HAL Id: jpa-00247348
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247348
Submitted on 1 Jan 1997
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Anisotropy of Gap Parameter in Cuprate Superconductors
S. Prakash
To cite this version:
S. Prakash. Anisotropy of Gap Parameter in Cuprate Superconductors. Journal de Physique I, EDP
Sciences, 1997, 7 (4), pp.611-620. �10.1051/jp1:1997179�. �jpa-00247348�
J.
Phi-s.
I France 7(1997)
611-620 APRIL 1997, PAGE 611Auisotropy of Gap Parameter in Cuprate Superconductors
S. Prakash
Department
ofPhysics~ Panjab University~ Chandigarh-160014~
India andLaboratoire de
Physique
duSolide, ESPCI,
10 rueVauquelin,
75231 ParisCedex,
France(Receiied
3 June 1996, revised 19 September 1996, accepted 17 December1996)
PACS.74.20.Fg
BCStheory
and itsdevelopment
PACS.79.60.Bm Clean metal, semiconductor~ and insulator surfaces
PACS.73.20.Dx Electron states in lo,v-dimensional structures
(superlattices,
quantum well structures and
multilayers
Abstract. The
anisotropy
of gap parameter in cupratesuperconductors
isexplained
in the frame work of BCStheory using
two-dimensional itinerant model of conduction electrons. The BCS gap equation at T= 0 is solved in the first iteration approximation. The two-dimensional electron energy bands and electron-phonon interaction in
tight-binding
approximation are used.The
explicit
expression for the gap parameter1h°(k)
is evaluated for the Einstein model of the solid. It is found that/h°(k)
consists ofa constant part and an
oscillatory
part which variesas sin~ k~a. The
magnitude
ofoscillatory
part is found todepend
upon the cutoff energy fiuJc, width of thesingularity
in thedensity
of states near Fermi surface and overlapintegral.
1. Introduction
In the BCS
ground
state the two electrons ofopposite spin
andopposite
momentum arecoupled through
thephonon
mediated attractive electron-electron interaction[lj.
This interactionproduces
a finite energy gap/h(k)
at the Fermi surface and the same isgiven by
theintegral equation [lj
£h(k)
=
~j
Vk>,k[/h(k')/2Ek,] tanh(Ek>/2kBT) (1)
~,
where
~k,,k
is theelectron-phonon-electron interaction,
k' = k+ q, q is thephonon
wave vector and T is the temperature.Ek
is thequasiparticle
energy in thesuperconducting
state and isgiven
asEk
"
(El
+/h~(k))~/~
where ek is the Bloch energy in the normal state relative toFermi energy. It was
pointed
outby Cooper
[2j that the form of theintegral equation (I)
is such that if there is an energy gap over apart
of the Fermisurface,
there will be oneeverywhere
exceptperhaps
at the isolatedpoints
or lines. Thus the nodes were leastexpected
in/h(k).
BCS e,>aluated
isotropic
gapparameter £h(k)
= /h for
~k,,k
" -V and found that£h
=
2hwc exp(-I/n(ef)V) (2)
where
hwc
is the cutoffphonon
energy andn(ef)
is the electrondensity
of states at the Fermi energy.. These authorsconsistently pointed
out that/h(k)
isanisotropic
and many of the transportproperties
in thesuperconducting phase
may be related to theanisotropic
character©
Les(ditions
dePhysique
1997of
/h(k).
However asystematic investigation
ofanisotropy
of/h(k)
islacking
as most of the laterinvestigations
were based on theEliashberg strong coupling theory [3j.
With the invention of
high
transitiontemperature Tc
incuprate superconductors [4],
the interest in theanisotropy
of/h(k)
is revived toexplain high Tc
and to understand the nature of BCSground
state[5].
Shen et al. [5]attempted
to fit theirexperimental
data for/h(k)
assuming
that the BCSground
state hasd~2-y2 symmetry.
