'-
I
A STUDY OF THE CHARACTERISTICS, ORGANIZATION, AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE CO-CURRICULAR ~. r.. RAMS IN THE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES
TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED
(Without Author's Permission)
GEORGE SAMUEL CROCKER
c.. . J
362Z96
, '
','
\ '
, ,
, 0
• • J, -,', ,
00
I ',1
.~
" '
"
! . . .
, • . ' b
" " ' }
, "
,
'.
'• I; ,',
" '
.... r '
..
.,
, ,
.
".
'A
STUDY OF',THE, CHARACTERiSTICS, ORGANiZATION;'~
-ADMINISTRATION'" ' , ' • ' . ' , , " : ; . , ' 0 \
" ,', . OF THE oC~-CURRICULAR PROGRAMS IN THE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOQ~S
J'-.' -
'\.,' o.
> o
"
"
" '.
'.
OF NEWFOUNDJ,.AND AND LABRAOOR
-.
,
· r·,~,~ ':
" ·A Thesis". ' ,
0, ,
, \
, ' Submitted to
"
.
'0'
Meinorial' 'University '(If Newfoundland
.
,and
'oi •
',Th~' Deijlrtment of Educational 0 Administution'
,"
" ,
: "
!I .
~, II
, " ,
, '
.Af
.
. ~. ~o ~
. "
'"
"
Of" I
. " ....
, " . , '0' f ' ,
.
In Partial -Fulfillment ,,'~'.' of, the Requir.eriient:s for the D~gree /
:'~.' ,
.. Master of Education
- !;,
I ,
by
George Samuel Crocker
..
·August 1973
."
. ..
"
0"
o.
.
, , '' "
"t.,
"
.... , ~ t . "
\
.
)
. 0
"
"
.
- .
"
..
/. ,
,'.
"
, .
."
",.
~. ..
,. .
,
.
:
..,
, .\ '
"
. '
/. -:
,I '
.OJ , ,"
't ... ,
~ , ..
If
I
~"
,j.
. '
, "
.',
"
.. '.'
..
-' " '"
.
.' .;-i
.. .,
.
.' - ./" "-.
", . '~.'
j
...
,
I .
" .
--
...
, ,
. " , I.
,I, "
.1',
• t-
( ,
. !,,' '"
,., ' r
, '
.
,, .'
. !1.
.
,, "
", ';
,,'
"
" . .:
,.'
' ..
..
'," .'
.
'"
,"
I "
~
"
i. '.
" . -".
.: , ~
' t' :
-, ,
" -~
. .
'; '. - , ~"" .
, ')'<5
~,. ... ( .'
.
~. :
~ ~\' .
'J ','
"
' .
',
.
Geprge Samuel Crocke(
",
" .
."
~ ,
.... I' •
i i·
, '
.~
'" .
, ,
,
, 1 ••
','
. '. ':-.'
'. ,
, ' , '
" , .
"
" , -,
..
,,' .
, ' \1 .'
.... ; .
.' .
'.,
. .... ~
: '. ~ .
;,
"
.'
"'
. .: .
~ , .<
....
, "
i ·
"
",
i :
.~" 1
:. .
' •• 1 •
," \ "
. ' .. '
.
'. ,. "
':'.
.' '
,"
,"
.
'... .
\.
,lip,. '0"
; ,
J .•.
I', '.
\ .-'
....
",
'",II
, "
.
.
, "" .0' .
'"
.
"
"
"
~ ''.
, "
',, ' .;. 1
, r
"
."
'i to
.
"~ . .,
,'. ,
.
~>:'-' '
,,'
• I
" '
"
"
,
,
: Q
"
, I
. ,
MEMORIAL' UNIVE,RSITY OF NEWF.OUNDLAND
0,
COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES
"The undersigned certify th'ab they have read, and recommend to
. " ~ , , I. I
the ,Co~1:ttee on' Graduate Studies for' acceptariG,e. a thesis entitle~
~~
, ---
itA Study of the Charactei).,Stics, Organization, and Administration of . 'The Co-curricular Programs in the I Regi~na~ 'High Schools in Newfoundland
and Labrador" submtt ~ed by George'
a J -. • • •
Samuel Crocker in part'ial
. ! ' ' " "
fulfilment. of the requirement:' for the Degree
. ..
