• Aucun résultat trouvé

MAY 10

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "MAY 10"

Copied!
197
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

'-

I

A STUDY OF THE CHARACTERISTICS, ORGANIZATION, AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE CO-CURRICULAR ~. r.. RAMS IN THE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES

TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED

(Without Author's Permission)

GEORGE SAMUEL CROCKER

(2)
(3)

c.. . J

362Z96

(4)
(5)

, '

','

\ '

, ,

, 0

J, -,', ,

00

I ',1

.~

" '

"

! . . .

, . ' b

" " ' }

, "

,

'.

'

I; ,',

" '

.... r '

..

.,

, ,

.

"

.

'

A

STUDY OF',THE, CHARACTERiSTICS, ORGANiZATION;'

~

-ADMINISTRATION'

" ' , ' ' . ' , , " : ; . , ' 0 \

" ,', . OF THE oC~-CURRICULAR PROGRAMS IN THE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOQ~S

J'-.' -

'\.,' o.

> o

"

"

" '.

'.

OF NEWFOUNDJ,.AND AND LABRAOOR

-.

,

· r·,~,

~ ':

" ·A Thesis

". ' ,

0, ,

, \

, ' Submitted to

"

.

'0'

Meinorial' 'University '(If Newfoundland

.

,

and

'oi

',Th~' Deijlrtment of Educational 0 Administution'

,"

" ,

: "

!I .

~, II

, " ,

, '

.Af

.

. ~. ~

o ~

. "

'"

"

Of" I

. " ....

, " . , '0' f ' ,

.

In Partial -Fulfillment ,,'~'.' of, the Requir.eriient:s for the D~gree /

:'~.' ,

.. Master of Education

- !;,

I ,

by

George Samuel Crocker

..

·August 1973

."

. ..

"

0"

o.

.

, , '

' "

"

t.,

"

.... , ~ t . "

\

.

)

. 0

(6)

"

"

.

- .

"

..

/. ,

,'.

"

, .

."

",

.

~. ..

,. .

,

.

:

..,

, .

\ '

"

. '

/. -:

,I '

.OJ , ,"

't ... ,

~ , ..

If

I

~

"

,j.

. '

, "

.',

"

.. '.'

..

-' " '"

.

.' .;-i

.. .

,

.

.' - ./" "-

.

", . '~.'

j

...

,

I .

" .

--

...

, ,

. " , I.

,I, "

.1',

t-

( ,

. !,,' '"

,., ' r

, '

.

,

, .'

. !1.

.

,

, "

", ';

,,'

"

" . .:

,.'

' ..

..

'

," .'

.

'"

,"

I "

~

"

i. '.

" . -".

.: , ~

' t' :

-, ,

" -~

. .

'; '. - , ~"" .

, ')'<5

~,

. ... ( .'

.

~. :

~ ~\' .

'J ','

"

' .

',

.

Geprge Samuel Crocke(

",

" .

."

~ ,

.... I'

i i·

, '

.~

'" .

, ,

,

, 1 ••

','

. '. ':-.'

'. ,

, ' , '

" , .

"

" , -,

..

,,' .

, ' \1 .'

.... ; .

.' .

'.,

. .... ~

: '. ~ .

;,

"

.'

"'

. .: .

~ , .<

....

, "

i ·

"

",

i :

.~" 1

:. .

' •• 1

," \ "

. ' .. '

.

'. ,. "

':'.

.' '

,"

,"

.

'

... .

\.

,lip,. '0"

; ,

J .•.

I', '.

\ .-'

....

",

'",II

, "

.

.

, "

" .0' .

'"

.

"

"

"

~ ''.

, "

',, ' .;. 1

, r

"

."

'i to

.

"

~ . .,

,'. ,

.

~

(7)

>:'-' '

,,'

I

" '

"

"

,

,

: Q

"

, I

. ,

MEMORIAL' UNIVE,RSITY OF NEWF.OUNDLAND

0,

COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES

"The undersigned certify th'ab they have read, and recommend to

. " ~ , , I. I

the ,Co~1:ttee on' Graduate Studies for' acceptariG,e. a thesis entitle~

~~

, ---

itA Study of the Charactei).,Stics, Organization, and Administration of . 'The Co-curricular Programs in the I Regi~na~ 'High Schools in Newfoundland

and Labrador" submtt ~ed by George'

a J -.

