• Aucun résultat trouvé

Scien&fic  reading  and  reviewing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Scien&fic  reading  and  reviewing"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Scien&fic  reading  and  reviewing  

(2)

WHY  AND  HOW  TO  READ  

RESEARCH  PAPERS?  

(3)

Why  read  research  papers?  

•  Read  for  a  conference  or  a  class  

•  Keep  current  in  your  own  field  

•  Get  “up  to  speed”  in  a  new  field  

–  Learn  about  a  sub-­‐field  (e.g.,  wireless)  

–  Learn  about  another  discipline  that  may  offer   solu&ons  to  a  problem  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(4)

Too  many  papers…  

•  Example:  Networking  Conferences  

–  SIGCOMM:  ~  40  papers   –  SIGMETRICS:  ~  20  papers   –  IMC:  ~  40  papers  

–  CoNext:  ~  30  papers   –  ICNP:  ~  30  papers  

–  Infocom:  ~  100  papers   –  Journals,  workshops,  …  

•  Per  year:  More  than  2,000  pages  to  read  

•  Impossible  to  read  it  all…  

–  doesn’t  even  count  cross-­‐disciplinary  reading  

(5)

Step  1:  Deciding  what  to  read  

•  Purpose:  Learn  about  “hot  topics”  of  current  

research  in  an  area.  (searching  for  problems,  etc.)  

•  Approach:  Scan  papers  in  latest  conference   proceedings  

•  Purpose:  Get  up  to  speed  on  sub-­‐field  

•  Approach:  Transi&ve  closure  of  related  work  of   papers  in  a  top  conference  

•  Purpose:  Learn  about  an  area  that  is  further  afield  

•   Approach:  Ask  expert  colleagues  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(6)

Step  2:  Deciding  How  to  Read  

•  Always  “top  down”  

–  First:  Abstract,  introduc&on,  conclusion     –  Rest  of  paper  if  necessary  

•  If  you  want  to  do  follow-­‐up  research  

•  If  you  want  to  beMer  understand  the  methods/conclusions  

•   Next  steps  depend  on  specific  purpose  

–  News  reading   –  Deep  diving  

–  Literature  survey  

(7)

Invariant  comprehension  ques&ons  

•  What  is  the  problem?  

•  What  are  the  contribu@ons?  

•  What  are  the  conclusions?  

•  What  is  the  support  for  the  conclusions?  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(8)

Invariant  Evalua&on  Ques&ons  

•  What  is  the  “intellectual  nugget”?  

–  Each  paper  should  have  a  single  key  intellectual  contribu&on  

–  Remembering  this  key  idea  will  also  give  your  brain  a  way  to  “index”  

the  paper  

•  What  is  the  main  conclusion/contribu&on?  

–  New  finding?    Method?    Perspec&ve?  

•  (Why)  is  the  conclusion  important?  

•  Does  the  content  support  the  conclusion?      

–  If  so,  how?      

–  Are  the  methods  sound?    In  other  words,  do  the  main  conclusions   appear  to  be  correct?  

–  Are  the  results  likely  to  be  affected  by  the  method?  

(9)

Prac&ce:  reading  conference   papers  

•  SIGCOMM  2014  best  papers  

–  Balancing  accountability  and  privacy  in  the  network  

–  CONGA:  Distributed  conges&on-­‐aware  load  balancing  for  datacenters  

•  MOBICOM  2014  best  papers  

–  Tagoram:  Real-­‐&me  tracking  of  mobile  RFID  tags  to  high  precision   using  COTS  devices  

–  EkhoNet:  High  speed  ultra  low-­‐power  backscaMer  for  next  genera&on   sensors  

•  CoNext  2013  best  paper  

–  Enhancing    video  accessibility  and  availability  using  informa&on-­‐bound  

references  

(10)

Reading  the  News  

•  Conference  proceedings  

–  Goal:  Grasp  main  idea  of  a  collec&on  of  a  large  number  of   papers.    Keep  informed  about  problems  and  recent  

solu&ons  

•  Top-­‐Down  Method  

–  Skim  table  of  contents:  Papers  are  clustered  into  

“sessions”  which  typically  iden&fy  the  main  areas   –  Consider  authors  

–  Priori&ze  by  (1)  area  of  interest  (2)  reputable  authors  

(11)

Deep  Diving  

•  Goal:  seek  to  understand  some  problem  area   in  greater  depth  

•  Find  the  seminal  paper  in  the  field  

•  Read  carefully,  including  evalua&on  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(12)