, of Haster of Education."
.
'...
~...
~..
,.. , ... .
" Supervisor
.
-' ... , ., • 1 •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' 4 ' ••• • ,_, • • • • • • •
.. ' "l
.
", I
,
.
-I,
· ...
'... .
, ' . .
.
, '
Date
...
~... .
'D'
, '
" i i i
·
".
"",' ' \
/
.
,.
"
'/
'5.l •
'.-"
"
.
, '
I '
/~ .
/ '
I
' .
'. '
' . j
). I ,
"
, ,
','., I . ( ,
.'
1
ACKNOWLEUGEMENTS
. ;/:
p. "" \
.The writer ,wishes to, e,xpress his gratitude ' . .
. -
for the ~ssistanc·e •
. . : '
.
Dr. R. D. Fish~r. the· supervisor of this
I '
, ,I
'. . , : ,
also, expressed' to the ,princ:ipal~ . of the
Regional High Schools who took time from" tbeir ~chedules to "complete' the questionnaire.' Without' their help' this study' ~~uid not.· have be,~n . pos~ible.
.
,I •
,
.
"
,Finally, the writer wishes to express ,appi:ecia~iOlI to his
.wife, for her patience~ ,encouragemen.t, and assistance whlle the thesis was bEdng pr:epaf ed .
,," "
\ '
.~ ...
'
.
. r
\ '
,.,..
,
. .
, ' o
•
. , '
Co
"
iv
,~ ;.
, "
, "
" '
, .
. -:;\. '-'
" .
• " ,",,"~~. <t'). 'r'
1 ~'
.;
'.
-
",',
.'
., "
.. ~-r:-'.~ .,. I:' , .
" '
.. '" ~ .
j .
r: '.'
'. ,:.~;.,.. ~
.~ .
,': .
', ~ , . , .
. :" !,:. ',;' . ~::~.:,
'e, r,o 'i'/',,". ';" • JJ , ,iJ
( ) ' " 1 " •
':.' ..
( ,
."
, '
. I
..
. " ..
f'
) ,
'.
"
"
.
. P ..
.'
,1
'I':f
( ,
/
'~'ABSTRACT
' ..
',
.
. '
The purpose" of this study w~s to survey the"Regiorial' H!gh I, Schools of Newfoundland and Labrador" to
~scert'ain
what the currentI I ,
J I
practice~ were relative to, the ~haracteristics, organization, ~d' , administration 'of the c07'curricul{lr .activity '.'~rograms. To this end_
\
-
the!37 principals oLthe regional high s~h~ols were surveyed byq questionnaire and a 78 percent return was realized.
MAJOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
,1. The size of the regional high, schools q~d no signifi~ant ' i~fluence with respect to the characteristi~s, organizatr~n, and administration of the co-curricular programs.
, ,(2; An', overall aver,age of 66 .,~. percent of the staff members
participated in co~curricular activities. ..
....
3. The most-ad~quate activity in terms of student n~eds and in~_erests was 'sports .. for boys and ,girls. The !'activities which'; t,he , principa1s felt needed to be improved were subje~t related cfubs
(I .
I ' ,
·and school publicat4ons.
,
,,
.
,
4. The
s~h ~eduling
of a.ctivitype:ri,o:?~
during the~,QiiOOL
day'.
)... '.
,,"""
,"
is prq'(dded fn ~ew schools. T~e pe,ri~d6 which.·w~re~,.~chedu~ed
, ~. ~ .. ( .
