Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: Building Practice Note, 1980-02
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20338182
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Workmanship and rain penetration of masonry walls
Davison, J. I.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=43515d15-3020-4789-9df6-9e4661d01297 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=43515d15-3020-4789-9df6-9e4661d01297
Ser
TH1
BUILDING
PRACTICE
NOTE
WQRKMAP6SHIP AND
RAIN
PENETRATIONOF MASONRY WALLS
Atlantic Regional Station, Division of Building Research National Research Council o f Canada
Y E O R W S H I P AND RAIN PENETRATION
OF MASONRY
WALLS byJ.I. Davison
Poor workmanship has been cited as the major cause of leakage problems in masonry buildings. The wall system and design detail are a l s o factors, but the ultimate performance of the wall will reflect the calibre of workmanship during the construction period.
It is d i f f i c u l t to define workmanship accurately, The Oxford Dictionary defines it as "the relative finish or execution seen in the
manufactured article." Primarily workmanship, as it relates to masonry, r e f l e c t s the skills and a b i l i t i e s of the mason. But many other factors can influence the end result which, as defined above, is f i n a l l y judged in "relativett terms. Thus workmanship c o ~ l s i d e r e d good in one part of the
country, might be considered mediocre in another. The nebulous character of workmanship makes it t h e obvious culprit, sometimes erroneously, when
leakage problems occur.
Modern masonry buildings are much bigger than those of yesteryear and have larger wall areas exposed to t h e weather. In addition they have less protection, are thinner and
mom
brittle, have a greater tendency for cracking and less potential to absorb moisture entering via cracks.Approximately 28 per cent of a brkk wall c o n s i s t s of mortar j o i n t s , and it has been established that rain penetration usually occurs at the unit-mortar interface. Thus it follows that 20 per cent of t h e wall area is vulnerable to rain penetration. Because this is obviously more of a problem than it
once was, t h e quality of workmanship is a key f a c t o r in controlling it. The fast pace of modern construction coupled with the practice of awarding contracts to the lowest bidder are not conducive to excellence in workmanship. The mason is often faced with the dilemma of choosing between expediting the job to meet a time schedule or a price limit, or taking extra time t o achieve t h e calibre of workmanship that will ensure a wall capable of maximum resistance 20 rain penetration.
The calibre o f workmanship will be influenced by the quality of the masonry materials, their conditign at the time of use, the compatibility of the mortar and the units, and w a a t h e ~ conditions during construction. Some
of these factors vary considerably fropi day t o day, and although most masons do a remarkable job i n compensating for these variables, every effort should be made to assist him by controlling these factors whenever possible.
The compatibility af rha mastar-unit combination requires a knowledge of the properties of the two materials, The rate of water absorption of the masonry unit is probably the most important of the external factors affecting workmanship. If i t i s very high it should be reduced by soaking t h e u n i t prior to use so that the mortar does not dry out too f a s t . Care should be taken to select s mortar that w i l l be compatible with t h e brick. For example, a clay brick with a high absorption should be combined with a mortar having a high water retentivity to ensure maximtlln extent of bond and minimum rain penetration. In certain circumstances the designer may place a p r i o r i t y on high compressive strength rather than protection against ~ a l n penetration, and must accamplish t h i s
by using
a high strength mortar vrhich has lower plasticity and lass ability to fom t h e complete extent of b m d necessaryif
the wall is to be t'~ain-prooPr. The objectives dictating the selection of the unit-mortar combination should be explained t o the mason - he will have a better chance of achieving the desired end r e s u l t if he understands thephilosophy underlying the design.
Tho proper e m a g e of masonry materials on the construction s i t e and the preparation of the martar are discussed in Building Practice Note Ma. 5, "Quality Control in Preparing Masonry Mortar1'. The Note contains
a
number of inexpensive to implement suggestions designed to improve quality controlon-site, and thus contribute to better workmanship in the end product. Daily variations in the weather during t h e constructim p e r i o d ,
particularly in air temperature and relative humidity, w i l l affect mortar propertics such as consistency and tine of s e t . This in turn can result in
' f v a ~ i a b l e " workmanship. Fortunately the mason c m minimize the effect of weather by rerapering the mortar to s u i t the condition.
Specific instances of poor workmanship that have recently been reparted from t h e f i c l d include empty head and collar j o i n t s , broken bond b~twecn bricks and mortar, cavity spaces plugged with martar droppings, weep holes that w e r e too small, and ripped and reverse sloped flashings. Rather than d e a l with these points specifically ground m l e s far goad workmanship, designed to prevent these and orher problems, will be reviewed.
1. Mortar. me mortar should be soft and plastic when placed in the wall. The mason obtains the desired degree of workability by tempering the mortar wirh the addition of water and
remixing
as required. Mortars containing cement that have not heenused
within t w o hours after mixing when the air temperatureis
27°C (80QF) should be discarded. If the temperature is less than 27°C (80°F) rhe time can be extended to three hours. Mortar that has stiffened within these time limits, because oE water evaporation, should be retempcrcd to satisfactory workability by adding water and remixing. The, beneficial effect of the improved bond t h a t will form between the masonryunit and the retempered mortar will more than compensate far the loss of some compressive strength caused by the addition of water.