Literature  Surveys  

•  Create  the  seed  

–  Recent  paper  from  top  conference   –  Survey  paper,  if  one  exists  

–  Seminal  paper,  if  it  is  different  from  the  above  

•  Perform  transi&ve  closure  of  cited  work  

–  Read  related  work  sec&ons  of  above  papers  

(13)

Keeping  Notes  

•  One-­‐sentence  summaries  are  infinitely  beMer   than  nothing  at  all  

•  Primi&ve  approach:  Single  file  of  notes  

•  BeMer:  Database  with  BibTeX  

–  There  are  some  exis&ng  tools  for  bibliography   management  

–  Will  also  help  you  more  quickly  construct  related   work  sec&ons  for  your  papers  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(14)

From  Reading  to  Research  

•  A  major  reason  to  read  research  papers  is  to   obtain  new  research  ideas  

•  How  can  we  arrive  at  new  research  ideas  by   studying  papers  that  describe  “solved  

problems”?  

(15)

Some  Ques&ons  to  Ask  

•  Time  travel:  Will  the  solu&on  apply  n  years   from  now?  

•  Context  switch:  Does  the  solu&on  or  

technique  apply  to  other  problem  domains?  

•  Unfinished  business:  Does  the  paper  describe   future  work  or  direc&ons?    Open  problems?  

From:    N.    Feamster,  A.  Gray,  “Reading  and  Reviewing  Papers”  

hMp://www.gtnoise.net/classes/cs7001/fall_2008/syllabus.html#Schedule  

(16)

More  Ques&ons  

•  Follow  Up:  Can  the  claims  in  the  paper  be  

beMer  supported  using  other  methods?    Or,  

perhaps  refuted?  

(17)

Prac&ce:  from  reading  to  research  

(18)

Homework  3  

•  Literature  survey  for  the  project  (at  most  one  page,  not   coun&ng  references)  

–  First,  search  the  literature  to  iden&fy  the  most  relevant  papers   to  the  topic  of  your  project  

–  Second,  write  one  page  summarizing  these  related  papers.      

•  You  should  do  a  cri&cal  summary  of  each  paper,  highligh&ng  how  each   paper  contributes  to  the  state  of  the  art  

•  Clearly  iden&fy  the  seminal  paper  in  the  area  of  your  project  

–  A  seminal  paper  is  a  kind  of  "classic"  in  a  broad  meaning  of  the  term.  It  is  a   paper  which  has  served  as  a  model  for  other  papers,  which  first  has  

presented  an  influen&al  view  of  theory.  

•  Prepare  using  latex/bibtex  

•  Submit  one  PDF  file  

(19)

Notes  on  homework  

•  Some  things  to  pay  aMen&on  

–  Don’t  forget  your  name  

–  Follow  format  specified  on  the  web   –  Follow  page  limits  

•  Only  accept  submissions  by  deadline  

–  Deadline:  13  Oct  2014  11pm  CEST  

–  Submission  site:  hMps://&bre.lip6.fr/hotcrp/meth14-­‐03  

–  Reminder  

•  hMp://www-­‐npa.lip6.fr/~&xeuil/m2r/pmwiki.php?

n=Main.METHOD  

(20)

Recommended  reading  

•  S.  Keshav,  “How  to  read  a  paper”,  ACM  Computer   Communica3on  Review,  July  2007.    

–  hMp://blizzard.cs.uwaterloo.ca/keshav/home/Papers/data/07/paper-­‐

reading.pdf  

Références

Documents relatifs

REPRÉSENTATION DUALE DE LA DÉMARCHE SCIENTIFIQUE.. LA

NAR requires that every similar image (s i > 0 ) in the searched data set or image domain is ranked by the tested CBIRS, or in other words the result list must contain all

.: In addition, it will be useful to provide the context to the contribution by stating what is the problem or question the author is attempting to solve or answer. .: The summary

To aid manual reviews of model-based specifications and in particular, the review of behavioral requirements and functional design, we proposed the use of a dedicated review model

Ahlame Douzal-Chouakria, Universit´ e Grenoble Alpes, France Jos´ e Antonio Vilar Fern´ andez, University of A Coru˜ na, Spain Pierre-Fran¸ cois Marteau, IRISA, Universit´ e

It is intended to engage patients in their own care in a more active way, to encourage their curiosity about the medications they are taking, and to empower them to communicate

I fi nd it hard to take care of these patients in addition to my own, especially because every time I attend the nursing home, I am given a pile of medication reviews and told that

Keywords: South Africa, blind spot, Breyten Breytenbach, ekphrasis, etching, Paris, pictorial text Mots-clés: Afrique du Sud, angle mort, Breyten Breytenbach, ekphrasis,