Mahan [6j fitted the same resultsassuming
the s-symmetry of the BCSground
state.Recently
Levi [7j has reviewed the presentstate of art about the nature of BCS
ground
state in cuprates.It was shown
by
Labb4 and Bok [8j and Bok et al. [9j thathigh Tc
in cuprates is a consequence of two-dimensional nature of itinerant electrons which arepermeated
in theperiodic squar@
(or rectangular)
lattice. Friedel et al. have shown[10j
thathigh Tc
in A-15compounds
canbe
explained
with thehelp
oftight-binding electron-phonon
interaction. This leads us toinvestigate
theanisotropy
of/h(k) using tight-binding
electron energy bands and electron-phonon
interaction for a two-dimensional square lattice. We find that/h(k)
consists of twoparts:
a constantpart
and anoscillatory part
which varies assin~ k~a
and has thesymmetry
of a square. Thisexplains
the recent results of Shen et al.[5j.
The
plan
of the paper is as follows: the necessary formalism isgiven
in Section2,
thecalculations and results are
presented
in Section 3 and these are discussed in Section 4.2.
Theory
It is evident from
equation (I)
that/h(k)
will have thesymmetry
of theeigenvalues
of the matrix of elements~k,,k. However,
to make the calculationstractable,
fewapproximations
have to be made as the self-consistent
analytic
solution ofequation (I)
seemsimprobable.
The firstapproximation
we make is that T isnearly
zero, thereforetanh(Ek/2kBT)
= 1. Thissimplifies equation (1)
as~(k)
=~jVk,,k (~(k')/(2(El,
+~lk')~)~/~)j
13)Here all the wave vectors k' are in the
vicinity
of Fermi surface(FS)
in the range of cutoffphonon
energyhwc.
Ifit,.k
isconstant, /h(k)
becomesisotropic,
therefore wekeep
theexplicit (k', k) dependence
of Vk>,k and iterateequation (3)
for/h(k).
The first iterationgives
/h(k)
=
~j Vk,,k (/ho/(2(e(,
+/h()~/~)j (4)
k'
where
/ho
is an initial nonzero gapiii
which is therequirement
for a finiteTc.
2.I. ELECTRON ENERGY BANDS. The
strong
electron-ionbonding
incuprates
occurs inthe
layers
which contain the copper and oxygen ions. Therefore weadopt tight-binding
approx-imation for ek which consists of
anisotropic
band character. Ifonly
the first nearestneighbour overlapping
betweend~2-y2
Cu states and p~,y oxygen states isconsidered,
ek in thetetragonal phase
isgiven
as[llj
ek " Ed +
(4t( loo) (2t( loo)(cos k~a
+ coskya) (5)
where a is a lattice constant and
(k~, kg)
are the Cartesiancomponents
of k, ti is theoverlap integral
between Cud~2-~2
and oxygen p~,y states. go is thesplitting
between the ionicenergies
Ed and ep of Cu and oxygen ionsrespectively.
In ioniccrystals
ti « go,however,
thisapproximation
may not hold very well inhigh Tc
materials.N°4 GAP PARAMETER IN CUPRATE 613
In this energy
band,
the electrondensity
is concentrated on the Cu sites. The electronshop
to the
adjacent
Cu-sitesby
virtual excitation to theintermediating
O-site. This leads to an effective Cu-Cuoverlap integral
t =t(loo
built up from two consecutive Cu-O-Cuoverlaps
divided
by
the excitation energy of the oxygen site. Thedensity
of electron statesn(e)
for energydispersion given
inequation (5)
contains the van-Hovesingularities
at the band half~v.idth [8j I-e-
n(e)
=(N/2ir~D)
InjD lej (6)
where N is the total number of electrons and D is the width of the
singularity
at the Fermi energy. Thesingularities
arise because the electron groupvelocity
vanishes at thepoints
k =
[0; +irlaj
and[+irla, 0j
on the square Brillouin zone(BZ).
We useequations (5, 6)
for ek andn(e) respectively
in the solution ofequation (4).
2.2. ELECTRON-PHONON INTERACTION. The
superconductivity
incuprates
arises due tononstoichiometry
of oxygen.Therefore,
both the electrons and holes may contribute in thesuperconducting
process. The exact nature ofVk,,k
isexpected
to be intricate andanisotropic.