Samuel Crocker in part'ial

. ! ' ' " "

fulfilment

. of the requirement:' for the Degree

. ..

, of Haster of Education.

"

.

'

...

~

...

~

..

,

.. , ... .

" Supervisor

.

-' ... , .

, 1

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' 4 ' ••• • ,_, • • • • • • •

.. ' "l

.

"

, I

,

.

-I,

· ...

'

... .

, ' . .

.

, '

Date

...

~

... .

'D'

, '

" i i i

·

"

.

"",' ' \

/

.

,.

"

'/

'5.l

'.-"

"

.

(8)

, '

I '

/~ .

/ '

I

' .

'

. '

' . j

). I ,

"

, ,

','., I . ( ,

.'

1

ACKNOWLEUGEMENTS

. ;/:

p. "" \

.The writer ,wishes to, e,xpress his gratitude ' . .

. -

for the ~ssistanc·e

. . : '

.

Dr. R. D. Fish~r. the· supervisor of this

I '

, ,I

'. . , : ,

also, expressed' to the ,princ:ipal~ . of the

Regional High Schools who took time from" tbeir ~chedules to "complete' the questionnaire.' Without' their help' this study' ~~uid not.· have be,~n . pos~ible.

.

,

I

,

.

"

,Finally, the writer wishes to express ,appi:ecia~iOlI to his

.wife, for her patience~ ,encouragemen.t, and assistance whlle the thesis was bEdng pr:epaf ed .

,," "

\ '

.~ ...

'

.

. r

\ '

,.,..

,

. .

, ' o

. , '

Co

"

iv

,~ ;.

, "

, "

" '

, .

. -:;\. '-'

" .

" ,",,"~~. <t'). 'r'

1 ~'

.;

'.

-

"

,',

.'

.

, "

.. ~-r:-'.~ .,. I:' , .

" '

.. '" ~ .

j .

r: '.'

'. ,:.~;.,.. ~

.~ .

,': .

', ~ , . , .

. :" !,:. ',;' . ~::~.:,

'e, r,o 'i'/',,". ';" JJ , ,iJ

( ) ' " 1 "

':.' ..

( ,

."

, '

. I

..

. " ..

f'

) ,

'.

"

(9)

"

.

. P ..

.'

,1

'I':f

( ,

/

'~'ABSTRACT

' ..

'

,

.

. '

The purpose" of this study w~s to survey the"Regiorial' H!gh I, Schools of Newfoundland and Labrador" to

~scert'ain

what the current

I I ,

J I

practice~ were relative to, the ~haracteristics, organization, ~d' , administration 'of the c07'curricul{lr .activity '.'~rograms. To this end_

\

-

the!37 principals oLthe regional high s~h~ols were surveyed byq questionnaire and a 78 percent return was realized.

MAJOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

,1. The size of the regional high, schools q~d no signifi~ant ' i~fluence with respect to the characteristi~s, organizatr~n, and administration of the co-curricular programs.

, ,(2; An', overall aver,age of 66 .,~. percent of the staff members

participated in co~curricular activities. ..

....

3. The most-ad~quate activity in terms of student n~eds and in~_erests was 'sports .. for boys and ,girls. The !'activities which'; t,he , principa1s felt needed to be improved were subje~t related cfubs

(I .

I ' ,

·and school publicat4ons.

,

,

,

.

,

4. The

s~h ~eduling

of a.ctivity

pe:ri,o:?~

during the

~,QiiOOL

day'

.

)... '

.

,,""

"

,"

is prq'(dded fn ~ew schools. T~e pe,ri~d6 which.·w~re~,.~chedu~ed

, ~. ~ .. ( .

. represented 1.'79 percent

oi":~her to~al ~n8tructi\lr\~'1

periods.

' .. "'''lff ',t""t; ",'J\' '

~ . . ;(' '''t~ "\ . \'1

5. The principal' appointed: the spt1'nsor.s<' who h,ad the gr~ate'st,

. ~ . ~.. • • i' t:04. , ' , .

