• Aucun résultat trouvé

Removal of cells from body fluids by magnetic separation in batch and continuous mode: influence of bead size, concentration, and contact time

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Removal of cells from body fluids by magnetic separation in batch and continuous mode: influence of bead size, concentration, and contact time"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

S-1

Electronic Supporting Information

Removal of Cells from Body Fluids by Magnetic

Separation in Batch and Continuous Mode: Influence of

Bead Size, Concentration and Contact Time

Nils Bohmer1†, Nino Demarmels1†, Elena Tsolaki2, Lukas Gerken1, Kerda Keevend1, Sergio Bertazzo2,

Marco Lattuada3, Inge K. Herrmann1*

1Department Materials Meet Life, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa), Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

2Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London (UCL), Malet Place Engineering Building, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

3

Department of Chemistry, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 9, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.

† contributed equally as first authors *inge.herrmann@empa.ch

(2)

S-2

Figure S1: Particle size and polydispersity index (PDI). Hydrodynamic size of magnetic beads in water

(3)

S-3

Mathematical Model

Closed form solution of Equations (1-5)

In order to find the closed form solution of the equations, we can proceed as follows. The equations are first rendered dimensionless. The following dimensionless quantities are defined:

0 0 0 2 1 1 3 b C MP C MP i i k T R R N t R R N N C y N            (1.1)

The equations can be written in dimensionless form:

1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M i i i i i M M d i y d M dy y d dy i i y y d M M dy y d M                                           

(1.2)

The initial conditions are:

 

 

 

0 0 0 0 0 for 1 0 1 T i C y r N y i M        (1.3)

Using the conservation of particles and cells, we can rewrite the first equation as follows:

1 1 d r d M           (1.4)

This equation can be solved exactly, and the solution reads:

1 1 exp 1 1 exp r r M M r r M M                             (1.5)

(4)

S-4 0 0 0 1 1 exp 1 1 exp 1 1 exp 1 M r r M M dy y d r r M M r r M M y r r M                                                    (1.6)

To integrate the other equations, we start taking the ratio of all cell balance equations with the one for y0. In this manner, the concentration of particles disappears. We have:

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i M M dy y dy M y dy i y i y dy M y M y dy y dM y                               (1.7)

The solution can be written in the following general form:

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 i i i M M M M i M M r y y r y y i i y                       (1.8)

One can easily verify that this solution satisfies the mass balance on all cells:

1 1 0 0 0 0 i M i M M M M M i i i M y y r y r i             

(1.9)

The average number of particles per cell can be obtained as follows:

1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 i M i M M M M M M i i i i M i M M M M M M M M i i i M i M i M i i M d i y y r y r i dr M M i y i y r y M r r y i i y y i M r y                                                    

(1.10)

(5)

S-5

Finally, the final form of the solution is obtained by substituting Equation (1.6) into Equation (1.8) 1 1 1 1 exp exp 1 1 1 M i i r r r r M M M M M y r i r r M M                                               (1.11) Solution of Equations (7-9)

For the solution of Equations (7-9), we proceed in a similar manner. The following dimensionless quantities are defined:

1, 0 1, 1, 2, 0 0 0 2, 2, 1, 1, 2 1 1 3 , , 1 1 1 1 b C MP C MP i i i i C MP C MP C MP C MP k T R R N t R R C C N y z N N N R R R R W R R R R                                  (1.12)

The equations can be written in dimensionless form:

1 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M M i i i i i i i M M i i i M d i i y z d M M dy y d dy i i y y d M M dy y d M dz z d dz i i z z d M M dz d                                                                                        

1 2 M z M    (1.13)

(6)

S-6

The initial conditions are:

 

 

 

 

 

0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 for 1 0 0 0 for 1 0 1 i i y r y i M z r z i M           (1.14)

The magnetic particles concentration conditions can be written as:

1 2 1 1 1 M M i i i i i y i z        

(1.15)

The solution of the cell populations equations in terms of y0 and z0, respectively, is:

1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 i i M M M i i i M M M i M y y r y i M z z r z i                     (1.16)

The balance equation of particles can be reformulated as:

1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 0 M M M M M M d r r r r y r r z d                              (1.17)

A relationship between y0 and z0 can be easily obtained:

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 dz z z y dy y r r             (1.18)

Then, the equation for the particle concentration will be integrated as a function of y0:

1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 M M M M M M M M M y r r r r d r y r r dy y y y y r y y v M r M r r r                                                     (1.19)

The only equation to be solved (numerically) is the following one, providing the concentration of cells without bound particles, as a function of time:

(7)

S-7 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 M M dy y d dy y y y M r M r d r r                                     (1.20)

(8)

S-8

Figure S2: Mathematical modelling results for magnetic beads with a size of 300 nm. Unspecific

binding was included through the parameter . Two different ratios of specific versus unspecific cells were investigated: 0.2 and 10-5. Total contact time: 10 minutes. Change in the fraction of cells with at least 10 magnetic particles as a function of for both specific and unspecific cells. Four particles number concentrations: (a) 5 x 109 beads per mL. (b) 5 x 108 beads per mL. (c) 5 x 107 beads per mL. (d) 5 x 106 beads per mL.

a

b

(9)

S-9

Figure S3: Mathematical modelling results for magnetic beads with a size of 300 nm. Unspecific

binding was included through the parameter . Two different ratios of specific versus unspecific cells were investigated: 0.2 and 10-5. Particles number concentration 5 x 106 beads per mL. (a) Change in the fraction of cells with at least 10 magnetic particles as a function of for both specific and unspecific cells, contact time 100 minutes. (b) Change in the fraction of cells with at least 10 magnetic particles as a function of for both specific and unspecific cells, contact time 1000 minutes. (c) Change in the concentration of magnetic particles as a function of for both specific and unspecific cells, contact time 100 minutes. (d) Change in the concentration of magnetic particles as a function of for both specific and unspecific cells, contact time 1000 minutes.

a

b

Figure

Figure S2:  Mathematical modelling results for magnetic beads with a size of 300 nm. Unspecific  binding was included through the parameter 
Figure S3:  Mathematical modelling results for magnetic beads with a size of 300 nm. Unspecific  binding was included through the parameter 

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper, two distinct approaches are proposed to synthesize consensus laws in linear multi agent systems ensuring a certain level of performance in the presence of homogenous

Non-gray gas radiation analysis and comparison are conducted by combining a ray tracing method and two statistical narrow band (SNB) spectral models, namely the Goody SNB model

This sequent is not derivable in the finitary calculus proposed by [2] without the cut rule, and the partial cut-elimination result they have limits the set of cuts that can be used

The role of (i) the intensity of magnetic field and its gradient, (ii) the position of magnetic field, (iii) the magnetic susceptibility of magnetic particles, (iv) the

Table 1 shows the results of mean strain values (msv), particle size, chemical composition, magnetic properties of alloyed powders, and some mechanical properties

This is evidenced by the fact that Evenki, which is spoken in contact with Mongolic languages and Sakha, is the sole Tungusic language to have completed such a shift; the

It was then found that the location and configuration of residential buildings may expose their occupants to an „extreme‟ vulnerability (including death) in case of marine

The mechanism at work in our model is quite different: namely, reproduction in groups, combined with dispersal between groups, results in variations in group size, and for groups