Therefore we write the model
phonon
induced electron-electron interaction as[lj
~k',k
"~(i
+Uk',k) (7)
where I% is a
positive
constant andUk,,k explicitly depends
upon k' and k. Themagnitude
of~j
+Uk,,k
has to bealways positive.
IfUk,,k
isnegligibly small,
BCSequation (2)
for/ho
is retrieved. Weadopt
theelectron-phonon
interactionsuggested by
Fr0hlich and Mitra[12j
to evaluate theanisotropic
partUk,,k.
In this formalism theelectron-phonon
matrix element isgiven
asfiI/,
~ =
-i(qo/2a)e/,
~
[v(k') v(k)j
+2i(qola)e/,
~
v((k' k) /2). (8)
Here qo is the Slater
coefficient, e( (q
=
k'-k)
is thephonon polarization
vector forpolarization
~ and
v(k) (= 0e/0k)
is t,he groupvelocity
for the statejk).
The first term ofequation (8)
is associated with the local variation of the band width in
equation (5)
and has themajor
contribution toMl,
~. The second term of
equation (8)
arises from the variation of the center ofgravity
of the band associated with the small variation of the short range Cu-O distances in the second term ofequation (5).
However the deformation of Cu-O bonds incuprates
arenot observed
experimentally [13j, therefore,
the second term ofequation (8)
isexpected
to be small. In addition there will bephonon
induced variations in ep and Ed which will lead to an additionalelectron-phonon
interaction which is notexplicitly
included inequation (8).
This term may beimportant
for ioniccrystals [14j.
In fact it is too difficult to account for(k', k) dependence
of all the contributions toelectron-phonon
interaction. Therefore we consider hereonly
theexplicit (k', k) dependence
of the first term ofequation (8)
and assume that all otherelectron-phonon
processes, not included in the first term ofequation (8),
are included inII
inequation (7).
Thissimplification
may noteffectively
alter thesymmetry
of the gapparameter.
The
electron-phonon
interaction involves the term (AM(q)
)~/[(ek
-ek, )~ (AM(q) )~j.
If ek" 0
is the Fermi energy, then the
important
contribution to/h(k)
will arise from the statesjk')
near the saddle
points
taken on the Fermisurface,
I.e. ek, « AM(q).
With thesesimplifications Uk,,k
is written as~k',k
~
~ (lfl',k'~/ [~iA"~(~)j (~)
>
Here
M,
is the reduced atomic mass for the vibrational mode ~. In the multiatomic formula unit cell of thecuprates
the reduced acoustic andoptical
masses are different.Considering
the
phonon
inducedchange
in groupvelocity v(k') v(k) along
the direction ofphonon propagation
andusing equation (8)
in(9)
weget
Uk,,k
=-(ql/4a~)1lv(k') v(k)I
l~~j le(l~/ [MAW] (q)] (10)
From
equation (8)
we find that as q ~0, JzI/,
~ ~ 0. Therefore to
keep Uk,,k finite,
smallvalues of
~J,(q)
must be accounted for. Inother
words the contribution of acousticphonons
which modulate
locally
the Cu-Cu distances in theconducting plane
should be included. How-ever the
compensation
betweenM(,
~ and
w,(q)
for small values of q can becompleted
intwo ways. First the
phonons
withviry
small values offrequencies
are eliminated from super-conductivity by
theinequality hw(q)
»jek, ek(.
Therefore acoustic modes can be treatedmore like the Einstein modes.
Secondly
the q inMl,
~ is a two-dimensional vector while in
w,(q)
it is three-dimensional because the materialhis
theisotropic
elasticproperties.
Thelarge
components of qperpendicular
to theconducting plane
make w,(q) large.
The neutron and Raman
scattering experiments [lsj
show that thecuprates
consist oflarge
number of
optical phonons
and these are about ten times moreenergetic
than the acousticphonons.