. represented 1.'79 percent
oi":~her to~al ~n8tructi\lr\~'1
periods.' .. "'''lff ',t""t; ",'J\' • • ' •
~ . . ;(' '''t~ "\ . \'1
5. The principal' appointed: the spt1'nsor.s<' who h,ad the gr~ate'st,
. ~ . ~.. • • i' t:04. , ' , .
" • J. t :.. ~ \ ".... - ' . "
interest in' a~d abiltty to pB-tfo:~JIl.,tlle required ,duties. fOT; the
o . ). •
,. .1 ')
, • J. I "(A."/,,,,,,:I \ J '
... '" , -1 ~ .t I l , J '
,.' .'
"
. I "
.'
, )
I
, . ~ t
"
" ,{ ~ .. ' ~'.,
.J
, .
, !. 'C'~. ,~ ,
,' , ' .,'
. .. .
.'
...
,
.
:
.
,
.
'. '
. ~
- . .
t'
' }
,
.
\ ,
ri, ,
.... '0, • ~ ...
.
, C'
'n
, ,
, ,
"
.
~ .. .
,
.
I
"
" vi,
f
particular co-cu~ricular activ~ty. , ..
I '
6. The principal, was the person' usually ~esponsible for direction
,, ' J
and supervision of activities.( : ..
I '
7. Fund'raising act.ivit:t'es by students was the' ba!3~c means whereby
.
.
.. . \principal's
f~nanced
theirco~,cu~;~~':'7ar ' '.~togr;a~s .
', 8. Teachers did not receive
an~ ~tra
pay for the extra work'done, '
in sponsoring . .co-curricular acti,vitie's.' , ,
9. The participation, rate by students, in at least one acUvity,
4i
was less than 70 perc~nt in 58 percent of the' schools.
10 • . The ~ost s~tious' probl~m p~incipals had was'scheduling
.... , . .;'/ .
activities at a 'time which ~as compatibl~ with bus schedules.
, '
MAJOR.SUGGESXIONS
",
1. "
Each principal should evaluate each of the co-curricula~:act;.ivities in 'his 'school' s program, and deteniline ,
.
'which, of the, "activities'are ~eeting the goals of the .program.
I ' ,
2. The; studen't council' should play mor'e of an 'in tegrai part i~
the o'rganiza tion and a?minis tra tion o, .f; the pro grams. .. ~
6 '
,,3. Principals should make greater efforts to get students involved
-, '
in at least one co-curricular activity:,
\ 4. Schop,l boards should give adequate support from their budget
"J' -
I " ",
. '
~ , ' ,- -, "the' co-curricular activities' in ,the ,schools. '
to , -,
'.
5. ,',Teachers workloads and the .human iEYSOUrCes of the community
sho'u1ci be considered when sponsors for 'the various activities are'
.
:,being assigne~. '
,'.'
.. ~ .
",
/-
", .
,1'7"
. - -
,
.
, \
" '/','
'\
\ ' ,
, .
: • / /'
, . ', " , /'
"
0: .
~ ,.'" vii
,,'
'.'
-
. , ," 6, Co-currlc'u1ar ac:t l vitiea 'which ·1.lave greatest ed~c'ational
/ '
. '. 'II
~.
l' J. value Bhou~ 'bj scheduled' during ,regular 'class. hours.
.' .
,
, \. ' .
. ...
"
1 i.I I ' ~ to
..
I / I"I
' ,• •
" I "
. ' /. ,
.
"
'1:' , , ,.""
I ...s
" j .,
.
,,' J-"
r...
" , " ' '"
'b
, , ).
,
'j , .
'"
J I .
" oS ","
\ '
,
r-
. , , . '/
'-'-,--i.
,
, ,
.'
.
, ". .
-: -.. l' ~
-
, , '..
,J .. ;..
," , ,
" .
,
. ..
.,...". , ,
\,. ,~\
":
. ./
, ,
'" '"
. ~~ . \ . . . #" •
I ,
.
",~
.
i9 ' ,
,
~.
. .
-, , ,. ! \': \ '.
.
)-. . . '.IiI...
\ ., Q
"
, I , - ~" '\..
