• Aucun résultat trouvé

Reviewing a colleague's orders.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Reviewing a colleague's orders."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Pratique clinique Clinical Pract ice

QUESTION

I have a large family practice. One of my colleagues recently became ill, and I agreed to assist with his practice for the next few months. Other colleagues are helping as well, but his patients at a local nursing home are my responsibility. I fi nd it hard to take care of these patients in addition to my own, especially because every time I attend the nursing home, I am given a pile of medication reviews and told that I have to sign them or the patients will not be able to get their medications. I am concerned about my legal lia- bility if I sign the reviews without seeing the patients, and about the risk to patients if the medications are suddenly stopped. How should I handle this?

ANSWER

Th is seems like a time for clinical and administrative discretion. Certainly, if you sign the authorization for the medications to continue and a patient has a bad outcome, your judgment in ordering those medi- cations will be called into question. If you refuse to sign the medication reviews and a patient suff ers as a result of the medication being discontinued, the rea- sonableness of your decision will also be examined.

Since you are going into the nursing home, you are presumably seeing patients. Because you are there, you would be expected to review patients’ histories, including their medication histories. When you do this review, you should decide whether patients’ med- ications are appropriate and, if you think they are, sign the appropriate forms. Even if a routine review does not come up for another week or 10 days, your assess- ment will give you a solid basis upon which to decide whether medications should be continued or discon- tinued before you sign the forms.

If you are asked to sign a medication review form for a patient you have not yet seen, the ideal approach, of course, would be to see and assess the patient, review the medications, and then authorize continuation or modifi cation as you see fi t. You will be fully responsible for your decision. Th is clearly would take time and would interfere with your abil- ity to manage your own patients.

Alternatively, you could ask the nursing staff whether they have concerns about specifi c patients whose medi- cations have come up for review. In the absence of con- cerns that might lead you to think a patient should be assessed or the medications specifi cally reviewed, you might ask whether the nursing home administration, in this unusual situation, is prepared to have the medica- tions continued unchanged until you can carry out a proper review or the original physician returns and can carry out his or her own review. If the administration is willing to allow delay, you could set aside some time in the near future specifi cally for seeing and assessing these patients and completing their medication reviews.

Although it will mean spending more time at the nursing home, it is both your ethical and your legal duty to take reasonable steps to ensure that patients do not come to harm through either your action or your inaction.

Reviewing a colleague’s orders

Philip G. Winkelaar, CD, MD, CCFP

Although laws governing medical practitioners are similar across the country, they can vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Specifi c answers to questions cannot be given in a national publication. While the information in this article is true in general, it is intended to bring issues to your attention, not to give specifi c advice. You should consult a lawyer if you have specifi c concerns. Members of the Canadian Medical Protective Association can contact the Association at 1-800-267-6522.

Readers may submit questions on medicolegal issues by fax to Dr Philip Winkelaar at (613) 725-1300. They will be considered for future Medicolegal Files.

FOR PRESCRIBING INFORMATION SEE PAGE 293

Medicolegal File

VOL 5: FEBRUARY • FÉVRIER 2005dCanadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 205 Dr Winkelaar, a Fellow of the College, is a Medical Offi cer at the Canadian Medical Protective Association in Ottawa, Ont.

Références

Documents relatifs

It may, however, be worth pointing out that in case the operation of modulation leaves the core meaning unaltered, the possibilities of the "conditional interpretation"

La diversité des paysages canadiens Fiches de devinettes Réponse : Réserve de parc national Gwaii Haanas Je suis sur une île. Je suis sur la côte ouest

Cigarette smokers who inhale the smoke or breathe it in can (develop –lead –damage) lung cancer more than non-smokers. Other smokers (which- who –when) only take the smoke into

I would like to remind you that the Intergovernmental Committee at its first ordinary session in Tokyo expressed its support for the Secretariat to prepare a Manual to

It is intended to engage patients in their own care in a more active way, to encourage their curiosity about the medications they are taking, and to empower them to communicate

From the above it will be seen that the whole problem of air pollution by motor traffic is extremely complicated, both on account of the increase in the

At the risk of provoking the charge of medical paternalism, I am con- vinced as a practitioner that one of the most fundamental missions of the medical and health fraternity

This points to an area for further research since, although there is no evidence to suggest that the “decoding” process of the Mate- rial History Framework for Historical