In view of these facts we assume all the acoustic andoptical phonons
as thedegenerate
Einstein modes. This
simplifies
the last factor ofequation (10)
as~j je(j~ / [M,w((q)j
=
nE/&iEw( (11)
>
where nE is the number of Einstein
modes,
wo is the Einsteinfrequency
andfiiE
is the reduced Einstein mass. If there is one copper atom and two oxygen atoms in the unit cell of square latticeJziE
"
(Mcfilx)/ [2fi?c
+Jzlxj
for theoptical
Einstein modes where Jzlc andMx
are thecopper and oxygen atomic masses
respectively.
Thelongitudinal
and transverse modes aredegenerate
at the zoneboundary- along
the[llj
direction. Inobtaining equation (10)
thecoupling
of the electrons with thephonons
in the z-direction ispartially included,
which will be discussed later.2.3. EVALUATION OF
EQUATION (4). Using
the abovesimplifications
inequation (4),
weget
/h(k)
=
/h1 /h2(k) (12)
where
~~ ~~~°~~~ [ ~fi
~~~~
and
~~~~~ ~~~~~°~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ l~~~(~~e[, ~~~~/2)
~~~~Considering
thespin degeneracy
factor andreplacing
the sum over k'by integration
in the two-dimensionalBZ, equations (13, 14) simplify
as~ dk'
(15)
~i
=i~i~o/2)w II
fi~
and
~2 ik) iiqi ~onEi/14a~ J~iEwi)i [Al121r)~i / /
dk
~~~/j,itj
~i16)
N°4 GAP PARAMETER IN CUPRATE 615
where -4 is the area of the square lattice. The
integration
over k' is to be carried out in thevicinity
of Fermi energy such that ek, <hwc
as discussedby
BCS[I].
To facilitate the
integrations
inequations (15, 16)
we write dk'= dk
[dk(
=
(dk [ /de)dedk(
=
dedk(/jv[j (17)
where
v(
=v(k')
andk(
and k[
are therectangular components
of k'along
thetangent
and normal to theedge
of the square Fermi surfacerespecti,>ely. Using equation (17)
in(15)
and(16)
weget
~
~~ ~~~~~~~~ /
~~)
~~~~
o
and
~2~~~
"
~~i~°jE~/~~~~~E"i~i i~/~~~i~i
~"~ /h
~
~ (
[lV[l~
+lvlk)l~ 2V[ V(k)] l19)
~
The
integral
overdk(
isalong
theedges
of the Fermi square andn(e)
is defined as [9jn(e)
=
lA/(27r~)1 f )
1201
The last term of
equation (19)
vanishes due tosymmetry.
Use ofequation (20)
in(19) gives
~2 (k) i(~i~onE)/(4a~J/IEWI)i (A/(21r)~ ~~~ fi I
vg dki
+11/2)iv(k)i~ ~"~ fit. (21)
Using
the relationsjv(j
=2V5jtjajsink~aj
k~ =
kt/Vh
ijv( jdkt
"32jtj (22)
equation (21) simplifies
as/~Jik) i~i/~onE)/14a~MEWi)1ll~ll"nlhwcll~o
+
(hwcll~o)2
+)
+
(1/2) iv(k)
i~~"~ fij
(231
Evidently /hi depends
on16,
cutoff energyhwc
and thedensity
of statesn(e)
as found in BCStheory.
In addition/h2(k)
alsodepends
on thescreening length
qo, Einsteinphonon
energya~fiiEw(
and the reducedoverlap integral
t. In thissimplified
but realisticphysical
model theanisotropy
of/h(k)
is the same as that of/h2(k)
which varies asjv(k)j~.
Labb4 and Bok
[8,
9] calculateddensity
of states for arectangular
lattice in thetight-binding approximation
andexpressed equation (6)
asn(e)
= no + ni InjDlej;
-D < e < D= no e E
[-W/2, -D]
U[D, W/2] (24)
where no
"
1/(4irjtj
per copperatom,
ni "1/2ir~D
per copper atom and W is the band width.Since
hwc
<D,
the firstequality
ofequation (24)
is used in the calculations ofequations (18, 23).
