R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
T AMOTU K INOSHITA
On the wellposedness in the Gevrey classes of the Cauchy problem for weakly hyperbolic equations whose coefficients are Hölder continuous in
t and degenerate in t = T
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 100 (1998), p. 81-96
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1998__100__81_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1998, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
of the Cauchy Problem for Weakly Hyperbolic Equations
whose Coefficients
areHölder Continuous in t and Degenerate in t
=T.
TAMOTU
KINOSHITA (*)
1. Introduction.
In 1983 F.
Colombini,
E. Jannelli and S.Spagnolo got
the result con-cerned with the relation between the H61der
continuity
of the coeffi-cients and the
Gevrey well-posedness
forweakly hyperbolic equations
ofsecond order
(see [3]).
In their paper the coefficients of theprinciple part
are Holder continuous anddegenerate
in infinite number ofpoints.
Therefore the order of the
degeneration
isautomatically
determinedby
the
regularity
of the coefficients.Pay
attension to thisfact,
we shall re-strict the coefficients which
degenerate
inonly
one(or
finite numberof) point(s)
anddistinguish
the condition of thedegeneration
from the con-dition of the
regularity.
Our aim is to deduce the relation among the Holdercontinuity
of the coefficients and the order of thedegeneration
and the
Gevrey well-posedness (see Theorem).
While many
people
studied the influence of the lower term for theGevrey well-posedness(see [6], [7], [9], etc.).
In this paper,imposing
thecondition that the lower terms
degenerate
in the samepoint
with theprincipal part,
we shall find the influence of the lower term(see
Corol-lary).
We remark that this result can beeasily compared
with Ivrii’s result.(*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Institute of Mathematics,
University
of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305,Japan.
We shall consider in
[0, T] x R"
where
A(t) _
is a realsymmetric
matrix whosecomponents
Ui,j(t) belong
toB(t) _
a real vector whose
components bi (t) (1 ~
i ~n ) belong
toC°[o, T).
Now we assume the
followings.
For
a(t, ~) _ (A(t) ~ ~ ~)
andb(t, ~) _ (B(t)~ ~) (= ¿bi(t) Çi),
there existCl , C2
> 0independent
ofT,
such thatfor
dt E [ o,
In this paper we don’t assume the conditions concerned with
at a( t , ~ ),
forexample
the condition such that thatat a( t , ~ )
admits finite number of zerosfor vE
ERg ) ( 0 ) (see [3], [5]).
THEOREM. Let T > 0. The
coe.fficieuts satisfy (1), (2).
Thenfor
any uo and ul E
G ;
theCauchy problem (P)
has aunique
soltionu E
C 2 ( [ o , T], provided
We remark that
(3)
whenk = 0,
a = 1 coincides(4)
whenk = 1,
a = 0. We shall compare our theorem with the results of otheres.
i)
When~3
=0, i.e., (P)
isequivalent
to thestrictly hyperbolic equation, (3)
becomes which isquite
same with the re-sult of F.
Colombini,
E. DeGiorgi,
and S.Spagnolo (see [2]
and see also[1]).
ii) When f3 = 00, i.e., (P)
is aweakly hyperbolic equation
whose co-efficients are
identically equal
to zero,(3)
and(4)
become 1 ~ s 1 ++
(k
+a)/2
which isquite
same with the result of F.Colombini,
E. Jannel-li,
and S.Spagnolo (see [3]
and see also[4], [10]).
Hence we can see thatour results connect with their
result,
in which the coefficients of theequations
may beidentically
zero in some intervals.iii)
The coefficients of ourequation degenerate
in t = T. From thetime-reversal of
hyperbolic equations,
we can see that our results also holds in the case that the coefficientsdegenerate
in t = 0. On the other hand Ivrii treated theequatins
whose coefficientsdegenerate
in t = 0and
invistigated
the influence of the lower terms(see [6]).
Then we shall introduce the similarcorollary
as the Ivrii’sresult,
which is obtainedeasily by
ourtheorem(
use(5)).