2 . Joining of Work. Where new work joins masonry that is partially or t o t a l l y set, the exposed surface of the s e t masonry should be cleaned and lightly wetted so as to obtain the best possible bond with t h e new work. All louse b r i c k and mortar should be removed. Providing a clean surface and wetting the existing masonry w i l l ensure that it will not e x t r a c t water f r o m
the fresh mortar and thus reduce its a b i l i t y to form a maxirum extent of bond with the s e t masonry. If it becomes necessary to "'stop D ~ P '
a
horizontal run of masonry it should be done by racking back one-half brick length in each course.
3 . Bed and Head Joints. Solid masmry units should be laid with full bed and head joints, except where they are used for weep holes or ventilation. [lo1 low masonry u n i t s should have full bed and head j o i n t s in both inner and outcr shells. The webs should be l a i d i n full bed in all courses in p i e r s , columns and pilasters, in the starting course on footings and solid
foundation walls, and where adjacent to cells
or
cavities that are to be reinforced with grout or concrete.Full bed joints can be obtained by spreadfng a thick bed of mortar and making a shallow furrow with the t i p of the trowel. FurrorJing a V-shaped trough in the bed t o a depth that impairs full joints is not acceptable hecausc it
can
result in the formation of void spaceswhere
water permeating t h e exterior surface can collect. This will ultimately accelerate thedeterioration of the masonry as a result o f the freeze-thaw action that will subsequently occur-
The length of the bed j o i n t being laid out will depend
on
t h e suctionof the u n i t s and t h e air temperature. The limiting factor is t h e ability of the mortar at t h e end of the bed to r e t a i n enough plasticity to form a
c u m l ) l c t e bund wllcrh the last unit is placed. 'Che maximum length should be
1 metre (3 feet) when concrete block and low suction clay bricks are being used. I f b r i c k suction exceeds %I gms. /30 sq. in ./min, and is not m o d i f i e d by wetting, thc lcngah of spread should bc ~ c d u c e d to ensure t h a t t h e b r i c k s are being laid in plastic mortar.
Full head joints are obtained by buttering the end of t h e unit with mortar, then pressing
the
unit down into the bed joint and pushing iti n t o
place so that the mor*ar squeezes out from the top and s i d e s of the head joint, In a like manner t h e entire side of header units should be covered w i t h mortar before they are placed. When closures are required the opening should contain cnough mortar so that it w i l l be extruded laterally andvertically when the unit is inserted, Attempts t o fill head and bed joints by slushing dr dashing mortar into
the
openingsare
ineffective.The National Buildi~lg
Code permits a maximum average joint thickness of 12.5 nim [f in.), with maximum thickness af an individual joint of 19.0 m (3 i n . ) . The optimum joint Xhickness is c o n s i d e r e d to be 9.5 mm(8
in.).Masonry units should
be
adjusted to their final poslltim while .the mortar is srill soft and p l a s t i c . If an adj~stment is necessary after the mortar has started to harden it should be removed and replaced with fresh mortar.Mortar joints that are expos-kd t n the weather arid have become "thumb-
11rinr" hard should hc tpolcd w i t h a round j o i n t e r t o form n coficavo surfacc. Tooling is neither a substitute nor a remedy for incompletely filled mortar j o i n t s , but it is deferice against rain penetration. Tt compacts the surface of the j o i n t making the martar more dense, and it helps seal any f i n e cracks that may have developed between the unit and the mortar. mere are a number of
tooling configurari~as used to achieve certain aesthetic effects, but the concave shape is best far pratectian againsT rain penetration. If naiZs or
line p i n s are used, the holes l e f t when they are removed should be plugged immediately, while the adjacent mortay is green enough to a l l o w adequate
bond
w i t h t h e patch.
4. Cavity Walls. Failure to prevent mortar extruding from the j o i n t s from dropping i n t o rhe cavity will enable water to cross the c a v i t y barrier via
mortar "bridges" and thus penetmte the interior wall. It is fundamental to t h e success of the system that the cavity be kept clean. The conventional method recommended to achieve t h i s is to place wood strips, equipped with w5re or rope pulls, m mmal ties crossing the cavity. As the walls are built up to the next lwel ~equiring t i e s , the strips are withdrawn, cleaned
of
mortar droppings, and p l a c a on the new r o w of ties. The problem with this method is t h a t the caviky width often varies for one reason or another, and t h e wood s t r i p s can alternately be too narrow to be e f f e c t i v e in a wider area, ar t o o wide to f i t into a narrower c a v i t y space. A more pracrical methad of ensuring a clean cavity involves bevelling the p l a s t i c mortar bed ta incline toward the cavity. When the m i t is placed t h e bevelled area will be f i l l e d and will minimize the amount of mortar normally extruded into the cavity- Any mortar f i n s left protruding into the c a v i t y can be trowelled flat onto the face of t h ewythe
.