no and ni are determinedby
the conditionnolv
+2niD
= 1 and
jv(k)
j~=
4a~t~ (sin~ k~a
+sin~ kya)
=
8a~t~ sin~ k~a (25)
because
ky
=irla
+ k~ at the square Fermi surface.Equations (24, 25)
are used inequations (18, 23)
to evaluate the gapparameter
per copper atom which is written as/h(k)
=
Cl C2 (sin k~aj~ (26)
where
Cl
"(ii1h0/2) l~0fl
+illf21
CO)fl, (27~l
C2
"Co (4t~) [nofi
+nif2]
,
(27b)
ii
" In((hwcllho)
+(hwc llho)~
+lj
,
(27c)
/~"~
in(DIE(
~~ ~~~~~~
o
@@
'and
Co
"(qoa)~nE/(4a~&iEw(llho). (27e)
Here
Ci
has to bealways greater
thanC2
so thatVk,,k, given
inequation ii),
isnegative.
The
important
feature ofequation (26)
is that/h(k)
consists of twoparts:
a constant part and anoscillatory part varying
assin~ kza,
which has the four fold rotationsymmetry
of thesquare lattice. Since the two contributions are of the
opposite sign, j/h(k)j
will be maximumin the
vicinity
of the van-Hovepoints
and minimum in the middle of the two van-Hovepoints.
This is
essentially
observedby
Shen et al. [5jby angular photoemission experiments
in the abplane
ofB12Sr2CaCu208+&.
SinceCi
>C2,
there shouldalways
be a gap, howsoever small it may be. In thefollowing
wepresent
the model calculations for/h(k).
3. Calculations and Results
The observed energy gap
parameter /h°(k)
for asuperconductor
isgiven
as/h°(k)
=
2j/h(k)j
=
2jCi C2 sin~ k~aj. (28)
From
equation (28)
~hSx
"21Cl
Iik~
" o
(29~)
and
/h$,
=2jCi C2
Ii k~=
ir/2a. (29b)
N°4 GAP PARAMETER IN CUPRATE 617
is
(a) Sample Samples 2,7
~
. ©~
# jk
1* ~ .
Z %
~ .
0.5 0.7
kx
("la 25
(c) Sample 3
(d) Samples 6,9,11 .
. ~
~Z ~
@ E
E ~
~ ~
jQ .
~ . ~
0~~
0.5 0.6 0.7
x("la )
Table I. The initial
parameters
and calculated resultsfor /h° (k) for different samples. /ho
is the initial gapparameter, ~i
is the constantpart of electron-phonon
interaction and(Ci, C2)
are the calculated
parameters
asdefined
in the text./h$~
and/h$;
are the mammum and minimum gapsrespectively.
All thequantities
are m mev. In these calculations qoa=
1,
a~mow( llho
"
1,
reducedoverlap integral
t= 10 me V, width
of singularity
D= 16t and
cutoff
energy
h~c
= 60 me V are used.samples ~o ~i ci c2 ~$~ ~$; ~Sx/~S;
10 265 8.86 8.76 17.71 0.18 98.39
2,
7 11 265 11.30 8.40 22.56 5.71 3.953 11 260 10.69 8.40 21.37 4.58 4.67
8, 9,
11 10 280 10.50 8.80 21.00 3.47 6.05and there are many
simplifications
in thetheory
too, the calculated results represent very well theexperimental
data. The ratio/h$~llh$;
varies from 4 to 100 for differentsamples.
Theinput
parameters and calculated results are tabulated in Table I. It is found thatby increasing h~c, /h°(k)
is enhanced, howe,>er itsgeneral
behaviour remains the same.The
overlap
parameter t isimportant
indetermining
the itinerant character ofcharge
carri-ers. Here t
depends
upon ti and go and ti is sensitive to inversescreening length
qo. Thereforewe varied t from 0.01 to 0.15 eV. It is found that
by making
thecorresponding changes
in the values of qoa from I to 0.08 andadjusting
the value of Vo such thatCl
>C2,
the results remain similar to thosegiven
inFigure
I. There is a closeness in the values ofCl
andC2
in Table I.This indicates that both
/hi
and/h2
inequation (12)
arise from theelectron-phonon coupling
of the same
physical origin.