" J. t :.. ~ \ ".... - ' . "

interest in' a~d abiltty to pB-tfo:~JIl.,tlle required ,duties. fOT; the

o . ).

,. .1 ')

, J. I "(A."/,,,,,,:I \ J '

... '" , -1 ~ .t I l , J '

,.' .'

"

. I "

.'

, )

I

, . ~ t

"

" ,{ ~ .. ' ~'.,

.J

, .

, !. 'C'~. ,~ ,

,' , ' .,'

. .. .

.'

...

,

.

:

.

,

.

'. '

. ~

- . .

t'

(10)

' }

,

.

\ ,

ri, ,

.... '0, • ~ ...

.

, C'

'n

, ,

, ,

"

.

~ .

. .

,

.

I

"

" vi,

f

particular co-cu~ricular activ~ty. , ..

I '

6. The principal, was the person' usually ~esponsible for direction

,, ' J

and supervision of activities.( : ..

I '

7. Fund'raising act.ivit:t'es by students was the' ba!3~c means whereby

.

.

.. . \

principal's

f~nanced

their

co~,cu~;~~':'7ar ' '.~togr;a~s .

'

, 8. Teachers did not receive

an~ ~tra

pay for the extra work'done

, '

in sponsoring . .co-curricular acti,vitie's.' , ,

9. The participation, rate by students, in at least one acUvity,

4i

was less than 70 perc~nt in 58 percent of the' schools.

10 • . The ~ost s~tious' probl~m p~incipals had was'scheduling

.... , . .;'/ .

activities at a 'time which ~as compatibl~ with bus schedules.

, '

MAJOR.SUGGESXIONS

",

1. "

Each principal should evaluate each of the co-curricula~:

act;.ivities in 'his 'school' s program, and deteniline ,

.

'which, of the, "

activities'are ~eeting the goals of the .program.

I ' ,

2. The; studen't council' should play mor'e of an 'in tegrai part i~

the o'rganiza tion and a?minis tra tion o, .f; the pro grams. .. ~

6 '

,,3. Principals should make greater efforts to get students involved

-, '

in at least one co-curricular activity:,

\ 4. Schop,l boards should give adequate support from their budget

"J' -

I " "

,

. '

~ , ' ,- -, "

the' co-curricular activities' in ,the ,schools. '

to , -,

'.

5. ,',Teachers workloads and the .human iEYSOUrCes of the community

sho'u1ci be considered when sponsors for 'the various activities are'

.

:

,being assigne~. '

,'.'

.. ~ .

",

/-

", .

,1'7"

. - -

,

.

, \

" '/','

(11)

'\

\ ' ,

, .

: / /'

, . ', " , /'

"

0: .

~ ,.'

" vii

,,'

'.'

-

. , ,

" 6, Co-currlc'u1ar ac:t l vitiea 'which ·1.lave greatest ed~c'ational

/ '

. '. '

II

~.

l' J. value Bhou~ 'bj scheduled' during ,regular 'class. hours.

.' .

,

, \. ' .

. ...

"

1 i

.I I ' ~ to

..

I / I

"I

' ,

• •

" I "

. ' /. ,

.

"

'

1:' , , ,.""

I ...s

" j .,

.

,,' J-"

r...

" , " ' '"

'b

, , ).

,

'j , .

'"

J I .

" oS ",

"

\ '

,

r-

. , , . '/

'-'-,--i.

,

, ,

.'

.

, "

. .

-: -.. l' ~

-

, , '

..

,J .. ;

..

,

" , ,

" .

,

. ..

.,...". , ,

\,. ,~\

":

. .

/

, ,

'" '"

. ~~ . \ . . . #" •

I ,

.

"

,~

.

i

9 ' ,

,

~.

. .

-, , ,. ! \'

: \ '.

.

)-. . . '.IiI..

.

\ .

, Q

"

, I , - ~" '\

..

~1 ~ ".

,v

" J

,

.

;,

(12)

-;

, ,

(~ "~

,~

"

! " ,

,

TABLE :'OF CONTEN:rS , ,

CHAPTER'

/

G PAGE

" , r~'

f~\:'

\J: , .. ~ .

