• Aucun résultat trouvé

Formulating preliminary design optimization problem of an agrifood process using expert knowledge: Application to milk microfiltration

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Formulating preliminary design optimization problem of an agrifood process using expert knowledge: Application to milk microfiltration"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02790956

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02790956

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Formulating preliminary design optimization problem of an agrifood process using expert knowledge: Application

to milk microfiltration

Maellis Belna, a L Marie, F Sfiligoï-Taillandier, Amadou Ndiaye, Geneviève Gésan-Guiziou

To cite this version:

Maellis Belna, a L Marie, F Sfiligoï-Taillandier, Amadou Ndiaye, Geneviève Gésan-Guiziou. Formu- lating preliminary design optimization problem of an agrifood process using expert knowledge: Ap- plication to milk microfiltration. journées scientifiques de l’école doctorale, Jul 2019, Rennes, France.

2019. �hal-02790956�

(2)

FORMULATING PRELIMINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM OF AN AGRIFOOD PROCESS USING EXPERT KNOWLEDGE:

Application to milk microfiltration

BELNA M.

(1,2,3)

, MARIE, A-L.

(1)

, SFILIGOI-TAILLANDIER F.

(4,*)

, NDIAYE A.

(2)

, GESAN-GUIZIOU G.

(3)

www6.rennes.inra.fr/stlo

labellisé

(1) Boccard, ResearchAnd Development, 35360, Montauban-de-bretagne, France (2) I2M, INRA, Université De Bordeaux, 33400 Talence, France

(3) STLO, INRA, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, 35000, Rennes, France

(4) I2M,Université De Bordeaux, 33400, Talence, France

(*) New Adress : Recover, Irstea, Aix-marseille Université, 13080, Aix-en-provence, France Contact adress : xxxxxxxxxxxx

• Complexity of the food product itself

Lack of knowledge concerning mechanisms limiting process performances

• Heterogeneity of involved variables

(ordinal, cardinal, discrete or continuous variables)

Milk

(Product state variables)

Characteristics of obtained products

(permeate & retentate)

(composition, purity...)

Costs

(Investment, operating cost)

Env. impacts

(water, energy…)

Product

Conflicting objectives

Membrane

(polymeric, ceramic...)

Processing designs

(UTP or without, diafiltration…)

Operating conditions

(Transmembrane pressure,

temperature…)

• Mainly based on know-how of operators and available expert knowledge

• Does not take into account links between product, multiple designs and conflicting objectives

Optimisation

CONTEXT

METHOD

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

HOW TO FORMULATE A DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM USING EXPERT KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION ?

Example of an agrifood process : skim milk 0.1 µm crossflow microfiltration

(Talbi et al.,2009)

(Hobbalah et al., 2018)

Knowledge modeling

Modeling of the

optimization objectives

Problem to solve

Knowledge model

Objective functions Experts Interviews

Knowledge elicitation

Skim milk crossflow microfiltration pore diameter 0.1 µm (MF 0.1 µm) is used in dairy industry to separate casein micelles (retentate) from serum proteins (permeate). This fractionation method allows the preservation of

« native » properties of dairy proteins and offers many ways of valorization for the two products.

In the literature, optimization of MF 0.1 µm is only partial and empirical.

Many links between the process operating variables, product state variables and optimization objectives are not formalized. Knowledge elicitation can be coupled with optimization in order to solve the problem.

Multiple designs but no existing rules to guide the design of this process.

123 variables - 218 influence relations

The optimization problem studied is complex with conflicting objectives and heterogeneous variables.

The integration of expert knowledge allows the identification of relevant objectives regarding to industrial issues. The MF process is considered from conception to performances with the identification of lack of knowledge in order to plan new experiments.

Causal maps allow an easy to understand representation of the influences between the variables and make it possible to establish which variables influence which objectives. Based on these maps, the objective functions will be formalized allowing to perform the optimization.

Optimization

The problem domain was divided into domains of knowledge : easier way to identify experts and collect knowledge.

Influence relations between variables and objectives were represented as causal maps.

After validations by experts, maps of the same knowledge domain were merged, discussed and validated by the group of the domain experts.

The final map represent the knowledge model to use for formulating the optimization objectives as functions.

Membrane properties Permeate

fraction

Retentate fraction Performance of the filtration Costs

Environmental impacts

Operating variables Diafiltration

Process design

Domains of knowledge : MF 0,1 µm Experts and domains

Semi-structure interviews Intermediate maps (exemple) Final map

Different types of experts :

Industrialists, scientists, equipment manufacturers

11 experts

36 interviews

14h30 of audio recording

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Number of experts by domains

Domains

Important to setup :

shared glossary

generic process scheme

Validation of domain map by the domain expert group

Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3

Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3

Merged by domain

Individual validations by expert on their maps

=

Discussion and Validation of the whole map by the whole group of experts

Références

Documents relatifs

The design of batch processes was reviewed by Reklaitis (1989) , who de fined the conceptual batch design process using problem as decomposed into four decisions levels: determination

They had also taken an elective addressing (among others) PS content, in which they were introduced to strategies and heuristics, problem posing and strategies

It is therefore the purpose of this study to provide a design method for using Mechanical Tolerances (MT), Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Interval

Figure 2 shows the fit to the mass- constrained candidates in the J/ψ mass region, also with the three highest neural network response bins for each data taking period combined..

• dynamic variables in the form of curves: above ground biomass, leaf area index, above ground N uptake, cumulated evapotranspiration and rooting depth (see an example in Figure

Hence, the base model shows encompassment for paper [6] as it can convey the interpretation of the results in the form of causal graph (Fig. It appears that the kinetic simulation

Using Conceptual Graphs to embed expert knowledge in VR Interactions: Application to Structural Biology.. 5th Joint Virtual Reality Conference – JVRC 2013, Dec 2013, Campus

Design and Evaluation of Shared Prosodic Annotation for Spontaneous French Speech: From Expert Knowledge to Non-Expert Annotation.. Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 2010,