These two contributionscompensate
eachother, therefore,
it canargued
thatCi
andC2
arise due tophonon
induced electron-electron attraction and electron- holerepulsion respectively.
We also calculated/h°(k)
as the function offi
which is theangle
of k with
respect
to k~ axis in the(k~, ky) plane.
In thisrepresentation equation (28)
becomesli°(<)
=
21ci c~ sin2(m/(i
+ tan<))1 (30)
where tan
#
=kg /k~
and 0 <#
<ir/2
on the square Fermi surface.Evidently
the gap ismaximum for
#
= 0 and minimum for#
=
ir/4.
The results ofequation (30)
can also becompared
with theexperimental
data rewritten on the scale tan#
=
ky/k~.
A schematicrepresentation
of/h°(#)
with four fold rotation symmetry of the square in the(k~, kg plane
is shown inFigure
2.4. Discussion
Assuming
that the cuprates are d-wavesuperconductors,
Shen et al. [5jexpressed
the gap parameter for a square lattice as:/~~(k)
"
/hdo(
cosk~a
coskyaj. j31)
The
photoemission
measurementsgive j/h((#)j.
Therefore Shen et al.attempted
to fit their databy
thestraight
linej/h((#)j
versusjcos k~aj.
Inequation (31)
the gap varies from 0 to2/hdo
on the Fermi surface. However thequestion
is: can the zero gap be measured within theexperimental
accuracies. Mahan [6j has shown that the data of Shen et al. can be fitted withthe s-wave order parameter
which,
in the lowest order for a squarelattice,
isgiven
as:/h)(#)
=
/hn
+/h4 cos(4fi) (32)
N°4 GAP PARAMETER IN CUPRATE 619
ky
d(fS)
a a
~
kx B
Fig.
2. Schematic variation ofA°(#)
in the(k~, kg) plane along
the square Fermi surface. Thegap is maximum at the van-Hove points A
(#
=
0)
and minimum between the van-Hove points B(#
=
ir/4).
A°Ii)
has the four fold rotation symmetry of the square.where
/hn
and/h4
are constants.Recently Kirtley
et al.[19j reported
the directexperimental
observations ofspontaneous magnetization
at atricrystal point
in apolycrystalline
thin film of Y-123. Thetricrystal geometry produces
an odd number ofnegative Josephson
criticalcurrents around a
path enclosing
thetricrystal point
if the order parameter of Y-123 hasd-wave
symmetry.
However these authors havepointed
out that theirmodeling
oftricrystal
vortex could be inaccurate because the
magnetic
fields inside thegrain boundary
are modeledassuming
aninfinitely
thick film.In the present model of
electron-phonon interaction,
we can rewriteequation (28)
as~°(k)
=
~$;
+2C2(cos k~a)~. (33)
Thus
/h°(k)
versus cosk~a
will be aparabola
with anintercept /h$;.
This is the trend of datapoints
forsamples
1,2, 3, 5, 7, 8,
9 and 11 where the datapoints
are more than three. We can also rewriteequation (33)
as:£h°(#)
=
(/h$, C2)
+C2 cos(2ir/(1
+ tan#) ). (34)
Thus
/h°(#)
versuscos(2ir/(1+ tan<))
will be astraight
line with a finiteintercept.
Thus Shen et al. [5j and
Kritly
et al.[19j
haveattempted
tointerpret
their resultsassuming
that the gap parameter
/h°(k)
has d-wave symmetry. However it is shown in the present calculations that the data of Shen et al. canequally
beexplained using anisotropic
electron-phonon
interaction. There may be other ways toexplain
theexperimental
data also but at thisjuncture
thepossibility
ofelectron-phonon coupling being
theorigin
of such a gap is not ruled out. However much work is needed to understand theelectron-phonon
interaction in cuprates.In the
present calculations,
we have used the energy band structure and theelectron-phonon
interaction for the two-dimensional square lattice to
explain
theanisotropy
of gap parameter.In the energy bands
only
the first nearestneighbour
interaction is considered. Addition of the second nearestneighbour
interaction may account for the deviation of FS from an exact square and hence may further contribute to theanisotropy
of gapparameter.