~1 ~ ".,v
" J
,
.
;,-;
, ,
(~ "~
,~
"
! " ,
,
TABLE :'OF CONTEN:rS , ,
CHAPTER'
/
G PAGE" , r~'
f~\:'
\J: , .. ~ .1 ' INTRODUCTION
· · ·
•· 3l~
t~\tl '1!~/ "\'~ 0 ; 0 1l ' -
NEED FOR THE STUDY 0
·
0 '\ ,3STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM , • • •
..
0 5.
~ ;,M.l~ir"
'I'DELIMITATIONS
~'I !--~TATIONS:
OF THE STUD:Y 0, 7,~
...
De1imitat ions '0 , 0 0 0 7 -,Limitations. 0
·
0· ·
0· · .
" 7"10 ,
DEFINITION OF TERMS 'J '.
· · .'
"Co-curricular '.l\ctivities
·
•·
10Regional' High School 0 ~
·
~ • • 0.. .
".
11---
,Activity Period
· ·
0· ·
~ 11Sponsor (advisor) ,
.
11· · · · · · · ·
,METllOD AND ~ROCEDURE ~ , 12
The Instrument
· · ·
.,1'-~---
. ~ 12" The Pilot', Stu~y
·
-'·
.,r7"·~· ·
0 I. .
,.
13I' , t~
Procedure
·
• " 0· ·
".
, ,. .
1 ,"14 f' Design'
. ·
,· · · ·
"•
". ' . ·
ORGANIZATION. OF THE STUDY
·
! ~. ".
15sriMMARy
,~I~( ." .. ·
I • 16•
. 2 REVIEW OF THE·
, •·
• 18HISTORY
. · ·
0·
,·
0 " 0·
, 18 ...ORGANIZAT)~N AND ~MINISTRATION 0 20'
,. ,,' · " .... '-
Sch~duling 'Practices" .. '~' .... ~ .... ; .. '~ .. ' .. " 20 ,
.
'.
~
,
-
.' ,,~ .• .r:.J."';~'.I' '~ ""
. .
.
~-
r
f i'
I'
~ .. '
" '
.
,,~
.:;.
,
..
' ~CHAPTER
~5
rr'
,', , ,
" , i ' ....
Fi.nancing the
~4~~~r~e~~r
<,
. . ,. . . .
Participation " • \ ~
Administrative
Pro~ems
SUMMARY
.,
~rograms
'. . . .'.
.
,,
'/
SUMMARY
AND'
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FtIRTHER" STUDY,l '
RECO~NDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY , ,
.
BI~~I0GRAPHY
APPENDIOES
" ,
. ' . .
......
".
,A B
,
t.,~:...-=-~ .. IO·~"~·
"
....
..
I l
, ,.., 41
.
~._ ....
.//" ~-">" ~"
.. ,t,1' .......
, ,.
J. ,"
,.
'"
"
"
"
,
.
,, '
.'
, '
"
"
, , ,
-
'":.
f
'
..
, ,
,.
• L
p' x
PAGE
121 '122 124
"',
, " 127
~ •
.
129,'<---
.
'.
132146
.
'.
•. 148"
"
,155
"
----~---~----
, "
\
:\.
"
,'\ ~ ,
- .
....
t '
~ ,
r" •
"
.
","
" ,
, if
,
.
T~LE
L
2.
.-"
"
-, '/
- , !
i
_ D
:,
.
" -. .
'l
I
~.,
, Ii,
"i-
-I f'
, . ~(
I
i
/
I
I
- ~ LIST, OF TABLES
-
.
, , ,J'
' Nu~lr o~
! .: Questionnair~-B
Sent Out., Number ,of"
,QJestionnaires' Returned, 'and Percent, 0; Rsrn"
, I
- l\ccording to School
-En~olment classifi~a~io
- • •,
,
I
, 0
School Designation Number, Size of School-I , , and 'c, Extent
jr:i
Participationb~ FU1H~
Staff Me,cl,ers,I
,According to School Enrolment:~u~~~
of Schools Witha~d'
Without RegularlyI
Scheduled Activity' Yeriods During In-Class Hours.l , 'Accordi~g
to Size of SC'hool • • • • • • • • • • • •~.
