)

is a set r of local

automorphisms

of

(E,fi4) satisfying

the

following

conditions:

(a)

r contains the

identity automorphism

Id : E -

E, Id(a)

= a, for any

subgraph (E, M)

of

(E, fi4)>

(b)

if an

automorphism

g:

El

-

E2

is in

r,

then

g~~ E2

-

El

is in

r,

(c)

if the

automorphisms

g

El

-

E2, g' E[

-

E[ belong

to

r,

and

E2

n

E[ # 4l,

then the

automorphism

belongs

to r.

Let

(I, fir)

,

(E, fi4)

be two

graphs

and let r be a

pseudogroup

of

automorphisms

of

(E, fi4).

A

family

A of

graph-isomorphisms (called

local

charts)

~J

I

- E from

subgraphs (I,$i)

of

(E, fi4)

to

subgraphs (E, M)

of

(E, fi4)

will be called a r-atlas for

(E, fi4)

if it satisfies the

conditions:

a)

for each a E

I,

there exists

~J

I-

E in fir such that

I

is

a

vicinity

of a,

b)

if~Ji

ii

-

El,

~Q2

12- E2 belong

to fir and

ii n12 #

4l then

~J2o~Jj~

~Ji

(ii n12)

-

~J2

(ii

n

E2) belongs

to r.

Evidently,

the

family

r of all local

automorphisms

of G is a

pseudogroup

of

automorphisms

of G and A is a r-atlas for

(.

We consider a diamond

type

semiconductor

crystal doped

with donor

impurities.

Let

no

C R be the subset of all

points occupied by impurities.

The

crystal

can be identified with the

no-graph (

and modeled

by using

the

(o) -graph G,

where o

=

(0, 0, 0, o).

The set of all local

automorphisms

g

El

-

E2 satisfying

the condition

g(o)

= o if o E

Eli

is a

pseudogroup

of

automorphisms ro

of the

(o)-graph

G. If we assume that the minimum element of the set

(b (A, A') A, A'

E

no

is

greater

than one, then there exists a

ro-atlas Ao

for the

no-graph (,

whose local charts ~J

I

- E

satisfy

the condition ~J

(I

n

no

=

lo).

The

ro-invariant

mathematical

objects

we can associate to the

(o)-graph G,

can be carried on the

no-graph ( by using Ao

and

they

may be useful in

modelling.

Now,

we consider a diamond type semiconductor

crystal doped

with

acceptor impurities.

Let

(Aj j

E

J)

C R be the set of all

points occupied by impurities

and let

((Aj, A') j

E

J)

be the set of all absent covalent bonds

(Fig. 2).

~

JOURN~L DE PHYSIQUE I -T 3, h'll NOVEMBER 19Vl

(15)

Fig.

2. -A diamond type semiconductor

doped

with acceptor impurities. The covalent bond

(Aj,

A is absent.

The

crystal

can be identified with the

graph (R, £i),

where

£i

" £

( ((Aj, Aj j

E

J),

and described

by using

the "numerical"

graph (ti, Li ),

where

Li

=

L( ((o, o')),

o =

(0, 0, 0, 0),

and o'

=

(1, 0, 0, 0).

The set of all local

automorphisms

g :

El

-

E2

of

(ti,Li) satisfying

the condition

g(o)

= o

if o E

El,

and g

(o')

= o' if

o'

E

Eli

is a

pseudogroup

of

automorphisms ri

of

(ti, Li

If we assume that the minimum element of the set

(b (Az, Aj I, j

E

J)

is

greater

than

three,

then there exists a

ri-atlas AI

of

(R, £i),

whose charts ~J

fl

- E

satisfy

the conditions:

~J

(I

n

(Aj(j

E

J)) =(o)

and ~J

(I

n

(Aj j

E

J))

=

(o').

The

ri

-invariant mathematical

objects

we can consider on

(ti, Li

can be carried on

(R, £i by using Al

and

they

may be useful in

modelling.

In a similar way, for a

crystal

with vacancies

(Fig. 3),

we can use as model the "numerical"

graph (ti ( (o), L2),

where

1~2 =

ll~l llo,O°I,lo,o~l,lo,o~l,lo,o~ll)

U

llo°,o~l,lo~,o~ll.

7. Conclusions.

The

descriptions

in terms of

graph theory

offer new

possibilities

to extend some elements of the usual models from

perfect crystals

to real

crystals.

The mathematical

apparatus developed

for diamond type semiconductors can be

easily

extended to zincblende type

crystals (regular

or

distorted).