COROLLARY. Let
7’>0, /?-2y-2~0,
andaij (t) ( 1 ~ i, j::::; n)
EeC~’~’~[0, T).
Thecoefficients satisfy (1), (2).
Then theCauchy problem (P)
iswell-posed
inG s, provided
We find that the
Gevrey
order of thiscorollary
coicides the one of the Ivrii’s result. Moreover the condition~3 - 2 y - 2 ~ 0
also coincides the Ivrii’s condition. In Ivrii’s case the coefficients aregiven concretely
asthe power of t which
naturally belong C °°,
while in our case the coeffi- cients are admitted tobelong C2f3/(f3 - 2y - 2).
.Finally
we mention that sincegenerally
the lower terms don’talways degenerate
in theonly
one(or
finite numberof) point(s)
where theprin- cipal part
alsodegenerates,
the anothertype
of condition is needed for thegeneral
lower terms(see [3], [7], [11]).
NOTATIONS.
C ~ + a [ o ,
T )(k E N1 ,
0 ~ a ~1)
is the space of functionsf having
k-derivativescontinuous,
and the k-th derivativelocally
Holdercontinuous with
exponent
a on[0, T].
GS is the
Gevrey
functionsf satisfying
for anycompact
setK c Rn,
G’
is the space ofy’
withcompact support.
2. Proof of Theorem.
When s =
1,
theproblem (P)
iswell-posed
inG
with the coefficientA( t )
whichbelongs
toT]
or even toL 1 [ o , T] (see [2]).
Thereforewe can suppose s > 1 for the
proof.
By Holmgren’s
theorem weget
theuniqueness
of solutions to(P)
andcan suppose that
Uo (x)
andul (x) belong
toGo .
Moreover Ovciannikov theoremgives
the existence of solutions(see [3]).
Our task is to deduce theregularity
for x of solutions.We
change (P) by
Fourier transform.where
and define
(0
3 KT).
We shall first consider the case 1~ = 0.Putting
(0 ê 1),
where satisfieswe define
Moreover
using this,
we shall also define theapproximate
en-ergy
were is determined later.
Defferentiating (E"))2 in t, by (6)
weget
here we used Hence we
get
Thus Gronwall’s
inequality yields
Picking
up eachterm,
we shall estimate. From the definition ofa¿E),
we can
get
here we used
While from the definition of and
(1),
we can alsoget
By (9), (10)
weget
where
C5 = ( 1 /2 ) C1-1C3C4.
From the definition of
again,
we canget
Noting
that on0 ~ t ~ T - ~,
and~ on T - d ~ t
T, by (10), (12)
weget
where
We remark that
Hence
by (13)
weget
From the
hypothesis (2), by (10)
weget
It
generally
holds that for 0 ~ x ~ 1By (16), (17),
weget
where
By (8), (11), (15), (18),
we have the estimateHere,
if we takeand
put
with the
parameter A
= min{ 1,
y +1 ~,
we havewhere Here we used
Supposing (20)
we
get
Finally
if we choose(2(t)
=(2(0) - Clou(t) VKO-K,
we have the energy estimateNoting
that is thedecreasing function, by (7), (10),
the left side of(22)
ischanged
as followsk ’f)
While
by (1)
and(7)
theright
side of(22)
ischanged
as followsBy (22), (23), (24)
we haveTherefore we obtain
where ’ I
Moreover
noting
that for v 1 ~ v 21
and
taking
by (19)
weget
At last we have
Since
Uo (x)
andUl (x) belong
toGô,
there existv o > 0
suchthat
Thus
by (P), (20), (25)
we find that the solution where s =x -1
satisfiesThis
implies (3).
We shall next consider the case of 1~ =
1, 2 , ... ,.
We also define theapproximate
energywhere
a,5 (t, i) * (A,5 (t) ~, ~).
Similarly
weget (see (8))
In order to estimate the coefficients which
belong
toC 1
atleast,
weneed the
following
lemma.LEMMA
(Colombini, Jannelli, Spagnolo).