1 ' INTRODUCTION

· · ·

· 3l~

t~\tl '1!~/ "\'~ 0 ; 0 1

l ' -

NEED FOR THE STUDY 0

·

0 '\ ,3

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM , • • •

..

0 5

.

~ ;,M.l~ir

"

'I'

DELIMITATIONS

~'I !--~TATIONS:

OF THE STUD:Y 0, 7

,~

...

De1imitat ions '0 , 0 0 0 7 -,

Limitations. 0

·

0

· ·

0

· · .

" 7"

10 ,

DEFINITION OF TERMS 'J '.

· · .'

"

Co-curricular '.l\ctivities

·

·

10

Regional' High School 0 ~

·

~ 0

.. .

"

.

11

---

,

Activity Period

· ·

0

· ·

~ 11

Sponsor (advisor) ,

.

11

· · · · · · · ·

,

METllOD AND ~ROCEDURE ~ , 12

The Instrument

· · ·

.,1'-~--

-

. ~ 12

" The Pilot', Stu~y

·

-'

·

.,r7"·~

· ·

0 I

. .

,

.

13

I' , t~

Procedure

·

" 0

· ·

"

.

, ,

. .

1 ,

"14 f' Design'

. ·

,

· · · ·

"

"

. ' . ·

ORGANIZATION. OF THE STUDY

·

! ~

. ".

15

sriMMARy

,

~I~( ." .. ·

I 16

. 2 REVIEW OF THE

·

,

·

18

HISTORY

. · ·

0

·

,

·

0 " 0

·

, 18 ...

ORGANIZAT)~N AND ~MINISTRATION 0 20'

,. ,,' · " .... '-

Sch~duling 'Practices" .. '~' .... ~ .... ; .. '~ .. ' .. " 20 ,

.

'.

~

,

-

.' ,,~ .• .r:.J."';~

'.I' '~ ""

. .

.

~

-

r

(13)
(14)

f i'

I'

~ .. '

" '

.

,

,~

.:;.

,

..

' ~

CHAPTER

~5

rr'

,', , ,

" , i ' ....

Fi.nancing the

~4~~~r~e~~r

<,

. . ,. . . .

Participation " • \ ~

Administrative

Pro~ems

SUMMARY

.,

~rograms

'. . . .'.

.

,

,

'/

SUMMARY

AND'

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FtIRTHER" STUDY,

l '

RECO~NDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY , ,

.

BI~~I0GRAPHY

APPENDIOES

" ,

. ' . .

.....

.

"

.

,A B

,

t.,~:...-=-~ .. IO·~"~·

"

....

..

I l

, ,.., 41

.

~.

_ ....

.//" ~-">" ~"

.. ,

t,1' .......

, ,.

J. ,"

,.

'"

"

"

"

,

.

,, '

.'

, '

"

"

, , ,

-

'

":.

f

'

..

, ,

,.

• L

p' x

PAGE

121 '122 124

"',

, " 127

~

.

129,

'<---

.

'

.

132

146

.

'

.

•. 148

"

"

,155

"

----~---~----

, "

\

:\.

"

,'\ ~ ,

- .

....

t '

~ ,

r"

"

(15)

.

"

,"

" ,

, if

,

.

T~LE

L

2.

.-"

"

-, '/

- , !

i

_ D

:,

.

" -

. .

'l

I

~

.,

, Ii

,

"i-

-I f'

, . ~(

I

i

/

I

I

- ~ LIST, OF TABLES

-

.

, , ,

J'

' Nu~lr o~

! .

: Questionnair~-B

Sent Out., Number ,

of"

,QJestionnaires' Returned, 'and Percent, 0; Rsrn"

, I

- l\ccording to School

-En~olment classifi~a~io

- • •

,

,

I

, 0

School Designation Number, Size of School-I , , and 'c, Extent

jr:i

Participation

b~ FU1H~

Staff Me,cl,ers,

I

,According to School Enrolment

:~u~~~

of Schools With

a~d'

Without Regularly

I

Scheduled Activity' Yeriods During In-Class Hours.

l , 'Accordi~g

to Size of SC'hool • • • • • • • • • • • •

~.

. , . · . '

~

.

,',

I .

," 44

,46

49 :4. Sch,eduled Time of Activities, Number o,f Schools

.