. , . · . '
~.
,',
I .
," 44
,46
49 :4. Sch,eduled Time of Activities, Number o,f Schools
.
I!
i- ,
, i
5/.
,
.
. ~ .
..,- I '"
...
..:
f "
I
I'
I
,I / __
.
'.
'~.j
- ' ,-
'i ,
-~ I
j
! '
,i .
I '
I .'
, I
',{ ,
/~ I '
7.
1 -' I
"
by' Enrolment, and
Avera~mb~~ ofo D~ys P~~
• , - f
0 ' ,
..
.
. ' .Week 'in "Each Time Block
. . . . . ' . . . . .
. ,"
-, In-Clag.~ .. and Out~0f.-Ci8438·-. , Accordin'g to School.., ' Size
,
: .
,'..
" / ' 'Number of TimeaCo-curricular Acti~t~es are Offered
,
. .
'Per Week, on the Basis_pf the ,Num~er of Schools, by Sch'ool Size, and rn,-ClasG and Out-of-Criiss Time
, , -
Blocks
•
/) '-_.
.
Stunmary of Activities' Spons'ored 'and Their Time of , , ,Meeting, in Schools Reporting, According to
.
'.! ' .
· .
•
. .
:' ' School E~ro~ent • 0 • • ~!!,
· . . . . .
'~',
'.,
.. :... . ... ,
.
... ... ,.(i. ~ ; "':-:.:.: -....
'"
. .
Q. .'
":'
. '
. '
50 , .
.. . .
, 52,:
,53,
~ ,54
'\
,.
" : --.,.,-. ,. .
r .,
"
',.,
'-
..
',
1 -
:" ~.~ \
\ '
: .-;' " A/
;}:~
.•
:"'~ ... ;:.
" ., "
~ .. ,
.'
.......•
.' .'
, ''';' :-
--"
.
'.
'. "
.:.:,.~~ .. :, "
:'
, "
"
/ '" .
.' .'
', f
t,
~ -', , .. , .
"",,!,"
')
.
'~'I
, ,
.
.
,
/
/'
/, I \ \
. ~' ,- ' .
.
"" '
"
, .. .
" '
<1, •
. .. • C'.
,TABLE . :,
. ,
- ' l> ''8~ h-;M~lln' N~ber
o'f.~tudent P~tt:i.'cipa~~s '
in"E,a'chActiv~ty
., . . . . ' ~ ' . . . ' _ , . 0 . ', •
. ~
. . 9.,
, 0
(\ ' .. by' S,chool ',Enr,?lmEmt, 'Accor~ing' to NtiInber of
. ,Schoois ~epoit'~ng
. .
, -,
'~ ': . '. .'. . , .
".
,.
~{ ,-Principals' Estimat~ of'~he P~rcent of Stu~ent ,
~, " . " H '
. ~
.
~n ~t L~aat
'OneA~tiV;Lty, ':CCO '~~li~g ,
~m.:::.'!:'~~~!~= " , '. "
~0'1u~er Enrolment Classificatic:?n ".'
~
-"
~ ." • . i~. , p~1nC1pai::
i;,nk0 \~Of rmport~nce
of those" , • Act vitiea ·which e£m to be Valued· Most. Highly
" by
S~Uden:S.' A~C~~~~ .\~r~\.
toNum~er .', '
Of' Schools .;~:
..
xii . PAGE
,'. ':'
. .
- ' .68...
..
78
• • by
Enrolmentclass"i~[ca,t~
• ..' .' ..~ . .', . . .
4 . ' 80.'
.
, lL..
: . '. . , ;1'\1 '
Device~
Used'inAcqua1nting \~tudents
.with the Programof' Ac"tivi'Ues, A~cord'1ng to School Enrolment',' ' .