When placing flashing at the base of the cavity care should be taken to ensure that the flashing material is not punctured. This means chat the
surfaces against which the flashing material is laid should be smooth and free of any sharp projections. It is equally important
t h a t
flashings havea
positive slope toward the autside in order rhat any water that penetrates the exterior +he and drains t o the bottom, will be d i r e c t e d back outside through t h e
weep
holes. Particular care m s t be takenwith
pliable p l a s t i c flashing materials,some
of which puncturs easily and/or wrinkle, when the m s m r y unit is l a i d on them, thus interrupting the slope to the outside and causing water to back up and penezrare the interior wythe. Through wall flashings should be placed on a bed of mortar and mortar should be placed on top of them.Weep holes, spaced horizontally at 600 mm C24 in.) intervals, should be located in head joints in the first course above f l a s h i n g s . The most effective method of forming them is to omit a l l or part of t h e mortar in t h e head j o i n t , Some masons like ra leave a free-draining material in the weep hale t o prevent
the entry of insects into the cavity. Others prefer to use one of a number of preformed plastic Or metal weep holes; these must be a minimum
of
9.5 rnC*
in.)in diameter. The important consideration is that the weep holes must be free draining. This means that they must be big enough to carry off the water and t h a t the cavity area behind them
mu-st
be free of mortar droppings that can block t h eenmanee
of water.5.
Parging. Parging, or back-plastering, e i t h e r the back of the exterior wythe or t h e face of the back-up wytht, i s another effective defence against rain penetration. Studies in the Division of Building Research indicate that it is effective in minimizing r a i n penetration problems in single wythe wallsCTlW u n i t s ) ' . The parging mortar should be the same as that used to lay up the wall and it should be applied to a thickness of 6 . 5 to 9,s ntm [# to
#
in.). Too much pressure on the wall during the parging ope-ration can t l i s t u r h thc bond hctwccn t.hc ncwl y 1r1 i d t ~ n i t s and theirmrrar
hcd, crciit i n g cracks that can provide p a t h s for water t o penetrate the wall.6 . Tuck Pointing. In any pointing operation the existing mortar j o i n t s must
be raked back to a depth of at l e a s t 12.5 mm
( 3
in.). A l l dust and loose material should be removed, the joints wetted down with clean water, then filled s o l i d l y with a mortar compatible w i t h the wits and t h e o l d mortar, and finally tooled t o a concave surface.me
tendencyra
use a stronger, denser mortar than previously used should Ere avoided. The pointing mortar should be no denser than that previously used, If there are any doubts, a 1:1:6 cement-lime mortar is a good choice, Prehydration of this mortar fay a period oP one to two hours bef~re use will help in improving its workability and eliminating initial shrinkage.7. Pratecrian af Work. The tap surface of uncompleted masonry walls should be covered a t the end of each day's work to protect them fmm inclement weather. New walls that have not had t i m e to cure properly can be damaged
by r a i n and snow, and by very high or vary low temperatures. Covering with a tarpaulin or some other waterproof material is adequate protection against rain. Better protection may be necessary to prevent frost damage if thc
w i l l l s a r e built without the benefit of an cnclasure during winter weather.
Good workmanship in masonry construction is d i f f i c u l t to define because of the many variables involved. The end result reflects the ability of the mason to correctly make a number of arbitrary decisions on the job, and his
skill in
executingthem.
The
paceof modern construction
oftan complicates the picture by pitting expdiency against pmficieney.A knowledge of the philosophy behind the design and o f t h e properties of t h e materials selected far the project will help t h e mason make these
decisions. hoper use of this information in conjunction with some
reasonably f l e x i b l e "ground rules" will enable him to achieve a standard of workmanship t h a t w i l l r e s u l t in a masmry wall capable of resisting rain penetration.
1 . Clay Mason~y Manual, Cutler and Mikluchin. The Brick and T i l e Institute of Ontario, 4824 Yonge Street, Wii.lowdale, Ontario
W N
5M9.2 . Caravaty and Plumier. Principles
of
Clay Masonry Constructicm. Brick Institute of America, 175D OldMeadow
Road, McLean, Virginia 22102. 3 . Concrete Masonry Handbook, Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old OrchardRoad, Skokie, I l l i n o i s 60076.
4. PICMA Tek Note #85, National Concrete Masonry Association, P.O.
b x
135, McLean, Virginia 2210I.5. Technical Notes on Brick and Tifc Construction, Nos. 7R and RE, Brick Institute of America, 1750 Old Meadow Road, Mcliean, Virginia 22102.
6 Building Practice Notes Nos. 5 , 12 and 13. Division of Building Research, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario KIA qR6.
7. Ritchie, T. Water Penetration Tests on 'ITIY Walls. Building Research Mote No. 8 6 , Division o f Building Research, National Resea~ch Council, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OR6,