Letf(t)
be a realfunction of
classC k + a
on somecompact
interval I cR,
with kinteger ~
1 and0 ~ a ~
1,
and assume thatf ( t ) ~
0 on I. Then thefunction
+ a) isabsolutely
continuous on I. MoreoverFor the
proof,
refer to[3].
Hence
by (1)
weget
where is the
increasing
functionsatisfying
= 0.In the same way with the second term of
(15),
weget
When + a ~
2,
in the same way with(18),
weget
By (28),(29),(30),(31)
we have the estimateHere,
if we takeand
put
with the
parameter A
=min {1,
y +1 },
we haveSupposing
we
get
When remark that if
fl/2 -
y - 10,
thefollowing
holds
This
implies
that the lower term does’nt influence thewell-posedness
ofthe
problem.
Hence it is sufficient toinvistigate
the case812 -
y - 1 ~ 0.With the
parameter
T1,
weget
By (17)
weget
By (28), (29), (30), (34)
we have the estimateHere,
if we takeand
put
with the
parameter
~, = min{ 1,
1 -T},
we havewhere (
We remark that for any fixed
there exists T 1 such that
Then we
get
Taking place
of(21) by (33),(36),
andnoting
thatif k=1, 2 , ..., B -
-
2 y -
20, by (32)
it holds thatand if
k=2, 3,
... ,~3 - 2 y - 2 ~ 0, by (35)
it holds thatwe can conclude the theorem.
’ ’
Acknowledgments.
The author wishes to thankheartily
Prof. K.Kaji- tani,
T.Hoshiro,
and K.Yagdjian
for many useful advices.REFERENCES
[1] M. CICOGNANI, On the
strictly hyperbolic equations
which are Hölder con-tinuous with respect to time,
preprint.
[2] F. COLOMBINI - E. DE GIORGI - S. SPAGNOLO, Sur les
equations hyperboliques
avec des
coefficients qui
ned6pendent
que du temps, Ann. Scuola Norm.Sup.
Pisa, 6 (1979), pp. 511-559.[3] F. COLOMBINI - E. JANNELLI - S. SPAGNOLO,
Wellposedness
in theGevrey
classes
of the Cauchy problem for
a nonstrictly hyperbolic equation
with co-efficients depending
on time, Ann. Scuola Norm.Sup.
Pisa, 10 (1983), pp.291-312.
[4] P. D’ANCONA,
Gevrey
wellposedness of
an abstractCauchy problem of weak- ly hyperbolic
type, Publ. RIMSKyoto
Univ., 24 (1988), pp. 433-449.[5] P. D’ANCONA, Local existence
for
semilinearweakly hyperbolic equations
with time
dependent coefficients,
NonlinearAnalysis. Theory,
Methods andApplications,
Vol 21, No. 9 (1993), pp. 685-696.[6] V. YA. IVRII,
Cauchy problem
conditionsfor hyperbolic
operators with char-acteristics
of
variablemultiplicity for Gevrey
classes, Siberian. Math., 17 (1976), pp. 921-931.[7] K. KAJITANI, The well
posed Cauchy problem for hyperbolic
operators, Ex-posé
au Séminaire de Vaillant du 8 février (1989).[8] T. KINOSHITA, On the
wellposedness
in theGevrey
classesof
theCauchy problem for weakly hyperbolic
systems with Hölder continuouscoefficients
in t,preprint.
[9] M. REISSIG - K. YAGDJIAN, Levi conditions and
global Gevrey regularity for
the solutions of
quasilinear weakly hyperbolic equations,
Mathematische Nachrichten, 178 (1996), pp. 285-307.[10] T. NISHITANI, Sur les
équations hyperboliues
àcoefficients
hölderiens en t et de classes deGevrey
en x, Bull. Sci. Math., 107 (1983), pp. 739-773.[11] H. ODAI, On the
Cauchy problem for
ahyperbolic equation of
second order,Doctoral thesis (1994).
Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 22 novembre 1996.