I

!

i

- ,

, i

5/.

,

.

. ~ .

..,- I '"

...

..:

f "

I

I'

I

,I / __

.

'.

'

~.j

- ' ,-

'i ,

-

~ I

j

! '

,

i .

I '

I .'

, I

',{ ,

/~ I '

7.

1 -' I

"

by' Enrolment, and

Avera~mb~~ ofo D~ys P~~

, - f

0 ' ,

..

.

. ' .

Week 'in "Each Time Block

. . . . . ' . . . . .

. ,

"

-, In-Clag.~ .. and Out~0f.-Ci8438·-. , Accordin'g to School.., ' Size

,

: .

,

'..

" / ' '

Number of TimeaCo-curricular Acti~t~es are Offered

,

. .

'Per Week, on the Basis_pf the ,Num~er of Schools, by Sch'ool Size, and rn,-ClasG and Out-of-Criiss Time

, , -

Blocks

/) '-

_.

.

Stunmary of Activities' Spons'ored 'and Their Time of , , ,Meeting, in Schools Reporting, According to

.

'.! ' .

· .

. .

:' ' School E~ro~ent • 0 ~!!,

· . . . . .

'~',

'.,

.. :... . ... ,

.

... ... ,

.(i. ~ ; "':-:.:.: -....

'"

. .

Q. .'

":'

. '

. '

50 , .

.. . .

, 52

,:

,53,

~ ,54

'\

,

.

" : --.,.,-. ,

. .

r .,

"

',.,

'-

..

'

,

1 -

(16)

:" ~.~ \

\ '

: .-;' " A/

;}:~

.•

:"'~ ... ;:

.

" .

, "

~ .. ,

.'

.......

.' .'

, ''';' :-

--"

.

'

.

'. "

.:.:,.~~ .. :

, "

:'

, "

"

/ '" .

.' .'

', f

t,

~ -', , .. , .

"",,!,"

')

.

'

~'I

, ,

.

.

,

/

/'

/, I \ \

. ~' ,

- ' .

.

"

" '

"

, .. .

" '

<1,

. .. C'.

,TABLE . :,

. ,

- ' l> '

'8~ h-;M~lln' N~ber

o'f.

~tudent P~tt:i.'cipa~~s '

in"E,a'ch

Activ~ty

.

, . . . . ' ~ ' . . . ' _ , . 0 . ',

. ~

. . 9.,

, 0

(\ ' .. by' S,chool ',Enr,?lmEmt, 'Accor~ing' to NtiInber of

. ,Schoois ~epoit'~ng

. .

, -

,

'~ ': . '. .'

. . , .

"

.

,

.

~{ ,-

Principals' Estimat~ of'~he P~rcent of Stu~ent ,

~, " . " H '

. ~

.

~n ~t L~aat

'One

A~tiV;Lty, ':CCO '~~li~g ,

~m.:::.'!:'~~~!~= " , '. "

~0'1u~er Enrolment Classificatic:?n ".'

~

-"

~ .

" • . i~. , p~1nC1pai::

i;,nk

0 \~Of rmport~nce

of those

" , • Act vitiea ·which e£m to be Valued· Most. Highly

" by

S~Uden:S.' A~C~~~~ .\~r~\.

to

Num~er .', '

Of' Schools .

;~:­

..

xii . PAGE

,'. ':'

. .

- ' .68

...

..

78

• • by

Enrolment

class"i~[ca,t~

..' .' ..

~ . .', . . .

4 . ' 80

.'

.

, lL.

.

: . '

. . , ;1'\1 '

Device~

Used'in

Acqua1nting \~tudents

.with the Program

of' Ac"tivi'Ues, A~cord'1ng to School Enrolment',' ' .

~

Classification . ' . . • • • • • ' ,'

. ' .

,~

' . . .

1:2. , . Met;hodlf _Vsed t<;> Assist Studepts in Ma~ing Choices of,

. ~ . tf' ' .

" ,I

. ...

82

, " (:'J

x.i';"'"

,: . ' ~ .'~

Activities in: which they ParticipS'te, Accord.ing to ,

"

". '

"

{J

o 0' 00 ,: 0 . ' . " d '. ' ~

School Enrolment Cla'ssification • ; • ~ r ' . ' . , .,;. , ",

.. ~ .

