• Aucun résultat trouvé

Habitat constraints on the functional significance of soil microbial communities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Habitat constraints on the functional significance of soil microbial communities"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01535184

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01535184

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative CommonsAttribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License

Habitat constraints on the functional significance of soil microbial communities

Naoise Nunan, Julie Leloup, Léo Ruamps, Valerie Pouteau, Claire Chenu

To cite this version:

Naoise Nunan, Julie Leloup, Léo Ruamps, Valerie Pouteau, Claire Chenu. Habitat constraints on the functional significance of soil microbial communities. EGU 2017, European Geophysical Union General Assembly 2017, Apr 2017, Vienne, Austria. �hal-01535184�

(2)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 19, EGU2017-6745, 2017 EGU General Assembly 2017

© Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Habitat constraints on the functional significance of soil microbial communities

Naoise Nunan, Julie Leloup, Léo Ruamps, Valérie Pouteau, and Claire Chenu CNRS, Paris, France ([email protected])

An underlying assumption of most ecosystem models is that soil microbial communities are functionally equiv- alent; in other words, that microbial activity under given set of conditions is not dependent on the composition or diversity of the communities. Although a number of studies have suggested that this assumption is incorrect, ecosystem models can adequately describe ecosystem processes, such as soil C dynamics, without an explicit de- scription of microbial functioning. Here, we provide a mechanistic basis for reconciling this apparent discrepancy.

In a reciprocal transplant experiment, we show that microbial communities are not always functionally equivalent.

The data suggest that when the supply of substrate is restricted, then the functioning of different microbial com- munities cannot be distinguished, but when the supply is less restricted, the intrinsic functional differences among communities can be expressed. When the supply of C is restricted then C dynamics are related to the properties of the physical and chemical environment of the soil. We conclude that soil C dynamics may depend on microbial community structure or diversity in environments such as the rhizosphere or the litter layer, but are less likely to do so in oligotrophic environments such as the mineral layers of soil.

Références

Documents relatifs

$PRQJVRLORUJDQLVPVPLFURRUJDQLVPVEDFWHULDDQGIXQJLDUHWKHPRVWLPSRUWDQWLQWHUPVRI GHQVLW\ LQGLYLGXDOVJ VRLO GLYHUVLW\ VSHFLHVJ VRLO DQG LQYROYHPHQW LQ

VKRZHG WKDW D UHGXFWLRQ LQ GHQLWULILHU GLYHUVLW\ UHVXOWHG LQ D VLJQLILFDQW GHFUHDVH LQ SRWHQWLDO GHQLWULILFDWLRQ DFWLYLW\ +RZHYHU RXU FRPSUHKHQVLRQ RI WKH UXOHV JRYHUQLQJ WKH

According to this concept, which was dominant for a long time in ecology, soil cannot be considered 56.. as an ecosystem, because it relies entirely on vegetation for

TEM, TiO 2 -NPs in the roots of wheat grown for 2 weeks in an artificially contaminated loamy clay soil

d'op erateur pour la formule de T rotter pour des g en erateurs m-se toriels ( e hapitre.. est ind ependant des deux pr e  edents et la limite n'est pas n e essairement

In this flow regime, the channels be- come longer with increasing injection pressure, so we define arbitrarily (in order to perform statisti- cal analyses on groups of

[14] developed a promising SOM dynamics model that represents two functional groups of microorganisms to account for interactions between residue and soil mineralisation (i.e. One

316 cants, which are more or less likely to bioaccumulate in the periphyton matrix and Table 10.2 In situ translocation studies of the recovery potential of microbial