Methods of approach on the population dynamics of hake (Merluccius merluccius) in Majorca (NW Mediterranean)
Oliver P., Massutí E., Reñones O.
Dynamique des populations marines Zaragoza : CIHEAM
Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 10 1995
pages 25-26
Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :
--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=95605395
--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article
--- Oliver P., Massutí E., Reñones O. Meth ods of approach on th e popu lation dyn amics of h ake ( Merlu cciu s merlu cciu s) in Majorca ( N W Mediterran ean ) . Dynamique des populations marines . Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 1995. p. 25-26 (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 10)
---
http://www.ciheam.org/
http://om.ciheam.org/
-
o f
.
Xeywords:
6 8 0 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 08 89 90 91 1992
Years
- Fishing mortality 0 Rocruitmont
t3
0
vm
VPA VPA
CO &R 1980-92 pt.8Wbt.d.
CIHEAM - Options Mediterraneennes
VPA per year
o 0.005
1 1.w
2 1.7s
3 4
5 0.792 6 0.554
'I 0 . 3 9
8 0.m
9 0.m
r
0.-0.075 1.099 .XI 1
.n9
1 . w o . 6 ~
0.m 0.m 0.892
0.003 0.51b 1.450 0.911 0.857 0.569
0.30 0.m) 0.700
o.on
0.001 0.478 1 0.619 0.119 0.43 0.119 0.000
0.m 0.333
0.023 1.657 1 .W7 0.879 0.730 0.482 0.281 0.m 0.3%
0.92 0.ou 1.26 1 .l*
1.115 0.489 0.m 0.243 0.350 0.3.9 O.(%
0.001 1.172 1 1.343 0.9%
0 . N 0.m 0 . m
0.m 0 . d 0.583 0.629 O.% .
0.655 0.1%
0 . N 0.W 0.441
0.C"
0.712 0.922 0.4U o.
0.245 0.m 0.003 0.mO 0.m
0.Wl 1
.m
1.199 0.273
0.09 0.154 0.w) 0.m
0 . W O. 393 0.702 01611 0.404 0.290 0.m O. lb1 0.lW 0 . W
o. l54
O D X l 0.150 0.039 0 . 1 ~ 5 0.354 0 . m 0.350
0.717 0.150 0.970 0.249 0.350 0.493 0.330 0.1% 0.456 0.060 0.350 0.350 0.192 0.350 0.232
0.m 0.1% 0.108
0.51~ 0.350
o.no
o.lm
o.=o.us
VPA
13 years
O 2 3 4 G S 7 8 9
991.19 11n.14
W. 55 u.87 10.
+.M 0.00 0.00 0.00
966.03
21.8 9-17 2 . u 0.00 0.00 241.19
1385.06 2897.41 7U.90
m . 4 4
w.o.)o
596.97 19.191o.n
44.94 113.793.65 10.23 3.96 1 . 6 1.93
0.m o.* 1.12
0.71 0.70
o.m
0.00 0.w 0.17
1414.42 2451 .W 182.13 39.44 7.66 5.28 1.24 O. 55
Ml. 35 1137.28 93.45
n.!d
1O.M 1.92 4.03 0.00
1135.r)
707.20
76.65 18.85 b.01 3.46 2.11 0.00
m.1)
2 . n
948.05
129.91 87.14 8.78 2.10 1 A 5 0.00
1m.u
m.0 6an.96
110.68 24%.P 91.24
97.95
144.1228.95
(5.01 42.bS 18.48 18.40 0 . 1 75.01 13.96- 11.41 1.70 1.65 10.72 1.a 0.00 0.00
*.n
W.* 6m.911.75
o.-
2.600.Q 0.00 snz.41
o.n 1m.n
u n . 9 3m.u
lm3.W 58.6 0 1 . 4 3 21.23 15.01 12.49b.8S 8.88 8.43 4.03 1.47 4.96
1WS.18 1701.47
11.22 11.66 2.m 0.26 5.w
Y/R to
1980-92.
1981. 1984 Lo
the ar
Y/H per
rawhum E,,,,,
Lo ( i f I w o r
1980-92 1981 1984 1991
1 565 8SO 1 177 819 3 105 947 704
2 461 800 1 958 900 4 346 100 l 795
91 721 150 870 119 970 169 330
bi-8. 4 139 320 2 069 350 8 208 130 2 086
0.750 0.440 0.690 O. 3BO
(cm) d12.76 14.70 11.40 15.90 (cm) 2 3 . 0 0
1.25 0.89 1.38
2.00 2.00 2.00 2 .o0
63.98 68.84 46.79 87.36
WSY/R 147.34 91.23 106.73 106.20
O. 23 0.45 0.25 0.50