.

, .,

~?

.

,;.~ Methods Use~ to Regulate Student Participation,'

o , .

According to School Enrolmenf Classification

<J

' .

.,

.

i4:.

e' ' .

Practices 'Used for the Direction 6r~upervision of

o~ of . ' ~

• . the Tb~l Act~~ty to Enrolment " ." ,

, ". " -' ; ~., - : • . ' a -

'e " Classification .' . ~ •.••... : . • • • •

. . "

". :

. .

.' 0

.practices· Used for ·the Selectio~ of Sponsors.

• :

' A~c9rding

to, School' Enrolme'n't .' • ' .• 0_" . .

","",:. t t , . . :

, ~

~ 16. ptactices Used,

.

.. .for the Appointm~n~ , ' of. , Sp~nsor~" , .,. .. "

, :" "Acc~r,di'bg to Scho,,~. Enrolment •

~ ,

. . . . .

.

. ... .

. ,

... "

.

I

.~;. .

.,'

.. I' " ,

a . \). ,

" . .' .

'.: .. "

.

,

.

....,

.

, '

..

, '

, "

.,83

85

' , ' ,

-' '.' o

.~ "

,~.

\ r~

" "

~

'. - !to

~ ~. ~. '- ..• J .: ....

~ R . . .

'.

"

'.

(17)

,J

" ~.

.. '.

"".",

: ..... ~

..

... , ... ', .

. ..~

", ~'

'1 . '

TABLE, ,17. '

: ;, 18 ..

19

I

21. "

'22.

"

, I

1 .

!

. ,,'

-

, ."

'\',

,

, q

, "

i

\ '

" ) '

Desh'able Qualifications ,in' th~ 'Selecti~n' ~l

- ,

6 '

Sponsors, According to School Enroiment ,and a'

Rating 'from 1 t,o 5 " • , ,' ,. , I . ' I ,~ .!

· . . .

, - : ' f" " ,

,Procedure for Getting Activities Approved, , .

,

.

'

According to School Enrolment I I ' , 0' " ,I . ' .

Numb~~

of

.~Ch~Ol~K:ePin~ , se.1-~~ te~ Rec~rds,

According to Sc l'Enrolment. I ' • • • • ' I

.~ ... -... -:.

,Ratings by Prinaipals of Methods Used in Financing

I

, ,

".f,.. '

the Co-curricular Activities Program, Accoroi~g

II 1 .'

.,.

, '

. ."

_4~t~r:::·

""' ..

xiii

-PAGE"

, ' , p

" .. ' ~ ,

.

: '., ~

. , ' ..

,

. .

92

, ,

" 93 ...

, ,

to School Enrolment • I I

. . . . . .

~

· . . .

95 '

Number of Schools Receivipg Financial Assistance from

" \ . ,

the School Board f~r Admini~tering the

~Co-curricular Program, According to Type of

Activity and Number of Schools by Enrolment, • 96

Numbe~ of Principals Reporting Limitations or

..."

"

. , J,

.

:'..r;'lad~ of 1.imitations Plac~d on Cost of Participation,

'/ ,

Borne,by Students or School; By the School Boa!d;

.

,'0 -,

Principal; P.T.A.;, or Other Groups; Accord~ng

, ,

to School Enrolment. • ~" . • • ." .

23.'

~ , ~ N~?er , oi sCho~'i s Gr~n:~g Gra~u~iln

· . .

p

Credit ~ot , I

· . .,

98

, 24,

_ ~. t

•• ,. -:*

Certain Co-curricular' Activ.iti~s, According to

. . .-

. . . ...

School Enrolment ' . • -.-":: . • ,:~ -' . '.. • .' .' • ,. •

·

.. :.:..:, "'~)~~'::":'. .. \ '.

Method~ Used to Inform', ~~rents ~ega:;-ding the School \

.~ .~. ' " I'.~

Co-curricular Progra~, Accordirlg to Schooi '

Enrolment

. . . .. . . ' .

'4:.'

, , :

.

9~

.:, 101

,

,

'.

'

(18)

,~ ;(.

. {& .

.... . r

;l;r

- ~; ',

~r-

, .-: .