Further the electron-phonon
interaction is calculated in the linearapproximation.
The non-linear terms will alsocontribute towards the
anisotropic
character ofA°(k).
It isexpected
that thesecontributions
may be corrections to/h°(k)
and the essential features will remain the same.In the
present calculations,
theelectron-phonon coupling
in the z-direction isimplicitly
in- cluded. It has been shownby
Fortini[20j
that thiscoupling brings
in the effect ofapical
oxygenwhich has been found
important
in theexplanation
ofhigher Tc.
The detailed calculations of the second term ofequation (8) give
the smalloscillatory
contribution to/h°(k).
Thus the second term ofequation (26)
will be enhanced. However thegeneral
characteristics remain thesame. These calculations
along
with temperaturedependence
of/h°(k)
will bereported
later.There are many
questions
yet to be answered. However the mostimportant
conclusion has been that even the first order iteration of BCSintegral equation
for/h°(k)
near T= 0
gives
the
required symmetry
of/h°(k)
with thehelp
of well establishedelectron-phonon
interaction.This shows that the BCS
prescriptions
fornearly
two-dimensional system may continue toexplain
thehigh Tc
incuprates.
Acknowledgments
I was
greatly
benifitted with the fruitful discussions and comments of Professor J. Bok. The informative discussions with Drs. L. Force and J. Bouvier are alsoacknowledged.
A part of financial support wasgiven by
Universit4 Paris VI.References
[1] Bardeen J. and Schrieffer
J-R-, Reprints
fromProgress
in lowTemperature Physics
and references therein(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991)
[2]
Cooper L-N-, Superconductivity
Conference(Cambridge,1959).
[3]
Eliashberg G.M.,
Sovt.Phys.
ZETA11(1960) 696;
CarbotteJ-P-,
Rev. Mod.Phys.
62(1990)
1027.[4j Bendorz J-G- and Muller
K-A-,
Z.Phys.
B 64(1986)
183.[5j Shen Z.-X. et
al., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 70(1993) 1553;
ibid 71(1993) 27; Ding H., Campuzano J-C-,
GofronK.,
GuC.,
LiuR.,
Beal B-W- andJennings G., Phys.
Rev. B 50(1994) 1333j
Ala
J., Quitmann C., Kelly R-J-,
AlmerasP., Berger H., Margaritondo
G. and OnellionM., Phys.
Rev. B 51(1995)
3832.[6j Mahan
G-D-, Phys.
Rev. B 40(1989)
11317; ibid 48(1993) 16557; Phys.
Rev. Lett. 71(1993)
4277.[7j Levi
B-G-, Phys. Today (Jan. 1996)
p. 19 and references therein.[8j Labb4 J. and Bok
J., Europhys.
Lett. 3(1987)
1225.[9j Bok J. and Force
L., Physica185 (1991) 1449;
Solid. State Commun. 85(1993)
976.[10j
BariiitS.,
Labb4 J. and FriedelJ., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 25(1970)
919.[llj
BariiitS.,
Batistit I. and FriedelJ., Europhys.
Lett. 3(1987)
1231.[12]
Fr0hlich H. and MitraT-K-,
J.Phys.
Cl(1968) 548;
MitraT-K-,
J.Phys.
C 2(1969)
52.[13] Ganguly
P. and RaoC-N-R-,
Solid State Chem. 53(1984)
193.[14]
Bariiit S. etal.,
Int. J. Mod.Phys.
B15(1991)
3439.[15]
MoseS.,
in "Studies ofhigh
temperaturesuperconductors",
Vol.4,
A.Narlikar,
Ed.(Nova
Science
Publisher,
NewYork, 1993)
p. 129.[16]
KrakauerH.,
Pickett W-E- and CohenR-E-, Phys.
Rev. B 47(1993)
1002.[17]
Dessau D-S- etal., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 71(1993)
278.[18)
BansilA.,
LinchasM.,
Gofron K. andCampuzano J-C-,
J.Phys. Chem Solids
54(1993)
l185.