~
Classification . ' . . • • • • • ' ,'
. ' .
,~' . . .
1:2. , . Met;hodlf _Vsed t<;> Assist Studepts in Ma~ing Choices of,
. ~ . tf' ' .
" ,I
. ...
82
, " (:'J
x.i';"'"
,: . ' ~ .'~
Activities in: which they ParticipS'te, Accord.ing to ,
"
". '
"
• • {J •
o 0' 00 ,: 0 . ' . " d '. ' • ~
School Enrolment Cla'ssification • ; • ~ r • • ' . ' . , .,;. , ",
.. ~ .
.
, .,
~?
.
,;.~ Methods Use~ to Regulate Student Participation,'o , .
According to School Enrolmenf Classification
<J
' .
.,.
i4:.
e' ' .
Practices 'Used for the Direction 6r~upervision ofo~ of . ' ~
• . the Tb~l Act~~ty to Enrolment " ." ,
, ". " -' ; ~., -• : • . ' a -
'e " Classification .' . ~ •.••... : . • • • •
. . "
". :
. .
• .' 0.practices· Used for ·the Selectio~ of Sponsors.
• :
' A~c9rding
to, School' Enrolme'n't .' • ' .• 0_" • • . .","",:. • • • • t t , . . :
, ~
~ 16. ptactices Used,
.
.. .for the Appointm~n~ , ' of. , Sp~nsor~" , .,. .. ", :" "Acc~r,di'bg to Scho,,~. Enrolment •
~ ,
. . . . .
.. ... .
. ,
... "
.I
.~;. .
.,'
.. I' " • ,
a . \). ,
" . .' .
'.: .. "
.
,.
....,.
, '..
, ', "
.,83
85
' , ' ,
-' '.' o
.~ "
,~.
\ r~
" "
~
'. - !to
~ ~. ~. '- ..• J .: ....
~ R . . .
'.
"
'.
,J
" ~.
.. '.
"".",
: ..... ~
..
... , ... ', .
. ..~
", ~'
'1 . '
TABLE, ,17. '
: ;, 18 ..
19
I21. "
'22.
"
, I
1 .
!
. ,,'
-
, ."
'\',
,, q
, "
i
\ '
" ) '
Desh'able Qualifications ,in' th~ 'Selecti~n' ~l
- ,
6 '
Sponsors, According to School Enroiment ,and a'
Rating 'from 1 t,o 5 " • , ,' ,. , I • . ' • I ,~ .!
· . . .
, - : ' f" " ,
,Procedure for Getting Activities Approved, , .
,
.
'According to School Enrolment I • I ' , • 0' " • ,I . ' .
Numb~~
of.~Ch~Ol~K:ePin~ , se.1-~~ te~ Rec~rds,
According to Sc l'Enrolment. I ' • • • • ' I
.~ ... -... -:.
,Ratings by Prinaipals of Methods Used in Financing
• I •
, ,
• ".f,.. '
the Co-curricular Activities Program, Accoroi~g
• II 1 • .'
.,.
, '. ."
_4~t~r:::·""' ..
xiii
-PAGE"
, ' , p
" .. ' ~ ,
.
: '., ~. , ' ..
,
. .
92, ,
" 93 ...
, ,
to School Enrolment • I I
. . . . . .
~· . . .
95 'Number of Schools Receivipg Financial Assistance from
" \ . ,
the School Board f~r Admini~tering the
~Co-curricular Program, According to Type of
Activity and Number of Schools by Enrolment, • 96
Numbe~ of Principals Reporting Limitations or
..."
". , J,
.
:'..r;'lad~ of 1.imitations Plac~d on Cost of Participation,'/ ,
Borne,by Students or School; By the School Boa!d;
.
,'0 -,Principal; P.T.A.;, or Other Groups; Accord~ng
, ,
to School Enrolment. • ~" . • • ." .
23.'
