R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
S ANTI K UMAR C HATTERJEA
Operational formulae for certain classical polynomials - II
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 33 (1963), p. 163-169
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1963__33__163_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1963, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
where
y,~(x, a, b)
is thegeneralised
Besselpolynomials
definedby
Using (1.1)
we have derived thefollowing
results :*) Pervenuta in red.azione il 9
agosto
1962.Indirizzo dell’A.:
Department
of mathematics,Bangabasi College,
Calcutta
(India).
.
1)
CHATTERJEA S. K.:Ope.ratraonal f or
certain classicalpolynomials,
I, Communicated to the Quart. J. Math. Oxford.164
In the same paper we have derived the formula, :
where is the
generalised Laguerre polynomials
ofdegree
n.The
object
of thepresent
paper is to derive some more ope- rational formulae for thespecial
case of Besselpolynomials y,~(x,
a,b),
obtainedby taking a,
= b =2,
sometimes written asy,~(x),
and for thegeneralised La.guerre polynomials. Lastly
westudy
the formula(1.5)
for thespecial
case of the Besselpoly-
nomials
just
now mentioned.’
2. The Bessel
polynomials
of Krall and Frink : Thepolynomials
are definedby
In 1),
we have derivedwhere Y is an
arbitrarily
dilierentiable function of s.Now
using
theoperational formula 2),
2)
STEPHENS E.: Theelementary them of operational
mathematics(1937), 26. -
A8 a
special
case of(2.4)
w e notice thatwhich was derived
by Rajagopal 3).
Again
we observewhere
Thus from
(2.2)
and(2.6)
we obtain3)
RAJAGOPAL A. g. : Onof
the classicalorthogonal polynomials.
Amer. Math.
Monthly,
67 (1960), 166-169.166
where
As a
special
case of(2.7)
we note that3. The Bessel
polynomials
of Bu.rchnall:Burchnall 4),
foundadditional
properties
of the Besselpolynomials 6,~(x)
definedby
More
generally
he definedNow we observe from
(3.1)
Thus we obtain
In other
words,
.
4)
BURCHNALL J. L.: Beaselpolynomials,
Canad. J. Math..3 (1951), 62-68.
It follows therefore from
(3.3)
and(3.4)
tha,tAs a
special
case of(3.5)
we observeAgain
we notice thatwhere
168
Thus we derive from
(3.3)
and(3.7)
thatwhere
In
particular,
we obtainwhich
implies
theexplicit representation
of8ri(~, 2, 2) viz.,
4. The
Laguerre polynomials:
Carlitz
6),
hasrecently proved
thatBut we notice that
Thus we obtain from
(4.1 )
and(4.2)
.
5)
CARLITZ L.: A note on theLaguerre polynomials. Michigan
Math. J.,7 (1960), 219-223.
following
Now
making
use of the relationwe obtain from
(5.1)
which is the differential
equation
satisfiedby
thepolynomial ym+1(x).
I am indebted to Dr. M. Dutta for his kind