-

,~.r

" .

, ,

.

i' . '

.

.'

~

,

~.

"

,

.

'

" .

. .

.

TABLE"

25.

26.-

. '

/

(

.

.~

. ...

Num~er of'School~ Using Major '~ources of ~uhlici~y,

p -

I "

~ccording to School'. Enrolmen t ', ' • • ,. • • '. '. • • •

.. ... , , I

pri~cipal~

....

Ra~i~gs o~ Ad~qu'a~y .'

of .

''Pubii~i~y Cov~rage

,

.

~ • 1 ."

.

"

.

. ~f A,ctivities., According ,t"o Sclio'ol Enrolment ',.

. . '. .

~7.

'" - \ . . . . , . . ' " ,

'.' princ:lpal;s' Ratings

~f Ade~ua~y

of Co-curricular

" "

"-

"

28.

Activitie~ in which their'Schoo1s are I~volved,

, " According to School Etlrolment~. •..• •

I

Principals"Ratings of the Problems they Experience

~ ,_ .II :~._ _

: in Administering Co-curric~lar

-

Activities"

xiv' PAGE

',102

,103

lOS' .

Accordi~g to. Sc~oo~ Enrolment·" ... '. . • " • ,

.

' . 106'

29, Non-Staff Personnel Involved in Co-curricular

30.

' ....

(.: Ai:. tivitie~, According- to S~h?ol Enrolment

'Areas of Involvement of Non-Staff Personnel in

Co-curricular Programs, Acc,ording to School Enrolment ,~; , ,

. . . . . . . . . '. . . .

31. Principais'

Op~nion

on

Extr~

Pay

fo~

Teachers' Co-curricular Duties,. According to School

.. ,'Enrolment •

'. J

, '

I : '

-

..

: I

~

,.,.\

/ ~

. . . .

. ~

. ..

' : ,

': .

" ..

~ ( I

,',

..

"

"

.

..

. . . .

109

I "

.. 111

. .

112

.. I) "

, . ' :L

; '"

"

e'

." ~

-'

(19)

"

"

,.. '

"

..

"

",

v

-,

',: '

''-..,. " "

.

, '.

"

"

"

FIGqRE,

"

,-

\:, , : ' I

",

,0

LIST OF. FIGURES

1/ ., ...

. ..

. .

,

... , "

1.

~ ... '.

9rgani~ationa1 Structure for, the C?-curricu1ar '.

Programs of the New£o~dla~d and Labrado~

"

, -

Regional High· Schools

..

'

.

2 ... A Type 9f Organizational' Structure for th~' , 'Administra~ion'" of ,Co-curricular Programs

d·.,A..~. \.,.."";',.

"v'·'

,,, '

"

, .;

j',

" '

',-

,-

. .

"

, "

\ \

"

"

'.

' . . p '

,

.

, ,"

,

;::"

. .

'

,.

.

'

Q '

\~ "

'. '

... I ._ .. _ . r

" \'

• • e'

'.';. •. ·0

'-

'\ I

\

\'

.

,..:

.'

"PAGE

: 137

0

.

(

,

, eo"

139 , "

, .

"

, "-.2.

'd

"

. .

. <

" ;.

"

M

~J

' .. -; ,

."

-,

-·-F

Références

Documents relatifs

Our research showed that an estimated quarter of a million people in Glasgow (84 000 homes) and a very conservative estimate of 10 million people nation- wide, shared our

z New rules have been developed for Question Analysis, Question Classification and Answer Filtering for the legal domain using the development set.. z Query generation has

Under British rule, there were two kinds of elitist schools in India: those for the hereditary aristocracy, called the chiefs’ colleges; and those for the newly emerging

We tested for two additional contrasts an- alyzed by Smolka et al.: the difference in priming strength between Transparent and Opaque Deriva- tion (not significant in either

CONGRATULATES the Regional Director and his dynamic team and ASSURES him of the unqualified support of the Member States for the orientation of the

The most common large-scale studies are the Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP), the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the Progress in International

Further recalling that the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, in its Decision 6.COM 22, decided that category

In Kazakhstan, the public attention was brought to popularization of a decaying tradition of games with Assyks already in the late 1990s. Because of that, a