~ , ~ N~?er , oi sCho~'i s Gr~n:~g Gra~u~iln
· . .
pCredit ~ot , I
· . .,
98, 24,
_ ~. t
•• ,. -:*
Certain Co-curricular' Activ.iti~s, According to
. . .-
. . . ...
School Enrolment ' . • -.-":: . • ,:~ -' . '.. • .' .' • ,. •
·
.. :.:..:, "'~)~~'::":'. .. \ '.
Method~ Used to Inform', ~~rents ~ega:;-ding the School \
.~ .~. ' " I'.~
Co-curricular Progra~, Accordirlg to Schooi '
Enrolment
. . . .. . . ' .
'4:.'
, , :
.
9~
.:, 101
,
,'.
',~ ;(.
. {& .
• .... . r
;l;r
- ~; ',
~r-
, .-: .
-
,~.r" .
, ,
.
i' . '
.
.'~
,
~.
"
,
.
'" .
. .
.TABLE"
25.
26.-
. '
/(
.
.~
. ...
Num~er of'School~ Using Major '~ources of ~uhlici~y,
p -
• I "
~ccording to School'. Enrolmen t ', ' • • ,. • • '. '. • • •
.. ... , , I
pri~cipal~
....Ra~i~gs o~ Ad~qu'a~y .'
of .''Pubii~i~y Cov~rage
,.
~ • 1 ."
.
".
. ~f A,ctivities., According ,t"o Sclio'ol Enrolment ',.
. . '. .
~7.
'" - \ . . . . , . . ' " ,
'.' princ:lpal;s' Ratings
~f Ade~ua~y
of Co-curricular" "
"-
"
28.
Activitie~ in which their'Schoo1s are I~volved,
, " According to School Etlrolment~. •..• •
• I • • •
Principals"Ratings of the Problems they Experience
• ~ ,_ .II :~._ _ •
: in Administering Co-curric~lar
-
Activities"xiv' PAGE
',102
,103
lOS' .
Accordi~g to. Sc~oo~ Enrolment·" ... '. . • " • ,
.
' . 106'29, Non-Staff Personnel Involved in Co-curricular
30.
' ....
(.: Ai:. tivitie~, According- to S~h?ol Enrolment
'Areas of Involvement of Non-Staff Personnel in
Co-curricular Programs, Acc,ording to School Enrolment ,~; , ,
. . . . . . . . . '. . . .
31. Principais'
Op~nion
onExtr~
Payfo~
Teachers' Co-curricular Duties,. According to Schoolt·
.. ,'Enrolment •
'. J
, '
I : '
-
..• : • I
~
,.,.\
/ ~. . . .
. ~
. ..
' : ,': .
" ..
~ ( I
,',
..
""
.
... . . .
109I "
.. 111
. .
112•
.. I) "
, . ' :L
•
; '"
"
e'
." ~
-'
"
"
,.. '
•
"
..
"",
v
-,
',: '
''-..,. " "
.
, '."
"
"
FIGqRE,
"
,-
\:, , : ' I
",
,0
LIST OF. FIGURES
1/ ., ...
. ..
. .
,... , "
1.
~ ... '.
9rgani~ationa1 Structure for, the C?-curricu1ar '.
Programs of the New£o~dla~d and Labrado~
"
, -
Regional High· Schools
..
'.
2 ... A Type 9f Organizational' Structure for th~' , 'Administra~ion'" of ,Co-curricular Programs
d·.,A..~. \.,.."";',.
"v'·'
,,, '
"
, .;
j',
" '
',-
,-
. .
"
, "
\ \
"
"
'.
' . . p '
,
.
, ,",
;::"
. .
',.
.
'Q '
\~ "
'. '
... I ._ .. _ . r
" \'
• • e' •
'.';. •. ·0
'-
'\ I
\
\'
.
,..:
.'
"PAGE
: 137
• 0
.
(,
, eo"
139 , "
, .
"
, "-.2.
'd
"
. .
. <
" ;.
"
M
~J' .. -; ,
."
-,
-·-F