Extensions to other

regular

or

distorted tetrahedral structures

[15]

seem also to be

possible.

All the notions and results

presented

in this article can be extended to

higher

dimensional spaces

by using (0,1, 2,..

,

k

I)

instead of

(0,1, 2, 3),

Gk instead of G4.

(16)

N°11 TIGHT-BINDING METHOD IN TERMS OF GRAPH THEORY 2283

Fig. 3. - A

vacancy in

a

diamond

type

emiconductor. The atom

A and

the bonds

(A,

lk-I

n =

(no,

ni,

,nk-i)

E

Z~ ~jnj

E

(o;1) (7.1)

j=0

instead of

ti,

etc. This

possibility

and the ideas

presented

in section 6 may be useful in the

study

of the

quasicrystals [21-23].

The

physical phenomena

in a

crystal (for example,

in a semiconductor

device) depend

on the local

physical phenomena occurring

inside the

crystal.

The mathematical elements

presented

in section 6 may be useful in the

description

of the

physical phenomena

in a

crystal by taking

into consideration of the local

phenomena.

References

ill

Cotfas

N.,

J.

Phys.

Condens. Matter 3

(1991)

9279.

[2] Cotfas

N.,

J. Geom.

Phys.

lo

(1993)

107.

[3]

Kasteleyn

P-W-,

Graph Theory

and

Crystal Physics,

F.

Harary Ed.; Graph Theory

and Theo- retical

Physics (Acad. Press, London, 1967).

[4] K14man

M.,

J.

Phys.

France 50

(1989)

2475.

[5] Kireev

P-S-,

Semiconductor

Physics (Mir,

Moscow,

1974).

[6] Herman F., Phys. Rev. 88

(1952)

1210.

[7] Herman F.,

Physica

20

(1954)

801.

[8] Bassani F., Nuovo Cimento 13

(1959)

244.

[9] Kleinman

L., Phillips

J-C-,

Phys.

Rev. l18

(1960)

1152.

[10] Bassani F., Yoshimine M.,

Phys.

Rev. 130

(1963)

20.

[11] Bassani

F.,

Brust

D., Phys.

Rev. 131

(1963)

1524.

[12] Brust D.,

Phys.

Rev. 134

(1964)

A1337.

[13] Saravia

L-R-,

Brust

D., Phys.

Rev. 176

(1968)

915.

(17)

[14] Kittel

C.,

Introduction to Solid State

Physics (Wiley,

New

York, 1967).

[15] Parthe E.,

Crystal Chemistry

of Tetrahedral Structures

(Gordon

and Breach Science Publishers, New

York, London, 1964).

[16] Dieudonn£

J.,

Foundations of Modern

Analysis (Academic,

New

York, 1960).

[17] Weidmann J., Linear

Operators

in Hilbert

Spaces (Springer-Verlag,

New

York, 1980).

[18]

Cycon

H-L-, Froese R-G-, Kirsch W., Simon B.,

Schr6dinger Operators

with

Application

to

Quantum

Mechanics and Global

Geometry (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

[19]

Kobayashi S.,

Nomizu

K.,

Foundations of Differential

Geometry (Wiley-Interscience,

New York,

1963).

[20]

Kobayashi

S., Transformation

Groups

in Differential Geometry

(Springer, Berlin, 1972).

[21] Shechtman

D.,

Blech

I.,

Gratias D., Cahn J-W-,

Phys.

Rev. Lett 53

(1984)

1951.

[22]

Verger-Gaugry

J.-L., J.

Phys.

France 49

(1988)

1867.

[23] Levitov

L-S-, Rhyner J.,

J.

Phys.

France 49

(1988)

1835.

Références

Documents relatifs

Unité de recherche INRIA Rocquencourt, Domaine de Voluceau, Rocquencourt, BP 105, 78153 LE CHESNAY Cedex Unité de recherche INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, 2004 route des Lucioles, BP 93,

It is affirmative for models whose measurements have few outcomes and small trace norm (see section IV D ) and it is negative for measurements whose POVM elements are too long to

Since all machine learning models are based on a similar set of assumptions, including the fact that they statistically approximate data distributions, adversarial machine

Si la commune de Lattes a été choisie comme terrain d’étude pour cette recherche sur l’habiter au risque de l’inondation, parallèlement, elle l’a également été dans

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

In this work, we addressed the choice of transformed normalized expression profiles rather than raw counts for RNA-seq co-expression analysis under the framework of Gaussian mix-

We first introduce the notion of λ-K¨ onig relational graph model (Definition 6.5), and show that a relational graph model D is extensional and λ-K¨ onig exactly when the